A new memetic algorithm named EAMDGA is designed by combining the characteristics of Environmental Adaption Method for Dynamic Environment (EAMD) and Genetic Algorithm (GA). This algorithm is highly efficient and robust in solving the unimodal and multimodal problems. It avoids the problems of getting trapped in local optima and premature convergence. Performance of this algorithm is checked over a group of 24 unimodal and multimodal benchmark functions provided by Black Box Optimization Benchmarking (BBOB-2013). It is found that EAMDGA is superior in performance in comparison to the other algorithms.
TripathiA., et al., Environmental adaption method for dynamic environment, Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 2014.
2.
An environmental adaption method with real parameter encoding for dynamic environment,(in press), Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (2015) (in press).
3.
WundM.A., Assessing the impacts of phenotypic plasticity on evolution, Integrative and Comparative Biology52(1) (2012), 5–15.
4.
MishraK.K., TiwariS. and MisraA.K., A bio inspired algorithm for solving optimization problems. In Computer and Communication Technology (ICCCT), 2011 2nd International Conference on, IEEE, 2011, pp. 653–659.
5.
DavisL., ed., Handbook of genetic algorithms. Vol. 115. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991.
6.
PremalathaK. and NatarajanA.M., Hybrid PSO and GA for global maximization, Int J Open Problems Compt Math2(4) (2009), 597–608.
7.
KaoY.-T. and ZaharaE., A hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for multimodal functions, Applied Soft Computing8(2) (2008), 849–857.
8.
KavehA. and MalakoutiS., Rad, Hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for the force method-based simultaneous analysis and design, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B: Engineering34(B1) (2010), 15–34.
9.
HeQ. and WangL., A hybrid particle swarm optimization with a feasibility-based rule for constrained optimization, Applied Mathematics and Computation186(2) (2007), 1407–1422.
10.
SheikhalishahiM., EbrahimipourV., ShiriH., ZamanH. and JeihoonianM., A hybrid GA–PSO approach for reliability optimization in redundancy allocation problem, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology68(1-4) (2013), 317–338.
11.
HuangH-.C., FPGA-based hybrid GA-PSO algorithm and its application to global path planning for mobile robots, Przeglad Elektrotechniczny88(7B) (2012), 281–284.
12.
ElhaddadY. and OmarS., A new hybrid genetic and simulated annealing algorithm to solve the traveling salesman problem, In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, vol. 1, 2010, pp. 2078–0958.
13.
LoukilL., MehdiM., MelabN., TalbiE. and BouvryP., A parallel hybrid genetic algorithm-simulated annealing for solving Q3AP on computational grid. In Parallel & Distributed Processing, 2009 IPDPS 2009 IEEE International Symposium on, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–8.
14.
NagpureH. and RajaR., RBGCA-Bee Genetic Colony Algorithm for Travelling Salesman Problem.
15.
KumarS., SharmaV.K. and KumariR., A novel hybrid crossover based artificial bee colony algorithm for optimization problem, International Journal of Computer Applications82(8) (2013), 18–25.
16.
El-AbdM. and KamelM.S., Black-box optimization benchmarking for noiseless function testbed using an EDA and PSO hybrid. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference: Late Breaking Papers ACM, 2009.
17.
García-NietoJ., AlbaE. and ApolloniJ., Noiseless functions black-box optimization: Evaluation of a hybrid particle swarm with differential operators. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference: Late Breaking Papers ACM, 2009.
18.
LiuC. and BinL., Memetic algorithm with adaptive local search depth for large scale global optimization. 2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) IEEE, 2014.
19.
VoglisC., Adapt-MEMPSODE: A memetic algorithm with adaptive selection of local searches. Proceedings of the 15th annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary computation ACM, 2013.
20.
NalepaJ., Adaptive memetic algorithm for the vehicle routing problem with time windows. Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation ACM, 2014.
FinckS., HansenN., RosR. and AugerA., Real-parameter black-box optimization benchmarking: Presentation of the noiseless functions. Technical Report 2009/20, Research Center PPE, 2009. Updated February.
25.
FinckS., HansenN., RosR. and AugerA., Real-parameter black-box optimization benchmarking 2010: Presentation of the noisy functions. Technical Report 2009/21, Research Center PPE2010.
26.
ShetaA.F., Estimation of the COCOMO model parameters using genetic algorithms for NASA software projects, Journal of Computer Science2(2) (2006), 118.
27.
TadayonN., Neural network approach for software cost estimation. Information Technology: Coding and Computing, 2005 ITCC 2005 International Conference on, Vol. 2. IEEE, 2005.
28.
KumarS., Ananda KrishnaB. and SatsangiP.S., Fuzzy systems and neural networks in software engineering project management, Applied Intelligence4(1) (1994), 31–52.
29.
AlaaF.S. and Al-AfeefA., A GP effort estimation model utilizing line of code and methodology for NASA software projects, Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA), 2010 10th International Conference on IEEE, 2010.
30.
BaileyJ.W. and BasiliV.R., A meta-model for software development resource expenditures, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Software Engineering IEEE Press, 1981.
31.
LiY.-F., XieM. and GohT.N., A study of project selection and feature weighting for analogy based software cost estimation, Journal of Systems and Software82(2) (2009), 241–252.
32.
FossT., et al., A simulation study of the model evaluation criterion MMRE, Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on29(11) (2003), 985–995.
33.
SinghB.K., et al., Effect of Variations in Measurement Process for Software Development Efforts. Multimedia, Computer Graphics and Broadcasting (MulGraB), 2014 6th International Conference on, IEEE, 2014.
KemererC.F., An empirical validation of software cost estimation models, Communications of the ACM30(5) (1987), 416–429.
36.
SharmaN., SinhalA. and VermaB., Software assessment parameter optimization using genetic algorithm, International Journal of Computer Applications72(7) (2013), 8–13.
