Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch.) is a species of great economic and nutritional importance. It is widely cultivated in different regions of the world. However, climatic factors have a significant influence on its production.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the ecoclimatic suitability and growth index of F.×ananassa in the face of the impacts of climate change in Brazil and the world.
METHODS:
The potential global distribution of F.×ananassa it was based on predicted global climate changes using CLIMEX and the A1B and A2 emissions scenario for the years 2050 and 2100. CLIMEX weekly growth index (GIw) was applied, and productivity data in commercial strawberry cultivation in Brazilian areas were collected.
RESULTS:
The results indicate a progressive reduction in areas suitable for strawberry cultivation globally, mainly on the African continent, Australia, China, and the Americas for the years 2050 and 2100. In Brazil, only the South region and part of the Southeast will continue to be suitable for strawberry production.
CONCLUSIONS:
The CLIMEX model predicts a reduction in the suitable area for cultivating Fragaria×ananassa Duch between 2050 and 2100 due to climate change. The generated maps can help identify new cultivation areas and support genetic improvement programmes to develop cultivars more tolerant to heat.
BiswasA, MelmaieeK, ElavarthiS, JonesJ, ReddyU. Characterization of strawberry (Fragaria spp.) accessions by genotyping with SSR markers and phenotyping by leaf antioxidant and trichome analysis. Scientia Horticulturae. 2019;256:108561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108561
QinY, da SilvaJAT, ZhangL, ZhangS. Transgenic strawberry: State of the art for improved traits. Biotechnology Advances. 2008;26(3):219–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.004
4.
Enciso-GarayCR, Santacruz-OviedoVR, GarciaD, GuillénO. Prolificity of strawberry genotypes in subtropical climate. Idesia. 2020;38:57–63.
5.
Hernández-MartínezNR, BlanchardC, WellsD, Salazar-GutiérrezMR. Current state and future perspectives of commercial strawberry production: A review. Scientia Horticulturae. 2023; 312, 111893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.111893
6.
CamargoLKP, PilatiL, ZchonskiFL, de ResendeJTV, Da-SilvaPR. Genetic diversity of Brazilian farmers-made strawberry genotypes and their relationship with commercial cultivars. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2022;69(5):1879–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-022-01350-5
7.
AntunesLEC, Reisser JunioryC, BonowS. Morango produção aumenta ano a ano. Campo e Negócios – Anuário HF. 2021;1:87–90.
8.
FagherazziAF, GrimaldiF, KretzschmarAA, MolinaAR, GonçalvesMA, AntunesLEC, BaruzziG, RufatoL. Strawberry production progress in Brazil. Acta Horticulturae. 2017;1156(1156):937–40. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1156.138
9.
TangY, MaX, LiM, WangY. The effect of temperature and light on strawberry production in a solar greenhouse. Solar Energy. 2020;195:318–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.070
10.
CuiM, PhamMD, HwangH, ChunC. Flower development and fruit malformation in strawberries after short-term exposure to high or low temperature. Scientia Horticulturae. 2021;288:110308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110308
11.
AntunesLEC, BonowS, Reisser JúniorC. Morango: Crescimento constante em área e produção. Campo e Negócios – Anuário H. 2020;37:88–92.
12.
ZeistAR, ResendeJTV. Strawberry breeding in Brazil: Current momentum and perspectives. Horticultura Brasileira. 2019;37:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-053620190101
13.
TazzoIF, FagherazziAF, LerinS, KretzschmarAA, RufatoL. Exigência térmica de duas seleções e quatro cultivares de morangueiro cultivado no planalto catarinense. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2015;37:550–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-2945-097/14
14.
ElithJ, LeathwickJR. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics. 2009;40:677–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159
15.
SutherstRW, MaywaldGF, KriticosD. CLIMEX version 3. CD and user’s guide. 2007;131.
16.
PhillipsSB, AnejaVP, KangD, AryaSP. Modelling and analysis of the atmospheric nitrogen deposition in North Carolina. In: International Journal of Global Environmental Issues. Inderscience Publishers. 2006, 231–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2006.010156
17.
ThuillerW, LafourcadeB, EnglerR, AraújoMB. BIOMOD – a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography (cop). 2009;32:369–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05742.x
18.
ByeonDH, JungS, LeeWH. Review of CLIMEX and MaxEnt for studying species distribution in South Korea. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity. 2018;11(3):325–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2018.06.002
19.
