Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this paper, a novel mechanical model based on arc tangent function is established to accurately describe the hysteretic behavior of the squeeze mode Magnetorheological (MR) damper. An improved differential evolution (DE) algorithm, which can avoid the shortage of being easily trapped in a local extremum, is applied to identify the parameters of the model. The dynamical characteristic of the MR damper is experimentally investigated with the help of the MTS machine. The validity of the proposed model is confirmed from a good agreement between the simulations and measured data. In addition, comparative analysis of the simulations with two other existing models, reveals that the proposed model has a relatively high modelling accuracy with less parameters and explicit physical meaning.

Keywords

Magnetorheological damper squeeze-mode characteristic analysis modeling differential evolution algorithm

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dyke

S.J.

Spencer Jr.

B.F.

Sain

M.K.

and Carlson

J.D.

, Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction, Smart Mater Struct 5(5) (1996), 565–575.

Sun

X.H.

Xue

X.M.

Zhang

and Zhang

, Mechanics performance test of MR damperand its application in structural seismicresponse control, Int J Appl Electrom 33 (2010), 1493–1501.

Cetin

Zergeroglu

Sivrioglu

and Yuksek

, A new semiactive nonlinear adaptive controller for structures using MR damper: Design and experimental validation, Nonlinear Dynamics 66 (2011), 731–743.

Balamurugan

Jancirani

and Eltantawie

M.A.

, Generalized magnetorheological (MR) damper model and its application in semi-active control of vehicle suspension system, Int J Automot Techn 15 (2014), 419–427, doi:10.1007/s12239-014-0044-4.

Mazlan

S.A.

Issa

Chowdhury

H.A.

and Olabi

A.G.

, Magnetic circuit design for the squeeze mode experiments on magnetorheological fluids, Materials and Design 30(6) (2009), 1985–1993.

Kulkarni

Ciocanel

Vieira

S.L.

and Naganathan

, Study of the behavior of MR fluids in squeeze, torsional and valve modes, J Intel Mat Syst Str 14(2) (2015), 99–104.

Mazlan

S.A.

Ekreem

N.B.

and Olabi

A.G.

, The performance of magnetorheological fluid in squeeze mode, Smart Mater Struct 16 (2007), 1678–1682.

Sims

N.D.

Stanway

and Johnson

A.R.

, Vibration isolation using a magnetorheological damper in the squeeze-flow mode, Proc. SPIE 3668 (1999), 520–527.

Kim

K.J.

Lee

C.W.

and Koo

J.H.

, Design and modeling of semi-active squeeze film dampers using magneto-rheological fluids, Smart Mater Struct 17 (2008), 035006.

10.

Sahin

Engin

and Cesmeci

, Comparison of some existing parametric models for magnetorheologicalfluid dampers, Smart Mater Struct 19(3) (2010), 1–11.

11.

Butz

and von Stryk

, Modelling and simulation of electro and magnetorheological fluid dampers, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 82(1) (2002), 3–20.

12.

Wen

Y.K.

, Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 102(2) (1976), 249–263.

13.

Spencer Jr.

B.F.

Dyke

S.J.

Sain

M.K.

and Carlson

J.D.

, Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers, Journal of Engineering Mechanics-American Society of Civil Engineers 123 (1997), 230–238.

14.

Kwok

N.M.

Q.P.

Nguyen

T.H.

and Samali

, A novel hysteretic model for magnetorheological fluid damper andparameter identification using particle swarm optimization, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 132(2) (2006), 441–451.

15.

Zhang

X.J.

Farjoud

Ahmadian

Craft

and Guo

K.H.

, Dynamic testing and modeling of an MR squeeze mount, J Intel Mat Syst Str 22(15) (2011), 1717–1728.

16.

Lam

and Zhang

, Modelling of a magneto-rheological damper by evolving radial basis function networks, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 19(8) (2006), 869–881.

17.

Schurter

K.C.

and Roschke

P.N.

, Fuzzy modeling of a magnetorheological damper using ANFIS, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems 1 (2000), 122–127.

18.

Jin

Sain

M.K.

and Spencer

B.E.

