Surge arresters are essential equipment for power system protection against transient overvoltages. Therefore, their operating condition and fault diagnosis are very important. Leakage current analysis is a conventional method of surge arrester condition monitoring. In this paper, the impacts of disruptive factors on harmonic components of surge arrester current have been evaluated experimentally. Experimental tests have been done on different surge arresters to investigate disruptive factors effects on surge arresters leakage current. To show the ability of introduced indicators, obtained dataset was applied to fuzzy network for recognition task and classification. In order to increase the accuracy of proposed system, the optimum vector of radius has been found using the optimization algorithm. Bees algorithm, genetic algorithm, imperialist competitive algorithm and particle swarm optimization have been applied to evolve adaptive network based fuzzy inference system. Also the performance of adaptive network based fuzzy inference system has been compared with other classifiers to investigate the capability of the proposed classifier. Results show that the success rates of Bees-ANFIS is higher than the performance of other systems.
KisielewiczT., Lo PiparoG.B. and MazzettiC., Surge protective devices efficiency for apparatus protection in front of direct flashes to overhead low voltage lines, Electric Power System Research134 (2016), 88–96.
2.
StojanovicZ.N., StojkovicZ.M., Evaluation of MOSA condition using leakage current method, Electrical Power and Energy System52 (2013), 87–95.
3.
DoorsamyW., BokoroP., On-line monitoring of metal-oxide surge arresters using improved equivalent model with evolutionary optimization algorithm, Industrial Electronics Conference (ISIE) (2017), 135–139.
4.
CoffeenL.T., McBrideJ.E., High voltage ac resistive current measurements using a computer based digital watts technique, IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery2 (1991), 550–556.
5.
HeinrichC., HinrichsenV., Diagnostics and monitoring of metal-oxide surge arresters in high-voltage networks-comparison of existing and newly developed procedures, IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery16 (2001), 138–143.
6.
MetwallyI.A., EladawyM., FeilatE.A., Online condition monitoring of surge arresters based on third-harmonic analysis of leakage current, IEEE Transaction on Dielectric and Electric Insulation24 (2017), 2274–2281.
7.
PaplinskiP., WankowiczJ., Application of leakage current parameters for technical diagnostics of surge arresters, IEEE Transaction on Dielectric and Electric Insulation23 (2016), 3458–3465.
8.
ChrzanK.L., Influence of moisture and partial discharges on the degradation of high-voltage surge arresters, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems14 (2004), 175–184.
9.
KhodsuzM., MirzaieM., Evaluation of ultraviolet ageing, pollution and varistor degradation effects on harmonic contents of surge arrester leakage current, IET Science Measurement and Technology9 (2015), 979–986.
10.
AlmeidaC.A.L., BragaA.P., NascimentoS., PaivaV., MartinsH.J.A., TorresR., CaminhasW.M., Intelligent thermo-graphic diagnostic applied to surge arresters A new approach, IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery24 (2009), 751–757.
11.
LiraG.R.S., CostaE.G., AlmeidaC.W.D., Self-organizing maps applied to monitoring and diagnosis of ZnO surge arresters, Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, Latin America (T&D-LA) (2010), 659–664.
12.
SeyyedbarzegarS.M., MirzaieM., Thermal balance diagram modeling of surge arrester for thermal stability analysis considering ZnO varistor degradation effect, IET Generation Transmission and Distribution10 (2016), 1570–1581.
13.
WongK.L., Electromagnetic emission based monitoring technique for polymer ZnO surge arresters, IEEE Transaction on Dielectric and Electric Insulation13 (2006), 181–190.
14.
XuJ., KubisA., ZhouK.et al., Electromagnetic field and thermal distribution optimization in shell-type traction transformers, IET Electric Power Applications7 (2013), 627–632.
15.
IEC 60099-5: Surge arresters: Part 5: Selection and application recommendations, (2000–2003).
16.
LiaoR., ZhongyiW., CaixinS., LeguaG., PingY., BinY., The harmonic analysis method and its application in the on-line detection of electric equipment insulation, 6th International Conference on Properties and Applications of Dielectric Materials1 (2000), 474–478.
17.
NovizonY., ZulkurnainA.M., Correlation between third harmonic leakage current and thermography image of zinc oxide surge arrester for fault monitoring using artificial neural network, Applied Mechanics and Materials554 (2014), 598–602.
18.
HanY., LiZ., ZhengH., A decomposition method for the total leakage current of moa based on multiple linear regression, IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery31 (2016), 1422–1428.
19.
ZhaoT., LiQ., QianJ., Investigation on digital algorithm for on-line monitoring and diagnostics of metal oxide surge arrester based on an accurate model, IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery20 (2005), 751–756.
20.
XuZ., ZhaoL., DingA., LuF., A current orthogonality method to extract resistive leakage current of MOSA, IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery28 (2013), 93–101.
21.
IEC 60507 ed.3.0, Artificial pollution tests on high-voltage ceramic and glass insulators to be used on a.c. systems, 2013.
22.
SalzbergS.L., On comparing classifiers: Pitfalls to avoid and a recommended approach, Data mining and knowledge discovery1 (1997), 317–328.
TakagiT., SugenoM., Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control, IEEE Trns Syst15 (1985), 116–132.
25.
TakagiT., SugenoM., Derivation of fuzzy control rules from human operator’s control actions, in: Proceeding IFAC Symposium Fuzzy Information, Knowledge Representation and Decision Analysis, 1985, pp. 55–60.
26.
PhamD.T., GhanbarzadehA., KocE., OtriS., RahimS., ZaidiM., The bees algorithm–a novel tool for complex optimization problems, in: Intelligent Production Machines and Systems, 2006, pp. 454–459.
27.
HaykinS., Neural networks, a comprehensive foundation. New York: MacMillan, 1999.
28.
RiedmillerM., BraunH., A direct adaptive method for faster back-propagation learning: The rprop algorithm, In: Proc I CN N, 1993, pp. 586–591.
29.
HaganM., MenhajM., Training feed-forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm, IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks5 (1994), 989–993.
30.
MollerM., A Scaled Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for Fast Supervised Learning, 1990.
31.
ScalesL.E., Introduction to Non-Linear Optimization, New YorkSpringer-Verlag, 1985.
32.
The Numerical Algorithms Group. Keyword Index: Quasi-Newton. NAG Library Manual, Mark 23. Retrieved, 2012.
33.
BattitiR., First and second order methods for learning: Between steepest descent and Newton’s method, Neural Computation4 (1992), 141–166.
34.
PoggioT., GirosiF., Networks for approximation and learning, Proceedings of the IEEE78 (1990), 1481–1497.
35.
TangK.S., ManK.F., KwongS., HeQ., Genetic algorithms and their applications, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine13 (1996), 22–37.
36.
Atashpaz-GargariE., LucasC., Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition, In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2007, pp. 4661–4667.
37.
KennedyJ., EberhartR., Particle swarm optimization, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 4, 1995, pp. 1942–1948.
