Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Periodontal disease (PeD) is a risk factor of Alzheimer’s disease and is associated with cognitive decline in older adults. However, the relationships between subitems of neuropsychological tests and PeD have not been fully clarified.

Objective:

To evaluate associations between PeD and subitems of neuropsychological tests.

Methods:

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data of 183 participants (women: 50%, mean age: 79 years) from a clinical study. We enrolled patients who visited our memory clinic and assessed demographics, dementia-related risk factors, neuropsychological tests, brain magnetic resonance images, and a dental screening check. We evaluated the relationships between cognitive function and PeD using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results:

Participants with dementia were less likely to make periodical visits to the dentist, had fewer teeth, had less frequent tooth brushing habits, and were more likely to have PeD. Impaired cognitive function was significantly associated with an increasing degree of PeD. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, impaired visuospatial function and attention were associated with twice the risk of moderate or severe PeD compared with individuals with preserved visuospatial function and attention (odds ratio: 2.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–4.29, p = 0.037). Impaired word recall and recognition and following commands were associated with increased risk of PeD (odds ratio: 2.80, 95% confidence interval: 1.41–5.32, p = 0.003).

Conclusions:

Cognitive decline, such as impaired visuospatial function, attention, word recall and recognition, and inability to follow commands were independently and strongly associated with PeD. These items can be assessed easily on a daily basis.

Keywords

Alzheimer’s disease cognitive decline dementia oral health periodontal disease periodontitis

INTRODUCTION

Dementia is a major public health issue. Approximately 47 million people worldwide were living with dementia in 2015 [1]. The number of people with dementia globally is expected to increase approximately 1.5-fold by 2030 [1], and the financial cost of dementia has steadily increased in recent years [1, 2]. Japan is facing substantial age-related healthcare challenges. The percentage of the population in Japan aged 65 and over has risen to nearly 30% [3], and the number of patients with dementia is also increasing. Thus, a comprehensive strategy to reduce the impacts of dementia has been developed, with the aim of extending healthy life expectancy [4].

In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on the associations between periodontal disease (PeD) and cognitive decline [5 –9]. PeD is an inflammatory disease that is affected by a variety of factors, including smoking, gender, stress, depressive mode, and education level [10, 11]. PeD increases the risk of life-threatening diseases, such as cerebrovascular diseases [12], as well as leading to tooth loss [13], and constitutes a potentially preventable and modifiable risk factor for cognitive impairment [8]. Additionally, PeD is associated with amyloid-β, which underlies the onset of dementia [14, 15]. Thus, the prevention and management of PeD in middle-aged and older adults may be important for reducing the risk of dementia.

Several clinical studies of the relationship between PeD and cognitive function have been conducted in a memory clinic setting, including a small interview-based study [16] and several case-control studies [17 –19]. However, there is still a lack of knowledge regarding comprehensive assessment for both PeD and cognitive function, including various neuropsychological tests and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

We have conducted observational research to examine the relationship between gut microbiota and cognitive function. In our previous studies, gut microbiota were found to be associated with cognitive decline [20 –22], risk factors [23, 24], cerebral small vessel disease [25, 26], and blood biomarkers [27, 28]. These findings suggest the existence of gut microbiome-brain cascades. However, PeD, as a microbial factor, has not yet been fully investigated. Examining PeD in the setting of a comprehensive memory clinic and identifying its links with various neuropsychological tests may clarify an unidentified pathway of the periodontal–brain axis. In addition, identification of specific subitems of neuropsychological tests which are closely related to PeD may be helpful for identifying older adults who have a high risk for PeD easily on a daily basis.

Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between PeD, neuropsychological test performance, and cognitive biomarkers. We hypothesized that PeD would be independently associated with subitems of neuropsychological tests in our cohort data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

This was a single-center observational study designed as a clinical survey to clarify the association between PeD, oral health, and cognitive function (Periodontal Disease Assessment Study: the Pearl study), conducted at the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (NCGG) in Japan. The Pearl study was conducted as a collaboration between the NCGG and the Lion Foundation for Dental Health. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review boards of the NCGG (No. 1533) and the Lion Foundation for Dental Health (No. LDH202107). Informed consent was obtained from all patients and their families. This study was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000048126).

