The reaction process of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) denitrification system is complex, which has the characteristics of large inertia, large delay, strong interference and uncertainty. Traditional PID control can’t achieve accurate control of ammonia injection. Based on linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC), Smith predictor is used to eliminate the delay output variables before entering extended state observer. The nonlinear state error feedback control law of ADRC structure is designed by using sliding mode control law, which improves the fast response and stability of the system. To solve the problem that the selective catalytic reduction denitrification system is difficult to achieve accurate modeling and large delay, Smith-SMC linear extended state observer (Smith-SMC-LESO) is designed. The simulation results of tracking characteristics, anti-jamming characteristics and robustness show that the set-point tracking performance and anti-jamming ability of Smith-LADRC and Smith-SMC-LESO are significantly improved.
LiuJ.QinT.YangT. et al., SCR denitrification system modeling based on self-adaptive multi-scale kernel partial least squares, Proceedings of the CSEE35(23) (2015), 6083–6088.
2.
ZhangY.LiQ. and ZhangW., [Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering] Proceedings of 2017 Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference Volume 459 Modeling and Dynamic Characteristic Analysis of Flexible Manipulator, 10.1007/978-981-10-6496-8 (Chapter 58), 2018, 637–646.
3.
HanX.MaY.WeiL. and LiuZ., Simulation and application of fuzzy PID controller in SCR flue gas denitrification system, Journal of Shenyang Institute of Engineering (Natural Science)14(3) (2018), 259–262+273.
4.
HuY.JiaX.LeiX.HouP. and BaiJ., Multiple model switching DMC-PID cascade predictive control for SCR denitrification systems, 2018 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), 2018.
5.
LiY.WangY.CaoL. et al., Modeling for the performance evaluation of 600MW supercritical unit operating No.0 high pressure heater, Energy149 (2018), 639–661.
6.
MaZ.XuH. and ZhuR., Robust disturbance rejection control of SCR denitrification system, Control Engineering of China27(1) (2020), 114–120.
7.
PanY.NiuY.LiY. and LiX., Optimized sliding mode control of power plant SCR flue gas denitrification system, Control Engineering of China26(5) (2019), 872–878.
8.
ZhangJ., Application of improved fuzzy-smith controller in the control system of cement rotary kiln, IOP Conference569 (2019), 042013.
9.
HuangY.ZhangW. and JinX., Linear active disturbance rejection cascade control of SCR denitrification system, Proceedings of the CSEE38(18) (2018), 5518–5526.
10.
LiD.ZengT.LiaY. et al., Thermal control investigation and engineering practice of an SCR denitrification system in near-zero emission coal-fired units, Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering37(7) (2017), 569–576.
11.
SmithO., Closer control of loops with dead time, Chemical Engineering Progress53(5) (1957), 217–219.
12.
HanJ., Auto-disturbances-rejection controller and its applications, Control and Decision13(1) (1998), 19–23.
13.
HanJ., From PID technique to active disturbances rejection control technique, Control Engineering of China9(3) (2002), 13–18.
14.
LiJ.GaoC.JingW. et al., Dynamic analysis and control of novel moving mass flight vehicle, Acta Astronautica131(FEB.) (2017), 36–44.
15.
ChengB.ChenZ.SunM. and SunQ., Multivariable inverted decoupling active disturbance rejection control and its application to a distillation column process, Acat Automatica Sinica43(6) (2017), 1080–1088.
16.
HermanC.OscarS. and Salas-PeñaJ., Extended observer based on adaptive second order sliding mode control for a fixed wing UAV, ISA Transactions66 (2017), 226–232.
17.
LiJ.TanW. and ZhangB., Linear active disturbance rejection control of SCR flue gas denitrification systems, Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering39(3) (2019), 203–207.
18.
WuY.WangL. and LiF., A Robust Path Tracking Control Method for Intelligent Vehicle, 2018, 1.
19.
GaoZ., Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning, in: Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, Denver, USA, IEEE, 2003.
20.
PuC.RenJ. and SuJ., The sliding mode control of the drum water level based on extended state observer, IEEE Access (99) (2019), 1–1.
21.
CuiR.ChenL.YangC. and ChenM., Extended state observer-based integral sliding mode control for an underwater robot with unknown disturbances and uncertain nonlinearities, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics64(8) (2017), 6785–6795.
22.
FuJ.GuoW.LiuY. and TangY., Conditional integral sliding mode control for SCR denitrification system based on smith predictor, Thermal Power Generation46(4) (2017), 93–98.
23.
LiuJ.VazquezS. and MemberS., Extended state observer-based sliding-mode control for three-phase power converters, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics64(1) (2016), 22–31.
24.
WuY. and LiG., Adaptive disturbance compensation finite control set optimal control for PMSM systems based on sliding mode extended state observer, Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing98 (2018), 402–414.
25.
GuanY., Optimization of ammonia control strategy for SCR system in coal-fired power plants, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2019.
26.
PanJ.LiangJ.SunT.WangH.XieG. and YanY., Optimization of rotor position observer with BP neural network, in: 2019 22nd International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), 2019.
27.
UzunovicT.BaranE.GolubovicE. et al., A novel hybrid contouring control method for 3-DOF robotic manipulators, Mechatronics40(Complete) (2016), S0957415816301118.
28.
HuY.JiaX. and LeiX., Multiple Model Switching DMC-PID Cascade Predictive Control for SCR Denitration Systems, 2018 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), 2018.
