Mapping Cognitive Trajectories and Detecting Early Dementia Using the Mini-Mental State Examination Cognitive Charts: Application to the French Three-City Cohort
Restricted accessBrief reportFirst published online March 19, 2024
Mapping Cognitive Trajectories and Detecting Early Dementia Using the Mini-Mental State Examination Cognitive Charts: Application to the French Three-City Cohort
The Cognitive Quotient (QuoCo) classification algorithm monitoring decline on age- and education-adjusted Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)-derived cognitive charts has proved superior to the conventionally-used cut-off for identifying incident dementia; however, it remains to be tested in different settings. Data were drawn from the Three-City Cohort to 1) assess the screening accuracy of the QuoCo, and 2) compare its performance to that of serial MMSE tests applying different cut-offs. For the QuoCo, sensitivity was 74.2 (95% CI: 71.4–76.8) and specificity 84.1 (83.6–84.7) and for the MMSE < 24, 64.1 (61.1–67.0) and 94.8 (94.4–95.1), respectively; whereas overall accuracy and sensitivity was highest for MMSE cut-offs <25 and <26. User-friendly charts for mapping cognitive trajectories over visits with an alert for potentially ‘abnormal’ decline can be of practical use and encourage regular monitoring in primary care where the <24 cut-off is still widely used despite its poor sensitivity.
GauthierS, WebsterC, ServaesS, MoraisJA, Rosa-NetoP(2022) World Alzheimer Report 2022: Life after diagnosis: Navigating treatment, care and support. Alzheimer’s Disease International, London, England.
2.
ConnollyA, GaehlE, MartinH, MorrisJ, PurandareN (2011) Underdiagnosis of dementia in primary care: Variations in the observed prevalence and comparisons to the expected prevalence. Aging Ment Health15, 978–984.
3.
CreavinST, Noel-StorrAH, LangdonRJ, RichardE, CreavinAL, CullumS, PurdyS, Ben-ShlomoY (2022) Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.CD. Cochrane Database Syst Rev6, 012558.
4.
Abd RazakMA, AhmadNA, ChanYY, Mohamad KasimN, YusofM, Abdul GhaniMKA, OmarM, Abd AzizFA, JamaluddinR (2019) Validity of screening tools for dementia and mild cognitive impairment among the elderly in primary health care: A systematic review. Public Health169, 84–92.
5.
CreavinST, WisniewskiS, Noel-StorrAH, TrevelyanCM, HamptonT, RaymentD, ThomVM, NashKJ, ElhamouiH, MilliganR, PatelAS, TsivosDV, WingT, PhillipsE, KellmanSM, ShackletonHL, SingletonGF, NealeBE, WattonME, CullumS (2016) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of dementia in clinically unevaluated people aged 65 and over in community and primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2016, CD011145.
6.
MatthewsF, MarioniR, BrayneC,
Medical Research Council Cognitive F
, AgeingS (2012) Examining the influence of gender, education, social class and birth cohort on MMSE tracking over time: A population-based prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr12, 45.
7.
OuvrardC, BerrC, MeillonC, RibetC, GoldbergM, ZinsM, AmievaH (2019) Norms for standard neuropsychological tests from the French CONSTANCES cohort. Eur J Neurol26, 786–793.
8.
TombaughTN, McIntyreNJ (1992) The mini-mental state examination: A comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc40, 922–935.
9.
GrutM, FratiglioniL, ViitanenM, WinbladB (1993) Accuracy of the Mini-Mental Status Examination as a screening test for dementia in a Swedish elderly population. Acta Neurol Scand87, 312–317.
10.
MitchellAJ (2009) A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the mini-mental state examination in the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. J Psychiatr Res43, 411–431.
11.
BernierPJ, GourdeauC, CarmichaelPH, BeaucheminJP, VerreaultR, BouchardRW, KrogerE, LaforceRJr. (2017) Validation and diagnostic accuracy of predictive curves for age-associated longitudinal cognitive decline in older adults.. CMAJ189, E1472–E1480.
12.
BernierPJ, GourdeauC, CarmichaelPH, BeaucheminJP, VoyerP, HudonC, LaforceRJr. (2023) It’s all about cognitive trajectory: Accuracy of the cognitive charts-MoCA in normal aging, MCI, and dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc71, 214–220.
13.
The 3C Study Group (2003) Vascular factors and risk of dementia: Design of the Three-City Study and baseline characteristics of the study population. Neuroepidemiology22, 316–325.
14.
YingGS, MaguireMG, GlynnRJ, RosnerB (2020) Calculating sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for correlated eye data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci61, 29.
15.
YoudenWJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer3, 32–35.
16.
BiggerstaffBJ (2000) Comparing diagnostic tests: A simple graphic using likelihood ratios. Stat Med19, 649–663.
17.
HouXH, FengL, ZhangC, CaoXP, TanL, YuJT (2019) Models for predicting risk of dementia: A systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry90, 373–379.
18.
MuraT, ColeyN, AmievaH, BerrC, GabelleA, OussetPJ, VellasB, AndrieuS,
GuidAge/DSA study group (2022) Cognitive decline as an outcome and marker of progression toward dementia, in early preventive trials. Alzheimers Dement18, 676–687.
19.
Proust-LimaC, AmievaH, DartiguesJF, Jacqmin-GaddaH (2007) Sensitivity of four psychometric tests to measure cognitive changes in brain aging-population-based studies. Am J Epidemiol165, 344–350.
20.
PiccininniM, RohmannJL, WechsungM, LogroscinoG, KurthT (2023) Should cognitive screening tests be corrected for age and education? Insights from a causal perspective. Am J Epidemiol192, 93–101.
21.
HesslerJ, TuchaO, ForstlH, MoschE, BickelH (2014) Age-correction of test scores reduces the validity of mild cognitive impairment in predicting progression to dementia. PLoS One9, e106284.
22.
QuarantaD, GainottiG, VitaMG, LacidognaG, ScaricamazzaE, PiccininniC, MarraC (2016) Are raw scores on memory tests better than age- and education- adjusted scores for predicting progression from amnesic mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease?Curr Alzheimer Res13, 1414–1420.
