Abstract
Introduction
Epidemiological evidence has revealed populations that consume procyanidin-rich diets are less susceptible to inflammatory disease, such as asthma [1, 2]. Asthma is an inflammatory lung disease that involves inappropriate airway inflammation, bronchiole constriction, and lung tissue remodelling that collectively restrict airflow [3]. In allergic asthma these pathophysiological features are perpetuated by Th2 cell driven mechanisms and the infiltration of immune cells into lung tissue [4]. During homeostasis, eosinophil migration into the lung tissue would be tightly controlled; however, the hyperreactive airway epithelium of an asthmatic produces the chemokine eotaxin (CCL11 and its associated isoforms CCL24, and CCL26) in excess, which along with other cytokines instigates the allergic cascade [5].
Procyanidins are polyphenolic secondary plant metabolites that are thought to be biologically active in the context of human health. They are the product of polymerization of monomeric flavon-3-ol units by a currently unknown mechanism within plants [6]. The monomeric units can be bonded together by either A-type orB-type linkages. The differences in structure that result due to linkage are suspected to play a role in the biological activity of procyanidins. In the western diet, fruit are the predominate source of dimeric procyanidins, compounds that consist of two flavon-3-ol units [7]. Cranberries and lingonberries are high in A-type bonded procyanidins such as structurally-defined, procyanidin A2, whereas, apples are a high source of B-type bonded procyanidins such as structurally-defined procyanidin B1 and procyanidin B2 [8]. Polyphenolic metabolites are thought to accumulate in plants as a consequence of stress or pathogenic infiltration [9]. Modern agriculture limits these stresses; Joven et al. suggested that in a western diet it would be difficult to consume enough polyphenols from fruit and vegetables to influence health as a result of reduced polyphenolic profiles due to modern agricultural practices [10, 11]. Furthermore, the mean consumption of fruit and vegetable servings per person in the US is half of the recommended portions at 1.5-2 cups and 2–3 cups, respectively, per day [12]. Thus, concentrated extracts or isolated compounds could be incorporated into foods to supplement the typical western diet for improved health and wellbeing.
In this study, we investigated commercially sourced, structurally-defined, pure dimeric procyanidin compounds for
Materials and methods
Materials
The human alveolar epithelial (A549) cell-line was purchased from the American Tissue Cell Collection (ATCC® CCL-185trademark (c/o Cryosite Lane Cove, NSW, Australia)). Cell culture media, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), penicillin-streptomycin-neomycin antibiotic mixture, 100x L-glutamine, and 2.5% trypsin were purchased from Life Technologies (Auckland, NZ). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Moregate Biotech (Hamilton, NZ). Procyanidin A2 (HPLC ≥99%, epicatechin-(4β-8, 2β-0–7)-epicatechin), procyanidin B1 (HPLC ≥80%, epicatechin-(4β-8)-catechin, and procyanidin B2 (HPLC ≥90%, epicatechin-(4β-8)-epicatechin) were purchased from Extrasynthese (Genay, France). Human recombinant IL-4, TNF
Isolated procyanidins
Procyanidins were dissolved in DMSO and stored at –80°C until experimental use. Procyanidins were then dissolved in serum-free media to desired concentration and added immediately to cell cultures. In synergy experiments concentrations of each procyanidin were prepared separately and added together in the cell culture well. The final DMSO concentration was 0.58% and 1.15% (v/v) DMSO respectively for cultures exposed to 5 μM and 10 μM procyanidins and were used in the negative controls.
Cell culture conditions
Cells were grown under standard tissue culture conditions of 37°C in a 95% humidified atmosphere at 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium: Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F-12) containing 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 μg/mL penicillin, 50 μg/mL streptomycin, 100 μg/mL neomycin, and 10% FBS. The cell cultures were grown to form a monolayer (80% confluence) and then growth arrested for 24 h in the absence of FBS before conducting experiments. Experiments used A549 cells of passage 89–107.
Cytotoxicity
Cell metabolism (viability/ cytotoxicity) after 6 h procyanidin exposure was measured using water soluble tetrazolium-1 (WST-1) reagent to ensure isolated procyanidins were not cytotoxic to cell cultures [13]. During the WST-1 assay, the rate at which tetrazolium salts are cleaved to formazan by cellular mitochondrial dehydrogenases correlates with the number of viable cells in the culture. Changes in the formation of formazan in response to procyanidins is extrapolated to cellular viability/cytotoxicity. A549 cells were plated at 5×104 per well in 96-well plates with media changes to serum-free media 24 h before starting the experiment. Cells were incubated with control media, positive control 2.5 mM H2O2, or procyanidin B1, B2, or A2 at concentrations ranging from 1 μM to 20 μM for 6 h. After a wash with PBS, WST-1 assay reagent was added to each well and cellular viability was measured according to the manufacturer’s directions.