Participants

Between August 2021 and April 2022, we enrolled consecutive patients visiting the memory clinic at the NCGG who agreed to undergo medical assessment of cognitive function and a dental examination to assess PeD. Information about the Pearl study was provided via a leaflet at the memory clinic reception, and patients who wished to participate were informed about the study in detail. Patients were eligible for the study if they: 1) were able to undergo brain MRI; 2) provided written informed consent; 3) provided informed consent for the NCGG Biobank to store their clinical data and blood samples; and 4) were accompanied by family members who could assess the condition of the patient. We excluded patients if they: 1) were unable to undergo MRI examination, or if the MRI scan could not be evaluated because of movement; 2) had a history of a major psychological disorder, or currently exhibited serious or unstable alcohol or drug abuse; or 3) were judged by an investigator to be ineligible to participate as a study subject for any other reason.

Assessments

All participants underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment [29] of the following features: 1) demographic characteristics; 2) risk factors; 3) activities of daily living (ADL); 4) global cognitive function; 5) neuropsychological tests; 6) behavioral and psychological symptoms; 7) depression status; 8) laboratory parameters, such as apolipoprotein E ɛ4; 9) ankle-brachial index and pulse wave velocity as indicators of arteriosclerosis [30] and the “impact” of pulse [31], respectively; 10) results of brain MRI; and 11) lifestyle factors, including living alone, physical exercise habits, daytime napping, and being a recipient of the Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) system [32]. Clinical data were partially provided by the NCGG Biobank, which collects clinical data for research.

Classification of cognitive function

Global cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [33] and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scales [34]. We divided patients into two categories according to their MMSE scores and CDR scales: dementia and non-dementia. Dementia was defined as having either 1) CDR global score of ≥1 or (2) both an MMSE score of ≤23 and a CDR global score of ≥0.5 [35], because a CDR global score of 0.5 indicates very mild dementia [36]. Non-dementia was defined as having both an MMSE score of ≥24 and a CDR global score ≤0.5. Mild cognitive impairment was included in the non-dementia group in the present study. Our definitions of dementia and mild cognitive impairment were in accordance with the criteria of the National Institute of Aging-Alzheimer’s Association (NIA/AA) workgroups [37, 38]. We also conducted neuropsychological tests such as the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) [39], Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) [40], Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices (RCPM) [41].

Brain imaging

Brain MRI scans were performed using a 3-Tesla MRI scanner (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens Healthineers AG, Munich, Germany). The MRI examination comprised standardized sequences used for analysis of the brain. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging, T2*-weighted gradient echo imaging, and intracranial 3D time-of-flight MR angiography were conducted. The presence of cerebral small vessel disease and its components, such as silent lacunar infarcts, white matter hyperintensity, cerebral microbleeds, and enlarged periventricular space, was assessed. The voxel-based specific regional analysis system for Alzheimer’s disease (VSRAD) software (Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to quantify cortical and hippocampal atrophy as an indicator of Alzheimer’s disease.

Dental examination

The dental examination was conducted by one trained periodontist (Y.I.) and dental hygienists, independent of the clinical data collection. First, dental history was obtained from the participants and their family members. Second, the number of teeth, clinical attachment loss, and probing pocket depth were measured. Clinical attachment loss and probing pocket depth indicate the gingiva tissue destruction caused by PeD (Fig. 1) [42]. Participants were categorized into four groups (none, mild, moderate, and severe PeD) according to the CDC/AAP definitions (Supplementary Table 1) [43]. Six sites per tooth were examined with a CPUNC15 periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy Mfg. Co. LLC., Chicago, IL, USA) as previously reported [44].

Fig. 1

Diagram of clinical attachment loss and pocket depth in a patient with periodontal disease. This figure shows the schema of the clinical attachment loss and probing pocket depth, which indicate periodontal disease (PeD) [42]. The pocket is the space between the root surface and the gingiva. In PeD, the base of the pocket migrates apically, thereby creating a pocket. The base of the pocket is therefore apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ, the boundary between the enamel crown and the root), and attachment loss can be measured using a periodontal probe from the CEJ to the base of the pocket. Probing pocket depth is measured from the top of the pocket to the base of the pocket. Probing pocket depth is usually greater than attachment loss due to the inflammation-induced swelling of the gingiva. The direction of insertion of a periodontal probe is also indicated in this figure [42].