FarooqS, MaqboolMM, BashirMA, UllahMI, ShahRU, AliHM, Al FarrajDA, ElshikhMS, HatamlehAA, BashirS, WangYF. Production suitability of date palm under changing climate in a semi-arid region predicted by CLIMEX model. Journal of King Saud University-Science. 2021;33(3):101394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101394
KriticosDJ, MaywaldGF, YonowT, ZurcherEJ, HerrmannNI, SutherstR. Exploring the effects of climate on plants, animals and diseases. CLIMEX Version. 2015;4:184.
22.
MendelsohnR. The Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture in Developing Countries. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research. 2008;1:15–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19390450802495882
23.
MalhiGS, KaurM, KaushikP. Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review. Sustainability. 2021;13(3):1318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031318
24.
ChandioAA, JiangY, RehmanA, RaufA. Short and long-run impacts of climate change on agriculture: An empirical evidence from China. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. 2020;12(2):201-21. DOI: 10.1108/IJCCSM-05-2019-0026
25.
GrussonY, WesströmI, JoelA. Impact of climate change on Swedish agriculture: Growing season rain deficit and irrigation need. Agricultural Water Management. 2021;251:106858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106858
SilvaRS, KumarL, ShabaniF, PicançoMC. Assessing the impact of global warming on worldwide open field tomato cultivation through CSIRO-Mk3· 0 global climate model. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2017;155(3):407–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616000654
28.
AlmeidaIR, AntunesL, Reisser JuniorC, SteinmetzS, CarvalhoF. Potenciais regiões produtoras de morango durante a primavera e verão e riscos de ocorrência de geada na produção de inverno no estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado. 2009; 5 p. (Comunicado Técnico, 229).
29.
StrikBC. Flower bud initiation in strawberry cultivars. Fruit Varieties Jornal. 1985;39:5–9.
30.
MaughanTL. Optimizing systems for cold-climate strawberry production. Utah State University, Logan, UT. 2013.
31.
TimmLC, TavaresVEQ, BambergAL, FariaLC, JúniorCR, EstrelaCC. Capítulo 13 – Manejo da água. In Morangueiro. 2016. 589 p. Antunes, LEC., Reisser Júnior, C., Schwengber, JF. Embrapa Clima Temperado, Pelotas.
32.
KrügerE, SchmidtG, RasimS. Effect of irrigation on yield, fruit size and firmness of strawberry cv. Elsanta. Acta Hort. 2000;567:471–4. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.567.99
33.
OliveiraRC. Modelagem de nicho ecológico para Helicoverpa punctigera (Wallengren, 1860) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) no mundo: Potencial invasão e riscos diante das mudanças climáticas. 2021. http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/61961
34.
GuX, GaoZ, ZhuangW, QiaoY, WangX, MiL, ZhangZ, LinZ. Comparative proteomic analysis of rd29A: RdreB1BI transgenic and non-transgenic strawberries exposed to low temperature. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2013;170(7):696–706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2012.12.012
35.
KadirS, SidhuG, Al-KhatibK. Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch.) growth and productivity as affected by temperature. HortScience. 2006;41(6):1423–30. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.41.6.1423
36.
SáJS, CrucianiDE, MinamiK. Efeitos de inundações temporárias do solo em plantas de ervilha. Horticultura Brasileira, Brasília. 2004;22(1):50–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362004000100010
37.
SousaFA, SouzaMJ, Oliveira NapoleãoIT, SantosMN, RochaAFF. Soma térmica do plantio à colheita para o morango em Diamantina–MG. XV Congresso Brasileiro de Agrometeorologia – – Aracaju – SE. 2007.
38.
CarvalhoSLCD, NevesCSVJ, BürkleR, MarurCJ. Épocas de indução floral e soma térmica do período do florescimento à colheita de abacaxi’Smooth Cayenne’. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2005;27:430–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452005000300022
39.
AlmeidaIR de. 7 Clima. In Morangueiro. 2016; 589 Antunes, L.E.C., Reisser Júnior, C., Schwengber, J.F. Embrapa Clima Temperado, Pelotas.
HancockJF. Strawberries. In 1 Strawberry Species. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 2008;1-31. Downloaded from https://cabidigitallibrary.org by 2804:10dc:d133:2b00:493a:33df:e0de:cffd, on 05/23/24
44.
