Through the researches on various item improvements of particle swarm optimization algorithm, the improved particle swarm optimization algorithm is proposed for the insufficient global searching ability. This paper has improved the parameters of velocity formula and introduced new distance calculation formula to modify various parameters in the velocity formula. The improved particle swarm optimization algorithm has been tested by adopting standard test function, and the result has been compared with other particle swarm optimization algorithms. The experimental result indicated that the proposed improved particle swarm optimization algorithm in this paper got the better result for function optimization problems.
KennedyJ. and CeberhartR., Particle swarm optimization, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (1995), 1942–1948.
2.
ShiY.H. and EberhartR., A modified particle swarm optimizer, in: IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Anchorage, Alaska, (1988), 69–73.
3.
ShiY.H. and EberhartR., Empirical study of particle swarm optimization, in: International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Washington, USA: IEEE, (1999), 1945–1950.
4.
ChenG.M.JiaJ.Y. and HanQ., Study on the strategy of decreasing inertia weight in particle swarm optimization algorithm, Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University40(1) (2006), 53–61.
5.
ClercM. and KennedyJ., The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation6(1) (2002), 58–73.
6.
RatnaweeraA.HalgamugeS.K. and WatsonH.C., Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation8(3) (2004), 240–255.
7.
KennedyJ., Small worlds and mega-minds: Effects of neighborhood topology on particle swarm performance, in: The 1999 Congress on Evolution Computation, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, (1999), 1931–1938.
8.
SuganthanP.N., Particle swarm optimizer with neighborhood operator, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Piscataway, IEEE, (1999), 1958–1962.
9.
ParsopoulosK.E. and MichaelN.V., Parameter selection and adaptation in unified particle swarm optimization, Mathematical and Computer Modelling46(1) (2007), 198–213.
10.
ZhangC. and YiZ., Scale-free fully informed particle swarm optimization algorithm, Information Sciences181(20) (2011), 4550–4568.
11.
Marco de OcaM.A. et al., Frankenstein’s PSO: A composite particle swarm optimization algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation13(5) (2009), 1120–1132.
12.
StefanJ. and MiddendorfM., A hierarchical particle swarm optimizer and its adaptive variant, IEEE Transactions on System Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics35(6) (2005), 1272–1282.
13.
ClercM., Particle swarm optimization, John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
14.
WangX. and LiJ., Hybrid particle swarm optimization with simulated annealing, in: Proceedings of 2004 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, IEEE, (2004), 2402–2405.
15.
LiS.T. et al., A hybrid PSO-BFGS strategy for global optimization of multimodal functions, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics41(4) (2011), 1003–1014.
16.
SettlesM. and SouleT., Breeding swarms: A GA/PSO hybrid, in: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, ACM, (2005), 161–168.
17.
TaherN. and AmiriB., An efficient hybrid approach based on PSO, ACO and k-means for cluster analysis, Applied Soft Computing10(1) (2010), 183–197.
18.
EsmatR.Nezamabadi-PourH. and SaryazdiS., GSA: Gravitational search algorithm, Information Science179(13) (2009), 2232–2248.
19.
JiangS.H. and JiZ.C., An improved HPSO-GSA with adaptive evolution stagnation cycle, in: Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference, Nanjing, China, (28–30 July 2014), 8601–8606.
20.
SemwalV.B. et al., Business and social behaviour intelligence analysis using PSO, IJIMAI2(6) (2014), 69–74.
JoaquínM.Z. et al., Statistical analysis of a multi-objective optimization algorithm based on a model of particles with vorticity behavior, Soft Computing20(9) (2016), 3521–3536.
23.
SankalapA. and SinghS., An effective hybrid butterfly optimization algorithm with artificial bee colony for numerical optimization, Changes26 (2017), 14–21.
24.
HassanR. et al., Multilayer perceptron: Architecture optimization and training, IJIMAI4(1) (2016), 26–30.
25.
ZhangY.D. et al., Binary PSO with mutation operator for feature selection using decision tree applied to spam detection, Knowledge-Based Systems64 (2014), 22–31.
26.
AbdulhamitS., Classification of EMG signals using PSO optimized SVM for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders, Computers in Biology and Medicine43(5) (2013), 576–586.
27.
