Modeling of single and bi-objective brain emotional intelligent controllers for improved performance of the dual stator winding induction motor drive at low speeds
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August 26, 2018
Modeling of single and bi-objective brain emotional intelligent controllers for improved performance of the dual stator winding induction motor drive at low speeds
This paper models the single and bi-objective brain emotional intelligent controllers for the dual stator winding induction motor (DSWIM) drive. The main purpose of this paper is performance improvement of the DSWIM drive control system and power losses reduction of the inverter in the DSWIM drive at low speeds. In the vector control method, it is difficult to estimate flux at low speeds. To solve the mentioned problem, researchers have used from the free capacity of the two windings of the stator. This paper presents three proposed methods: 1. Using the idea of rotor flux compensation based on classical PI controller at low speeds, the motor works in its standard operating mode; 2. Proposed Method 1 is reformed and improved based on the bi-objective brain emotional controller; and 3. Proposed Method 2 is improved using single-objective brain emotional controller in the speed control loops of the DSWIM drive. The proposed methods are simulated in MATLAB/Simulink software.
AlsofyaniI.M., and IdrisN.R.N., Lookup-table-based DTC of induction machines with improved flux regulation and extended kalman filterstate estimator at low-speed operation, IEEE Transaction on Industrial Informatics12 (4) (2016), 1412–1425.
2.
AlsofyaniI.M. and IdrisN.R.N., Simple flux regulation for improving state estimation at very low and zero speed of a speed sensorless direct torque control of an induction motor, IEEETransactions on Power Electronics31 (4) (2016), 3027–3035.
3.
AktasM., and OkumusH.I., Stator resistance estimation using ANN inDTC IM drives, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering andComputer Sciences18 (2) (2010), 197–210.
4.
BoseB.K., Modern power electronics and AC drives. 1nd., NewJersey, NJ, USA: Upper Saddle River, (2002).
5.
BasakS., and ChakrabortyC., Dual stator winding induction machine:Problems, progress and future scope, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics62 (7) (2015), 4641–4652.
6.
DaryabeigiE., AbjadiN.R., and Arab MarkadehG.R., Automatic speedcontrol of an asymmetrical six-phase induction motor using emotional controller (BELBIC), Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems26 (4) (2014), 1879–1892.
7.
ElwerA.S., A novel technique for tuning PI controllers in inductionmotor drive systems for electric vehicle applications, Journalof Power Electronics6 (4) (2006), 322–329.
8.
FarshadM., and LucasC., Intelligent modeling and control ofswitched reluctance motor for washing machine application, Ph.D.Dissertation, University of Tehran, Iran, 2006.
9.
GadoueS.M., GiaourisD., and FinchJ.W., Artificial intelligence-based speed control of DTC induction motordrives—a comparative study, Electric Power Systems Research79 (1) (2009), 210–219.
10.
GuerreroJ.M. and OjoO., Total air gap flux minimization in dualstator winding induction machines, IEEE Transactions PowerElectronics24 (3) (2009), 787–795.
11.
HuJ.and WuB., New integration algorithms for estimating motorflux over a wide speed range, IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics13 (5) (1998), 969–976.
12.
InanR. and BarutM., Bi input-extended Kalman filter-basedspeed-sensorless control of an induction machine capable of working in the field-weakening region, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences22 (3) (2014), 588–604.
13.
KortasI., SaklyA., and MimouniM.F., Analytical solution of optimized energy consumption of Double Star Induction Motoroperating in transient regime using a Hamiltone-Jacobie-Bellmanequation, Energy89 (3) (2015), 55–64.
14.
KortasI., SaklyA., and MimouniM.F., Optimal vector control to adouble-star induction motor, Energy131 (15) (2017), 279–288.
15.
KennyP.J., Reward mechanisms in obesity: New insights and future directions, Neuron69 (4) (2011), 664–679.
16.
LorenzR.D. and LawsonD.B., A simplified approach to continuous on-line tuning of field-oriented induction machine drives, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Applications26 (3) (1990), 420–424.
17.
LinF., ShiehH., ShyuK., and HuangP., Online gain tuning IPcontroller using real coded genetic algorithm, Electric Power Systems Research72 (2) (2004), 157–169.
18.
MorenJ., and BalkeniusC., A computational model of emotional learning in the amygdala , In Proc. 6th International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour, Paris (2000), 1–10
.
19.
MoayediradH., FarshadM., and Shamsi NejadM.A., Improvement ofspeed profile in induction motor drive using a new idea of PWMpulses generation base on artificial neural networks, Intelligent Systems in Electrical Engineering2 (4) (2012), 35–46.
20.
MunozA.R., and LipoT.A., Dual stator winding induction machinedrive, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications36 (5) (2000), 1369–1379.
21.
MoayediradH., ShamsinejadM.A., and FarshadM., Neural control ofthe induction motor drive: Robust against rotor and statorresistances variations and suitable for very low and high speeds, Iranian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering9 (2) (2011), 107–113.
22.
NovotnyD.W. and LipoT.A., Vector control and dynamics of ACdrives. 1nd. New York, USA: Oxford University Press Inc., (1997).
23.
OjoO. and WuZ., Speed control of a dual stator winding induction machine, In Proc. 20th IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, New York, 2007, pp. 229–235.
24.
OzsoyE.S., GokasM., and BogosyanS., Simultaneous rotor and stator resistance estimation of squirrel cage induction machine with a single extended Kalman filter, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences18 (5) (2010), 853–863.
25.
OjoO., WuZ., Modeling of a dual-stator-winding induction machine including the effect of main flux linkage magnetic saturation, IEEE Transaction on Industry Applications44 (4) (2008), 1099–1107.
26.
QutubuddinM.D., YadaiahN., Modeling and implementation of brain emotional controller for Permanent Magnet Synchronous motor drive, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence60-C (2017), 193–203.
27.
RahmanM.A., MilasiR.M., LucasC., ArrabiB.N., and RadwanT.S., Implementation of emotional controller for interior permanent magnetsynchronous motor drive, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications44 (5) (2008), 1466–1476.
28.
Santhose KumarR.S. and GirirajkumarS.M., Z-source inverter fedinduction motor drive control using particle swarm optimization recurrent neural network, Journal of Intelligent & FuzzySystems28 (6) (2015), 2749–2760.
29.
StojicD., MilinkovicM., VeinovicS., and KlasnicI., Improved stator flux estimator for speed sensorless induction motor drives, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics30 (4) (2015), 2363–2371.
30.
SenthilkumarS. and VijayanS., High performance emotional intelligent controller for induction motor speed control, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems27 (2), 891–900.
31.
WuZ., OjoO., and SastryJ., High-performance control of a dual stator winding DC power induction generator, IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications43 (2) (2007), 582–592.
32.
ZakyM.S. and MetwalyM.K., Sensorless torque/speed control ofinduction motor drives at zero and lowfrequencies with stator and rotor resistance estimations, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics4 (4) (2016), 1416–1429.
