Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-12
Hesitant fuzzy linguistic TOPSIS method using a possibility-based comparison approach for multi-criteria decision-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets
The purpose of this study is to develop a hesitant fuzzy linguistic TOPSIS (The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) method with a possibility-based comparison approach for addressing multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems within the environment of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs). This paper firstly analyses the existing comparison methods for HFLTSs and develops a new possibility degree formula which can address the issues in the previous ones. Then, based on the possibilities of the HFLTS binary relations, this paper defines the possibility-based outranking index to determine hesitant fuzzy linguistic positive ideal and negative ideal solutions. Subsequently, this paper introduces the concept of possibility-based comparison indices to establish a possibility-based closeness coefficient of each alternative relative to the ideal solutions. Based on a possibility-based comparison approach with the ideal solutions, this paper develops a hesitant fuzzy linguistic TOPSIS method for handling MCDM problems in which both the evaluative ratings of alternatives and the importance weights of criteria are expressed by HFLTSs. Finally, a numerical example is furnished to verify the feasibility and practicality of the proposed method and a comparative analysis with the existing methods is provided to illustrate the effectiveness and advantages of the proposed method.
BegI. and RashidT., TOPSIS for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems28 (2013), 1162–1171.
2.
ChenT.Y., The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision making, Applied Soft Computing26 (2015), 57–73.
3.
ChenT.Y., An interval type-2 fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions using a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis, Computers & Industrial Engineering85 (2015), 57–72.
4.
ChenS.-M. and LeeL.-W., Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Expert Systems with Applications37(1) (2010), 824–833.
5.
DongY., XuY. and YuS., Computing the numerical scale of the linguistic term set for the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems17 (2009), 1366–1378.
6.
HerreraF. and MartínezL., A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems8 (2000), 746–752.
7.
HwangC.L. and YoonK., Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 1981.
8.
LeeL.-W. and ChenS.-M., Fuzzy decision making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, in: ACIIDS, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 21–30.
9.
LeeL.-W. and ChenS.-M., Fuzzy decision making based on possibility-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and hesitant fuzzy linguistic operators, Information Sciences294 (2015), 513–529.
10.
LiD.F., Multiattribute group decision making method using extended linguistic variables, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems17(6) (2009), 793–806.
11.
LiaoH.C. and XuZ.S., Approaches to manage hesitant fuzzy linguistic information based on the cosine distance and similarity measures for HFLTSs and their application in qualitative decision making, Expert Systems with Applications42 (2015), 5328–5336.
12.
LiaoH.C., XuZ.S. and ZengX.J., Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making, Information Sciences271 (2014), 125–142.
13.
LiaoH.C., XuZ.S. and ZengX.J., Hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems23(5) (2015), 1343–1355.
14.
LiaoH.C., XuZ.S., ZengX.J. and MerigóJ.M., Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Knowledge-Based Systems76 (2015), 127–138.
15.
LinR., ZhaoX.F., WangH.J. and WeiG.W., Hesitant fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27 (2014), 49–63.
16.
LinR., ZhaoX.F. and WeiG.W., Models for selecting an ERP system with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(5) (2014), 2155–2165.
17.
LiuH. and RodriguezR.M., A fuzzy envelop for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making, Information Sciences258 (2014), 220–238.
18.
MartínezL. and HerreraF., An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: Extensions, applications and challenges, Information Sciences207 (2012), 1–18.
19.
MengF.Y. and ChenX.H., A hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-granularity decision making model based on distance measures, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems28 (2015), 1519–1531.
20.
MengF.Y., ChenX.H. and ZhangQ., Multi-attribute decision analysis under a linguistic hesitant fuzzy environment, Information Sciences267 (2014), 287–305.
21.
MengF.Y. and ChenX.H., Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their application based on fuzzy measures, Cognitive Computation7 (2015), 445–463.
22.
MengF.Y. and ChenX.H., An approach to interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making with incomplete weight information based on hybrid Shapley operators, Informatica25 (2014), 617–642.
23.
MerigóJ.M. and Gil-LafuenteA.M., Induced 2-tuple linguistic generalized aggregation operators and their application in decision-making, Information Sciences236 (2013), 1–16.
24.
MillerG.A., The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limitations on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review63 (1956), 81–97.
25.
PengH.G., WangJ.-Q., Hesitant uncertain linguistic Z-numbers and their application in multi-criteria group decision-making problems, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems (2016). DOI: 10.1007/s40815-016-0257-y
26.
PengJ.-J., WangJ.-Q. and WuX.-H., An extension of the ELECTRE approach with multi-valued neutrosophic information, Neural Computing and Applications (2016). DOI: 10.1007/s00521-016-2411-8
27.
PengJ.-J., WangJ.-Q. and YangW.-E., A multi-valued neutrosophic qualitative flexible approach based on likelihood for multi-criteria decision-making problems, International Journal of Systems Science48(2) (2017), 425–435.
28.
RodríguezR.M., MartínezL. and HerreraF., Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems20(1) (2012), 109–119.
29.
RodriguezR.M., MartinezL. and HerreraF., A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Information Sciences241 (2013), 28–42.
30.
TorraV., Hesitant fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems25 (2010), 529–539.
31.
TürksenI.B., Type 2 representation and reasoning for CWW, Fuzzy Sets and Systems127 (2002), 17–36.
32.
WangJ.H. and HaoJ., A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems14 (2006), 435–445.
33.
WangJ.-Q., KuangJ.-J., WangJ. and ZhangH.-Y., An extended outranking approach to rough stochastic multi-criteria decision-making problems, Cognitive Computation (2016). Doi: 10.1007/s12559-016-9417-5
34.
WangJ.-Q., WangJ., ChenQ.-H., ZhangH.-Y. and ChenX.-H., An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Information Sciences280 (2014), 338–351.
35.
WangJ., WangJ.-Q. and ZhangH.-Y., A likelihood-based TODIM approach based on multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic information for evaluation in logistics outsourcing, Computers & Industrial Engineering99 (2016), 287–299.
36.
WeiG.W., Interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics7(6) (2016), 1093–1114.
37.
WeiG.W., AlsaadiF.E., HayatT. and AlsaediA., Hesitant fuzzy linguistic arithmetic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems13(4) (2016), 1–16.
38.
WeiC.P., ZhaoN. and TangX.J., Operators and comparisons of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems21(3) (2013), 510–515.
39.
YuS.-M., WangJ. and WangJ.-Q., An interval type-2 fuzzy likelihood-based MABAC approach and its application in selecting hotels on the tourism website, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems (2016). DOI: 10.1007/s40815-016-0217-6
40.
ZadehL.A., The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning–I, Information Sciences8 (1975), 199–249.
41.
ZhangF.Y., LuoL., LiaoH.C., ZhuT., ShiY.K. and ShenW.W., Inpatient admission assessment in West China Hospital based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems30(6) (2016), 3143–3154.
42.
ZhouH., WangJ.-Q. and ZhangH.-Y., Multi-criteria decision-making approaches based on distance measures for linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets, Journal of the Operational Research Society (2016). doi: 10.1057/jors.2016.41
43.
ZhuB. and XuZ.S., Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems22 (2014), 35–45.
