The mechanisms through which acculturation influences the onset of cognitive impairment and dementia are not well understood, especially among older Hispanics.
Objective:
To investigate whether inflammation and psycho-behavioral factors mediate the relationship between acculturation and incident dementia among older Mexican Americans.
Methods:
We analyzed the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (1998–2007, SALSA), a longitudinal study (N = 1,194) with 10 years of follow-up, and used g-computation for mediation analysis with pooled logistic regression to evaluate whether acculturation (assessed by the Revised Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans [ARSMA-II]) affected dementia or cognitive impairment but not dementia (CIND) through inflammation (i.e., interleukin 6 [IL-6], tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP]), smoking, alcohol consumption, and depressive symptoms. The potential mediators were assessed at baseline.
Results:
The 10-year average adjusted risk ratio (aRR) for the effect of high U.S. acculturation and dementia/CIND was 0.66, 95% CI (0.36, 1.30). The indirect effects were: IL-6 (aRR = 0.98, 95% CI (0.88, 1.05)); TNF-α (aRR:0.99, 95% CI (0.93, 1.05)); hs-CRP: (aRR = 1.21, 95% CI (0.84, 1.95)); current smoking: aRR = 0.97, 95% CI (0.84, 1.16); daily/weekly alcohol consumption (aRR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.96, 1.05)); and depressive symptom score (aRR = 1.03, 95% CI (0.95, 1.26)). Hs-CRP yielded a proportion mediated of -26%, suggesting that hs-CRP could suppress the potential effect of high U.S. acculturation. The other factors explored resulted in little to no mediation.
Conclusions:
The effect of acculturation on time to incident dementia/CIND varied over time. Our study suggests that inflammation could suppress the effect between high U.S. acculturation and dementia risk.
2023 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement2023; 19: 1598–1695.
3.
SulkavaS, HaukkaJ, SulkavaR, et al.association between psychological distress and incident dementia in a population-based cohort in Finland. JAMA Netw Open2022; 5: e2247115.
4.
PeavyGM, JacobsonMW, SalmonDP, et al.The influence of chronic stress on dementia-related diagnostic change in older adults. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord2012; 26: 260.
5.
LeeM, WhitselE, AveryC, et al.Variation in population attributable fraction of dementia associated with potentially modifiable risk factors by race and ethnicity in the US. JAMA Netw Open2022; 5: e2219672.
6.
NianogoRA, Rosenwohl-MackA, YaffeK, et al.Risk factors associated with Alzheimer disease and related dementias by sex and race and ethnicity in the US. JAMA Neurol2022; 79: 584–591.
7.
SangalangCC, BecerraD, MitchellFM, et al.Trauma, post-migration stress, and mental health: a comparative analysis of refugees and immigrants in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health2019; 21: 909–919.
8.
Al-BaldawiR. Migration-related stress and psychosomatic consequences. Int Congr Ser1241;271–278.
9.
AllenJD, CaspiC, YangM, et al.Pathways between acculturation and health behaviors among residents of low-income housing: The mediating role of social and contextual factors. Soc Sci Med2014; 123: 26–36.
CrimminsEM, KimJK, AlleyDE, et al.Hispanic paradox in biological risk profiles. Am J Public Health2007; 97: 1305–10.
12.
PeekMK, CutchinMP, SalinasJJ, et al.Allostatic load among non-hispanic whites, non-Hispanic Blacks, and people of Mexican origin: effects of ethnicity, nativity, and acculturation. Am J Public Health2010; 100: 940–946.
13.
Martinez-MillerEE, RobinsonWR, AveryCL, et al.Longitudinal associations of US acculturation with cognitive performance, cognitive impairment, and dementia The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging. Am J Epidemiol2020; 189: 1292–1305.
14.
Janssen-KallenbergH, SchulzH, KlugeU, et al.Acculturation and other risk factors of depressive disorders in individuals with Turkish migration backgrounds. BMC Psychiatry2017; 17: 1–12.
15.
TorresJM, EpelES, ToTM, et al.Cross-border ties, nativity, and inflammatory markers in a population-based prospective study of Latino adults. Soc Sci Med2018; 211: 21–30.
16.
