This paper proposes a classification approach for hyperspectral image using the local receptive fields based random weights networks (RWN). Considering the local correlations of spectral features, it is promising to improve the performance of hyperspectral image (HSI) classification by introducing the local receptive fields (LRF). It is the first time to apply such LRF-based RWN structure to HSI classification. The proposed classification framework consists of four layers, i.e., input layer, convolution layer, pooling layer, and output layer. The convolution and pooling layer are used for feature extracting and the last layer is used as the classifier. Experimental results on two real hyperspectral image datasets have confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed HSI classification method.
SchmidtW.F., KraaijveldM.A. and DuinR.P., Feedforward neural networks with random weights, 11th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. II. Conference B: Pattern Recognition Methodology and Systems, Hague, Netherlands, pp. 1992, 1–4.
4.
PaoY.H. and TakefjiY., Functional-link net computing, IEEE Computer Journal25(5) (1992), 76–79.
5.
PaoY.H., ParkG.H. and SobajicD.J., Learning and generalization characteristics of the random vector functional-link net, Neurocomputing6(2) (1994), 163–180.
6.
IgelnikB. and PaoY.H., Stochastic choice of basis functions in adaptive function approximation and the functional-link net, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks6(6) (1995), 1320–1329.
7.
ZhaoJ., WangZ., CaoF. and WangD., A local learning algorithm for random weights networks, Knowledge-Based Systems74 (2015), 159–166.
8.
LuJ., ZhaoJ. and CaoF., Extended feed forward neural networks with random weights for face recognition, Neurocomputing136 (2014), 96–102.
9.
CaoF., YeH. and WangD., A probabilistic learning algorithm for robust modeling using neural networks with random weights, Information Sciences313 (2015), 62–78.
10.
CaoF., TanY. and CaiM., Sparse algorithms of random weight networks and applications, Expert Systems with Applications41(5) (2014), 2457–2462.
11.
WanW., ZhouZ., ZhaoJ. and CaoF., A novel face recognition method: Using random weight networks and quasisingular value decomposition, Neurocomputing151 (2015), 1180–1186.
12.
TruongT.K., LiK.L. and XuY.M., Chemical reaction optimization with greedy strategy for the 0-1 knapsack problem, Applied Soft Computing13(4) (2013), 1774–1780.
13.
WangY.G., CaoF.L. and YuanY.B., A study on effectiveness of extreme learning machine, Neurocomputing74(16) (2011), 2483–2490.
14.
CaoF., WangD., ZhuH. and WangY., An iterative learning algorithm for feedforward neural networks with random weights, Information Sciences328 (2016), 546–557.
15.
HuangG.B., ZhuH., DingX. and ZhangR., Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics42(2) (2012), 513–529.
16.
RaoC.R. and MitraS.K., Generalized Inverse of Matrices and Its Applications, Wiley, New York, 1971.
17.
BartlettP.L., The sample complexity of pattern classification with neural networks: The size of the weights is more important than the size of the network, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory44(2) (1998), 525–536.
18.
HubelD.H. and WieselT.N., Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex, Journal of Physiology160(1) (1962), 106–154.
19.
HubelD.H. and WieselT.N., Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat, Journal of Neurophysiology28(2) (1965), 229–289.
20.
KaraP. and ReidR.C., Efficacy of retinal spikes in driving cortical responses, Journal of Neuroscience23(24) (2003), 8547–8557.
21.
SosulskiD.L., BloomM.L., CutforthT., AxelR. and DattaS.R., Distinct representations of olfactory information in different cortical centres, Nature472(7342) (2011), 213–216.
22.
FukushimaK. and MiyakeS., Neocognitron: A new algorithm for pattern recognition tolerant of deformations and shifts in position, Pattern Recognition15(6) (1982), 455–469.
23.
SerreT., WolfL. and PoggioT., Object recognition with features inspired by visual cortex, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), San Diego, CA, 2005, 994–1000.
24.
LeCunY., BottouL., BengioY. and HaffnerP., Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, Proceedings of the IEEE86(11) (1998), 2278–2324.
25.
OlshausenB.A. and FieldD.J., Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images, Nature381(6583) (1996), 607–609.
26.
NgiamJ., ChenZ., ChiaD., KohP.W., LeQ.V. and NgA.Y., Tiled convolutional neural networks, 24th Annual Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Vancouver, Canada, 2010, pp. 1279–1287.
27.
SaxeA., KohP.W., ChenZ., BhandM., SureshB. and NgA.Y., On random weights and unsupervised feature learning, 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Bellevue, Washington, 2011, pp. 1089–1096.
28.
ThompsonW.D. and WalterS.D., A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology41(10) (1988), 949–958.
29.
PalM., Extreme-learning-machine-based land cover classification, International Journal of Remote Sensing30(14) (2009), 3835–3841.
30.
MelganiF. and BruzzoneL., Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing42(8) (2004), 1778–1790.
31.
LiC.H., KuoB.C., LinC.T. and HuangC.S., A spatial–contextual support vector machine for remotely sensed image classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing50(3) (2012), 784–799.
32.
Camps-VallsG., Gomez-ChovaL., Muñoz-MaríJ., Vila-FrancésJ. and Calpe-MaravillaJ., Composite kernels for hyperspectral image classification, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters3(1) (2006), 93–97.
33.
ChenY., NasrabadiN.M. and TranT.D., Hyperspectral image classification using dictionary-based sparse representation, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing49(10) (2011), 3973–3985.
34.
ChangC.C. and LinC.J., LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology2(3) (2011), Article 27.