Hernández-MartínezNR, BlanchardC, WellsD, Salazar-GutiérrezMR. Current state and future perspectives of commercial strawberry production: A review. Scientia Horticulturae.. 2023;312:111893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.111893
45.
López-ArandaJM, SoriaC, SantosBM, MirandaL, DomínguezP, Medina-MínguezJJ. Strawberry production in mild climates of the world: a review of current cultivar use. International Journal of Fruit Science. 2011;11(3):232–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2011.608294
46.
PhalengL, MatyoloP, TshitizaO, LubingaM, NtombelaS. South African fruit trade flow. Pretoria, South Africa. National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC). 2020;40.
47.
FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations Statistical Database. Statistical Division, FAO, Rome. 2021 https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QV (accessed on June, 6, 2024).
48.
Abd-ElgawadMM. Plant-parasitic nematodes of strawberry in Egypt: a review. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2019;43(1):7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0049-2
49.
FagherazziAF, BortoliniAJ, ZaninDS, BisolL, SantosAM, GrimaldiF, KretzschmarAA, BaruzziG, FaediW, LucchiP, RufatoL. New strawberry cultivars and breeding activities in Brazil. Acta Horticulturae. 2017;1156:167–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1156.24
50.
Martins de LimaJ, WelterPD, Soares dos SantosMF, KavcicW, Miranda CostaB, FagherazziAF, Regianini NerbassF, Anneliese KretzschmarA, RufatoL, BaruzziG. Planting Density Interferes with Strawberry Production Efficiency in Southern Brazil. Agronomy. 2021;11:408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030408
51.
DeleoJP, GeraldiniF, DiogoJV, BoteonM. Morango: Produção da fruta é um modelo de negócio lucrativo para o agricultor familiar. Hortifruti Brasil. N°. 2023;237:6–12.
52.
HeideOM, SønstebyA. Climate-photothermographs, a tool for ecophysiological assessment of effects of climate warming in crop plants: Examples with three berry crops. Journal of Berry Research. 2020;10(3):411–8. DOI: 10.3233/JBR-190490
53.
DeleoJP, GeraldiniF, DiogoJV, BoteonM. Morango: Produção da fruta é um modelo de negócio lucrativo para o agricultor familiar. Hortifruti Brasil. 2023;237:6–12.
54.
MenzelCM. Climate change increases net CO2 assimilation in the leaves of strawberry, but not yield. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 2023b;99(3):233–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2023.2263773
55.
TiradoMC, ClarkeR, JaykusLA, McQuatters-GollopA, FrankJM. Climate change and food safety: A review. Food Research International. 2010;43(7):1745–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.07.003
56.
MorkeliūnėqA,
RasiukevičiūtėqN,
ValiuškaitėqA. Meteorological Conditions in a Temperate Climate for Colletotrichum acutatum, Strawberry Pathogen Distribution and Susceptibility of Different Cultivars to Anthracnose. Agriculture. 2021;11:80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11010080
57.
AntunesLEC, PeresNA. Strawberry production in brazil and south america. International Journal of Fruit Science. 2013;13(1-2):156–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2012.698147
58.
AntunesLEC, Reisser JuniorC, BonowS, SchwengberJ. Morangos: os desafios da produção brasileira. Campo e Negócios – Anuário HF. 2023;37:88–92.
59.
YonowT, HattinghV, de VilliersM. CLIMEX modelling of the potential global distribution of the citrus black spot disease caused by Guignardia citricarpa and the risk posed to Europe. Crop Protection. 2013;44:18–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.10.006
60.
KriticosJM, KriticosDJ. 2021. Pretty (and) invasive: The potential global distribution of Tithonia diversifolia under current and future climates. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 2021;14:205–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/in2021.29
61.
SouzaPGC, AidooOF, FarneziPKB, HeveWK,
JúniorPAPicançoMCNinsinKDAblormetiFKXáMASiddiquiSASilvaRS. Tamarixia radiata global distribution to current and future climate using the climate change experiment (CLIMEX) model. Sci Rep. 2023;13:1823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29064-3
AngelottiF, GiongoV. Ações de mitigação e adaptação frente às mudanças climáticas. In: Melo, RF. de; Voltolini, TV. (orgs.). Agricultura Familiar Dependente de Chuva no Semiárido Brasília: Embrapa. 2019; p. 445–67.