PatriciaM. et al., Optimal design of fuzzy classification systems using PSO with dynamic parameter adaptation through fuzzy logic, Expert Systems with Applications40(8) (2013), 3196–3206.
28.
MasoudS. and ELMekkawyT.Y., Multi-objective optimal design of hybrid renewable energy systems using PSO-simulation based approach, Renewable Energy68 (2014), 67–79.
29.
HannahI.H.AzarA.T. and JothiG., Supervised hybrid feature selection based on PSO and rough sets for medical diagnosis, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine113(1) (2014), 175–185.
30.
BahramiS.HooshmandR.A. and ParastegariM., Short term electric load forecasting by wavelet transform and grey model improved by PSO (particle swarm optimization) algorithm, Energy72 (2014), 434–442.
31.
HuguesR. et al., A PSO-based global MPPT technique for distributed PV power generation, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics62(2) (2015), 1047–1058.
32.
JordehiA.R., Enhanced leader PSO (ELPSO): A new PSO variant for solving global optimisation problems, Applied Soft Computing26 (2015), 401–417.
33.
SelakovA. et al., Hybrid PSO-SVM method for short-term load forecasting during periods with significant temperature variations in city of Burbank, Applied Soft Computing16 (2014), 80–88.
34.
NahavandiS.K. et al., A novel adaptive compression technique for dealing with corrupt bands and high levels of band correlations in hyperspectral images based on binary hybrid GA-PSO for big data compression, International Journal of Computer Applications109(8) (2015), 18–25.
35.
WangS.H. et al., Feed-forward neural network optimized by hybridization of PSO and ABC for abnormal brain detection, International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology25(2) (2015), 153–164.
36.
MamtaK.SarinR.K. and UddinM., Evolutionary design of efficient type-2 fuzzy models from noisy data using hybrid PSO model, International Journal of Swarm Intelligence1(2) (2014), 156–178.
37.
MichalP. et al., On the behavior and performance of chaos driven PSO algorithm with inertia weight, Computers & Mathematics with Applications66(2) (2013), 122–134.
38.
VandanaK. et al., A three diode model for industrial solar cells and estimation of solar cell parameters using PSO algorithm, Renewable Energy78 (2015), 105–113.
39.
ZuoX.Q.ZhangG.X. and WeiT., Self-adaptive learning PSO-based deadline constrained task scheduling for hybrid IaaS cloud, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering11(2) (2014), 564–573.
40.
BaoY.K.HuZ.Y. and XiongT., A PSO and pattern search based memetic algorithm for SVMs parameters optimization, Neurocomputing117 (2013), 98–106.
41.
TonnizamM.E. et al., Prediction of the unconfined compressive strength of soft rocks: A PSO-based ANN approach, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment74(3) (2015), 745–757.
42.
JordehiA.R. et al., Enhanced leader PSO (ELPSO): A new algorithm for allocating distributed TCSC’s in power systems, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems64 (2015), 771–784.
43.
NietoP.J.G. et al., Hybrid PSO-SVM-based method for forecasting of the remaining useful life for aircraft engines and evaluation of its reliability, Reliability Engineering & System Safety138 (2015), 219–231.
44.
NimaH. et al., A hybrid PSO algorithm for a multi-objective assembly line balancing problem with flexible operation times, sequence-dependent setup times and learning effect, International Journal of Production Economics141(1) (2013), 99–111.
45.
LiuZ.W. et al., Multi-fault classification based on wavelet SVM with PSO algorithm to analyze vibration signals from rolling element bearings, Neurocomputing99 (2013), 399–410.
46.
YangJ.HeL.F. and FuS.Y., An improved PSO-based charging strategy of electric vehicles in electrical distribution grid, Applied Energy128 (2014), 82–92.
47.
JamshidA. et al., Distribution expansion planning considering reliability and security of energy using modified PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization) algorithm, Energy65 (2014), 398–411.
48.
ChenJ.J. et al., A variant of group search optimizer for global optimization, Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering16(2) (2016), 219–230.
49.
LuoX.W. and ZuoY.L., Study on the particle swarm optimization based on double mutation, Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering15(4) (2015), 635–644.
50.
WangP.ZhaoD.M. and ZhangX., Reactive power optimization in regional grids by improved PSO algorithm, in: Fourth International Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control (2014), 121–125.
