Today, with the development of economic globalization, the quality competition between enterprises has extended to the supply chain. If the enterprises want to get sustainable development, the traditional closed “Vertical Integration” mode needs to be changed; “Horizontal Integration” has become the inevitable choice of enterprises. With the development of performance management and supply chain technology, the combination of the two and focusing on the green supply chain quality management under low-carbon agricultural economy environment have become the hot topics in both academic area and practical area. In this paper, we study on the multiple attribute decision making problems to estimate the green supply chain performance under low-carbon agricultural economy environment with 2-tuple linguistic information. Then, we propose the 2-tuple power Einstein weighted geometric (2TPEWG) operator for aggregating 2-tuple linguistic information, and then apply 2TPEWG operator for evaluating the green supply chain performance under low-carbon agricultural economy environment with 2-tuple linguistic information. In the end, we propose an example to test the effectiveness of our proposed method.
EllramL.M., TateW.L. and BillingtonC., Understanding and managing the services supply chain, Journal of Supply Chain Management40(4) (2004), 17–32.
2.
ChoyK.L., LiC.L., SoS.C.K., LauH., KwokS.K. and LeungD.W.K., Managing uncertainty in logistics service supply chain, International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management7(1) (2007), 19–43.
3.
Wei-huaL., Xue-caiX., Zheng-xuR. and YanP., An emergency order allocation model based on multi-provider in two-echelon logistics service supply chain, Supply Chain Management16(6) (2011), 391–400.
4.
LeungJ.Y., Handbook of Scheduling: Algorithms, Models, and Performance Analysis, CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
5.
PinedoM., Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
6.
NeelyA.D., AdamsC. and KennerleyM., The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success, Prentice Hall Financial Times, London, UK, 2002.
7.
LiuW., YangY., LiX., XuH. and XieD., A time scheduling model of logistics service supply chain with mass customized logistics service, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society2012 (2012), 18. Article ID 482978.
8.
de SnooC.,
van WezelW. and JornaR.J., An empirical investigation of scheduling performance criteria, Journal of Operations Management29(3) (2011), 181–193.
9.
BruckerP. and BruckerP., Scheduling Algorithms, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
10.
SuleD.R., Production Planning and Industrial Scheduling: Examples, Case Studies, and Applications, CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
11.
van HoekR.I.,
HarrisonA. and ChristopherM., Measuring agile capabilities in the supply chain, International Journal of Operations and Production Management21(1-2) (2001), 126–147.
12.
BeamonB.M., Measuring supply chain performance, International Journal of Operations and Production Management19(3) (1999), 275–292.
13.
SalvadorF., ForzaC., RungtusanathamM. and ChoiT.Y., Supply chain interactions and time-related performances: An operations management perspective, International Journal of Operations and Production Management21(4) (2001), 461–475.
14.
GunasekaranA., PatelC. and McGaugheyR.E., A framework for supply chain performance measurement, International Journal of Production Economics87(3) (2004), 333–347.
15.
BolstorffP. and RosenbaumR.G., Supply Chain Excellence: A Handbook for Dramatic Improvement Using the SCOR Model, AMACOM, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
16.
BhagwatR. and SharmaM.K., Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach, Computers and Industrial Engineering53(1) (2007), 43–62.
17.
HerreraF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research120 (2000), 144–161.
18.
HerreraF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information, Fuzzy Sets and Systems115 (2000), 67–82.
19.
HerreraF., Herrera-ViedmaE. and MartínezL., A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems114 (2000), 43–58.
20.
WeiG.W., A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2-tuple linguistic information, Expert Systems with Applications37(12) (2010), 7895–7900.
21.
WeiG.W., Some harmonic averaging operators with 2-tuple linguistic assessment information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge- Based Systems19(6) (2011), 977–998.
22.
WeiG., Some generalized aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Computers & Industrial Engineering61(1) (2011), 32–38.
23.
XuZ. and YagerR.R., Power-geometric operators and their use in group decision making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems18(1) (2010), 94–105.
24.
YagerR.R., The power average operator, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A31(6) (2001), 724–731.
25.
HeY., HeZ., WangG. and ChenH., Hesitant fuzzy power bonferroni means and their application to multiple attribute decision making, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems23(5) (2015), 1655–1668.
26.
WangL., ShenQ. and ZhuL., Dual hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Appl Soft Comput38 (2016), 23–50.
27.
WeiG., ZhaoX. and LinR., Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems46 (2013), 43–53.
28.
XuY.J. and WangH.M., Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment, Applied Soft Computing Journal11(5) (2011), 3988–3997.
29.
WeiG., Some linguistic power aggregating operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems25 (2013), 695–707.
30.
RanL.-G. and WeiG., Uncertain prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy21(1) (2015), 118–139.
31.
ZhangZ., Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Inf Sci234 (2013), 150–181.
32.
LinR., ZhaoX., WangH. and WeiG., Hesitant fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27 (2014), 49–63.
33.
WeiG. and ZhaoX., Induced hesitant interval-valued fuzzy einstein aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems24 (2013), 789–803.
34.
LiuP.D. and JinF., The multi-attribute group decision making method based on the interval grey linguistic variables, African Journal of Business Management4(17) (2010), 3708–3715.
35.
LiuP.D. and ZhangX., The multi-attribute group decision making method based on the interval grey linguistic variables weighted geometric aggregation operator, Control and Decision26(5) (2011), 743–747.
36.
JinF., LiuP.D. and ZhangX., The multi attribute group decision making method based on the interval grey linguistic variables weighted harmonic aggregation operators, Technological and Economic Development of Economy19(3) (2013), 409–430.
37.
WeiG.W., A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2-tuple linguistic information, Expert Systems with Applications37(12) (2010), 7895–7900.
38.
RuiL., WeiG., WangH. and ZhaoX., Choquet integrals of weighted triangular fuzzy linguistic information and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Business Economics and Management15(5) (2014), 795–809.
39.
YagerR.R. and FilevD.P., Induced ordered weighted averaging operators, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part B29 (1999), 141–150.
40.
XuZ.S. and DaQ.L., An overview of operators for aggregating information, International Journal of Intelligent System18 (2003), 953–969.
41.
ZhangN., Method for aggregating correlated interval grey linguistic variables and its application to decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy19(2) (2013), 189–202.
42.
WeiG., An approach to multiple attribute group decision making with interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy information, Technological and Economic Development of Economy18(2) (2012), 317–330.
43.
WangW.Z. and LiuX.W., Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted averaging operator based on Einstein operation and its application to decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems25(2) (2013), 279–290.
44.
ZhaoX., LiQ. and WeiG., Model for multiple attribute decision making based on the einstein correlated information fusion with hesitant fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(6) (2014), 3057–3064.
45.
ZhaoX. and WeiG., Some intuitionistic fuzzy einstein hybrid aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems37 (2013), 472–479.
