Consequent-pole permanent magnet synchronous machines (CP-PMSMs) have attracted considerable interest because they can save considerable permanent magnets and provide acceptable torque performance. The aim of this paper is to discover the full design space potential of the CP-PMSM by optimizing the topology of iron poles. ON/OFF method is used to manage the design region, finding the trade-off relationship between the average torque and torque ripple is the optimization targets. To this end, the topology of iron poles will be optimized by redistributing the iron and air material over the design region. A set of Delaunay mesh-based evolutionary operators is proposed and formulated to apply multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) to the formulated problem. The resulting topologies and convergence of two MOEAs are presented, and the optimization results are discussed.
HidakaY.SatoT. and IgarashiH., Topology optimization method based on ON–OFF method and level set approach, IEEE Trans. Magn.50 (2014), 196–203.
2.
SatoT.WatanabeK. and IgarashiH., Multimaterial topology optimization of electric machines based on normalized gaussian network, IEEE Trans. Magn.51 (2015), 7202604.
3.
PutekP.PulchR.BartelA.ter MatenE.J.W.GüntherM. and GawrylczykK.M., Shape and topology optimization of a permanent-magnet machine under uncertainties, J. Math. Ind.6 (2016).
4.
HirumaS.OhtaniM.SomaS.KubotaY. and IgarashiH., Novel hybridization of parameter and topology optimizations: Application to permanent magnet motor, IEEE Trans. Magn.57 (2021), 8204604.
5.
KimD.-H.SykulskiJ.K. and LowtherD.A., Design optimisation of electromagnetic devices using continuum design sensitivity analysis combined with commercial EM software, IET Meas. Sci. Technol.1 (2007), 30–36.
6.
Di BarbaP., Many-objective shape optimisation of IPM motors for electric vehicle traction, Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech.60 (2019), S149–S162.
7.
AnagnostouG.RønquistE.M. and PateraA.T., A computational procedure for part design, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.97 (1992), 33–48.
8.
TakahashiN.YamadaT.ShimoseS. and MiyagiD., Optimization of rotor of actual IPM motor using ON/OFF method, IEEE Trans. Magn.47 (2011), 1262–1265.
9.
ChoiN.-S.KimD.-H.LeeH.-B. and ByunJ.-K., Topology optimization of dielectric resonator in 3-D waveguide structure considering higher mode incidence, IEEE Trans. Magn.48 (2012), 559–562.
10.
TominagaY.OkamotoY.WakaoS. and SatoS., Binary-based topology optimization of magnetostatic shielding by a hybrid evolutionary algorithm combining genetic algorithm and extended compact genetic algorithm, IEEE Trans. Magn.49 (2013), 2093–2096.
11.
BilquisM.AbdelmounaimT. and FredericG., Rotor head shape optimization in a salient pole synchronous machine, Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech.64 (2020), 1–11.
12.
RozvanyG.I.N.ZhouM. and BirkerT., Generalized shape optimization without homogenization, Struct. Optim.4 (1992), 250–252.
13.
BendsøeM.P. and KikuchiN., Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.71 (1988), 197–224.
14.
GrégoireA.FrançoisJ. and Anca-MariaT., A level-set method for shape optimization, Comptes Rendus Math.334 (2002), 1125–1130.
15.
LimS. and MinS., Design optimization of permanent magnet actuator using multi-phase level-set model, IEEE Trans. Magn.48 (2012), 1641–1644.
16.
LeeJ. and WangS., Topological shape optimization of permanent magnet in voice coil motor using level set method, IEEE Trans. Magn.48 (2012), 931–934.
17.
OkamotoY.WakaoS. and SatoS., Topology optimization based on regularized level-set function for solving 3-D nonlinear magnetic field system with spatial symmetric condition, IEEE Trans. Magn.52 (2017), 7402204.
18.
ChungS.U.KimJ.W.ChunY.D.WooB.C. and HongD.K., Fractional slot concentrated winding PMSM with consequent pole rotor for a low-speed direct drive: Reduction of rare earth permanent magnet, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.30 (2015), 103–109.
