Along with the quick development of economic, the corporeal civilization has been elevated enormously. At the same time, the resource was decreased increasingly, and the environment that the human lived on faced threaten. Since 20th90, the “green tidal wave” has been risen all over the world. The green revolution that aimed at sustainable development was very flourish, which has influenced various domains, including supply chain management. The green supply chain management (GSCM) was imperative under the situation. During the operation of GSCM, the core manufacture with strength and foresight played an important role. In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute decision making for green supplier selection with hesitant fuzzy information. Inspired by the power aggregation, we propose the hesitant fuzzy Hamacher power weighted average (HFHPWA) operator and then utilize this operator to solve the multiple attribute decision making for green supplier selection with hesitant fuzzy information. In the end, an example of green supplier selection is proposed to testify our method.
ByunD.-H., The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model, Information and Management38(5) (2001), 289–297.
2.
MuralidharanC., AnantharamanN. and DeshmukhS.G., A multi-criteria group decisionmaking model for supplier rating, The Journal of Supply Chain Management38(4) (2002), 22–33.
3.
ZhangZ., LeiJ., CaoN., ToK. and NgK., Evolution of supplier selection criteria and methods, European Journal of Operational Research4(1) (2003), 335–342.
4.
DulminR. and MininnoV., Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management9(4) (2003), 177–187.
5.
OhdarR. and RayP.K., Performance measurement and evaluation of suppliers in supply chain: An evolutionary fuzzy-based aroach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management15(8) (2004), 723–734 .
6.
Venkata SubbaiahK. and
Narayana RaoK., Supplier selection in supply chain management through AHP, in Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference of the Society of Operations Management, Mumbai, India, 2004, pp. 72–80.
7.
EnyindaC.I., DunuE. and GebremikaelF., An analysis of strategic supplier selection and evaluation in a generic pharmaceutical firm supply chain, in Proceedings of the ASBBS Annual Conference, vol. 17, Las Vegas, USA, 2010, pp. 77–91.
8.
ElanchezhianC., Vijaya RamnathB. and
KesavanR., Vendor evaluation using multi criteria decision making, International Journal of Computer Applications5(9) (2010), 4–9.
9.
KumarJ. and RoyN., A hybrid method for vendor selection using neural network, International Journal of Computer Applications11(12) (2010), 35–40.
10.
YücelA. and GüneriA.F., A weighted additive fuzzy programming approach for multi-criteria supplier selection, Expert Systems with Applications38(5) (2011), 6281–6286.
11.
YangJ. and JiangH., Fuzzy evaluation on supply chains’ overall performance based on AHM and M(1,2,3), Journal of Software7(12) (2012), 2779–2786.
12.
AbbasiM., HosnaviR. and TabriziB., An integrated structure for supplier selection and configuration of knowledge-based networks using QFD, ANP, and mixed-integer programming model, Journal of Industrial Engineering2013 (2013), 8. Article ID 407573.
13.
GalankashiM.R., MoazzamiA., MadadiN., RoudsariA.H. and HelmiS.A., Supplier selection for electrical manufacturing companies based on different supply chain strategies, International Journal of Technology Innovations and Research (2013), 1–13.
14.
XuZ.S. and XiaM., On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information, International Journal of Intelligence Systems26(5) (2011), 410–425.
15.
XuZ.S. and XiaM., Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets, Information Sciences181(11) (2011), 2128–2138.
16.
LiX. and WeiG., GRA method for multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information under hesitant fuzzy setting, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27 (2014), 1095–1105.
17.
WangH. and XuZ., Admissible orders of typical hesitant fuzzy elements and their application in ordered information fusion in multi-criteria decision making, Information Fusion29 (2016), 98–104.
18.
ZhaoX., LinR. and WeiG., Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation based on einstein operations and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Expert Systems with Applications41(4) (2014), 1086–1094.
19.
RodríguezR.M., BedregalB.R.C., BustinceH., DongY., FarhadiniaB., KahramanC., Martínez-LópezL., TorraV., XuY.J., XuZ. and HerreraF., A position and perspective analysis of hesitant fuzzy sets on information fusion in decision making. Towards high quality progress, Information Fusion29 (2016), 89–97.
20.
WeiG.W., ZhaoX.F., WangH.J. and LinR., Hesitant fuzzy choquet integral aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, Information: An International Interdisciplinary Journal15(2) (2012), 441–448.
21.
KahramanC., ÖztaysiB. and
OnarS.Ç., A multicriteria supplier selection model using hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing26(3-5) (2016), 315–333.
22.
WeiG.W., Hesitant Fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems31 (2012), 176–182.
23.
HuJ., XiaoK., ChenX. and LiuY., Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy set and its application in multi-criteria decision making, Computers & Industrial Engineering87 (2015), 91–103.
