Artificial intelligence mechanisms for management of QoS-aware connectivity in Internet of vehicles

Abstract

Today, Internet of Things (IoT) has provided intelligent interactions between sensors, smart devices, actuators, and cloud-based applications to ease human life. Currently, IoT-based connectivity management systems use computer-assisted learning methods to increase learning level and better understanding of the curriculums for students in universities, schools and research centers. On the other hand, virtual connectivity management systems are applied to facilitate teaching and learning methods under taken of pandemic effects. Because, data mining methods have important effect to enhancement and navigate IoT-based connectivity management systems, this paper presents a technical analysis on Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches for connectivity management systems in IoT environments. This paper provides a comprehensive perspective on vehicular communication systems, Internet of Vehicles (IoV) methods and Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET) environments that have evaluated using machine learning, fuzzy logic and intelligent algorithms. Also, applied evaluation metrics to predict and detect efficient connectivity methods, succeed learning models and enhancement of IoT-based connectivity management systems are discussed and analyzed for existing AI approaches. Finally, new research directions and emerging challenges are outlined to improve the performance of advanced IoT-based connectivity management systems.

Keywords

Internet of Things connectivity management systems vehicular communication artificial intelligence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbasi,

Zarei and

A.M.

Rahmani, FWDP: A fuzzy logic-based vehicle weighting model for data prioritization in vehicular ad hoc networks, Vehicular Communications (2021), 100413.

Abbasi

et al., Internet of vehicles: Architecture, services, and applications, International Journal of Communication Systems 34(10) (2021), e4793. doi:10.1002/dac.4793.

Abdollah and

Zarei, A traffic-centric fuzzy approach for solving the starvation problem of cooperative awareness messages in vehicular ad hoc networks, International Journal of Communication Systems 34(18) (2021), e4999.

Agrawal

et al., Position based seamless connectivity for vehicular ad hoc networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences 87(1) (2016), 73–81. doi:10.1007/s40010-016-0312-y.

Ahmad

et al., A cooperative heterogeneous vehicular clustering mechanism for road traffic management, International Journal of Parallel Programming (2019).

Aymen, New traffic modeling for IoV/V2X in 5G network based on data mining, in: 2021 IEEE 93rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Spring), IEEE, 2021.

Campanile

et al., Privacy regulations challenges on data-centric and iot systems: A case study for smart vehicles, in: IoTBDS, 2020.

Campanile

et al., Privacy regulations, smart roads, blockchain, and liability insurance: Putting technologies to work, IEEE Security & Privacy 19(1) (2020), 34–43. doi:10.1109/MSEC.2020.3012059.

Campanile

et al., Privacy regulations, smart roads, blockchain, and liability insurance: Putting technologies to work, IEEE Security & Privacy 19(1) (2021), 34–43. doi:10.1109/MSEC.2020.3012059.

10.

Cirne

et al., The impact of ECDSA in a VANET routing service: Insights from real data traces, Ad Hoc Networks 90 (2019), 101747. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.08.017.

11.

Dai

et al., UAV-assisted data offloading for smart container in offshore maritime communications, China Communications 19(1) (2022), 153–165. doi:10.23919/JCC.2022.01.012.

12.

Das and

Almhana, A new cooperative communication algorithm for improving connectivity in the event of network failure in VANETs, Computer Networks 128 (2017), 51–62. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2017.04.004.

13.

Das and

Misra, Improvised dynamic network connectivity model for vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs), Journal of Network and Computer Applications 122 (2018), 107–114.

14.

Fawaz, Effect of non-cooperative vehicles on path connectivity in vehicular networks: A theoretical analysis and UAV-based remedy, Vehicular Communications 11 (2018), 12–19. doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2018.01.005.

15.

Guo

et al., Spatial stochastic vehicle traffic modeling for VANETs, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 19(2) (2017), 416–425. doi:10.1109/TITS.2017.2688860.

16.

A.N.

