IoT-enabled smart farming with Industry 5.0

Abstract

Due to increasing advancements in the field of technology the agricultural sector is experiencing a drastic change, this paradigm shift is the result of integrating technologies like Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Remote Sensing. The integration of these technologies helps in multiple aspects such as IoT sensors help in real-time data monitoring which includes parameters such as soil conditions, meteorological aspects„the valuable insights about overall crop health, and also help in promoting informed decision-making in agriculture. Cognitive systems of Industry 5.0, revolutionize manufacturing processes, enabling predictive maintenance, real-time data analyses, and autonomous decision-making for increased production efficiency. Implementing digital twin technology further boosts this transformation process by creating dynamic representations of agricultural systems. Digital twins simplify complex interactions for farmers by integrating data obtained from diverse sources. This paper explores the relationship between Industry 5.0, smart farming practices, implementation of the latest techniques like IoT, and digital twins, understanding their impact on precision agriculture, sustainable farming, and efficiency. In conclusion, this study demonstrates how Industry 5.0 technologies, including digital twin technology, possess the potential to revolutionize agricultural operations, enhance crop yields, foster sustainability, and prepare agriculture for the challenges of a rapidly changing global environment.

Keywords

Smart farming Industry 5.0 cognitive and intelligent systems Internet of Things (IoT)precision agriculture digital twin technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aggarwal,

S.K.

Singh,

Chopra,

Kumar and

Colace, Deep learning in robotics for strengthening industry 5.0.: Opportunities, challenges and future directions, in: Robotics and AI for Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure in Smart Cities, 2022, pp. 1–19.

Al-Qerem ,

Alauthman ,

Almomani et al., IoT transaction processing through cooperative concurrency control on fog–cloud computing environment, Soft Computing 24 (2020), 5695–5711. doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04220-y.

R.G.

Alves,

Souza,

R.F.

Maia,

A.L.H.

Tran,

Kamienski,

J.P.

Soininen et al., A digital twin for smart farming, in: 2019 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–4.

Amiri-Zarandi ,

Hazrati Fard ,

Yousefinaghani ,

Kaviani and

Dara , A platform approach to smart farm information processing, Agriculture 12(6) (2022), 838. doi:10.3390/agriculture12060838.

Angin ,

M.H.

Anisi ,

Göksel ,

Gürsoy and

Büyükgülcü , AgriLoRa: A digital twin framework for smart agriculture, J. Wirel. Mob. Networks Ubiquitous Comput. Dependable Appl. 11(4) (2020), 77–96.

Atzori ,

Iera and

Morabito , The Internet of things: A survey, Computer networks 54(15) (2010), 2787–2805. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010.

S.A.

Bhat and

N.F.

Huang , Big data and ai revolution in precision agriculture: Survey and challenges, IEEE Access 9 (2021), 110209–110222. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3102227.

Cai and

Zhu , The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era, Data science journal 14 (2015), 2–2. doi:10.5334/dsj-2015-002.

Cambra Baseca ,

Sendra ,

Lloret and

Tomas , A smart decision system for digital farming, Agronomy 9(5) (2019), 216. doi:10.3390/agronomy9050216.

10.

Chopra ,

Kumar ,

Madan and

Sharma , December. Influence and establishment of smart transport in smart cities, in: International Conference on Smart Systems and Advanced Computing (Syscom-2021), 2021.

11.

Chopra,

S.K.

Singh,

Aggarwal and

Gupta, Predicting catastrophic events using machine learning models for natural language processing, in: Data Mining Approaches for Big Data and Sentiment Analysis in Social Media, IGI Global, 2022, pp. 223–243. doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8413-2.ch010.

12.

Chopra,

S.K.

Singh,

Gupta,

Aggarwal,

B.B.

Gupta and

Colace, Analysis & prognosis of sustainable development goals using big data-based approach during COVID-19 pandemic, Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship 1(2) (2022), 100012, https://www.overleaf.com/project/65ebf9b8c5d49b07e1d622c7 . doi:10.1016/j.stae.2022.100012.

13.

Dagar,

Som and

S.K.

Khatri, Smart farming–IoT in agriculture, in: 2018 International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1052–1056. doi:10.1109/ICIRCA.2018.8597264.

14.

Dubey ,

Kumar and

Chhabra , Cyber security model to secure data transmission using cloud cryptography, Cyber Secur. Insights Mag. 2 (2022), 9–12.

15.

