This study focuses on a class of a 3-phase Switched Reluctance Motor. The aim of the paper is to optimize torque and iron losses as a function of the geometry. To enhance the efficiency of the motor, a procedure of automated optimal design is adopted. Two materials are evaluated and compared: in particular, a Soft Magnetic Composite material might be a good alternative for rotor and stator cores instead of a laminated steel. The analysis model of the motor is based on 2D Finite Element Method (FEM) simulation, while the design optimization is based on evolutionary computing.
MillerT.J.E., Switched Reluctance Motors and Their Control, Magna Physics Publishing, Hillsboro, OH, and Oxford, 1993.
2.
LawrensonP.J.StephensonJ.M.BlenkinsopP.T.CordaJ. and FultonN.N., Variable-speed switched reluctance motors, IEE Proceedings B: Electric Power Applications127(4) (1980), 253–265.
3.
VijayakumarK.KarthikeyanR.ParamasivamS.ArumugamR. and SrinivasK.N., Switched Reluctance Motor Modeling, Design, Simulation, and Analysis: A Comprehensive Review, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics44(12) (2008).
PalkaR., Synthesis of magnetic fields by optimization of the shape of areas and source distributions, Archiv für Elektrotechnik75(1) (1991), 1–7.
6.
Di BarbaP.MognaschiM.E.PalkaR.PaplickiP. and SzkolnyS., Design optimization of a permanent-magnet excited synchronous machine for electrical automobiles, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetic and Mechanics39(1-4) (2012), 889–895.
7.
Di BarbaP.DolezelI.MognaschiM.E.SaviniA. and KarbanP., Non-linear multi-physics analysis and multi-objective optimization in electroheating applications, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics50(2) (2014).
8.
Di BarbaP.DolezelI.KarbanP.KusP.MachF.MognaschiM.E. and SaviniA., Multiphysics field analysis and multiobjective design optimization: a benchmark problem, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering (IPSE)22(7) (2014).
9.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.MognaschiM.E.SaviniA. and WiakS., Biogeography-Inspired Multiobjective Optimization and MEMS Design, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics52(3) (2016).
10.
Di BarbaP.MognaschiM.E.SaviniA. and WiakS., Island biogeography as a paradigm for MEMS optimal design, IJAEM51(s1) (2016), 97–105.
11.
JankowskiB.KapelskiD.KarbowiakM.PrzybylskiM. and ŚlusarekB., Analysis of Static Characteristics of a Switched Reluctance Motor, Lecture notes in Electrical Engineering, Springer 2015, pp. 289–294.
12.
TorrentM.AndradaP.BlanquéB.MartinezE.PeratandJ.I. and SanchezJ.A., Method for estimating core losses in switched reluctance motors, European Transactions on Electric Power21(1) (2010), 757–771.
13.
Di BarbaP. and MognaschiM.E., Sorting Pareto solutions: a principle of optimal design for electrical machines, The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering – Compel28(5) (2009), 1227–1235.
MATLAB (2013a). Genetic algorithm, The Math Works, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States.
16.
DebK., Multi-Objective Optimisation Using Evolutionary Algorithms, Wiley, 2001.
17.
XuJ.X.PandaS.K. and ZhengQ., Multiobjective optimization of current waveforms for switched reluctance motors by genetic algorithm, International Journal of Modeling and Simulation24(3) (2002), 1860–1865.
