Work is needed to advance the current understanding of tactile interaction among humans through haptic technologies. We introduce a novel language that has been designed to guide users in leader-follower dances. This language is based on a nine-word vocabulary that corresponds to nine dance steps, following the metaphor of a leader-follower dance. Our work benefits from a haptic coding that is commonly used by couples when dancing, and explores the potential of wearable technology in this scenario. A wearable prototype consisting of four vibrotactile actuators was used to test the idea. Two user studies show a high recognition rate (more than 90%) of the intended tactile vocabulary. This particular work highlights the feasibility of a haptic vocabulary to exchange full, understandable commands between users, the importance of dance as a case study, and the potential of using wearable technology to support haptic communications in scenarios similar to those in the real world, such as partner dancing. Current results show it is viable to successfully guide someone to follow dance through communication using a basic vibrotactile language.
MacLeanK.E., PasqueroJ. and SmithJ., Building a haptic language: Communication through touch, Research Gate38(7) (2015), 1434–1452.
2.
BrewsterS. and BrownL.M., Tactons: Structured tactile messages for non-visual information display, In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Australasian User Interface-Volume 28, Australian Computer Society, Inc, pp. 15–23.
3.
RiddleD.L. and ChapmanR.J., Tactile language design, In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2012, pp. 478–482.
4.
GentryS.E., Dancing cheek to cheek: Haptic communication between partner dancers and swing as a finite state machine (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 2005.
5.
GentryS. and Murray-SmithR., Haptic dancing: Human performance at haptic decoding with a vocabulary, In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003 IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 4, 2003, pp. 3432–3437. IEEE.
6.
HölldampfJ., PeerA. and BussM., Synthesis of an interactive haptic dancing partner, In RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE, 2010, pp. 527–532. IEEE.
7.
VelázquezR. and PissalouxE., Constructing Tactile Languages for Situational Awareness Assistance of Visually Impaired People, In Mobility of Visually Impaired People, Cham, Springer, 2018, pp. 597–616.
8.
MorrisonA., KnocheH. and Manresa-YeeC., Designing a vibrotactile language for a wearable vest, In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability, Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 655–666.
9.
OliveiraV.A.D.J. and MacielA., Assessment of tactile languages as navigation aid in 3d environments, In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014, pp. 104–111.
10.
HaritaipanL. and MougenotC., Cross-Cultural Study of Tactile Interactions in Technologically Mediated Communication, In International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design, Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 63–69.
11.
SchelleK.J., Gomez NaranjoC.,
Ten BhömerM.,
TomicoO. and WensveenS., Tactile dialogues: Personalization of vibrotactile behavior to trigger interpersonal communication, In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, 2015, pp. 637–642. ACM.
12.
OliveiraV.A.D.J. and MacielA., Introducing the modifier tactile pattern for vibrotactile communication, In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014, pp 309–316.
13.
AltiniM., FarellaE., PiriniM. and BeniniL., A Cost-effective Indoor Vibrotactile Navigation System for the Blind, In HEALTHINF, 2011, pp. 477–481.
14.
ScheggiS., TalaricoA. and PrattichizzoD., A remote guidance system for blind and visually impaired people via vibrotactile haptic feedback, In Control and Automation (MED), 2014 22nd Mediterranean Conference of, 2014, pp. 20–23. IEEE.
15.
AggraviM., SalviettiG. and PrattichizzoD., Haptic assistive bracelets for blind skier guidance, In Proceedings of the 7th Augmented Human International Conference, 2016, p. 25. ACM.
16.
TanH., GrayR., YoungJ.J. and TaylorR., A haptic back display for attentional and directional cueing, 2003.
17.
HaritaipanL. and MougenotC., Cross-Cultural Study of Tactile Interactions in Technologically Mediated Communication, In International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design, Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 63–69.
18.
MorrisonA., KnocheH. and Manresa-YeeC., Designing a vibrotactile language for a wearable vest, In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability, Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 655–666.
19.
SpelmezanD., HilgersA. and BorchersJ., A language of tactile motion instructions, In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2009, p. 29. ACM.