Hassan

et al., Inter vehicle distance based connectivity aware routing in vehicular adhoc networks, Wireless Personal Communications 98(1) (2017), 33–54. doi:10.1007/s11277-017-4831-x.

17.

Jamalzadeh,

Maadani and

Mahdavi, EC-MOPSO: An edge computing-assisted hybrid cluster and MOPSO-based routing protocol for the Internet of vehicles, Annals of Telecommunications (2022), 1–13.

18.

Karimi and

Shokrollahi, PGRP: Predictive geographic routing protocol for VANETs, Computer Networks 141 (2018), 67–81.

19.

Kumar and

Das, SIoVChain: Efficient and secure blockchain based Internet of vehicles (IoV), in: 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking, 2022.

20.

Li,

Song and

Bi, CADD: Connectivity-aware data dissemination using node forwarding capability estimation in partially connected VANETs, Wireless Networks 25(1) (2017), 379–398. doi:10.1007/s11276-017-1568-0.

21.

Liao

et al., Cooperative ramp merging design and field implementation: A digital twin approach based on vehicle-to-cloud communication, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2021).

22.

Rahimi and

M.A.

Jabraeil Jamali, A hybrid geographic-DTN routing protocol based on fuzzy logic in vehicular ad hoc networks, Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 12(1) (2018), 88–101. doi:10.1007/s12083-018-0642-4.

23.

Ravi,

Thangaraj and

Petale, Data traffic forwarding for inter-vehicular communication in VANETs using stochastic method, Wireless Personal Communications 106(3) (2019), 1591–1607. doi:10.1007/s11277-019-06231-2.

24.

Rehman and

Ould-Khaoua, A hybrid relay node selection scheme for message dissemination in VANETs, Future Generation Computer Systems 93 (2019), 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.10.042.

25.

Rewadkar and

Doye, FGWSO-TAR: Fractional glowworm swarm optimization for traffic aware routing in urban VANET, International Journal of Communication Systems 31(1) (2018), e3430. doi:10.1002/dac.3430.

26.

Sedjelmaci

et al., Toward a lightweight and efficient UAV-aided VANET, Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies 30(8) (2018).

27.

Sousa

et al., Non-IP multi-protocol stack for vehicular communications, Mobile Networks and Applications 23(5) (2016), 1179–1193. doi:10.1007/s11036-016-0781-x.

28.

Tao

et al., A resource allocation game with restriction mechanism in VANET cloud, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 29(14) (2017), e4038. doi:10.1002/cpe.4038.

29.

Tiennoy and

Saivichit, Using a distributed roadside unit for the data dissemination protocol in VANET with the named data architecture, IEEE Access 6 (2018), 32612–32623.

30.

M.A.

Togou,

Hafid and

Khoukhi, SCRP: Stable CDS-based routing protocol for urban vehicular ad hoc networks, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 17(5) (2016), 1298–1307. doi:10.1109/TITS.2015.2504129.

31.

Wang

et al., VDNet: An infrastructure-less UAV-assisted sparse VANET system with vehicle location prediction, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 16(17) (2016), 2991–3003. doi:10.1002/wcm.2727.

32.

Wang

et al., Joint traffic signal and connected vehicle control in IoV via deep reinforcement learning, in: 2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, (WCNC), IEEE, 2021.

33.

Yan and

D.B.

Rawat, Vehicle-to-vehicle connectivity analysis for vehicular ad-hoc networks, Ad Hoc Networks 58 (2017), 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.11.017.

34.

Zahedi,

Zahedi and

A.S.

Ismail, Using two antennas to reduce the generated overhead of beacon-based protocols in VANET, Wireless Personal Communications 104(4) (2018), 1343–1354. doi:10.1007/s11277-018-6086-6.

35.

Zaimi

et al., A fuzzy geographical routing approach to support real-time multimedia transmission for vehicular ad hoc networks, Wireless Networks 25(3) (2018), 1289–1311. doi:10.1007/s11276-018-1729-9.