24.
WeiG.W., ZhaoX.F. and LinR., Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems46 (2013), 43–53.
25.
García-LaprestaJ.L. and Pérez-RománD., Consensus-based clustering under hesitant qualitative assessments, Fuzzy Sets and Systems292 (2016), 261–273.
26.
WeiG.W. and ZhaoX.F., Induced hesitant interval-valued fuzzy einstein aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems24 (2013), 789–803.
27.
WuZ. and XuJ., Possibility distribution-based approach for MAGDM with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information, IEEE Trans Cybernetics46(3) (2016), 694–705.
28.
ZhangN. and WeiG.W., Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set, Applied Mathematical Modelling37 (2013), 4938–4947.
29.
TorraV., Hesitant fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems25 (2010), 529–539.
30.
XiaM. and XuZ.S., Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning52(3) (2011), 395–407.
31.
ZhouL., ZhaoX. and WeiG., Hesitant fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(6) (2014), 2689–2699.
32.
HamacharH., Uber logische verknunpfungenn unssharfer Aussagen undderen Zugenhorige Bewertungsfunktione, in:
Trappl,
Klir,
Riccardi (Eds.), Progress in Cybernatics and systems research, vol. 3, Hemisphere, Washington DC, 1978, pp. 276–288.
33.
RoychowdhuryS. and WangB.H., On generalized Hamacher families of triangular operators, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning19 (1998), 419–439.
34.
ZhouL., ZhaoX. and WeiG., Hesitant fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(6) (2014), 2689–2699.
35.
LiuP., Some hamacher aggregation operators based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems22(1) (2014), 83–97.
36.
ZhouS. and ChangW., Approach to multiple attribute decision making based on the Hamacher operation with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27(3) (2014), 1087–1094.
37.
GálL., LovassyR., RudasI.J. and KóczyL.T., Learning the optimal parameter of the Hamacher t-norm applied for fuzzy-rule-based model extraction, Neural Computing and Applications24(1) (2014), 133–142.
38.
YagerR.R., The power average operator, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A31(6) (2001), 724–731.
39.
ZhangZ., Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Inf Sci234 (2013), 150–181.
40.
WeiG.W., Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems, Journal of Business Economics and Management17(4) (2016), 491–502.
41.
WangL., ShenQ. and ZhuL., Dual hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Appl Soft Comput38 (2016), 23–50.
42.
WeiG., Some linguistic power aggregating operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems25 (2013), 695–707.
43.
WeiG., ZhaoX. and LinR., Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems46 (2013), 43–53.
44.
Expósito-IzquieroC., Lalla-RuizE., LamataT., Melián-BatistaB. and Moreno-VegaJ.M., Fuzzy optimization models for seaside port logistics: Berthing and quay crane scheduling, in Computational Intelligence: Revised and Selected Papers of the International Joint Conference, IJCCI 2013, Vilamoura, Portugal, September 20–22, 2013, vol. 613 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2016, pp. 323–343.
45.
WeiG. and ZhaoX., Some dependent aggregation operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Expert Systems with Applications39 (2012), 5881–5886.
46.
YuenK. and LauH., Software vendor selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with ISO/IEC, IAENG International Journal of Computer Science35(3) (2008), 267–274.
47.
TianS.-F., ZhouS.-W., JiangW.-Y. and ZhangH.-Q., Analytic solutions, Darboux transformation operators and supersymmetry for a generalized one-dimensional time-dependent Schrödinger equation, Applied Mathematics and Computation218(13) (2012), 7308–7321.
48.
SuZ.X., ChenM.Y., XiaG.P. and WangL., An interactive method for dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making, Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 15286–15295.
49.
WeiG., Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems17(3) (2015), 484–489.
50.
TongS.-C., HeX.-L. and ZhangH.-G., A combined backstepping and small-gain approach to robust adaptive fuzzy output feedback control, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems17(5) (2009), 1059–1069.
51.
RanL.-G. and WeiG., Uncertain prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy21(1) (2015), 118–139.
52.
WeiG., LinR., ZhaoX. and WangH., An Approach to multiple attribute decision making based on the induced Choquet integral with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information, Journal of Business Economics and Management15(2) (2014), 277–298.
53.
Ranjbar-SahraeiB., ShabaniniaF., NematiA. and StanS.-D., A novel robust decentralized adaptive fuzzy control for swarm formation of multiagent systems, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics59(8) (2012), 3124–3134.
54.
LiuY.-J. and TongS., Adaptive fuzzy control for a class of nonlinear discrete-time systems with backlash, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems22(5) (2014), 1359–1365.
55.
ShenF., XuJ. and XuZ., An outranking sorting method for multi-criteria group decision making using intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Information Sciences334-335 (2016), 338–353.
