Magnetorheological (MR) damper is a smart device which the damping force can be adjusted according to the working operations in a short time. Metal foam MR damper is a new type of MR dampers in which uses the metal foam to store and release the MR fluids. The dynamic response time of the metal foam MR damper is quite different due to the added metal foam especially for the dynamic response time model. This paper proposed a dynamic response time model for the metal foam MR damper based on the demonstration of the working mechanisms and the factors about the response behaviors.
CarlsonJ.D. and JollyM.R., MR fluid, foam and elastomer devices, Mechatronics (2000), doi:10.1016/S0957-4158(99)00064-1.
2.
TaoR., Super-strong magnetorheological fluids, J. Phys. Condens. Matter (2001), doi:10.1088/0953-8984/13/50/202.
3.
YaoX.Y.YuM. and FuJ., Magnetic-enhanced normal force of magnetorheological fluids, Smart Mater. Struct. (2015), doi:10.1088/0964-1726/24/3/035001.
4.
DuE.ZhaoQ.XiaoY.CaiL. and TaoR., Electric field suppressed turbulence and reduced viscosity of asphaltene base crude oil sample, Fuel220 (2018), 358–362.
5.
DuE.CaiL.HuangK.TangH.XuX. and TaoR., Reducing viscosity to promote biodiesel for energy security and improve combustion efficiency, Fuel211 (2018), 194–196, doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.055.
6.
CarlsonJ.D. and SpencerB.F., Magneto-rheological fluid dampers for semi-active seismic control, in: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Motion Vib. Control, 1996, doi:10.1300/J124v24n04_06.
7.
ChoiS.-B.NamM.-H. and LeeB.-K., Vibration control of a MR seat damper for commercial vehicles, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. (2000), doi:10.1106/AERG-3QKV-31V8-F250.
8.
ChoiY.-T. and WereleyN.M., Biodynamic response mitigation to shock loads using magnetorheological helicopter crew seat suspensions, J. Aircr. (2005), doi:10.2514/1.6839.
9.
McManusS.J.ClairK.A.St.BoileauP.É.BoutinJ. and RakhejaS., Evaluation of vibration and shock attenuation performance of a suspension seat with a semi-active magnetorheological fluid damper, J. Sound Vib. (2002), doi:10.1006/jsvi.2001.4262.
10.
ChoiS.B.LiW.YuM.DuH.FuJ. and DoP.X., State of the art of control schemes for smart systems featuring magneto-rheological materials, Smart Mater. Struct. (2016), doi:10.1088/0964-1726/25/4/043001.
11.
DykeS.J.SpencerB.F.SainM.K. and CarlsonJ.D., An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection, Smart Mater. Struct. (1998), doi:10.1088/0964-1726/7/5/012.
12.
YangG.SpencerB.F.JungH.-J. and CarlsonJ.D., Dynamic modeling of large-scale magnetorheological damper systems for civil engineering applications, J. Eng. Mech.130(9) (2004), doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399 (1107).
13.
YoshidaO. and DykeS.J., Seismic control of a nonlinear benchmark building using smart dampers, J. Eng. Mech.130(4) (2004), doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399 (386).
14.
DasD.DattaT.K. and MadanA., Semiactive fuzzy control of the seismic response of building frames with MR dampers, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. (2012), doi:10.1002/eqe.1120.
15.
HuG.LuY.SunS. and LiW., Performance analysis of a magnetorheological damper with energy harvesting ability, Shock Vib. (2016), doi:10.1155/2016/2959763.
16.
JansenL.M. and DykeS.J., Semiactive control strategies for MR dampers: comparative study, J. Eng. Mech.126(8) (2000), doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399 (795).
17.
YangG.SpencerB.F.CarlsonJ.D. and SainM.K., Large-scale MR fluid dampers: Modeling and dynamic performance considerations, Eng. Struct. (2002), doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00097-9.
18.
YangJ.SunS.LiW.DuH.AliciG. and NakanoM., Development of a linear damper working with magnetorheological shear thickening fluids, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. (2015), doi:10.1177/1045389X15577653.
19.
ZhangX.ZhangX.ZhaoY.ZhaoJ. and XuZ., Experimental and numerical studies on a composite MR damper considering magnetic saturation effect, Eng. Struct. (2017), doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.055.
20.
LiB.LiuJ.SongZ. and HuY., Modelling and optimisation of a five dimensional vibration isolator, Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol. (2016), doi:10.1504/IJMPT.2016.076420.
21.
KikuchiT.NomaJ.AkaiwaS. and UeshimaY., Response time of magnetorheological fluid-based haptic device, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.27 (2015), 859–865, doi:10.1177/1045389X15596621.
22.
KooJ.-H.GoncalvesF.D. and AhmadianM., Investigation of the response time of magnetorheological fluid dampers, in: Smart Structures and Materials 2004: Damping and Isolation, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2004, pp. 63–71.
23.
FeedbackS. and AmputeesU.L., Contributions A1 Piezoactuators I A1 Piezoactuators I, 2018, pp. 25–27.
24.
ChaY.J.AgrawalA.K. and DykeS.J., Time delay effects on large-scale MR damper based semi-active control strategies, Smart Mater. Struct.22 (2013), doi:10.1088/0964-1726/22/1/015011.
25.
ChenK.TianY.ShanL. and JiangJ., Transient response of sheared magnetic powder excited by a stepwise magnetic field and its comparison with ER and MR fluids, Smart Mater. Struct.22 (2013), doi:10.1088/0964-1726/22/9/097001.
26.
SahinH.GordaninejadF.WangX. and LiuY., Response time of magnetorheological fluids and magnetorheological valves under various flow conditions, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. (2012), doi:10.1177/1045389X12447984.
27.
MichalK.OndřejM.ZbyněkS.JakubR.PetrN. and IvanM., Transient magnetic model of magnetorheological damper and its experimental verification, in: MATEC Web Conf., Vol. 153, 2018, p. 6002, doi:10.1051/matecconf/201815306002.
28.
StreckerZ.RoupecJ.MazurekI.MachacekO.KubikM. and KlapkaM., Design of magnetorheological damper with short time response, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.26 (2015), 1951–1958, doi:10.1177/1045389X15591381.
29.
YaoX.ChenZ.QinH.YuQ. and LiC., Delay time of magnetorheological fluids in porous foam metal, Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. Rapid Commun. (2016).
30.
YaoX.LiuC.LiangH.QinH.YuQ. and LiC., Normal force of magnetorheological fluids with foam metal under oscillatory shear modes, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. (2016), doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.014.
ChrzanM.J. and CarlsonJ.D., MR fluid sponge devices and their use in vibration control of washing machines, in: Smart Struct. Mater. 2001 Damping Isol., International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2001, pp. 370–379.
33.
YanY.X.HuiL.X.YuM.FuJ. and DongL.H., Dynamic response time of a metal foam magneto-rheological damper, Smart Mater. Struct.22 (2013), 25026.
34.
LangeA.LangerH. and EngelA., Dynamics of a single peak of the Rosensweig instability in a magnetic fluid, Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. (2000), doi:10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00018-X.
35.
GibsonL.J. and AshbyM.F., Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
36.
SochiT., Modelling the flow of yield-stress fluids in porous media, Transport in Porous Media85.2 (2010), 489–503.
