In the paper, a multi-objective optimization of an electrode pair for electrochemotherapy is performed. The aim is to design the electrode pair geometry in order to obtain an effective treatment, which means a homogeneous and suitable electric field distribution. To solve this problem, two recently developed algorithms, M-NSGA and 𝜇-BiMO, are applied.
MirL.M. and OrlowskiS., Mechanisms of electrochemotherapy, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews35 (1999), 107–118, doi:10.1016/S0169-409X(98)00066-0.
2.
MartyM.SersaG.GarbayJ.R.GehlJ.CollinsC.G.SnojM.BillardV.GeertsenP.F.LarkinJ.O.MiklavcicD.PavlovicI.Paulin-KosirS.M.CemazarM.MorsliN.SodenD.M.RudolfZ.RobertC.O’SullivanG.C. and MirL.M., Electrochemotherapy – An easy, highly effective and safe treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases: Results of ESOPE (European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy) study, European Journal of Cancer Supplements4 (2006), 3–13, doi:10.1016/j.ejcsup.2006.08.002.
3.
SersaG.MiklavcicD.CemazarM.RudolfZ.PuciharG. and SnojM., Electrochemotherapy in treatment of tumours, European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO)34 (2008), 232–240, doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2007.05.016.
4.
SersaG.CuferT.PaulinS.M.CemazarM. and SnojM., Electrochemotherapy of chest wall breast cancer recurrence, Cancer Treat. Rev.38 (2012), 379–386, doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.07.006.
5.
CampanaL.MocellinS.BassoM.PuccettiO.De SalvoG.Chiarion-SileniV.VecchiatoA.CortiL.RossiC. and NittiD., Bleomycin-based electrochemotherapy: Clinical outcome from a single Institution’s experience with 52 patients, Annals of Surgical Oncology16 (2009), 191–199, doi:10.1245/s10434-008-0204-8.
6.
AdeyanjuO.Al-AngariH. and SahakianA., The optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma, Radiology and Oncology46 (2012), doi:10.2478/v10019-012-0026-y.
7.
CampanaL.G.DughieroF.ForzanM.RossiC.R. and SieniE., A prototype of a flexible grid electrode to treat widespread superficial tumors by means of Electrochemotherapy, Radiol Oncol50 (2016), 49–57, doi:10.1515/raon-2016-0013.
8.
CampanaL.G.BulloM.DiBarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM.MognaschiM.E.SgarbossaP.TosiA.L.BernardisA. and SieniE., Effect of tissue inhomogeneity in soft tissue sarcomas: From real cases to numerical and experimental models, Technology in Cancer Research Treatment17 (2018), 153303381878969, doi:10.1177/1533033818789693.
9.
CampanaL.G.Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM.MognaschiM.E.RizzoR. and SieniE., Non-parallellism of needles in electroporation: 3D computational model and experimental analysis, COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (2018), doi:10.1108/COMPEL-04-2018-0189.
10.
GabrielS.LaulR.W. and GabrielC., The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz, Phys. Med. Biol.41 (1996), 2251–2269.
11.
GabrielS.LaulR.W. and GabrielC., The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues, Phys. Med. Biol.41 (1996), 2271–2293.
12.
BernardisA.BulloM.CampanaL.G.Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM.MognaschiM.E.SgarbossaP. and SieniE., Electric field computation and measurements in the electroporation of inhomogeneous samples, Open Physics15 (2017), doi:10.1515/phys-2017-0092.
13.
DenziA.StrigariL.Di FilippoF.BottiC.Di FilippoS.PerracchioL.RonchettiM.CadossiR. and LibertiM., Modeling the positioning of single needle electrodes for the treatment of breast cancer in a clinical case, BioMedical Engineering OnLine14 (2015), S1, doi:10.1186/1475-925X-14-S3-S1.
14.
MiklavčičD.ŠemrovD.MekidH. and MirL.M., A validated model of in vivo electric field distribution in tissues for electrochemotherapy and for DNA electrotransfer for gene therapy, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects1523 (2000), 73–83, doi:10.1016/S0304-4165(00)00101-X.
15.
PavseljN. and MiklavcicD., Numerical models of skin electropermeabilization taking into account conductivity changes and the presence of local transport regions, Plasma Science, IEEE Transactions on36 (2008), 1650–1658, doi:10.1109/TPS.2008.928715.
