Almost all existing analytical formulae describing the magnet-rail relationship for maglev trains have been derived with the assumption that magnetic media operate within the linear zone of the B-H curve and, therefore, over-predict the levitation and guidance forces when the magnetic media are in their saturation states. In such cases, finite element simulations are commonly used to obtain an accurate solution of the electromagnetic force, but this process is time-consuming. In this study, metamodels suitable for saturated magnetic media are constructed based on the methods of uniform design and stepwise regression, and their performance is assessed in terms of data fitting and prediction accuracy.
HeG., A Study of Dynamic Modeling and Steering Capability of EMS Mid-Speed Maglev Train, Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2016.
2.
YaoY.NiG. and FangY., The computation of mechanical dynamic characteristic in EMS-Maglev system by electro-mechanical equations coupled finite element analysis, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics25(1–4) (2007), 225–230.
3.
ZhaiW. and ZhaoC., Dynamics of Maglev Vehicle/Guideway Systems (I) – Magnet/Rail Interaction and System Stability, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering7 (2005), 1–10.
4.
ZhaoC. and ZhaiW., Dynamics of Maglev Vehicle/Guideway Systems (II) – Modeling and Simulation, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering8 (2005), 163–175.
5.
CuiP.ZhangK. and LiJ., Calculation of Electromagnetic Force and Torque of Suspension Electromagnet Based on Schwarz-Christoffel Transform, Proceedings of the CSEE24 (2010), 129–134.
6.
CuiP., A Study of Guidance Dynamics of Low-Speed Maglev Vehicles, National University of Defense Technology, 2010.
7.
ZhangS., University Physics, 3 Edition A. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2008.
8.
SongS.ChenS. and LinY., Characteristic and performance analysis of SRM with actual B-H curve of electrical steel, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics53 (2017), 435–449.
9.
BinnsK.J. and LawrensonP.J., Analysis and Computation of Electro and Magnetic Field Problems, People’s Education Press, 1980.
10.
CaoY.TaoS. and CaiJ., Magnetic field analytical solution and electromagnetic force calculation of coreless stator axial-flux permanent-magnet machines, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics54 (2017), 93–105.
11.
FangK., Theory, Methods, and Applications of Uniform Experiment Design-History Review, Application of Statistics and Management3 (2004), 69–80.
12.
FangK.LiuM. and ZhouY., Experimental Design and Modeling, Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2011.
13.
FangK. and MaC., Orthogonal and Uniform Experimental Design, Beijing: Science Press, 2001.
14.
FangK.LiR. and SudjiantoA., Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments, New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006.
15.
LüQ.XiaoZ. and LiJ., Moving least squares method for reliability assessment of rock tunnel excavation considering ground-support interactionComputers and Geotechnics84 (2017), 88–100.
16.
JiangW.XuC. and JiangS., Establishing a Mathematical Equations and Improving the Production of l-tert-Leucine by Uniform Design and Regression Analysis, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology181 (2017), 1454–1464.
17.
XinC.LuQ. and AiC., Optimization of hard modified asphalt formula for gussasphalt based on uniform experimental design, Construction and Building Materials136 (2017), 556–564.
18.
LiB.WangW. and ZhangX., Integrating uniform design and response surface methodology to optimize thiacloprid suspension, Scientific Reports7 (2017), 1–9.
19.
HeW.XueW. and TangB., Design Methods of Optimization Experiments and Data Analysis, Chemical Industry Press, 2012.
20.
WangY. and SuiS., Experimental Design and MATLAB Data Analysis, Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2015.