19.
LiJ.WangK. and LiF., Analytical prediction of optimal split ratio of consequent-pole permanent magnet machines, IET Electr. Power Appl.12 (2017), 365–372.
20.
WuZ.Z. and ZhuZ.Q., Comparative analysis of end effect in partitioned stator flux reversal machines having surface-mounted and consequent pole permanent magnets, IEEE Trans. Magn.52 (2016), 1–4.
21.
DhulipatiH.MukundanS.LiZ.GhoshE.TjongJ. and KarN.C., Torque performance enhancement in consequent pole PMSM based on magnet pole shape optimization for direct-drive EV, IEEE Trans. Magn.57 (2021), 1–7.
22.
PaplickiP., Hybrid excited electric machine with axial flux bridges, Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech.59 (2019), 703–711.
23.
SunZ.WatanebeK. and XuX., Derivation of optimal rotor topologies for consequent-pole PMSM by ON/OFF method, CES Trans. Electr. Mach. Syst.5(4) (2021), 301–310.
24.
DebK.PradiscoverA.AgarwalS. and MeyarivanT., A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput.6 (2002), 182–197.
25.
ZitzlerE.LaumannsM. and ThieleL., SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm, TIK-report, 2001, 103.
26.
DoiS.SasakiH. and IgarashiH., Multi-objective topology optimization of rotating machines using deep learning, IEEE Trans. Magn.55 (2019), 7202605.
27.
RyuN.SongW.S.JungY. and MinS., Multi-objective topology optimization of a magnetic actuator using an adaptive weight and tunneling method, IEEE Trans. Magn.55 (2019), 7202504.
28.
LiY.LiuL.YangS.RenZ. and MaY., A multi-objective topology optimization methodology and its application to electromagnetic actuator designs, IEEE Trans. Magn.56 (2020), 7506004.
29.
Technical report of the Institute of Electrical Engineering of Japan, Industry Application Society, No.776, 2000.
30.
SatoS.SatoT. and IgarashiH., Topology optimization of synchronous reluctance motor using normalized gaussian network, IEEE Trans. Magn.54 (2015), 8200904.
31.
SasakiH. and IgarashiH., Topology optimization using basis functions for improvement of rotating machine performances, IEEE Trans. Magn.54 (2018), 8201504.
32.
WatanabeK.SugaT. and KitabatakeS., Topology optimization based on the ON/OFF method for synchronous motor, IEEE Trans. Magn.54 (2018), 1–4.
33.
WatanabeK.CampeloF. and IgarashiH., Topology optimization based on immune algorithm and multigrid method, IEEE Trans. Magn.43 (2007), 1637–1640.
34.
WatanabeK., Optimization of inductors using evolutionary algorithms and its experimental validation, IEEE Trans. Magn.46 (2010), 3393–3396.
35.
SatoT.WatanabeK. and IgarashiH., A modified immune algorithm with spatial filtering for multiobjective topology optimisation of electromagnetic devices, Compel-Int. J. Comp. Math. Electr. Electron. Eng.33 (2014), 821–833.
36.
LipoT.A., Winding distribution in an ideal machine, in: Analysis of Synchronous Machine, 2nd edn, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012, pp. 1–76.
37.
ChengM.HanP. and HuaW., General airgap field modulation theory for electrical machines, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.64(8) (2017), 6063–6074.
38.
ChengM.WenH.HanP. and ZhuX., Analysis of airgap field modulation principle of simple salient poles, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.66(4) (2019), 2628–2638.
39.
WenH.ChengM.JiangY.TongM. and WangW., Analysis of airgap field modulation principle of flux guides, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.56(5) (2020), 4758–4768.
40.
ChengM.HanP.DuY.WenH. and LiX., A tutorial on general air-gap field modulation theory for electric machines, IEEE Trans. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. early access, doi:10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3055224.
