VIKOR method for effect evaluation of ancient village landscape planning based on the heritage historical context under 2-tuple linguistic enviroment

Abstract

In this paper, we proposed the 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method based on the fundamental theories of 2-tuple linguistic information and origin VIKOR model. Firstly, we introduce the concepts, operation formulas and the distance calculating method of 2-tuple linguistic information. Then we review some aggregation operator of 2-tuple linguistic number, thereafter, the calculating steps of the VIKOR model for 2-tuple linguistic MCGDM problems are simply presented, in our proposed method; it’s more scientific and reasonable for considering the conflicting attributes. Moreover, a numerical example for effect evaluation of ancient village landscape planning based on the heritage historical context has been proposed to illustrate the new method and some comparisons are also conducted to further illustrate advantages of the new method.

Keywords

MCGDM problems 2-tuple linguistic sets (2TLSs)VIKOR model 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method ancient village landscape planning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Opricovic and

G.H.

Tzeng , Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 156 (2) (2007), 445–455.

Benayoun ,

Roy and

Sussman , ELECTRE: Une methode pour guider le choix en presence de points de vue multiples, Rev.franaise Informat.recherche Opérationnelle 3 (1966), 31–56.

Mareschal ,

J.P.

Brans and

Vincke , Promethee: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. Ulb Institutional Repository, 1984.

C.L.

Hwang and

Yoon , Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Economics and Mathematical Systems; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1981.

G.W.

Wei , Extension of TOPSIS method for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information, Knowl Inf Syst 25 (2010), 623–634.

G.W.

Wei , Grey relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with preference information on alternatives, Int J Comput Intell Syst 4 (2011), 164–173.

G.W.

Wei , Grey relational analysis model for dynamic hybrid multiple attribute decision making, Knowl Syst 24 (2011), 672–679.

G.W.

Wei , Gray relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, Expert Syst Appl 38 (2011), 11671–11677.

Balezentis ,

Balezentis and

W.K.M.

Brauers , Personnel selection based on computing with words and fuzzy MULTIMOORA, Expert Syst Appl 39 (2012), 7961–7967.

10.

Balezentis , Group multi-criteria decision making based upon interval-valued fuzzy numbers: An extension of the MULTIMOORA method, Expert Syst Appl 40 (2013), 543–550.

11.

L.A.

Zadeh , Fuzzy sets, Inf Control 8 (1965), 338–356.

12.

Bellman and

L.A.

Zadeh , Decision making in a fuzzy environment, Manag Sci 17 (1970), 141–164.

13.

R.R.

Yager , Multiple objective decision-making using fuzzy sets, Int JMan-Mach Stud 9 (1997), 375–382.

14.

Gong ,

Hu ,

Zhang ,

Liu and

Deng , Multi-attribute group decision making method based on geometric bon-ferroni mean operator of trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy numbers, Comput IndEng 81 (2015), 167–176.

15.

S.P.

Wan ,

Wang ,

L.L.

Lin and

J.Y.

Dong , Some new generalized aggregation operators for triangular intuition-istic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making, Comput Ind Eng 93 (2016), 286–301.

16.

Herrera and

Martinez , A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8 (2000), 746–752.

17.

R.R.

Yager , On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18 (1988), 183–190.

18.

Jiang ,

Wei ,

Tang and

Zhou , Ordered visibility graph average aggregation operator: An application in produced water management, Chaos Interdiscip J Nonlinear Sci 27 (2017), 023117.

19.

Jiang ,

Wei ,

Zhan ,

Xie and

Zhou , A visibility graph power averaging aggregation operator: A methodology based on network analysis, Comput IndEng 101 (2016), 260–268.

20.

Wang ,

Mo ,

Sadiq ,

Hu and

Deng , Ordered visibility graph weighted averaging aggregation operator, Comput Ind Eng 88 (2015), 181–190.

21.

Li ,

Zeng ,

Pan and

Zheng , A method based on induced aggregation operators and distance measures to multiple attribute decision making under 2-tuple linguistic environment, J Comput Syst Sci 80 (2014), 1339–1349.

22.

Xu and

Wang , Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment, Appl Soft Comput 11 (2011), 3988–3997.

23.

Y.P.

Jiang and

Z.P.

Fan , Property analysis of the aggregation operators for two-tuple linguistic information, Control Decis 18 (2003), 754–757.

24.

Zeng ,

Balezentis and

Zhang , A method based on owa operator and distance measures for multiple attribute decision making with 2-tuple linguistic information, Informatica 4 (2012), 665–681.

25.

J.H.

Wang and

Hao , An approach to aggregation of ordinal information in multi-criteria multi-person decision making using choquet integral of fubini type, Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 8 (2009), 365–380.

26.

Liu ,

Lin and

Wu , Dependent interval 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 22 (2014), 717–735.

27.

Opricovic and

G.-H.

Tzeng , Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods, Eur J Oper Res 178 (2007), 514–529.

28.

Cevikcan ,

Cebi and

Kaya , Fuzzy VIKOR and Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Versus to Fuzzy Topsis: An Application of Candidate Assessment, Mul Valued Log Soft Comput 15 (2009), 181–208.

29.

Bausys and

E.K.

Zavadskas , Multicriteria decision making approach by VIKOR under interval neutrosophic set environment, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 4 (2015), 33–48.

30.

J.H.

Park ,

H.J.

Cho and

Y.C.

Kwun , Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making with interval-valued intu-itionistic fuzzy information, Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 10 (2011), 233–253.

31.