M.S.

Farooq ,

Riaz ,

Abid ,

Umer and

Y.B.

Zikria , Role of IoT technology in agriculture: A systematic literature review, Electronics 9(2) (2020), 319. doi:10.3390/electronics9020319.

16.

Grieves and

Vickers, Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems, in: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems: New Findings and Approaches, 2017, pp. 85–113. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4.

17.

R.D.

Grisso ,

M.M.

Alley ,

W.E.

Thomason ,

D.L.

Holshouser and

G.T.

Roberson , 2011, Precision farming tools: Variable-rate application.

18.

Gupta ,

Christie and

Manjula , Scalability in Internet of Things: Features, techniques and research challenges, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Res 13(7) (2017), 1617–1627.

19.

B.B.

Gupta and

Quamara , An overview of Internet of Things (IoT): Architectural aspects, challenges, and protocols, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 32(21) (2020), e4946. doi:10.1002/cpe.4946.

20.

Kaur ,

S.K.

Singh ,

Singh and

Kumar , Exploring convolutional neural network in computer vision-based image classification, in: International Conference on Smart Systems and Advanced Computing (Syscom-2021), 2021.

21.

Khan ,

R.L.

Ray ,

G.R.

Sargani ,

Ihtisham ,

Khayyam and

Ismail , Current progress and future prospects of agriculture technology: Gateway to sustainable agriculture, Sustainability 13(9) (2021), 4883. doi:10.3390/su13094883.

22.

Khanam ,

Tanweer and

S.S.

Khalid , Future of Internet of Things: Enhancing cloud-based IoT using artificial intelligence, International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC) 12(1) (2022), 1–23.

23.

M.A.

Kiran ,

S.K.

Pasupuleti and

Eswari , Efficient pairing-free identity-based signcryption scheme for cloud-assisted IoT, International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC) 12(1) (2022), 1–15.

24.

Kirkaya , Smart farming-precision agriculture technologies and practices, Journal of Scientific Perspectives 4(2) (2020), 123–136.

25.

S.S.

Koshy ,

V.S.

Sunnam ,

Rajgarhia ,

Chinnusamy ,

D.P.

Ravulapalli and

Chunduri , Application of the Internet of Things (IoT) for smart farming: A case study on groundnut and castor pest and disease forewarning, CSI Transactions on ICT 6 (2018), 311–318. doi:10.1007/s40012-018-0213-0.

26.

Kudama ,

Dangia ,

Wana and

Tadese , Will digital solution transform Sub-Sahara African agriculture?, Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture 5 (2021), 292–300. doi:10.1016/j.aiia.2021.12.001.

27.

Kumar ,

S.K.

Singh ,

Aggarwal and

Aggarwal , Evaluation of automatic parallelization algorithms to minimize speculative parallelism overheads: An experiment, Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography 24(5) (2021), 1517–1528. doi:10.1080/09720529.2021.1951435.

28.

Kumar ,

S.K.

Singh ,

Aggarwal ,

B.B.

Gupta ,

Alhalabi and

S.S.

Band , An efficient hardware supported and parallelization architecture for intelligent systems to overcome speculative overheads, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 37(12) (2022), 11764–11790. doi:10.1002/int.23062.

29.

S.S.

Kumar ,

S.K.

Singh ,

Aggarwal and

Aggarwal , Efficient speculative parallelization architecture for overcoming speculation overheads, in: International Conference on Smart Systems and Advanced Computing (Syscom-2021), Vol. 3080, 2021, pp. 132–138.

30.

Kwon ,

Lee and

Shin , Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics, International journal of information management 34(3) (2014), 387–394. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.02.002.

31.

Li ,

Luo ,

Li ,

Wang ,

Hong ,

Liu et al., Application of effective water-energy management based on digital twins technology in sustainable cities construction, Sustainable Cities and Society 87 (2022), 104241. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.104241.

32.

Li and

Zhang , A semantic feature enhancement-based aerial image target detection method using dense RFB-FE, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 19(1) (2023), 1–18. doi:10.4018/IJSWIS.341233.

33.

Liu ,

Fang ,

Dong and

Xu , Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 58 (2021), 346–361. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017.

34.

R.W.

Liu ,

Guo ,

Lu ,

K.T.

Chui et al., Deep network-enabled haze visibility enhancement for visual IoT-driven intelligent transportation systems, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 19(2) (2022), 1581–1591. doi:10.1109/TII.2022.3170594.

