Cities are the products of human social and economic development, and urbanization is the inevitable result of productivity improvement and social progress. Urban green space network is the only living infrastructure in the city, which provides essential space for the protection of urban biodiversity. Therefore, this paper proposes a heuristic decision tree model to construct the ecological urban green space network. The construction of ecological urban green space ecological network is studied based on the Geographical Information Systems (GIS) concepts. GIS and data mining technology are combined, to build the proposed decision tree model with monitoring and evaluation as the core, exploring its texture scale and characteristics, with green space types classified. Finally, the experimental results show that the proposed model can classify the types of green space in the natural geographical environment and play a decisive role in guiding the judgment of environmental monitoring and assessment. Therefore, the proposed algorithm has a positive effect on the monitoring and evaluation of the natural environment.
D.M.Evans, J.J.N.Kitson and D.H.Lunt, et al.Merging DNA metabarcoding and ecological network analysis to understand and build resilient terrestrial ecosystems, Functional Ecology30(12), (2016), 1904–1916.
2.
A.D.Montis, S.Caschili and M.Mulas, et al.Urban-rural ecological networks for landscape planning, Land Use Policy50(10) (2016), 312–327.
3.
B.Wu, W.Zeng and H.Chen, Grey water footprint combined with ecological network analysis for assessing regional water quality metabolis, Journal of Cleaner Production112(47) (2016), 3138–3151.
4.
C.Hui, D.M.Richardson and P.Landi, Defining invasive-ness and invasibility in ecological networks, Biological Invasions18(4) (2016), 1–13.
5.
W.Barfuss, J.F.Donges and M.Wiedermann, Sustainable use of renewable resources in a stylized social-ecological network model under heterogeneous resource distribution, Earth System Dynamics8(2) (2017), 1–13.
6.
J.Smith, A.Metaxas, A decision tree that can address connectivity in the design of Marine Protected Area Networks (MPAn), Marine Policy88(55) (2018), 269–278.
7.
M.J.O.Pocock, D.M.Evans and C.Fontaine, The Visualisation of Ecological Networks, and Their Use as a Tool for Engagement, Advocacy, and Management, Advances in Ecological Research54(06) (2016), 41–85.
8.
A.J.Golubski, E.E.Westlund and J.Vandermeer, et al.Ecological networks over the edge: Hypergraph Trait-Mediated Indirect Interaction (TMII), Structure Trends in Ecology & Evolution31(5) (2016), 344–354.
9.
M.Moravík, M.Schmid and N.Burch, DeepStack: Expertlevel artificial intelligence in heads-up no-limit poker, Science356(6337) (2017), 508.
10.
E.O.Daniel, Artificial intelligence and big data, IEEE Intelligent Systems28(2) (2013), 96–99.
11.
J.McCarthy, Generality in artificial intelligence, Resonance19(3) (2014), 283–296.
12.
R.V.Yampolskiy, Artificial Intelligence Safety Engineering: Why Machine Ethics isa Wrong Approach.Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence.Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013: 389–396.
13.
M.Moravík, M.Schmid and N.Burch, DeepStack: Expertlevel artificial intelligence in heads-up no-limit poker, Science356(6337) (2017), 508.
14.
D.C.Parkes and M.P.Wellman, Economic reasoning and artificial intelligence, Science349(6245) (2015), 267.
15.
E.S.Rigas, S.D.Ramchurn and N.Bassiliades, Managing electric vehicles in the smart grid using artificial intelligence: A survey, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems16(4) (2015), 1619–1635.
16.
P.Glauner, A.Boechat and L.Dolberg, The challenge of non-technical loss detection using artificial intelligence: A survey, International Journal ofComputational Intelligence Systems10(1) (2017), 760–775.
17.
JenniferHill, W. RandolphFord and Ingrid G.Farreras, Real conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human–human online conversations and human–chatbot conversations, Computers in Human Behavior49 (2015), 245–250.
18.
A.Bundy, Preparing for the future of artificial intelligence, Ai & Society32(2) (2017), 1–3.
19.
F.Cismondi, L.A.Celi and A.S.Fialho, Reducing unnecessary lab testing in the ICU with artificial intelligence, International Journal ofMedical Informatics82(5) (2013), 345–358.
20.
K.P.Singh, S.Gupta and P.Rai, Predicting acute aquatic toxicity of structurally diverse chemicals in fish using artificial intelligence approaches, Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety95(1) (2013), 221–233.
21.
K.Shankar, MohamedElhoseny, S.K.Lakshmanaprabu, M.Ilayaraja, R.M.Vidhyavathi, Mohamed A.Elsoud and MajidAlkhambashi, Optimal feature level fusion based ANFIS classifier for brain MRI image classification, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4887
22.
HamidReza Boveiri, RaoufKhayami, MohamedElho-seny and M.Gunasekaran, An efficient swarm-intelligence approach for task scheduling in cloud-based internet of things applications, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1071-1
23.
I.S.Farahat, A.S.Tolba, M.Elhoseny and W.Eladrosy, Data Security and Challenges in Smart Cities.In: Hassanien A., Elhoseny M., Ahmed S., Singh A. (eds)Security in Smart Cities: Models, Applications, and Challenges. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure.Springer, Cham, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01560-2.6
24.
HaidiRao, XianzhangShi, AhoussouKouassi Rodrigue, JuanjuanFeng, YingchunXia, MohamedElhoseny, Xiao-huiYuan and LichuanGu, Feature selection based on artificial bee colony and gradient boosting decision tree, Applied Soft Computing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.036
