An evolution strategy, approximating a single Pareto-optimal solution in an objective space exhibiting more than two objectives, is proposed as a cost-effective method (individual-based approach). Moreover, a standard NSGA-II code is modified in order to control the spread-out of unfeasible solutions in a three-dimensional objective space (population-based approach). Both methods are validated by means of a case study, i.e. the optimal design of a magnetic micro-switch.
CherechesR., Di BarbaP., TopaV., PurcarM. and WiakS., Optimal shape design of electrostatic microactuators. A multiobjecitve formulatiom, IJAEM30 (2009), 65-76.
2.
NSGA-II: www.iitk.ac.in/kangal/codes [last visited July 2014].
3.
DelinchantB., RakotoarisonH.L., ArdonV., ChabedecO. and CugatO., Gradient based optimization of semi-numerical models with symbolic sensitivity: Application to simple ferromagnetic MEMS switch device, IJAEM30 (2009), 189-200.
4.
Di BarbaP., SaviniA. and WiakS., Minimizing design criterion and sensitivity: a cost-effective evolutionary approach with applications in Mechatronics, IJAEM46 (2014), 335-340.
5.
PigotC., DelinchantB., PoulinG. and ReyneG., Optimization of a 3D micro-accelerometer based on diamagnetic levitation, IJAEM30 (2009), 179-188.
6.
DelinchantB., RakotoarisonH.L., ArdonV., ChabedecO. and CugatO., Gradient based optimization of semi-numerical models with symbolic sensitivity: Application to simple ferromagnetic MEMS switch device, IJAEM30 (2009), 189-200.
7.
DebK., Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, 2001.
8.
Coello CoelloC.A., Van VeldhuizenD.A. and LamontG.B., Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2002.
9.
EcheverriaD., LahayeD., EncicaL., LomonovaE.A., HemkerP.W. and VandenputA.J.A., Manifold-mapping optimization applied to linear actuator design, T-MAG42 (2006), 1183-1186.