35.

Madan ,

S.K.

Singh and

Jain , Signal filtering using discrete wavelet transform, International journal of recent trends in engineering 2(3) (2009), 96.

36.

Madhu ,

Padunnavalappil ,

P.P.

Saajlal ,

V.A.

Vasudevan and

Mathew , Powering up an IoT-enabled smart home: A solar powered smart inverter for sustainable development, International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence (IJSSCI) 14(1) (2022), 1–21.

37.

A.R.

Madushanki ,

M.N.

Halgamuge ,

W.S.

Wirasagoda and

Syed , Adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT) in agriculture and smart farming towards urban greening: A review, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 10(4) (2019), 11–28.

38.

Malik ,

Prabha ,

Soni ,

Arya ,

W.A.

Alhalabi ,

B.B.

Gupta et al., Machine learning-based automatic litter detection and classification using neural networks in smart cities, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 19(1) (2023), 1–20.

39.

V.A.

Memos ,

K.E.

Psannis ,

Ishibashi ,

B.G.

Kim et al., An efficient algorithm for media-based surveillance system (EAMSuS) in IoT smart city framework, Future Generation Computer Systems 83 (2018), 619–628. doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.04.039.

40.

Mishra and

S.K.

Sharma , Advanced contribution of IoT in agricultural production for the development of smart livestock environments, Internet of Things 22 (2023), 100724. doi:10.1016/j.iot.2023.100724.

41.

E.S.

Mohamed ,

A.A.

Belal ,

S.K.

Abd-Elmabod ,

M.A.

El-Shirbeny ,

Gad and

M.B.

Zahran , Smart farming for improving agricultural management, The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science 24(3) (2021), 971–981. doi:10.1016/j.ejrs.2021.08.007.

42.

Monteiro ,

Barata ,

Veloso ,

Veloso and

Nunes , September. Towards sustainable digital twins for vertical farming, in: 2018 Thirteenth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM), IEEE, 2018, pp. 234–239. doi:10.1109/ICDIM.2018.8847169.

43.

Morchid,

El Alami,

A.A.

Raezah and

Sabbar, Applications of Internet of Things (IoT) and sensors technology to increase food security and agricultural Sustainability: Benefits and challenges, Ain Shams Engineering Journal 15(3) (2023), 102509. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2023.102509.

44.

Oumkaltoum, Toward a business intelligence model for challenges of interoperability in egov system: Transparency, scalability and genericity, in: 2019 International Conference on Wireless Technologies, Embedded and Intelligent Systems (WITS), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6.

45.

P.P.

Pawase ,

S.M.

Nalawade ,

G.B.

Bhanage ,

A.A.

Walunj ,

P.B.

Kadam ,

A.G.

Durgude and

M.G.

Patil , Variable rate fertilizer application technology for nutrient management: A review, International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 16(4) (2023), 11–19. doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20231604.7671.

46.

F.J.G.

Peñalvo ,

Sharma ,

Chhabra ,

S.K.

Singh ,

Kumar ,

Arya and

Gaurav , Mobile cloud computing and sustainable development: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions, International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC) 12(1) (2022), 1–20. doi:10.4018/IJCAC.312583.

47.

M.G.

Raj and

S.K.

Pani , Chaotic whale crow optimization algorithm for secure routing in the IoT environment, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 18(1) (2022), 1–25. doi:10.4018/IJSWIS.310056.

48.

Sacco,

E.R.

Gargano,

Cornella,

Don and

Mazzetto, Digital sustainability in smart agriculture, in: 2021 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry (MetroAgriFor), IEEE, 2021, pp. 471–475. doi:10.1109/MetroAgriFor52389.2021.9628838.

49.

Saini ,

Kumar ,

Vats and

Singh , Edge computing in cloud computing environment: Opportunities and challenges, in: International Conference on Smart Systems and Advanced Computing (Syscom-2021), 2020.

50.

Setia ,

Chhabra ,

S.K.

Singh ,

Kumar ,

Sharma ,

Arya et al., Securing the road ahead: Machine learning-driven DDoS attack detection in VANET cloud environments, Cyber Security and Applications 2 (2024), 100037. doi:10.1016/j.csa.2024.100037.

51.

Sharma,

S.K.

Singh,

Badwal,

Kumar,

B.B.

Gupta,

Arya et al., Fuzzy based clustering of consumers’ big data in industrial applications, in: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), IEEE, 2023, pp. 01–03.