ByersAandYaffeK. Depression and risk of developing dementia. Nat Rev Neurol2012; 7: 323–331.
17.
SabiaS, ElbazA, DugravotA, et al.Impact of smoking on cognitive decline in early old age: The Whitehall II cohort study. Arch Gen Psychiatry2012; 69: 627–635.
18.
SolfrizziV, ScafatoE, CapursoC, et al.Metabolic syndrome and the risk of vascular dementia: the Italian Longitudinal Study on Ageing. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2010; 81: 433–440.
19.
WuJH, HaanMN, LiangJ, et al.Impact of diabetes on cognitive function among older Latinos: A population-based cohort study. J Clin Epidemiol2003; 56: 686–693.
20.
ShihI-F, HaanMN, PaulKC, et al.The roles of physical activity and inflammation in mortality, cognition, and depressive symptoms among older Mexican Americans. Am J Epidemiol2019; 188: 1944–1952.
21.
HaanMN, Zeki Al-HazzouriA, AielloAE. Life-span socioeconomic trajectory, nativity, and cognitive aging in Mexican Americans: the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci i2011; 66(Suppl 1): 102–10.
22.
JimenezDE, GrayHL, CucciareM, et al.Using the Revised Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans (ARSMA-II) with older adults. Hisp Health Care Int2010; 8: 14.
23.
GonzálezHM, MungasDandHaanMN. A semantic verbal fluency test for English- and Spanish-speaking older Mexican-Americans. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2005; 20: 199–208.
24.
HaanMN, MungasDM, GonzalezHM, et al.Prevalence of dementia in older Latinos: The influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, stroke and genetic factors. J Am Geriatr Soc2003; 51: 169–177.
25.
PearlJ. Causal diagrams for emprirical research. Biometrika1995; 82: 669–688.
VanderWeeleTJ. A unification of mediation and interaction: a 4-way decomposition. Epidemiology2014; 25: 749–61.
28.
PearlJ. Direct and indirect effects. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann2001; 411–20 (technical report).
29.
RobinsJMandGreenlandS. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology1992; 3: 143–155.
30.
HernanMAandRobinsJM. Standardization and the parametric G-formula. In: Causal Inference: What If. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2020.
31.
WestreichD, ColeSR. Invited commentary: positivity in practice. Am J Epidemiol2010; 171: 674–677; discussion 678–681.
32.
ColeSRandFrangakisCE. The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption?Epidemiology2009; 20: 3–5.
33.
RubinDB. Randomization analysis of experimental data: The Fisher randomization test comment. J Am Stat Assoc1980; 75: 591–593.
HernánMA. The hazards of hazard ratios. Epidemiology2010; 21(1): 13–5.
36.
WiemkenTL, FurmanekSP, CarricoRM, et al.Effectiveness of oseltamivir treatment on clinical failure in hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infection. BMC Infect Dis2021; 21: 1–7.
37.
BasuS, RaghavanS, WexlerDJ, et al.Characteristics associated with decreased or increased mortality risk from glycemic therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk: machine learning analysis of the ACCORD Trial. Diabetes Care2018; 41: 604–612.
38.
BaumA, ScarpaJ, BruzeliusE, et al.Targeting weight loss interventions to reduce cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes: a machine learning-based post-hoc analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects in the Look AHEAD trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol2017; 5: 808–815.
39.
AglerRandDe BoeckP. On the interpretation and use of mediation: Multiple perspectives on mediation analysis. Front Psychol2017; 8: 293306.
40.
MacKinnonDP, FairchildAJandFritzMS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol2006; 58: 593–614.
41.
MunnLL. Cancer and inflammation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med2017; 9: e1370.
42.
MurrayEJ, CanigliaECandPetitoLC. Causal survival analysis: A guide to estimating intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects from randomized clinical trials with non-adherence. Res Methods Med Health Sci2020; 2: 39–49.
43.
StensrudMJandHernánMA. Why test for proportional hazards?JAMA2020; 323: 1401–1402.
44.
BerryJW. Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Appl Psychol1997; 46: 5–34.
45.
ChoyB, ArunachalamKSG, et al.Systematic review: Acculturation strategies and their impact on the mental health of migrant populations. Public Health Pract (Oxf)2020; 2: 100069.