Inducing the production of CCL11
The production of CCL11 can be induced in A549 airway epithelial cells
Enquiry into procyanidin efficacy
In experiments examining effects of procyanidins on inflammation, A549 cells were plated at 5×105 per well in 12-well plates with media changes as described above. Cells were then incubated with media containing procyanidins at concentrations ranging from 1 μM to 10 μM, carrier control DMSO, or positive control 5.8 μM IFN
Statistics
Statistical analysis of data was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 (San Diego, CA, USA) or GenStat: 14th Edition (VSN International, London, UK). Data from CCL11 induction time course and TNF
Results
Optimization of airway epithelial cell bioassay conditions
The dose response profile of CCL11 production is shown in Fig. 1. Production of CCL11 increased rapidly and reached statistical significance at 2.5 ng/mL TNF
Cytotoxicity of procyanidins
Our primary focus in this study was to investigate modulation of CCL11 by procyanidins. To ensure changes observed after exposure were due to procyanidins and not an artefact of cytotoxicity, we utilized the WST-1 assay to investigate changes in cell metabolism (viability) after exposure to a range of procyanidin concentrations.A positive control of 2.5 mM H2O2 was established (Fig. 2A) through preliminary experiments (set up as described above for procyanidins) that investigated a range (1.25–100 mM) of H2O2 concentrations and demonstrated a dose-dependent reduction in viability (data not shown). Exposure to procyanidins B1, B2, and A2 at 1, 5, 10, and 20 μM had no statistically significant effect (Fig. 2B) on cell viability compared to control media and were not cytotoxic. Thus, any changes in CCL11 production following procyanidin exposure at these doses is attributed to an effect of the procyanidins and not as a result of toxicity.
Evaluation of the effects of procyanidins
Experiments evaluating the effects of exposure to procyanidins prior to the inflammatory insult revealed distinct differences in efficacy between the three investigated compounds. Experiments included the use of a positive control IFN
Furthermore, we investigated procyanidins A2 and B2 for possible synergistic relationships. We evaluated the CCL11 inhibitory capacity for a range of concentrations of procyanidins A2 and B2 that together would total 5 μM (e.g. 4 μM A2 with 1 μM B2). We decided to evaluate procyanidin combinations at a total concentration of 5 μM because at this dose an inhibitory capacity is likely to be detected (A2 alone inhibition detected, Fig. 3) and this total dose is physiologically relevant. [15] We choose procyanidin B2 as a representative of B-type procyanidins as we had observed it as a moderate inhibitor of another eotaxin isoform (unpublished data). Concentrations of each procyanidin were mixed separately and added together in the cell culture well. For all combinations of procyanidin A2 and B2 that totalled 5 μM, we observed no statistically significant additional inhibition versus procyanidin A2 alone (Table 1).
Discussion
Evidence supporting the use of plant polyphenolics to improve human health is strong. Scientists are now working toward defining the bioactive molecules that are eliciting effects and through which mechanisms they modulate change [16–18]. There is substantial evidence that procyanidins are capable of modulating key inflammatory pathways in various tissues which has been reviewed elsewhere [7]. Briefly, procyanidins have been demonstrated to modulate signalling pathways that include signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT), nuclear factor-
Here, we established an epithelial cell culture model of airway inflammation, and evaluated three different commercially sourced, structurally-defined, pure dimeric procyanidin compounds for their ability to modulate cytokine-induced CCL11 production. Our study provided evidence that procyanidin A2, but not procyanidins of the B-type, inhibits cytokine-induced production of CCL11, a chemokine that facilitates the early-stage infiltration of eosinophils into lung tissue [19]. We further demonstrated that effects were not due to cytotoxicity and our model demonstrated no synergistic interactions between procyanidin A2 and B2 in terms of inhibiting CCL11 production at a combined total of 5 μM. Our data contribute evidence in support of the continued investigation of A-type procyanidins, and more work in this area with actual A-type procyanidin rich foods (e.g. cranberries) would be a logical next step and could provide further evidence to support possible dietary intervention studies for assisting with the prevention/management of airway inflammation.
Previous work from our group proposed that proanthocyanidins may be the bioactive components responsible for blackcurrant extract-mediated modulation of the production of CCL26 (an isoform of eotaxin)
Our evidence is promising, but should not be extrapolated at this time as further investigation is needed to determine if A-type procyanidins would have an effect on airway inflammation
In our study, only procyanidin A2 was able to inhibit CCL11 production in the cell culture system, procyanidins B1 and B2 were not able to modulate CCL11 production significantly. Other work by our group has suggested that B-type procyanidins, in a complex mixture from fruit extracts, may inhibit other isoforms of eotaxin and thus we investigated the possibility of a synergistic relationship between A-type and B-type procyanidins for CCL11 inhibition. However, there were no significant differences observed in our experimental model when inhibition of CCL11 production by a combination of A- and B-type procyanidins totalling 5 μM was compared to inhibition of CCL11 production by 5 μM procyanidin A2 alone. Polyphenolic compounds evolved in plants to assist in coping with stresses such as drought, excess UV exposure and/or pathogenic invasion, and yet there isn’t a fruit identified with high concentrations of both A-type and B-type procyanidins [10]. Thus it could be speculated that these two different types of procyanidins may result in the same terminal protection of the plant from stress but through different pathways. It has been shown that B-type procyanidins are capable of forming structurally unique hydrogen bonds with subunits of NF-
The greatest potential for a dietary intervention to improve asthma outcomes in people would be to modulate multiple aspects of the condition, as asthma aetiology is not only characterised by inappropriate airway inflammation and there is data to suggest a dissociation between airway hyper-responsiveness and the other pathophysiological features of asthma [27]. The
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr Andrew McLachlan for statistical assistance. Educational resources were provided to S.L.C. by the School of Food and Nutrition, College of Health, Massey University. This work was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment contract (C11X1002) awarded to The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Ltd.