16.
PavšeljN. and MiklavčičD., Numerical modeling in electroporation-based biomedical applications, Radiology and Oncology42 (2008), 159–168, doi:10.2478/v10019-008-0008-2.
17.
CorovicS.LackovicI.SustaricP.SustarT.RodicT. and MiklavcicD., Modeling of electric field distribution in tissues during electroporation, BioMedical Engineering OnLine12 (2013), 16.
18.
OngaroA.CampanaL.G.De MatteiM.Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM.MognaschiM.E.PellatiA.RossiC.R.BernardelloC. and SieniE., Effect of electrode distance in grid electrode: Numerical models and in vitro tests, Technology in Cancer Research Treatment17 (2018), 153303381876449, doi:10.1177/1533033818764498.
19.
MiklavčičD.MirL.M. and Thomas VernierP., Electroporation-based technologies and treatments, The Journal of Membrane Biology236 (2010), 1–2, doi:10.1007/s00232-010-9287-9.
20.
CastellvíQ.BanúsJ. and IvorraA., 3D assessment of irreversible electroporation treatments in vegetal models, in: 1st World Congress on Electroporation and Pulsed Electric Fields in Biology, Medicine and Food Environmental TechnologiesJarmT. and KramarP. (eds), Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2016, pp. 294–297. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-287-817-5_65 (accessed January 8, 2016).
21.
BretonM.BuretF.KrahenbuhlL.LeguebeM.MirL. M.PerrusselR.PoignardC.ScorrettiR. and VoyerD., Non-linear steady-state electrical current modeling for the electropermeabilization of biological tissue, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics51 (2015), 1–4, doi:10.1109/TMAG.2014.2351836.
22.
BernardisA.BulloM.CampanaL.G.Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM.MognaschiM.E.SgarbossaP. and SieniE., Electric field computation and measurements in the electroporation of inhomogeneous samples, Open Physics15 (2017), doi:10.1515/phys-2017-0092.
23.
CorovicS.ZupanicA. and MiklavcicD., Numerical modeling and optimization of electric field distribution in subcutaneous tumor treated with electrochemotherapy using needle electrodes, Plasma Science, IEEE Transactions on36 (2008), 1665–1672, doi:10.1109/TPS.2008.2000996.
24.
SieniE.Di BarbaP. and ForzanM., Migration NSGA: method to improve a non-elitist searching of Pareto front, with application in magnetics, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering24 (2016), 543–566, doi:10.1080/17415977.2015.1047366.
25.
SieniE.Di BarbaP.DughieroF. and ForzanM., Self-adaptive migration NSGA and optimal design of inductors for magneto-fluid hyperthermia, Engineering Computations35 (2018), 1727–1746, doi:10.1108/EC-05-2016-0186.
DebK.PratapA.AgarwalS. and MeyarivanT., A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on6 (2002), 182–197, doi:10.1109/4235.996017.
28.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM. and SieniE., Self-adaptive NGSA algorithm and optimal design of inductors for magneto-fluid hyperthermia, COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering36 (2017), 535–545.
29.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM. and SieniE., Migration-corrected NSGA-II for improving multiobjective design optimization in electromagnetics, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics51 (2016), 161–172, doi:10.3233/JAE-150171.
30.
Di BarbaP.MognaschiM.E.SaviniA. and WiakS., Island biogeography as a paradigm for MEMS optimal design, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics51 (2016), S97–S105, doi:10.3233/JAE-2015.
31.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.MognaschiM.E.SaviniA. and WiakS., Biogeography-inspired multiobjective optimization and MEMS design, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics52 (2016), 1–4, doi:10.1109/TMAG.2015.2488982.
Di BarbaP.MognaschiM.E.VeniniP. and WiakS., Biogeography-inspired multiobjective optimization for helping MEMS synthesis, Archives of Electrical Engineering66 (2017), doi:10.1515/aee-2017-0046.
34.
Di BarbaP.MognaschiM.E. and KrawczykA., The biogeography-inspired optimization for the design of coils for nerve stimulation, in: IEEE, 2017, pp. 542–545.doi:10.1109/EUROCON.2017.8011170.