52.

Sharma ,

S.K.

Singh ,

Chhabra ,

Kumar ,

Arya and

Moslehpour , A novel deep federated learning-based model to enhance privacy in critical infrastructure systems, International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence (IJSSCI) 15(1) (2023), 1–23. doi:10.4018/IJSSCI.334711.

53.

Sharma ,

S.K.

Singh ,

Kumar ,

Chhabra and

Gupta , Security of Android banking mobile apps: Challenges and opportunities, in: International Conference on Cyber Security, Privacy and Networking, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021, pp. 406–416.

54.

Sharma and

Sharma , Attacks on resource-constrained IoT devices and security solutions, International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence (IJSSCI) 14(1) (2022), 1–21. doi:10.4018/IJSSCI.312561.

55.

Sharma ,

Bhargava and

B.V.

Tadikonda , Named entity recognition for code mixed social media sentences, International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence (IJSSCI) 13(2) (2021), 23–36. doi:10.4018/IJSSCI.2021040102.

56.

Silva ,

Rodríguez-Sedano ,

Baptista and

J.P.

Coelho , The digital twin paradigm applied to soil quality assessment: A systematic literature review, Sensors 23(2) (2023), 1007. doi:10.3390/s23021007.

57.

Singh,

S.K.

Singh,

Singh and

Kumar, Efficient loop unrolling factor prediction algorithm using machine learning models, in: 2022 3rd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–8.

58.

Singh,

S.K.

Singh,

Singh and

Kumar, Efficient loop unrolling factor prediction algorithm using machine learning models, in: 2022 3rd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–8.

59.

Singh,

S.K.

Singh,

Kumar and

S.S.

Gill, SDN-aided edge computing-enabled AI for IoT and smart cities, in: SDN-Supported Edge-Cloud Interplay for Next Generation Internet of Things, 2022, pp. 41–70. doi:10.1201/9781003213871-3.

60.

Singh, Kartik ,

J.A.S.

Gandhi and

Kumar, The role of site reliability engineering in sustainable development, Space 2(10), 11.

61.

S.K.

Singh ,

Kaur ,

Aggarwal and

Verma , Achieving high performance distributed system: Using grid cluster and cloud computing, Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications 5(2) (2015), 59–67.

62.

S.K.

Singh,

Kaur and

Aggrawal, Emerging trends and limitations in technology and system of ubiquitous computing, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science 5(7) (2014).

63.

S.K.

Singh ,

Kumar ,

Gupta and

Madan , Architectural performance of WiMAX over WiFi with reliable QoS over wireless communication, International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications 3(1) (2011), 1017.

64.

Suanpang and

Jamjuntr , A smart farm prototype with an Internet of Things (IoT) case study, Thailand. technology 5(12) (2019), 15.

65.

Tao ,

Zhang ,

Liu and

A.Y.

Nee , Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art, IEEE Transactions on industrial informatics 15(4) (2018), 2405–2415. doi:10.1109/TII.2018.2873186.

66.

Tiwari and

Garg , Adaptive ontology-based IoT resource provisioning in computing systems, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 18(1) (2022), 1–18. doi:10.4018/IJSWIS.306260.

67.

K.M.

Unertl,

R.J.

Holden and

N.M.

Lorenzi, Usability: Making it real from concepts to implementation and end-user adoption, in: Healthcare Information Management Systems: Cases, Strategies, and Solutions, 2016, pp. 165–175. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20765-0_9.

68.

B.T.

Van Zanten,

P.H.

Verburg,

Espinosa,

Gomez-y-Paloma,

Galimberti,

Kantelhardt et al., European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: A review, Agronomy for sustainable development 34 (2014), 309–325. doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0183-4.

69.

Vats and

Kumar , Next-generation towards construction of cyber-physical systems and digital twins.

70.

Vats,

S.K.

Singh,

Kumar,

B.B.

Gupta,

S.S.

Gill,

Arya and

Alhalabi, Explainable context-aware IoT framework using human digital twin for healthcare, Multimedia Tools and Applications (2023), 1–25.

71.

Verdouw ,

Tekinerdogan ,

Beulens and

Wolfert , Digital twins in smart farming, Agricultural Systems 189 (2021), 103046. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103046.

72.

Zhong ,

Wang ,

Wen and

Liao , An ontology-based automation system: A case study of citrus fertilization, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 18(1) (2022), 1–22.