Supply chain finance is a new financing model that makes the industry chain as an organic whole chain to develop financing services. Its purpose is to combine with financial institutions, companies and third-party logistics companies to achieve win-win situation. The supply chain is designed to maximize the financial value. The supply chain finance business in our country is still in its early stages. Conducting the research on risk assessment and control of the supply chain finance business has an important significance for the promotion of the development of our country supply chain finance business. The paper investigates the dynamic multiple attribute decision making problems, in which the decision information, provided by decision makers at different periods, is expressed in intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. We first develop one new aggregation operators called dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher weighted averaging (DIFHWA) operator. Moreover, a procedure based on the DIFHWA and IFHWA operators is developed to solve the dynamic multiple attribute decision making problems where all the decision information about attribute values takes the form of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers collected at different periods. Finally, an illustrative example for risk assessment of supply chain finance is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.
de CastilhoB. and DaganzoC.F., Optimal pricing policies for temporary storage at ports, Transportation Research Record1313 (1991), 66–74.
2.
KimK.H. and KimK.Y., Optimal price schedules for storage of inbound containers, Transportation Research B: Methodological41(8) (2007), 892–905.
3.
LeeC.-Y. and YuM., Inbound container storage price competition between the container terminal and a remote container yard,}}, Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal24(3) (2012), 320–348.
4.
Holguín-VerasJ. and Jara-DíazS., Optimal pricing for priority service and space allocation in container ports, Transportation Research B: Methodological33(2) (1998), 81–106.
5.
Holguín-VerasJ. and Jara-DíazS., Preliminary insights into optimal pricing and space allocation at intermodal terminals with elastic arrivals and capacity constraint, Networks and Spatial Economics6(1) (2006), 25–38.
6.
SauríS., SerraJ. and MartínE., Evaluating pricing strategies for storage in import container terminals, Transportation Research Record2238 (2011), 1–7.
7.
WatanabeI., Container Terminal Planning: A Theoretical Approach, World Cargo News (WCN), Great Britain, UK, 2001.
8.
LeeC.-Y. and YuM., Inbound container storage price competition between the container terminal and a remote yard, Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal24(3) (2012), 320–348.
9.
PfohlH.-C. and GommM., Supply chain finance: Optimizing financial flows in supply chains, Logistics Research1(3-4) (2009), 149–161.
10.
O’LearyD.E., The use of social media in the supply chain, Survey and extensions, Int Syst in Accounting, Finance and Management18(2-3) (2011), 121–144.
11.
JingB. and SeidmannA., Finance sourcing in a supply chain, Decision Support Systems58 (2014), 15–20.
12.
ZhaoX., YeungK.H., HuangQ. and SongX., Improving the predictability of business failure of supply chain finance clients by using external big dataset, Industrial Management and Data Systems115(9) (2015), 1683–1703.
13.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control8 (1965), 338–356.
14.
AtanassovK., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,, Fuzzy Sets and Systems20 (1986), 87–96.
15.
AtanassovK., More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems33 (1989), 37–46.
16.
ChenS.M. and TanJ.M., Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory, Fuzzy Sets Systems67 (1994), 163–172.
17.
HongD.H. and ChoiC.H., Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory, Fuzzy Sets Systems114 (2000), 103–113.
XuZ.S. and YagerR.R., Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning48(1) (2008), 246–262.
20.
WeiG.W., Some geometric aggregation functions and their application to dynamic multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge- Based Systems17(2) (2009), 179–196.
21.
HeL. and TengH., GRA model for dynamic hybrid multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems27(2) (2014), 1067–1075.
22.
XuZ.S. and YagerR.R., Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of General Systems35 (2006), 417–433.
23.
WeiG.W., Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making, Applied Soft Computing10(2) (2010), 423–431.
24.
XuZ.S., Models for multiple attribute decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy information, International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems15 (2007), 285–297.
25.
XuZ.S., Multi-person multi-attribute decision making models under intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making6 (2007), 221–236.
26.
WeiG.W., Gray relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 11671–11677.
27.
ZhouL. and WuW.Z., On generalized intuitionistic fuzzy rough approximation operators, Information Sciences178 (2008), 2448–2465.
28.
XuK., ZhouJ.Z., GuR. and QinH., Approach for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and its application to reservoir operation, Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 9032–9035.
29.
XuY.J., HuangC., DaQ.L. and LiuX.W., Linear goal programming approach to obtaining the weights of intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted averaging operator, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics21 (2010), 990–994.
30.
WeiG., Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems17(3) (2015), 484–489.
31.
WeiG.W. and ZhaoX.F., Induced hesitant interval-valued fuzzy einstein aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems24 (2013), 789–803.
32.
ChenT.Y. and LiC.H., Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: A comparative analysis, Information Sciences180 (2010), 4207–4222.
33.
ChenT.Y., WangH.P. and LuY.Y., A multicriteria group decision-making approach based on Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: A comparative perspective, Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 7647–7658.
34.
ZhaoX., LinR. and WeiG., Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation based on einstein operations and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Expert Systems with Applications41(4) (2014), 1086–1094.
35.
WeiG.W., ZhaoX.F. and LinR., Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems46 (2013), 43–53.
36.
HuangJ.-Y., Intuitionistic fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems27(1) (2014), 505–513.
37.
WangW. and LiuX., Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using einstein operations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems20(5) (2012), 923–938.
38.
WeiG., LinR., ZhaoX. and WangH., An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on the induced choquet integral with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information, Journal of Business Economics and Management15(2) (2014), 277–298.
39.
WangW.Z. and LiuX.W., Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators based on Einstein operations, International Journal of Intelligent Systems26 (2011), 1049–1075.
40.
RanL.-G. and WeiG., Uncertain prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy21(1) (2015), 118–139.
RuiL., WeiG., WangH. and ZhaoX., Choquet integrals of weighted triangular fuzzy linguistic information and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, of Business Economics and Management, Journal15(5) (2014), 795–809.
43.
MerigoJ.M., CasanovasM. and LiuP.D., Decision making with fuzzy induced heavy ordered weighted averaging operators, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems16(3) (2014), 277–289.
44.
MengF.Y., ChenX.H. and ZhangQ., Generalized hesitant fuzzy generalized shapley-choquet integral operators and their application in decision making, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems16(3) (2014), 400–410.
45.
JiangX.-P. and WeiG.-W., Some bonferroni mean operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27 (2014), 2153–2162.
46.
MerigóJ.M. and Gil-LafuenteA.M., The induced generalized OWA operator, Information Sciences179 (2009), 729–741.
47.
MerigóJ.M. and CasanovasM., Induced aggregation operators in decision making with the Dempster-Shafer belief structure, International Journal of Intelligent Systems24 (2009), 934–954.
48.
WeiG., ZhaoX. and LinR., Some hybrid aggregating operators in linguistic decision making with Dempster-Shafer belief structure, Computers & Industrial Engineering65 (2013), 646–651.
49.
YeJ., Fuzzy cross entropy of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its optimal decision-making method based on the weights of alternatives, Expert Systems with Applications38(5) (2011), 6179–6183.
50.
WeiG.W., WangJ.M. and ChenJ., Potential optimality and robust optimality in multiattribute decision analysis with incomplete information: A comparative study, Support Systems, Decision55(3) (2013), 679–684.
51.
WangZ.-J., Derivation of intuitionistic fuzzy weights based on intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, Applied Mathematical Modelling37(9) (2013), 6377–6388.
52.
WeiG. and ZhangN., A multiple criteria hesitant fuzzy decision making with Shapley value-based VIKOR method, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(2) (2014), 1065–1075.
