Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-5-23
An approach to evaluating the knowledge innovation ability of new ventures based on knowledge management with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information
Currently, most new ventures are knowledge-based enterprises; moreover, knowledge innovation constitutes the major activities of the enterprises’ production and knowledge management. Therefore, it is of great significance to be able to properly analyze and evaluate a new venture’s knowledge innovation ability. In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute decision making problems with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information. Then, we develop the fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher power weighted geometric (FNIFHPWG) operator. Then, we apply the FNIFHPWG operator to deal with multiple attribute decision making for evaluating the knowledge innovation ability of new ventures based on knowledge management under the fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy environments. Finally, an illustrative example for evaluating the knowledge innovation ability of new ventures based on knowledge management is given to verify the developed approach.
NonakaI., The knowledge-creating company, Harvard Business Review85 (2007), 7–8.
2.
CarrilloP. and ChinowskyP., Exploiting knowledge management: The engineering and construction perspective, Journal of Management in Engineering22 (2006), 2–10.
3.
PetersenB., PedersenT. and LylesM.A., Closing knowledge gaps in foreign markets, Journal of International Business Studies39 (2008), 1097–1113.
4.
SpenderJ.C., Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal17 (1996), 45–62.
5.
KenneyM., Schumpeterian innovation and entrepreneurs in capitalism: A case study of the U.S. biotechnology industry, Research Policy15 (1986), 21–31.
6.
WinterS.G., Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets, Ballinger, 1987.
7.
Javernick-WillA. and LevittR.E., Mobilizing institutional knowledge for international projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management136 (2010), 430–441.
8.
Javernick-WillA. and ScottW.R., Who needs to know what? Institutional knowledge and international projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management136 (2010), 546–557.
9.
LiuF. and YuanX.H., Fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy set, Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics21(1) (2007), 88–91.
10.
WangX.F., Fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy arithmetic aggregation operators, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems10(2) (2008), 104–111.
11.
WangX.F., Fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators and their application to decision making, Control and Decision23(6) (2008), 607–612.
12.
LinR., ZhaoX.F. and WeiG.W., Fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems24 (2013), 879–888.
13.
WanS.-P., WangF., LinL.-L. and DongJ.-Y., Some new generalized aggregation operators for triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making, Computers & Industrial Engineering93 (2016), 286–301.
14.
DongJ.-Y. and WanS.-P., A new method for prioritized multi-criteria group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems30(3) (2016), 1719–1733.
15.
DongJ. and WanS., A new method for multi-attribute group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, Kybernetes45(1) (2016), 158–180.
16.
WeiG.W., Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems17(3) (2015), 484–489.
17.
ZhouS. and ChangW., Approach to multiple attribute decision making based on the Hamacher operation with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27(3) (2014), 1087–1094.
18.
WangY., PengX. and BianJ., Study on the security of information system authentication scheme based on the fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems28(5) (2015), 2225–2232.
19.
HamacharH., Uber logische verknunpfungenn unssharfer Aussagen undderen Zugenhorige Bewertungsfunktione, in:
Tral,
Klir,
Riccardi (Eds.), Progress in Cybernatics and Systems Research, vol. 3, Hemisphere, Washington DC, 1978, pp. 276–288.
20.
RoychowdhuryS. and WangB.H., On generalized Hamacher families of triangular operators, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning19 (1998), 419–439.
21.
ZhouL., ZhaoX. and WeiG., Hesitant fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(6) (2014), 2689–2699.
22.
LiuP., Some hamacher aggregation operators based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems22(1) (2014), 83–97.
23.
XuZ. and YagerR.R., Power-geometric operators and their use in group decision making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems18(1) (2010), 94–105.
24.
YagerR.R., The power average operator, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A31(6) (2001), 724–731.
25.
WeiG., Some linguistic power aggregating operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems25 (2013), 695–707.
26.
RanL.-G. and WeiG., Uncertain prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy21(1) (2015), 118–139.
