AtanassovK., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems20 (1986), 87–96.
2.
AtanassovK., Two theorems for intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems110 (2000), 267–269.
3.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control8 (1965), 338–356.
4.
ChenT.Y., The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision making, Applied Soft Computing26 (2015), 57–73.
5.
ChenT.Y., An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy permutation method with likelihood-based preference functions and its application to multiple criteria decision analysis, Applied Soft Computing42 (2016), 390–409.
6.
TangY., WenL.L. and WeiG.W., Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on the generalized Dice similarity measures with intuitionistic fuzzy information, International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems21(2) (2017), 85–95.
7.
WeiG.W., Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems17(3) (2015), 484–489.
8.
NayagamV.L.G., MuralikrishnanS. and SivaramanG., Multi-criteria decision-making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 1464–1467.
9.
NayagamV.L.G. and SivaramanG., Ranking of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Applied Soft Computing11 (2011), 3368–3372.
10.
SzmidtE., KacprzykJ. and BujnowskiP., How to measure the amount of knowledge conveyed by Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Information Sciences257 (2014), 276–285.
11.
SzmidtE. and KacprzykJ., Dealing with typical values via Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of General Systems39 (2010), 489–506.
XuZ.S. and YagerR.R., Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of General System35 (2006), 417–433.
14.
ZhaoH., XuZ. and YaoZ., Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy derivative and differential operations, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems9(1) (2016), 36–56.
15.
WeiG.W. and ZhaoX.F., Some induced correlated aggregating operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Expert Systems with Applications39(2) (2012), 2026–2034.
16.
ZhaoX.F. and WeiG.W., Some intuitionistic fuzzy einstein hybrid aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems37 (2013), 472–479.
17.
WeiG.W., Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting, Knowledge-Based Systems21 (2008), 833–836.
18.
WeiG.W., Some geometric aggregation functions and their application to dynamic multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting, International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems17 (2009), 179–196.
19.
WeiG.W., GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting, Knowledge-Based Systems23 (2010), 243–247.
20.
WeiG.W., Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making, Applied Soft Computing10 (2010), 423–431.
21.
WeiG.W., WangH.J. and LinR., Application of correlation coefficient to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making with incomplete weight information, Knowledge and Information Systems26 (2011), 337–349.
22.
YeJ., Fuzzy decision-making method based on the weighted correlation coefficient under intuitionistic fuzzy environment, European Journal of Operational Research205 (2010), 202–204.
23.
YeJ., Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on cosine function for the decision making of mechanical design schemes, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems30(1) (2016), 151–158.
24.
ZhangH.-Y., YangS.Y. and YueZ.W., On inclusion measures of intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and their applications to group decision making, International Journal of Machine Learning & Cybernetics7(5) (2016), 833–843.
25.
LiangX. and WeiC., An Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making method based on entropy and similarity measure, International Journal of Machine Learning & Cybernetics5(3) (2014), 435–444.
26.
ZhangW.R., Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: A computational frame work for cognitive modelling and multiagent decision analysis, Proceedings of IEEE Conf (1994), 305–309.
27.
ZhangW.R., Bipolar fuzzy sets, Proceedings of FUZZY-IEEE (1998), 835–840.
28.
ZhangW.R. and ZhangL., Bipolar logic and bipolar fuzzy logic, Information Sciences165(3-4) (2004), 265–287.
29.
HanY., ShiP. and ChenS., Bipolar-valued rough fuzzy set and its applications to decision information system, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems23(6) (2015), 2358–2370.
30.
ZhangW.R., ZhangH.J., ShiY. and ChenS.S., Bipolar linear algebra and yinyang-N-element cellular networks for equilibrium-based biosystem simulation and regulation, Journal of Biological Systems17(4) (2009), 547–576.
31.
LuM. and BusemeyerJ.R., Do traditional chinese theories of Yi Jing (’Yin-Yang’ and Chinese medicine) go beyond western concepts of mind and matter, Mind and Matter12(1) (2014), 37–59.
32.
ZhangW.R., Equilibrium relations and bipolar cognitive mapping for online analytical processing with applications in international relations and strategic decision support, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: B33(2) (2003), 295–307.
33.
ZhangW.R., Equilibrium energy and stability measures for bipolar decision and global regulation, International Journal of Fuzzy System5(2) (2003), 114–122.
34.
ZhangW.-R., PandurangiA. and PeaceK., YinYang dynamic neurobiological modeling and diagnostic analysis of major depressive and bipolar disorders, IEEE Trans. On Biomedical Engineering54(10) (2007), 1729–1739.
35.
ZhangW.R., PandurangiK.A., PeaceK.E., ZhangY. and ZhaoZ., MentalSquares-A generic bipolar support vector machine for psychiatric disorder classification, diagnostic analysis and neurobiological data mining, International Journal on Data Mining and Bioinformatics5(5) (2011), 532–572.
36.
FinkG. and YollesM., Collective emotion regulation in an organization-a plural agency with cognition and affect, Journal of Organizational Change Management28(5) (2015), 832–871.
37.
LiP.P., The global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the east: How to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management, Cross Cultural & Strategic Management23(1) (2016), 42–47.
38.
ZhangW.R. and MarchettiF., A logical exposition of dirac 3-polarizer experiment and its potential impact on computational biology, Proceedings of ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM BCB)-2015 (2015), pp. 517–518.
39.
ZhangW.R., Bipolar quantum logic gates and quantum cellular combinatorics- a logical extension to quantum entanglement, Journal of Quantum Information Science3(2) (2013), 93–105.
40.