Selvakumari and Priyadharshini M. Ajitha, VIKOR method for decision making problem using octagonal neutrosophic soft matrix, International Journal of Latest Engineering Research and Applications 2 (7) (2017), 41–45.

32.

Wan ,

Wang and

Dong , The extended VIKOR method for multi-attribute group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, Knowl Based Syst 52 (2013), 65–77.

33.

Liu ,

You ,

Fan and

Chen , Site selection in waste management by the VIKOR method using linguistic assessment, Appl Soft Comput 21 (2014), 453–461.

34.

Qin ,

Liu and

Pedrycz , An extended VIKOR method based on prospect theory for multiple attribute decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment, Knowl Based Syst 86 (2015), 116–130.

35.

Liu and

Zhang , The extended VIKOR method formultiple criteria decision making problem based on neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy set, 2014.

36.

Liao ,

Xu and

Zeng , Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic VIKOR Method and Its Application in Qualitative Multiple Criteria Decision Making, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23 (2015), 1343–1355.

37.

Ren ,

Xu and

Wang , Dual hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making based on fuzzy measure and new comparison method, Inf Sci 388 (2017), 1–16.

38.

Li ,

Liu and

Qin , An extended VIKOR method for decision making problem with linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers based on some new operational laws and entropy, JIntell Fuzzy Syst 33 (2017), 1919–1931.

39.

Pouresmaeil ,

Shivanian ,

Khorram and

H.S.

Fathabadi , An extended method using TOPSIS and VIKOR for multiple attribute decision making with multiple decision makers and single valued neutrosophic numbers, Adv Appl Stat 50 (2017), 261–292.

40.

Y.H.

Huang ,

G.W.

Wei and

Wei , VIKOR Method for Interval Neutrosophic Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making, Information 8 (4) (2018), 144.

41.

Zhang and

Wei , Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set, Applied Mathematical Modelling 37 (7) (2013), 4938–4947.

42.

Opricovic and

G.-H.

Tzeng , Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, Eur J Oper Res 156 (2004), 445–455.

43.

Wang ,

Wei and

Gao , Approaches to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Information, Mathematics 6 (10) (2018), 201.

44.

X.M.

Deng ,

G.W.

Wei ,

Gao and

Wang , Models for safety assessment of construction project with some 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators, IEEE Access 6 (2018), 52105–52137.

45.

Deng ,

Wang ,

Wei and

Lu , Models for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Some 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Hamy Mean Operators, Mathematics 6 (11) (2018), 236.

46.

Xia ,

Xu and

Zhu , Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni means, International Journal ofIntelligent Systems 27 (1) (2012), 23–47.

47.

Z.S.

Xu and

R.R.

Yager , Intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni means, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 41 (2011), 568–578.

48.

G.W.

Wei , TODIM method for picture fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, Informatica 29 (3) (2018), 555–566.

49.

Wu ,

Wang ,

Wei and

Wei , Research on Construction Engineering Project Risk Assessment with Some 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Hamy Mean Operators, Sustainability 10 (5) (2018), 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051536.

50.

R.R.

Yager , On generalized Bonferroni mean operators for i-criteria aggregation, International Journal of Approximate-Reasoning 50 (2009), 1279–1286.

51.

Xia ,

Xu and

Zhu , Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni means, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 27 (1) (2012), 23–47.

52.

Wang ,

Wei and

Lu , TODIM Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making under 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Environment, Symmetry 10 (10) (2018), 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10100486.

53.

Y.H.

Huang and

G.W.

Wei , TODIM Method for Pythagorean 2-tuple Linguistic Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 35 (1) (2018), 901–915.

54.

G.W.

Wei ,

Gao ,

Wang and

Y.H.

Huang , Research on Risk Evaluation of Enterprise Human Capital Investment with Interval-valued bipolar 2-tuple linguistic Information, IEEE Access 6 (2018), 35697–35712.

55.

J.M.

Merigo and

Casanovas , Induced aggregation operators in decision making with the Dempster-Shafer belief structure, International Journal ofIntelligent Systems 24 (8) (2009), 934–954.

56.

Gao , Pythagorean Fuzzy Hamacher Prioritized Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 35 (2) (2018), 2229–2245.

57.

Wang ,

G.W.

Wei and

Wei , Models for Green Supplier Selection with Some 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Number Bonferroni Mean Operators, Symmetry 10 (5) (2018), 131. doi:10.3390/sym10050131

58.

D.F.

Li ,

Y.C.

Wang ,

Liu and

Shan , Fractional programming methodology for multi-attribute group decision making using IFS, Applied Soft Computing 9 (2009), 219–225.

59.

X.Y.

Tang and

G.W.

Wei , Models for green supplier selection in green supply chain management with Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic information, IEEE Access 6 (2018), 18042–18060.

60.

J.M.

Merigo and

Casanovas , Fuzzy Generalized Hybrid Aggregation Operators and its Application in Fuzzy Decision Making, International Journal of Fuzzzy Systems 12 (2010), 15–24.

61.

G.W.

Wei and

Gao , The generalized Dice similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications, Informatica 29 (1) (2018), 107–124.

62.

F.E.

Boran ,

Genc ,

Kurt and

Akay , A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2009), 11363–11368.

63.

G.W.

Wei ,

Gao and

Wei , Some q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Heronian Mean Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 33 (7) (2018), 1426–1458.

64.

Wei and

Wei , Some single-valued neutrosophic dombi prioritized weighted aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 35 (2) (2018), 2001–2013.

65.

J.M.

Merigo and

Casanovas , Induced aggregation operators in decision making with the Dempster-Shafer belief structure, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 24 (2009), 934–8.