20.
EnriquezM., MacLeanK. and ChitaC., Haptic phonemes: Basic building blocks of haptic communication, in Proc Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, Banff, Canada, 2006, pp. 302–309.
21.
KosugeK., Dance Partner Robot: An engineering approach to human-robot interaction, in Proc Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Osaka, Japan, 2010, pp. 201–201.
22.
Molina-TancoL.,
García-BerdonésC. and Reyes-LecuonaA.,
The delay mirror: A technological innovation specific to the dance studio, in Proc Conference on Movement Computing, New York, USA, 2017, 9:1–9:6.
23.
YanS.G., DingZ., GuanN., SunH. and LiL., Zhang, OutsideMe: Augmenting dancer’s external self-image by using a mixed reality system, in: Proc Conf on Human Factors in Comp Systems, Seoul, Reublic of Korea, 2015, pp. 965–970.
24.
GroßhauserT.,
BläsingB.,
SpiethC. and HermannT., Wearable sensor-based real-time sonification of motion and foot pressure in dance teaching and training, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society60(7/8) (2012), 580–589.
25.
FlorianH., MocanuA., VlasinC., MachadoJ., CarvalhoV., SoaresF. and AvramC., Deaf people feeling music rhythm by using a sensing and actuating device, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical267 (2017), 431–442.
26.
ShibasakiM., KamiyamaY. and MinamizawaK., Designing a haptic feedback system for hearing-impaired to experience tap dance, in Proc Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Tokyo, Japan, 2016, pp. 97–99.
27.
HossnyM., NahavandiS., FieldingM., MullinsJ., CreightonD. and HutchisonS., Haptically-enabled dance visualisation framework for deafblind-folded audience and artists, in Proc Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Kowloon, China, 2015, pp. 446–450.
28.
TsuchidaS., TeradaT. and TsukamotoM., A dance performance environment in which performers dance with multiple robotic balls, in Proc Augmented Human International Conference, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016, pp. 1–8.
29.
AlizadehH., WitcraftA., TangA. and SharlinE., HappyFeet: Embodiments for joint remote dancing, in Proc Graphics Interface Conf, British Columbia, Canada, 2016, pp. 117–124.
30.
BrownC. and PaineG., Interactive Tango Milonga: Designing internal experience, in Proc Workshop on Movement and Computing, Vancouver, Canada, 2015, pp. 17–20.
31.
ParkS.I., GooB., NoorF.N.M. and KimD.Y., Dancing queen: dancing in space (Connecting the Czech Republic, Spain, the United States of America and Taiwan), in Proc of the Asia-Pacific Advanced Network39 (2015), 40–53.
32.
DanjouxM., Choreography and sounding wearables, Scene2(1-2) (2014), 197–122.
33.
GiomiA., From haptic perception to movement: A phenomenological study on sound and technological mediation in dance pedagogy, Repertorio28 (2017), 342–361.
34.
ChiangI.K., SpiroI., LeeS., LeesA., LiuJ., BreglerC. and LiuY., Dancing with Turks, in Proc Conference on Multimedia, New York, USA, 2015, pp. 241–250.
35.
TrajkovaM. and CafaroF., E-ballet: Designing for remote ballet learning, In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct, 2016, pp. 213–216. ACM.
36.
RosR., ConinxA., DemirisY., PatsisG., EnescuV. and SahliH., Behavioral accommodation towards a dance robot tutor, in Proc Conference on Human-robot Interaction, Bielefeld, Germany, 2014, pp. 278–279.
37.
McLeanM., SuskoT., HarlowD. and BianchiniJ., Dancing robots: A collaboration between elementary school and university engineering students, in Proc on Creativity and Fabrication in Education, Stanford, USA, 2017, pp. 1–4.
38.
BryantD.A.G., LilesK.R. and BeerJ.M., Developing a robot hip-hop dance game to engage rural minorities in computer science, in Proc Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Vienna, Austria, 2017, pp. 89–90.
39.
MACHINA: An advanced wearable technology, Smart clothing. Retrieved at August, 30, 2018 from https://www.machina.cc/.
