In this paper, we focus on the connections between rough sets and skew lattices. On the one hand, we study the special properties of the rough sets constructed by means of the congruences induced by ideals of skew lattices which are considered as a non-commutative generalization of classic lattices; On the other hand, the properties of the generalized rough sets with respect to ideals of skew lattices are investigated.
BiswasR. and NandaS., Rough groups and rough subgroups, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Mathematics42(42) (1994), 251–254.
2.
Cvetko-VahK., KinyonM., LeechJ. and SpinksM., Cancellation in skew lattices, Order28(1) (2011), 9–32.
3.
DavvazB., A new view of the approximations in hv-groups.
4.
DavvazB., Roughness in rings, Information Sciences164(1–4) (2004), 147–163.
5.
DavvazB., A short note on algebraic t-rough sets, Information Sciences178(16) (2008), 3247–3252.
6.
DavvazB., Approximations in hyperrings, Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic & Soft Computing15(5-6) (2009), 471–488.
7.
DavvazB. and MahdavipourM., Roughness in modules, Information Sciences176(24) (2006), 3658–3674.
8.
JordanP., Über nichtkommutative verbände, Archiv der Mathematik2(1) (1949), 56–59.
9.
KazancO., YamakS. and DavvazB., The lower and upper approximations in a quotient hypermodule with respect to fuzzy sets, Information Sciences178(10) (2008), 2349–2359.
10.
KurokiN., Rough ideals in semigroups, Information Sciences100(1-4) (1997), 139–163.
11.
KurokiN. and WangP.P., The lower and upper approximations in a fuzzy group, Information Sciences90(1-4) (1996), 203–220.
12.
LeechJ., Skew lattices in rings, Algebra Universalis26(1) (1989), 48–72.
13.
LeechJ., Normal skew lattices, In Semigroup Forum, 1992, pp. 1–8.
14.
Leoreanu-FoteaV., The lower and upper approximations in a hypergroup, Information Sciences178(18) (2008), 3605–3615.
15.
Leoreanu-FoteaV. and DavvazB., Roughness in n-aryhypergroups, Information Sciences178(21) (2008), 4114–4124.
16.
LiuG. and ZhuW., The algebraic structures of generalized rough set theory, Information Sciences178(21) (2008), 4105–4113.
17.
ManiA., Choice inclusive general rough semantics, Information Sciences181(6) (2011), 1097–1115.
18.
PawlakZ., Rough sets, International Journal of Parallel Programming11(5) (1982), 341–356.
19.
CostaJ.P., On ideals of a skew lattice, Discussiones Mathematicae General Algebra & Applications, 2012, pp. 5–21.
20.
PolkowskiL. and SkowronA., Rough mereology: A new paradigm for approximate reasoning, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning15(4) (1996), 333–365.
21.
PolkowskiL. and SkowronA., Rough mereological foundations for design, analysis, synthesis, and control in distributed systems, Information Sciences104(1-2) (1998), 129–156.
22.
PomykałaJ. and JanuszA., The stone algebra of rough sets, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Mathematics36(7) (1988).
23.
XiaoQ. and ZhangZ., Rough prime ideals and rough fuzzy prime ideals in semigroups, Information Sciences176(6) (2006), 725–733.
24.
XiaoQ. and LiQ., The generalized roughness in lattices, In International Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications, 2011, pp. 1–4.
25.
XiaoQ., LiQ. and GuoL., Rough sets induced by ideals in lattices, Information Sciences271(7) (2014), 82–92.
26.
XiaoQ., LiQ. and ZhouX., Rough ideals in lattices, Neural Computing and Applications21(1) (2012), 245–253.
27.
YamakS., KazancO. and DavvazB., Generalized lower and upper approximations in a ring, Information Sciences180(9) (2010), 1759–1768.
