The paper considers the description of DC-biased minor loops with the GRUCAD model. The model is given in the form of a combination of nonlinear and ordinary differential equations, what bears resemblance to the well-known Jiles–Atherton formalism. However the model behaves in a qualitatively different way than the original Jiles’ proposal. The paper points out the differences between both approaches and presents the results of modeling for biased hysteresis loops of a Soft Magnetic Composite core.
PriceP., Geomagnetically induced current effects on transformers, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv.17(4) (2002), 1002–1008.
2.
MoussaviS.A., Electromagnetic modelling of power transformers with DC magnetization, Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden, 2012.
3.
MayergoyzI.D., Mathematical Models of Hysteresis, Springer, 1991.
4.
CaoY.XuK.JiangW.DroubayT.RamuhalliP.EdwardsD.JohnsonB.R. and McCloyJ., Hysteresis in single and polycrystalline iron thin films: Major and minor loops, first order reversal curves, and Preisach modeling, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.395 (2015), 361–375.
5.
ZhaoX.RobertsA.P.HeslopD.PatersonG.A.LiY. and LiJ., Magnetic domain state diagnosis using hysteresis reversal curves, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth122 (2017), 4767–4769.
6.
de la BarrièreO.RagusaC.AppinoC. and FiorilloF., Prediction of energy losses in soft magnetic materials under arbitrary induction waveforms and DC bias, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.64(3) (2017), 2522–2529.
7.
MadelungE., Über Magnetisierung durch schnellverlaufende Ströme und die Wirkungsweise des Rutheford-Marconischen Magnetdetektors, Ann. Phys.322(10) (1905), 861–890.
8.
TalukdarS.N. and BaileyJ.R., Hysteresis models for system studies, IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst.95(4) (1976), 1429–1434.
9.
NaiduS.R., Simulation of the hysteresis phenomenon using Preisach’s theory, IEE Proc. A137(2) (1990), 73–79.
10.
ZirkaS.E. and MorozYu.I., Hysteresis modeling based on transplantation, IEEE Trans. Magn.31(6) (1995), 3509–3511.
11.
TakácsJ., Mathematics of Hysteretic Phenomena, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
12.
FaizJ. and SaffariS., A new technique for modelling hysteresis phenomenon in soft magnetic materials, Electromagnetics30 (2010), 376–401.
13.
ChwastekK., Higher order reversal curves in some hysteresis models, Arch. Electr. Eng.61(4) (2012), 455–470.
14.
RenhartW.BiróO.MageleCh.PreisK. and RabelA., Inrush current computations using an optimized analytical hysteresis model, COMPEL36(5) (2017), 1568–1576.
15.
BastosJ.P.A.HoffmanK.LeiteJ.V. and SadowskiN., A new and robust hysteresis modeling based on simple equations, IEEE Trans. Magn.54(3) (2018), 7300104 (4 pp.).
16.
JilesD.C. and AthertonD.L., Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.61 (1986), 48–60.
17.
BenabouA.LeiteJ.V.ClénetS.SimaoC. and SadowskiN., Minor loops modelling with a modified Jiles–Atherton model and comparison with the Preisach model, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.320 (2008), e1034–e1038.
18.
ChwastekK., Modelling offset hysteresis loops with the modified Jiles–Atherton description, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.42 (2009), 165002 (5 pp.).
19.
TomsH.L.ColclaserR.G. and KreftaM.P., Two-dimensional finite element magnetic modeling for scalar hysteresis effects, IEEE Trans. Magn.37(2) (2001), 982–988.
20.
ZirkaS.E.MorozYu.I.HarrisonR.G. and ChwastekK., On physical aspects of the Jiles–Atherton hysteresis models, J. Appl. Phys.112 (2012), 043916 (7 pp.).
21.
JastrzębskiR. and ChwastekK., A comparison of macroscopic descriptions of magnetization curves, ITM Web of Conferences15 (2017), 03003, doi:10.1051/itmconf/20171503003.
22.
KoltermannP.I.RighiL.A.BastosJ.P.A.CarlsonR.SadowskiN. and BatistelaN.J., A modified Jiles method for hysteresis computation, Physica B275 (2000), 233–237.
23.
BenabouA.LeiteJ.V.ClénetS.SimaoC. and SadowskiN., Minor loops modelling with a modified Jiles–Atherton model and comparison with the Preisach model, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.320 (2008), e1034–e1038.
24.
BertottiG., Hysteresis in Magnetism, Academic Press, San Diego, 1998.
25.
FiorilloF., Measurement and Characterization of Magnetic Materials, Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2004.
26.
SteentjesS.ChwastekK.PetrunM.DolinarD. and HameyerK., Sensitivity analysis and modeling of symmetric minor hysteresis loops using the GRUCAD description, IEEE Trans. Magn.50(11) (2014), doi:10.1109/TMAG.2014.2323250.
27.
JastrzębskiR.ChwastekK.BiondićI. and MiličevićK., A comparison of different estimation methods for hysteresis modelling, Acta Phys. Pol. A131 (2017), 1228–1231.
