Dual Task Performance May be a Better Measure of Cognitive Processing in Huntington’s Disease than Traditional Attention Tests

Abstract

Background: Past research has found cancellation tasks to be reliable markers of cognitive decline in Huntington’s disease (HD).

Objective: The aim of this study was to extend previous findings by adopting the use of a dual task paradigm that paired cancellation and auditory tasks.

Methods: We compared performance in 14 early stage HD participants and 14 healthy controls. HD participants were further divided into groups with and without cognitive impairment.

Results: Results suggested that HD participants were not slower or less accurate compared with controls; however, HD participants showed greater dual task interference in terms of speed. In addition, HD participants with cognitive impairment were slower and less accurate than HD participants with no cognitive impairment, and showed greater dual task interference in terms of speed and accuracy.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that dual task measures may be a better measure of cognitive processing in HD compared with more traditional measures.

Keywords

Attention allocation divided attention dual task Huntington’s disease visual search

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

UNESCO. International Standard Classification of Education. 1997. Available from http://www.uis.unesco.org/ev.php?ID=7433_201&ID2=DO_TOPIC

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

Klingberg

2000

Limitations in information processing in the human brain: Neuroimaging of dual task performance and working memory tasks

Prog Brain Res 126 95 102

39.

40.

41.

42.

43.

44.

45.

46.

47.

48.

49.

50.

51.

52.

53.