In crisp logic every object is similar to itself with degree of reflexivity 1, while the degree of reflexivity in fuzzy logic can be any value in the unit interval, [0, 1]. This behaviour of a fuzzy set is used to enlighten the concept of similarity and inclusion measures. This paper is aimed at discovering the relations between the parameters of the transitive members of a family of cardinality-based fuzzy measure.
AshrafS., HusnineS.M. and RashidT., Fuzzy transitivity and monotonicity of cardinality-based similarity measures, Fuzzy Information and Engineering4(2) (2012), 145–153.
2.
BegI. and AshrafS., Similarity measures for fuzzy sets, Appl and Comput math8(2) (2009), 192–202.
3.
BlancoI.J., Martin-BautistaM.J., SanchezD. and VilaM.A., A new similarity measure for effectiveness in fuzzy information retrieval, Proc, IPMU (Perugia, Italy) (2004), 1991–1997.
4.
BosteelsK. and KerreE.E., A triparametric family of cardinality-based fuzzy similarity measures, Fuzzy Sets and Systems158(22) (2007), 2466–2479.
5.
BosteelsK. and KerreE.E., A biparametric family of cardinality-based fuzzy similarity measures, New Mathematics and Natural Computation3(03) (2007), 307–319.
6.
CasasnovasJ. and TorrensJ., Scalar cardinalities of finite fuzzy sets for t-norms and t-conorms, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems11(05) (2003), 599–614.
7.
ChairaT. and RayA.K., Fuzzy measures for color image retrieval, Fuzzy Sets and Systems150(3) (2005), 545–560.
8.
De BaetsB., MeyerH.D., NaessensH., A class of rational cardinality-based similarity measures, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics132(1) (2001), 51–69.
9.
De BaetsB., MeyerH.D., NaessensH., On rational cardinality-based inclusion measures, Fuzzy Sets and Systems128(2) (2002), 169–183.
10.
De BaetsB., De MeyerH., Transitivity-preserving fuzzification schemes for cardinality-based similarity measures, European Journal of Operational Research160(3) (2005), 726–740.
11.
De BaetsB., JanssensS., De MeyerH., Meta-theorems on inequalities for scalar fuzzy set cardinalities, Fuzzy Sets and Systems157(11) (2006), 1463–1476.
12.
De BaetsB., Janssens, S., De MeyerH., On the transitivity of a parametric family of cardinality-based similarity measures, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning50(1) (2009), 104–116.
13.
DiceL.R., Measures of the amount of ecologic associations between species, Ecology26 (1945), 297–302.
14.
FodorJ. and YagerR.R., Fuzzy set-theoretic operators and quantifiers, In Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets (2000), (pp. 125-193). Springer, US.
15.
GottwaldS., A note on fuzzy cardinals, Kybernetika16(2) (1980), 156–158.
16.
GowerJ.C. and LegendreP., Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coeficients, Journal of Classification3(1) (1986), 5–48.
17.
GregsonR.A.M., Psychometrics of similarity, New York: Academic Press, 1975.
18.
JaccardP., Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale, Bulletin de la Societee Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 40. (1908), 223–270.
19.
JavedM.A., AshrafS. and HusnineS.M., Transitivity of parametric family of cardinality-based similarity measures using Lukasiewicz t-norm, Bull Comput Appl Math6(1) (2018), 9–40.
20.
JanssensS. and De BaetsB., De MeyerH., On the transitivity of a parametrized family of similarity measures. In Proceedings of the 2002 EUROFUSE Workshop on Information Systems, Varenna, Italy, September 23–25, 2002/Editors: De BaetsB., FodorJ., PasiG., (2002). (pp. 239–244).
21.
JanssensS., De BaetsB. and
De MeyerH., Inequalities in fuzzy probability calculus, In Fuzzy Sets and Systems|IFSA 2003 (pp. 211–218). SpringerBerlin, Heidelberg2003.
22.
JanssensS., Bell inequalities in cardinality-based similarity measurement (Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University), 2006.
23.
KunchevaL.I., Fuzzy rough sets: Application to feature selection, Fuzzy sets and Systems51(2) (1992), 147–153.
24.
RogersD. and TanimotoT., A computer program for classifying plants, Science132 (1960), 1115–1118.
25.
RussellP.F. and RaoT.R., On habitat and association of species of anopheline larvae in south-eastern madras, Journal of the Malaria Institute of India3 (1940), 153–178.
26.
SchweizerB. and SklarA., Probabilistic Metric Spaces, 1983.
27.
SokalR. and MichenerC., A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships, Univ of Kansas Science Bulletin38 (1958), 1409–1438.
28.
SokalR. and SneathP., Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1963.
29.
TungarazaR., GuanJ., ShapiroL., BrinkleyJ., OjemannJ. and FranklinJ., A Similarity Retrieval Tool for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Statistical Maps, 2013.
30.
TverskyA., Features of similarity, Psychological Review84 (1977), 327–352.
31.
ValverdeL., On the structure of Findistinguishability operators, Fuzzy Sets and Systems17(3) (1985), 313–328.
32.
WangX. and De BaetsB., KerreE., A comparative study of similarity measures, Fuzzy Sets and Systems73(2) (1995), 259–268.
33.
WillmottR., On the transitivity of containment and equivalence in fuzzy power set theory, J Math Anal Appl120 (1986), 384–396.
34.
WygralakM., An axiomatic approach to scalar cardinalities of fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems110(2) (2000), 175–179.
35.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control8(3) (1965), 338–353.