ZhangW.R. and PeaceK.E., Causality is logically definable-toward an equilibrium-based computing paradigm of quantum agent and quantum intelligence, Journal of Quantum Information Science4 (2014), 227–268.
41.
ZhangW.R. and ChenS.S., Equilibrium and non-equilibrium modeling of YinYang WuXing for diagnostic decision analysis in traditional Chinese medicine, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making8(3) (2009), 529–548.
42.
ZhangW.X.,
LiangY.,
WuW.Z., Information systems and knowledge discoveries. Beijing: Science in China Press, 2003.
43.
ZhangW.R., YinYang Bipolar Relativity: A Unifying Theory of Nature, Agents and Causality with Applications in Quantum Computing, Cognitive Informatics and Life Sciences. IGI Global, Hershey and New York, 2011.
44.
ZhangW.R., Bipolar quantum logic gates and quantum cellular combinatorics-a logical extension to quantum entanglement, Journal of Quantum Information Science3(2) (2013), 93–105.
45.
ZhangW.R., G-CPT symmetry of quantum emergence and submergence-an information conservational multiagent cellular automata unification of CPT symmetry and CP violation for equilibrium-based many world causal analysis of quantum coherence and decoherence, Journal of Quantum Information Science6(2) (2016), 62–97.
46.
AkramM., Bipolar fuzzy graphs, Information Sciences181(24) (2011), 5548–5564.
47.
YangH.L., LiS.G., YangW.H. and LuY., Notes on “Bipolar fuzzy graphs”, Information Sciences242 (2013), 113–121.
48.
SamantaS. and PalM., Bipolar fuzzy hypergraphs, International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems2(1) (2012), 17–28.
49.
SamantaS. and PalM., Irregular bipolar fuzzy graphs, International Journal of Applications Fuzzy Sets2 (2012), 91–102.
50.
SamantaS. and PalM., Some more results on bipolar fuzzy sets and bipolar fuzzy intersection graphs, The Journal of Fuzzy Math22(2) (2014), 253–262.
51.
GulZ., Some bipolar fuzzy aggregations operators and their applications in multicriteria group decision making, M.Phil Thesis, 2015.
52.
HerreraF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research120 (2000), 144–161.
53.
HerreraF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information, Fuzzy Sets and Systems115 (2000), 67–82.
54.
HerreraF., Herrera-ViedmaE. and MartínezL., A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems114 (2000), 43–58.
55.
JiangX.P. and WeiG.W., Some Bonferroni mean operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27 (2014), 2153–2162.
56.
WeiG.W. and ZhaoX.F., Some dependent aggregation operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Expert Systems with Applications39 (2012), 5881–5886.
57.
YagerR.R., On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics18 (1988), 183–190.
58.
YagerR.R. and FilevD.P., Induced ordered weighted averaging operators, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part B29 (1999), 141–150.
59.
ChiclanaF., HerreraF., Herrera-ViedmaE., The ordered weighted geometric operator: Properties and application. In: Proc of 8th Int Conf on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, Madrid, 2000, pp. 985–991.
60.
XuZ.S. and DaQ.L., An overview of operators for aggregating information, International Journal of Intelligent System18 (2003), 953–969.
61.
MerigoJ.M. and Gil-LafuenteA.M., Fuzzy induced generalized aggregation operators and its application in multi-person decision making, Expert Systems with Applications38(8) (2011), 9761–9772.
62.
WeiG.W.,
WangJ.M., A comparative study of robust efficiency analysis and data envelopment analysis with imprecise data, Expert Systems with Applications81 (2017), 28–38.
63.
WeiG.W.,
AlsaadiFuad E.,
HayatTasawar,
AlsaediAhmed, A linear assignment method for multiple criteria decision analysis with hesitant fuzzy sets based on fuzzy measure, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(3) (2017), 607–614.
64.
ParkK.S. and KimS.H., Tools for interactive multi-attribute decision making with incompletely identified information, European Journal of Operational Research98 (1997), 111–123.
65.
KimS.H. and AhnB.S., Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information, European Journal of Operational Research116 (1999), 498–507.
66.
XuZ.S., Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning48(1) (2008), 246–262.
67.
YagerR.R., On generalized Bonferroni mean operators for multi-criteria aggregation, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning50 (2009), 1279–1286.
WeiG.W., Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems, Journal of Business Economics and Management17(4) (2016), 491–502.
70.
WeiG.W., AlsaadiF.E., HayatT. and AlsaediA., Hesitant fuzzy linguistic arithmetic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems13(4) (2016), 1–16.
71.
WeiG.W., Interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics7(6) (2016), 1093–1114.
72.
LiuP., Some Hamacher aggregation operators based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems22 (2014), 83–97.
73.
ChenT.Y. and LiC.H., Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: A comparative analysis, Information Sciences180 (2010), 4207–4222.
74.
LuM. and WeiG.W., Models for multiple attribute decision making with dual hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic information, International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems20(4) (2016), 217–227.
75.
WeiG.W., XuX.R. and DengD.X., Interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy linguistic geometric aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems20(4) (2016), 189–196.
76.
RodriguezR.M., MartinezL. and HerreraF., Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems20 (2012), 109–119.
77.
WeiG.W., WangJ.M. and ChenJ., Potential optimality and robust optimality in multiattribute decision analysis with incomplete information: A comparative study, Decision Support Systems55(3) (2013), 679–684.
R Lin, X.F. Zhao and G.W. Wei, Models for selecting an ERP system with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(5) (2014), 2155–2165.
80.
WeiG.W., AlsaadiF.E., HayatT. and AlsaediA., Picture 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Soft Computing (2016). doi: 10.1007/s00500-016-2403-8
