The application of surface permanent magnet synchronous motor (SPMSM) driven by inverter is becoming more and more extensive. However, the voltage harmonics generated by the inverter will have a severe impact on the motor torque ripple. In order to analyze its impact, a 1500 r/min 3 kW SPMSM is taken as an example. Firstly, the two-dimensional finite element model is established, and the accuracy of the model is verified by the experiment. Secondly, the torque ripple is calculated and analyzed. The influences of voltage harmonic amplitude and voltage harmonic initial phase angle on torque ripple are mainly studied, and the variation law is obtained. At the same time, in order to distinguish the influence of higher harmonics on torque ripple, the voltage harmonics is decoupled to get the variation law of torque ripple. Finally, based on the analysis of the current ripple and air gap magnetic density, the influence mechanism of voltage harmonics on torque ripple is revealed. The conclusion is helpful to optimize motor design and improve motor performance.
JinH.ParkJ.KumD. and LeeJ., Magnetic flux waveform estimation for fast efficiency map calculation in permanent magnet synchronous motors, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics56(3) (2018), 373–386, doi:10.3233/JAE-170042.
2.
ChenX.DengZ.HuJ. and DengT., An analytical model of unbalanced magnetic pull for PMSM used in electric vehicle: numerical and experimental validation, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics54(4) (2017), 583–596, doi:10.3233/JAE-160121.
3.
LiH.YaoH.HouS. and WangP., Current sensor fault diagnosis and adaptive fault-tolerant control of PMSM drive system based on differential algebraic method, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics53(3) (2017), 551–565, doi:10.3233/JAE-160090.
4.
HongD.JooD.LeeJ. and WooB., Effects of the pole-slot combination on the PMSM of an integrated motor propulsor for an unmanned underwater vehicle considering its electric performance, noise and vibration, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics52(3-4) (2016), 1689–1695, doi:10.3233/JAE-162162.
5.
QiuH.YuW.TangB.LiW.YangC. and WangY., Effects of driving modes on permanent magnet motor electromagnetic and temperature fields at limit conditions, COMPEL-The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering35(6SI) (2016), 2045–2062, doi:10.1108/COMPEL-04-2016-0148.
6.
HaraT.AjimaT.TanabeY.WatanabeM.HoshinoK. and OyamaK., Analysis of vibration of permanent magnet synchronous motor with distributed winding for thePWM method of voltage source inverters, IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (2017), 5438–5444, doi:10.1109/TIA.2018.2847620.
7.
HanJ.LiuR. and MaX., Research of the influence of different PWM inverters on the eddy current losses of induction motors, in: 2011 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, Beijing, 2011, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/ICEMS.2011.6073730.
8.
TaniguchiK.InoueM.TakedaY. and MorimotoS., A PWM strategy for reducing torque-ripple in inverter-fed induction motor, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications30(1) (1994), 71–77, doi:10.1109/28.273623.
9.
LiangP.PeiY.ChaiF. and ChengS., Equivalent stator slot model of temperature field for high torque-density permanent magnet synchronous in-wheel motors accounting for winding type, COMPEL-The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering35(2) (2016), 713–727, doi:10.1108/COMPEL-02-2015-0040.
10.
LiY.ZhuZ.Q. and LiG.J., Influence of stator topologies on average torque and torque ripple of fractional-slot SPM machines with fully closed slots, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications54(3) (2018), 2151–2164, doi:10.1109/TIA.2018.2799178.
11.
LiuJ.LiH. and DengY., Torque ripple minimization of PMSM based on robust ILC via adaptive sliding mode control, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics33(4) (2018), 3655–3671, doi:10.1109/TPEL.2017.2711098.
12.
BondreV.S. and ThosarA.G., Study of control techniques for torque ripple reduction in BLDC motor, in: 2017 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), Vellore, 2017, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/IPACT.2017.8245051.
13.
ZhuM.ZhangY.XieZ. and ZhaoB., Method of reducing noise and torque ripple of switched reluctance motor, in: 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Jinan, 2017, pp. 2761–2765.
14.
HsiehM.F. and HsuY.S., An investigation on influence of magnet arc shaping upon back electromotve force waveforms for design of permanent-magnet brushless motors, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics41(10) (2005), 3949–3951, doi:10.1109/TMAG.2005.854975.
15.
DaiM.KeyhaniA. and SebastianT., Torque ripple analysis of a permanent magnet brushless DC motor using finite element method, in: IEMDC 2001. IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference (Cat. No. 01EX485), Cambridge, MA, 2001, pp. 241–245. doi:10.1109/IEMDC.2001.939306.
16.
QiuH.WeiY.YangC. and FanX., Influence of different frequency harmonic generated by rectifier on high-speed permanent magnet generator, Journal of Electrical Engineering Technology13(5) (2018), 1956–1964, doi:10.5370/JEET.2018.13.5.1956.
17.
KelothV.MijasM.ManuP.A.ThomasP.MenonV.M. and PraveenR.P., Analysis of cogging torque reduction techniques of a slotless PMBLDC motor, in: 2014 Annual International Conference on Emerging Research Areas: Magnetics, Machines and Drives (AICERA/iCMMD), Kottayam, 2014, pp. 1–6.
18.
TudoracheT.TrifuI.GhitaC. and BostanV., Improved mathematical model of pmsm taking into account cogging torque oscillations, Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering12(3) (2012), 59–64, doi:10.4316/AECE.2012.03009.
19.
LiQ.FanT. and WenX., Armature-reaction magnetic field analysis for interior permanent magnet motor based on winding function theory, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics49(32) (2013), 1193–1201, doi:10.1109/TMAG.2012.2224358.
20.
QiuH.TangB.YuW.YuanS.WuJ.YangC. and CuiG., Analysis of the super high-speed permanent magnet generator under unbalanced load condition, IET Electric Power Applications11(8) (2017), 1492–1498, doi:10.1049/iet-epa.2016.0669.
