In order to predict the performance of a permanent magnet linear braking (ECB) with cylindrical structure, an analytical model is established in this paper. The model is based on the magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) method with the consideration of the often ignored magnetic saturation in pole shoe. The influence of induced eddy current is taken into account by introducing the magnetomotive force (MMF) in the model. To obtain braking force, a simple method for approximating the cross-section of the electric field with mean value method is proposed. The proposed model that can predict the braking force performance of ECB in a wide range of structural dimensions is obtained through referring to a small number of finite element models. A prototype test is carried out. The validity of the proposed method is verified through experiment and FEM. Results show that the braking force predicted by the presented method are in good agreement with experimental results and FEM results under different design parameters. The proposed model can accurately represent the variation trend of braking force and critical speed with design parameters.
TianJ.LiD. and YeL., Study on braking characteristics of a novel eddy current-hydraulic hybrid retarder for heavy-duty vehicles, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.35(3) (2020), 1658–1666.
2.
ZhangH.Y.ChenZ.Q.HuaX.G.HuangZ.W. and NiuH.W., Design and dynamic characterization of a large-scale eddy current damper with enhanced performance for vibration control, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing145 (2020).
3.
EbrahimiB., Development of Hybrid Electromagnetic Dampers for Vehicle Suspension Systems, University of Waterloo, Ontario, 2009.
4.
WangP.J. and ChiuehS.J., Analysis of eddy-current brakes for high speed railway, IEEE Trans. Magn.34(4) (1998), 1237–1239.
5.
Perez-DiazJ.L., A novel high temperature eddy current damper with enhanced performance by means of impedance matching, Smart Materials and Structures28(2) (2019), 025034.
6.
HuDYanY. and XuX., Energy saving optimal design and control of electromagnetic brake on passenger car, Mechanical Sciences10(1) (2019), 57–70.
7.
GoslineA., Eddy current brakes for haptic interfaces: Design, identification, and control, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics13(6) (2008), 669–677.
8.
KouB., Nonlinear analytical modeling of hybrid excitation double sided linear eddy current brake, IEEE International Magnetics Conference IEEE51(11) (2015).
9.
MoriscoD.P., A hybrid modeling approach for current diffusion in rectangular conductors, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics55(9) (2019).
10.
ZecM.UhligR.P.ZiolkowskiM. and BrauerH., Finite element analysis of nondestructive testing eddy current problems with moving parts, IEEE Trans. Magn.49(8) (2013), 4785–4794.
11.
LubinTMezaniS. and RezzougA., Exact analytical method for magnetic field computation in the air gap of cylindrical electrical machines considering slotting effects, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics46(4) (2010), 1092–1099.
12.
RamakrishnanK., Improved method for field analysis of surface permanent magnet machines using Schwarz–Christoffel transformation, IET Electric Power Applications11(6) (2017), 1067–1075.
13.
HannonB.SergeantP.DupreL. and PfisterP.-D., Two-dimensional Fourier-based modeling of electric machines—An overview, IEEE Trans. Magn.55(10) (2019), 1–17.
14.
BaoquanK.YinxiJ.HeZ.LuZ. and HailinZ., Analysis and design of hybrid excitation linear eddy current brake, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.29(2) (2014), 496–506.
15.
DingWLiangD. and TangR., A fast nonlinear variable structure equivalent magnetic circuit modeling for dual-channel switched reluctance machine, Energy Conversion & Management52(1) (2011), 308–320.
16.
SudhoffS.D., Magnetic equivalent circuit modeling of induction motors, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion22(2) (2007), 259–270.
17.
MeierS. and HahnI., Modeling single and double stator axial eddy current brakes considering current displacement, magnetic leakage, fringing and saturation using coupled electric and magnetic equivalent circuits, in: IECON 2014 - 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IEEE, 2015.
18.
Wolfgang, Modeling of a permanent magnet synchronous machine with internal magnets using magnetic equivalent circuits, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics50(6) (2014), Pt.2, 8101314-1-8101314-14.
19.
XikangC.WeiL.YangZ.SitongL. and WeiqiL., A concise transmitted torque calculation method for pre-design of axial permanent magnetic coupler, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.35(2) (2020), 938–947.
20.
MoutonZ. and KamperM.J., Modeling and optimal design of an eddy current coupling for slip-synchronous permanent magnet wind generators, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.61(7) (2014), 3367–3376.
21.
HsiehM.-F. and HsuY.-C., A generalized magnetic circuit modeling approach for design of surface permanent-magnet machines, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.59(2) (2012), 779–792.
22.
WuL.J.ZhuZ.Q.StatonD.PopescuM. and HawkinsD., Analytical modeling and analysis of open-circuit magnet loss in surface-mounted permanent-magnet machines, IEEE Trans. Magn.48(3) (2012), 1234–1247.
23.
ChenC., Characteristic analysis of the peak braking force and the critical speed of eddy current braking in a high-speed Maglev, Energies12(13) (2019), 2622.
24.
SaneieH.Nasiri-GheidariZ. and TootoonchianF., Design-oriented modelling of axial-flux variable-reluctance resolver based on magnetic equivalent circuits and Schwarz–Christoffel mapping, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.65(5) (2018), 4322–4330.
25.
WangJ. and ZhuJ., A simple method for performance prediction of permanent magnet eddy current couplings using a new magnetic equivalent circuit model, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.65(3) (2018), 2487–2495.
26.
MohammadiS.MirsalimM.Vaez-ZadehS. and TalebiH.A., Analytical modeling and analysis of axial-flux interior permanent-magnet couplers, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.61(11) (2014), 5940–5947.
27.
JinY.X., Research on Hybrid Excitation Linear Eddy Current Damper, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012.
