Since China’s adoption of reform and open-up policy in 1978, Jiangsu Province has achieved a fast economic development, with the average annual increasement rate of GDP per capita at 11.3% (counted with comparative price). In this process, the role of infrastructure in pushing the economic growth receives great attention. Study on the pushing effect of infrastructure on the economic growth will help the stipulation of proper infrastructure development strategy, so as to push forward economy and narrow the regional gap. In this paper, we investigates the comprehensive evaluation problems of regional economy development level in Jiangsu Province with 2-tuple linguistic information. Then we propose dependent 2-tuple linguistic Maclaurin symmetric mean (D2TLMSM) operator and then apply D2TLMSM operator for evaluating the regional economy development level in Jiangsu Province with 2-tuple linguistic information. At last, a practical example is proposed to test the effectiveness of the given method.
Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information, Knowledge-Based Systems23(2) (2010), 169–181.
2.
HerreraF., MartínezL. and SánchezP.J., Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making, European Journal of Operational Research166(1) (2005), 115–132.
3.
Herrera-ViedmaE., MartinezL., MataF. and ChiclanaF., A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems13 (2005), 644–658.
4.
HerreraF., Herrera-ViedmaE. and MartínezL., A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems16(2) (2008), 354–370.
5.
Herrera-ViedmaE. and Lopez-HerreraA.G., A review on information accessing systems based on fuzzy linguistic modelling, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems3 (2010), 420–437.
6.
HerreraF. and MartinezL., A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems8 (2000), 746–752.
7.
HerreraF. and MartinezL., A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranularity hierarchical linguistic contexts in multiexpert decision-making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics31(2) (2001), 227–234.
8.
WeiG.W., Extension of TOPSIS method for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information, Knowledge and Information Systems25 (2010), 623–634.
9.
WeiG.W., Grey relational analysis method for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information, Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 4824–4828.
10.
WeiG.W., LinR., ZhaoX.F. and WangH.J., Models for multiple attribute group decision making with 2-tuple linguistic assessment information, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems3 (2010), 315–324.
11.
WeiG.W., Some harmonic averaging operators with 2-tuple linguistic assessment information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge- Based Systems19(6) (2011), 977–998.
12.
MerigoJ.M., Gil-LafuenteA.M., ZhouL.G. and ChenH.Y., Generalization of the linguistic aggregation operator and its application in decision making, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics22 (2011), 593–603.
13.
MerigóJ.M., CasanovasM. and MartínezL., Linguistic aggregation operators for linguistic decision making based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of Evidence, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems18(3) (2010), 287–304.
14.
WeiG., Some generalized aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Computers & Industrial Engineering61(1) (2011), 32–38.
15.
WeiG., Some linguistic power aggregating operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems25 (2013), 695–707.
16.
MerigoJ.M. and CasanovasM., Decision making with distance measures and linguistic aggregation operators, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems12 (2010), 190–198.
17.
JiangX.-P. and WeiG.-W., Some Bonferroni mean operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27 (2014), 2153–2162.
18.
LiaoX.W., LiY. and LuB., A model for selecting an ERP system based on linguistic information processing, Information Systems32 (2007), 1005–1017.
19.
ZhouS.H., ChangW.B. and XiongZ.J., Risk assessment model with 2-tuple temporal linguistic variable. Shanghai, China: Trans Tech Publications, 2011, pp. 2540–2545.
20.
LiD.F., Multiattribute group decision making method using extended linguistic variables, International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems17 (2009), 793–806.
21.
XuY.J. and WangH.M., Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment, Applied Soft Computing11(5) (2011), 3988–3997.
22.
ZhangZ. and GuoC.H., A method for multi-granularity uncertain linguistic group decision making with incomplete weight information, Knowledge-based Systems26 (2012), 111–119.
23.
LiuP.D., A novel method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-based Systems22(5) (2009), 388–391.
24.
WeiG.W., Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems17(3) (2015), 484–489.
25.
MorenoJ.M., del CastilloJ.M.M., PorcelC. and Herrera-ViedmaE., A quality evaluation methodology for health-related websites based on a 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach, Soft Computing14 (2010), 887–897.
26.
ZhouL.G. and ChenH.Y., A generalization of the power aggregation operators for linguistic environment and its application in group decision making, Knowledge-based Systems26 (2012), 216–224.
27.
RanL.-G. and WeiG., Uncertain prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy21(1) (2015), 118–139.
28.
WeiG.W., Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems, Journal of Business Economics and Management17(4) (2016), 491–502.
29.
MaclaurinC., A second letter toMartin Folkes, Esq.; concerning the roots of equations, with demonstration of other rules of algebra, Philos Trans Roy Soc London Ser A36 (1729), 59–96.
30.
ZhangZ., WeiF. and ZhouS., Approaches to comprehensive evaluation with 2-tuple linguistic information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems28(1) (2015), 469–475.
31.
WeiG. and ZhaoX., Some dependent aggregation operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Expert Systems with Applications39 (2012), 5881–5886.
32.
BenyounesA., HafaifaA., GuemanaM. and TurbineG., Modeling based on fuzzy clustering algorithm using experimental data, Applied Artificial Intelligence30(1) (2016), 29–51.
33.
ZhouL., LinR., ZhaoX. and WeiG., Uncertain linguistic prioritized aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems21(4) (2013), 603–627.
34.
XuJ., WangZ., TanC. and LiuX.-H., A state recognition approach for complex equipment based on a fuzzy probabilistic neural network, Algorithms9(2) (2016), 34–44.
35.
LinG., ZhaoK. and WanQ., Takagi-sugeno fuzzy model identification using coevolution particle swarm optimization with multi-strategy, Appl Intell45(1) (2016), 187–197.
36.
WangL., ShenQ. and ZhuL., Dual hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Appl Soft Comput38 (2016), 23–50.
37.
ZhaoX., LiQ. and WeiG., Some prioritized aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(4) (2014), 1619–1630.
38.
RuiL., WeiG., WangH. and ZhaoX., Choquet integrals of weighted triangular fuzzy linguistic information and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Business Economics and Management15(5) (2014), 795–809.
39.
HeidarzadeA., MahdaviI. and Mahdavi-AmiriN., Supplier selection using a clustering method based on a new distance for interval type-2 fuzzy sets: A case study, Appl Soft Comput38 (2016), 213–231.
40.
WeiG., LinR., ZhaoX. and WangH., An Approach to multiple attribute decision making based on the induced Choquet integral with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information, Journal of Business Economics and Management15(2) (2014), 277–298.
41.
Olvera-GarcíaM.Á., HernándezJ.J.C., FernándezL.P.S. and Hernández-BautistaI., Air quality assessment using a weighted fuzzy inference system, Ecological Informatics33 (2016), 57–74.
42.
GuptaM. and MohantyB.K., An algorithmic approach to group decision making problems under fuzzy and dynamic environment, Expert Syst Appl55 (2016), 118–132.
43.
ZhaoN., XuZ. and RenZ., On typical hesitant fuzzy prioritized “or” operator in multi-attribute decision making, Int J Intell Syst31(1) (2016), 73–100.
44.
WangH. and XuZ., Admissible orders of typical hesitant fuzzy elements and their application in ordered information fusion in multi-criteria decision making, Information Fusion29 (2016), 98–104.
45.
GouX., XuZ. and LeiQ., New operational laws and aggregation method of intuitionistic fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems30(1) (2016), 129–141.
46.
LiuH., XuZ. and LiaoH., The multiplicative consistency index of hesitant fuzzy preference relation, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems24(1) (2016), 82–93.