, Nonlinear blackbox modeling of MR-dampers for civil structural control, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 13(3) (2005), 345–355.

19.

Goldberg

D.E.

, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machinelearning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.

20.

Clerc

and Kennedy

, The particle swarm-explosion, stability and convergence in a multidimensional complex space, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6 (2002), 58–73.

21.

Kirkpatrick

Gelatt

and Vecchi

, Optimisation by simulated annealing, Science 220 (1983), 671–680.

22.

Storn

and Price

, Differential evolution. a simple and efficient heuristic scheme for global optimization over continuos spaces, Journal of Global Optimization 11(4) (1997), 341–359.

23.

Yao

G.Z.

Yap

F.F.

Chen

W.H.

and Yeo

S.H.

, MR damper and its application for semi-active control of vehicle suspension system, Mechatronics 12(7) (2002), 963–973.

24.

Snyder

R.A.

Kamath

G.M.

and Wereley

N.M.

, Characterization and analysis of magnetorheological damperbehavior under sinusoidal loading, AIAA Journal 39(7) (2001), 1240–1253.

25.

Ferrante

and Ville

, Recent advances in differential evolution: a survey and experimental analysis, Artificial Intelligence Review 33 (2010), 61–106.

26.

Guo

S.M.

and Yang

C.C.

, Enhancing differential evolution utilizing eigenvector-based crossover operator, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 19(1) (2015), 31–49.

27.

Kim

H.K.

Chong

J.K.

Park

K.Y.

and Lowther

, Differential evolution strategy for constrained global optimization and application to practical engineering problems, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 43(4) (2007), 1565–1568.

28.

Liu

Wang

Jin

Y.H.

Huang

D.X.

and Tang

, Control and synchronization of chaotic systems by differential evolution algorithm, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 34(2) (2007), 412–419.

29.

Dangor

Dahunsi

O.A.

Pedro

J.O.

and Ali

M.M.

, Evolutionary algorithm-based PID controller tuning for nonlinear quarter-car electrohydraulic vehicle suspensions, Nonlinear Dynamics 78(4) (2014), 2795–2810.

30.

Wang

X.D.

Wang

J.S.

and Jiang

M.L.

, Solving parameter identification problem of nonlinear systems using differential evolution algorithm, Intelligent Information Technology Application 1 (2008), 687–691.

31.

Weng

J.S.

H.Y.

and Zhang

M.K.

, Experimental modeling of magnetorheological damper, Journal of VibrationEngineering 13(4) (2000), 616–620.

32.

Balamurugan

Jancirani

and Eltantawie

M.A.

, Generalized magnetorheological (MR) damper model and its application in semi-active control of vehicle suspension system, International Journal of Automotive Technology 15(3) (2014), 419–427.

33.

Geiler

A.L.

Harris

V.G.

Vittoria

and Sun

N.X.

, A quantitative model for the nonlinear response of fluxgate magnetometers, Journal of Applied Physics 99(8) (2006), 330.

34.

Trujillo

Cruz

Rivero

and Barrios

, Analysis of the fluxgate response through a simple spice model, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 75(1) (1999), 1–7.

35.

Snyder

R.A.

Kamath

G.M.

and Wereley

N.M.

, Characterization and analysis of magnetorheological damper behavior under sinusoidal loading, AIAA Journal 39(7) (2001), 1240–1253.

36.

Murakami

Sakai

and Nakano

, Damping and response characteristics of passive type MR damper, Int J Appl Electrom 33(3) (2010), 911–917.

37.

Priyandoko

and Baharom

M.Z.

, PSO-optimised adaptive neuro-fuzzy system for magneto-rheological damper modeling, Int J Appl Electrom 41 (2013), 301–312.

38.

Zhang

H.L.

Liu

Zhang

T.H.

Wang

Rakheja

and Su

C.Y.

, Nonlinear dynamic and electromagnetic interference coupled-field analysis in a semi-active suspension system with magneto-rheological damper, Int J Appl Electrom 55 (2018), 41–45.

Modelling and experimental investigation of a squeeze mode magnetorheological damper

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References