27.
ZhangZ., Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Inf Sci234 (2013), 150–181.
28.
HeY., HeZ., WangG. and ChenH., Hesitant fuzzy power bonferroni means and their application to multiple attribute decision making, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems23(5) (2015), 1655–1668.
29.
WangL., ShenQ. and ZhuL., Dual hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Appl Soft Comput38 (2016), 23–50.
30.
WeiG., ZhaoX. and LinR., Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems46 (2013), 43–53.
31.
XuY.J. and WangH.M., Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment, Applied Soft Computing Journal11(5) (2011), 3988–3997.
32.
RuiL., WeiG., WangH. and ZhaoX., Choquet integrals of weighted triangular fuzzy linguistic information and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Business Economics and Management15(5) (2014), 795–809.
33.
YagerR.R. and FilevD.P., Induced ordered weighted averaging operators, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part B29 (1999), 141–150.
34.
XuZ.S. and DaQ.L., An overview of operators for aggregating information, International Journal of Intelligent System18 (2003), 953–969.
35.
LinR., ZhaoX., WangH. and WeiG., Hesitant fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27 (2014), 49–63.
36.
WeiG. and ZhaoX., Induced hesitant interval-valued fuzzy einstein aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems24 (2013), 789–803.
37.
ZhangN., Method for aggregating correlated interval grey linguistic variables and its application to decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy19(2) (2013), 189–202.
38.
WeiG., An approach to multiple attribute group decision making with interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy information, Technological and Economic Development of Economy18(2) (2012), 317–330.
39.
LiuP.D. and JinF., The multi-attribute group decision making method based on the interval grey linguistic variables, African Journal of Business Management4(17) (2010), 3708–3715.
40.
LiuP.D. and ZhangX., The multi-attribute group decision making method based on the interval grey linguistic variables weighted geometric aggregation operator, Control and Decision26(5) (2011), 743–747.
41.
JinF., LiuP.D. and ZhangX., The multi attribute group decision making method based on the interval grey linguistic variables weighted harmonic aggregation operators, Technological and Economic Development of Economy19(3) (2013), 409–430.
42.
WeiG.W., A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2-tuple linguistic information, Expert Systems with Applications37(12) (2010), 7895–7900.
43.
HerreraF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information, Fuzzy Sets and Systems115 (2000), 67–82.
44.
HerreraF., Herrera-ViedmaE. and MartínezL., A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems114 (2000), 43–58.
45.
DelgadoM., HerreraF., Herrera-ViedmaE., Martin-BautistaM.J., MartínezL. and VilaM.A., A communication model based on the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation for a distributed intelligent agent system on internet, Soft Computing6 (2002), 320–328.
46.
CordónO., HerreraF. and ZwirI., Linguistic modeling by hierarchical systems of linguistic rules, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems10 (2002), 2–20.
47.
WeiG.W., WangJ.M. and ChenJ., Potential optimality and robust optimality in multiattribute decision analysis with incomplete information: A comparative study, Decision Support Systems55(3) (2013), 679–684.
48.
OuyangY. and PedryczW., A new model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attributes decision making, European Journal of Operational Research249(2) (2016), 677–682.
49.
XuZ.S. and YagerR.R., Intuitionistic fuzzy bonferroni means, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics41 (2011), 568–578.
50.
WeiG.W., GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting, Knowledge-Based Systems23 (2010), 243–247.
51.
WeiG.W., Gray relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 11671–11677.
52.
LiD.F., Mathematical-programming approach to matrix games with payoffs represented by atanassov’s interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Ieee Transactions on Fuzzy Systems18 (2010), 1112–1128.
53.
LiD.F., TOPSIS-Based nonlinear-programming methodology for multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems18 (2010), 299–311.
54.
LiD.F., Closeness coefficient based nonlinear programming method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiattribute decision making with incomplete preference information, Applied Soft Computing11 (2011), 3402–3418.
