In this paper, we define aggregation operators for triangular cubic linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets which includes generalized triangular cubic linguistic hesitant fuzzy weighted averaging (GTCLHFWA) operator, generalized triangular cubic linguistic hesitant fuzzy weighted geometric (GTCHFWG) operator, generalized triangular cubic linguistic hesitant fuzzy ordered weighted average (GTCLHFOWA) operator, generalized triangular cubic linguistic hesitant fuzzy ordered weighted geometric (GTCLHFOWG) operator, generalized triangular cubic linguistic hesitant fuzzy hybrid averaging (GTCLHFHA) operator and generalized triangular cubic linguistic hesitant fuzzy hybrid geometric (GTCLHFHG) operator. Furthermore, we relate these aggregation operators to develop an approach to multiple attribute group decision-making with triangular cubic linguistic hesitant fuzzy information. Finally, a numerical example is providing to demonstrate the submission of the established approach.
AtanassovK.T., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems20(1) (1986), 87–96.
2.
ChenX., ZhangH. and DongY., The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making: A survey, Information Fusion24 (2015), 72–83.
3.
ChenN., XuZ. and XiaM., Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems37 (2013), 528–540.
4.
DongY., ZhangG., HongW.C. and YuS., Linguistic computational model based on 2-tuples and intervals, IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems21(6) (2013), 1006–1018.
5.
DongY., ChenX. and HerreraF., Minimizing adjusted simple terms in the consensus reaching process with hesitant linguistic assessments in group decision making, Information Sciences297 (2015), 95–117.
6.
DongY., ZhangH. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Consensus reaching model in the complex and dynamic MAGDM problem, Knowledge-Based Systems106 (2016), 206–219.
7.
DongY., LiC.C. and HerreraF., Connecting the linguistic hierarchy and the numerical scale for the 2-tuple linguistic model and its use to deal with hesitant unbalanced linguistic information, Information Sciences367 (2016), 259–278.
8.
DongY., DingZ., MartínezL. and HerreraF., Managing consensus based on leadership in opinion dynamics, Information Sciences397 (2017), 187–205.
9.
DongY., LiuY., LiangH., ChiclanaF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making, Omega75 (2018), 154–164.
10.
JunY.B., KimC.S. and YangK.O., Cubic sets, Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics4(1) (2011), 83–98.
11.
LiC.C., DongY., HerreraF., Herrera-ViedmaE. and MartínezL., Personalized individual semantics in computing with words for supporting linguistic group decision making. An application on consensus reaching, Information Fusion33 (2017), 29–40.
12.
LiuW., DongY., ChiclanaF., CabrerizoF.J. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Group decision-making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making16 (2017), 429–447.
13.
TorraV., Hesitant fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems25(6) (2010), 529–539.
14.
TorraV. and NarukawaY., On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In Fuzzy Systems, 2009. FUZZ-IEEE 2009, IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1378–1382). IEEE.
15.
YuD., Triangular hesitant fuzzy set and its application to teaching quality evaluation, Journal of Information & Computational Science10(7) (2013), 1925–1934.
16.
ZadehL.A., The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I, Information Sciences8(3) (1975), 199–249.
ZhangH., DongY. and ChenX., The 2-rank consensus reaching model in the multigranular linguistic multiple-attribute group decision-making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Systems, in press. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2694429
19.
ZhangH., DongY. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Consensus building for the heterogeneous large-scale GDM with the individual concerns and satisfactions, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, in press. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2697403
20.
LiangQ., LiaoX. and Liu.J., A social ties-based approach for group decision-making problems with incomplete additive preference relations, Knowledge-Based Systems119 (2017), 68–86.
21.
YouX.Y., YouJ.X., LiuH.C. and ZhenL., Group multi-criteria supplier selection using an extended VIKOR method with interval 2-tuple linguistic information, Expert Systems with Applications (2014), In press. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.10.004
22.
HashemiS.H., KarimiA. and TavanaM., An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis,in press, International Journal of Production Economics (2014), in press. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.027
23.
WangW.J., ChengC.H. and HuangK.C., Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection, Applied Soft Computing9(1) (2009), 377–386.
24.
SalmeronJ.L., VidalR. and MenaA., Ranking fuzzy cognitive map based scenarios with TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications39(3) (2012), 2443–2450.
