Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-5
A critical-path focus for earned duration increases its sensitivity for project-duration monitoring and forecasting in deterministic,fuzzy and stochastic network analysis
Earned duration metrics improve project-duration-performance monitoring and forecasting compared to earned schedule metrics because they depend only on time-based variables. In projects with multiple-parallel paths of work items and with work items varying significantly in individual durations, earned duration metrics sometimes fail to provide reliable project-duration monitoring and forecasts. Calculating earned duration using information for the critical-path work items only, provides a way of overcoming distortions in earned duration caused by non-critical-path work items. Weighting the work items used in an earned duration calculation, according to their individual-planned durations, places more emphasis on the longer-duration work items, which often constitute the more-crucial work items in terms of uncertainty and performance. Two new earned duration formulations are derived and evaluated. The analysis is performed using deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy models related to work breakdown progress diagrams that illustrate the quality and reliability of the information that can be derived from these new formulations.
AcebesF.PeredaM.PozaD.PajaresJ. and GalánJ.M., Stochastic earned value analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and statistical learning techniques, International Journal of Project Management33 (2015), 1597–1609.
2.
AnbariF.T., Earned value project management method and extensions, Proj. Manag. J.34(4) (2003), 12–23.
3.
BatselierJ. and VanhouckeM., Evaluation of deterministic state-of-the-art forecasting approaches for project duration based on earned value management, International Journal of Project Management33 (2015), 1588–1596.
4.
CioffiD.F., Designing project management: a scientific notation and an improved formalism for earned value calculations, International Journal of Project Management24(2) (2006), 136–144.
5.
FlemingQ.W. and KoppelmanJ.M., The Essence of Evolution of Earned Value, Cost Engineering36(11) (1994), 21–27.
6.
HazirÖ., A review of analytical models, approaches and decision support tools in project monitoring and control, International Journal of Project Management33(4) (2015), 808–815.
7.
HendersonK., Earned schedule: a breakthrough extension to earned value theory? The Measurable News (Summer 2003), 13–23.
8.
JacobD.S., Is “Earned Schedule” an unreliable indicator? No, but It’s not necessarily the premier indicator for assessing schedule performance, The Measurable News6 (2006).
9.
JacobD.S. and KaneM., Forecasting schedule completion using earned value metrics…revisited, The Measurable News (2004), 10–17.
10.
KhamooshiH. and GolafshaniH., EDM: Earned Duration Management, a new approach to schedule performance management and measurement, International Journal of Project Management32 (2014), 1019–1041.
11.
KimE.-H.WellsW.G. and DuffeyM.R., A model for effective implementation of Earned Value Management methodology, International Journal of Project Management21 (2003), 375–382.
12.
LipkeW., Schedule is different, The Measurable News3 (2003), 31–34.
13.
LipkeW., Applying Earned Schedule to Critical Path Analysis and More’, The Measurable News Fall Edition (2006), 26–30.
14.
LipkeW., The To Complete Performance Index …an expanded view, The Measurable News (2) (2009), 18–22.
15.
LipkeW.ZwikaelO.HendersonK. and AnbariF., Prediction of project outcome: the application of statistical methods to earned value management and earned schedule performance indexes, International Journal of Project Management27(4) (2009), 400–407.
16.
LipkeW., Speculations on Project Duration Forecasting, The Measurable News3(1) (2012), 4–7.
17.
LipkeW., Applying statistical forecasting of project duration to earned schedule-longest path, PM World JournalIV(II) (2015), 1–13.
18.
LipkeW., The To Complete Performance Index …an expanded view, The Measurable News (2) (2016), 18–22.
19.
LukasJ.A., Earned Value Analysis – Why it Doesn’t Work,AACE International Transactions EVM (1) (2008), 1–10.
20.
MoweryB., Earned schedule: from emerging practice to practical application, Computer Sciences Corporation, Leading Edge Forum, 2012, 28. http://assets1.csc.com/innovation/downloads/CSC_Papers_2012_Earned_Schedule.pdf.
21.
NaeniL.M. and SalehipourA., Evaluating fuzzy earned value indices and estimates by applying alpha cuts, Expert Syst. Appl.38(7) (2011), 8193–8198.
22.
NaeniL.M.ShadrokhS. and SalehipourA., A fuzzy approach for the earned value management (Erratum), International Journal of Project Management32 (2014), 709–717.
23.
NooriS.BagherpourM. and ZareeiA., A. Applying Fuzzy Control Chart in Earned Value Analysis: A New Application, World Applied Sciences Journal3(4) (2008), 684–690.
24.
Project Management Institute, Practice Standard for Earned Value, Management Newtown Square, PA, Project Management Institute, 2005.
25.
Project Management Institute, 2013. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute (2013), 589 pages.
26.
SoroushH.M., The most critical path in a PERT network, The Journal of Operational Research Society45(3) (1994), 287–300.
27.
VandevoordeS. and VanhouckeM., A comparison of different project duration forecasting methods using earned value metrics, International Journal of Project Management24(4) (2006), 289–302.
28.
VandevoordeS. and VanhouckeM., A simulation and evaluation of earned value metrics to forecast the project duration, Journal of the Operational Research Society58 (2007), 1361–1374.
29.
VanhouckeM., Measuring the efficiency of project control using fictitious and empirical project data, International Journal of Project Management30 (2012), 252–263.
30.
WilliamsT.M., Criticality in stochastic networks, Journal of Operational Research Society43 (1992), 353–357.
31.
WoodD.A., Probabilistic methods with simulation help predict timing, cost of projects,Oil & Gas Journal (12 Nov 2001), 79–83.
32.
WoodD.A., Gas and Oil Project Time-Cost-Quality Tradeoff: Integrated Stochastic and Fuzzy Multi-Objective Optimization Applying a Memetic, Nondominated, Sorting Algorithm, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering45 (2017), 143–164.
33.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control8(3) (1965), 338–353.