Statistical analysis

Continuous, ordinal, and categorical variables are expressed as means±standard deviations, medians and interquartile ranges, and frequencies and proportions (percentages), respectively. Data were compared using Student’s unpaired t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and χ² tests, respectively. First, we compared clinical characteristics between men and women, participants with dementia and those without dementia. Second, we compared clinical characteristics and cognitive function between participants with moderate or severe PeD including edentate status, and those with mild PeD or no PeD. Third, we assessed the relationships between neuropsychological tests and the presence of PeD. MoCA-J items were categorized into six subgroups (visuospatial function, attention, language, executive function, memory, and orientation) according to a previous study [45]. We assessed the cutoff values of neuropsychological tests and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the detection of severe or moderate PeD. Finally, multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent associations between the presence of moderate or severe PeD and neuropsychological tests. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. All comparisons were two-tailed, and p < 0.05 represented statistical significance. Data were analyzed using the JMP 17.1 software package (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

RESULTS

Participant characteristics

We enrolled 201 participants in this study. Of these, 18 participants were excluded (13: participation revoked; 5: insufficient data). Ultimately, we analyzed 183 participants (women: 50%, mean age: 79 years, dementia: n = 93). Women were less likely than men to have a current and/or past smoking habit (women versus men; 8.8% versus 65.2%, p < 0.001), to consume alcohol (9.9% versus 34.8%, p < 0.001), to have a hearing impairment (46.1% versus 68.5%, p = 0.003), to use a removable partial denture or dental implant (44.0% versus 59.8%, p = 0.039), to take naps, and were more likely to live alone (16.7% versus 3.4%, p = 0.004), and to brush their teeth daily (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). However, there were no significant differences between women and men in age, global cognitive function, risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and the degree of PeD.

Dementia versus non-dementia

Compared with participants without dementia, participants with dementia were more likely to be apolipoprotein E ɛ4 carriers (dementia versus non-dementia; 40% versus 24%, p = 0.028), to have impaired cognitive function, to have a history of falls in a year (39% versus 25%, p = 0.040), and to exhibit white matter hyperintensity (58% versus 36%, p = 0.003), as well as having higher VSRAD scores (median score: 1.81 versus 0.97, p < 0.001), walking more slowly (gait speed; 0.93 versus 1.06 m/s, p < 0.001), and taking naps more frequently (Table 1, Supplementary Table 4). Furthermore, participants with dementia were less likely than those without dementia to make periodical visits to the dentist (67.7% versus 84.4%, p = 0.010), had a smaller number of remaining teeth (median number; 21 versus 23, p = 0.036), and had less frequent teeth-brushing habits (Table 2, Supplementary Table 5).

Table 1

Comparisons of background information between participants with and without all-cause dementia

	Dementia (+)	Dementia (–)	p
	(n = 93)	(n = 90)
Demographics
Age, y	79, 75–84	79, 75–82	0.466
Sex, female, n (%)	50 (54)	41 (46)	0.302
Education, y	12, 9–12	12, 10–14	0.001
Risk factors
Alcohol consumption, n (%)	13 (14)	28 (31)	0.008
APOEɛ4 carrier, n (%)	37 (40)	22 (24)	0.028
Comprehensive geriatric assessment
Barthel Index	100, 90–100	100, 100–100	<0.0001
IADL impairment, n (%)	80 (86)	32 (37)	<0.0001
DBDS	13, 8–25	6, 3–12	<0.0001
GDS	3, 2–6	2, 1–3	0.001
Vitality index	9, 8–10	10, 9–10	<0.0001
History of fall in a year	36 (39)	22 (25)	0.040
Gait speed, m/s	0.93, 0.70–1.09	1.06, 0.93–1.20	<0.0001
Hearing impairment	43 (47)	61 (69)	0.004
MNA-SF	11, 10–13	12, 11–14	0.002
Cognitive function
MMSE	20, 18–22	28, 26–29	<0.0001
MoCA-J	13, 10–17	22, 19–25	<0.0001
CDR-SOB	4, 3–6	1, 0.5–2	<0.0001
ADAS-cog	17.4, 13.4–24	6.7, 5–10.7	<0.0001
RCPM	22.5, 16–27	29, 25–32	<0.0001
FAB	9, 6–11	12, 10–14	<0.0001
Brain MRI findings
SLI, n (%)	3 (3.2)	4 (4.5)	0.716
WMH, n (%)	54 (58.1)	32 (36.0)	0.003
CMB, n (%)	14 (15)	9 (10)	0.376
EPVS, n (%)	63 (67.7)	63 (70.0)	0.752
VSRAD	1.81, 1.14–2.48	0.97, 0.68–1.43	<0.0001
Lifestyle
Living alone, n (%)	12 (14.0)	5 (5.8)	0.079
Physical exercise habit	41 (48.2)	66 (76.7)	0.051
Recipient of LTCI service	45 (48.4)	13 (14.4)	<0.0001
Daytime nap			0.014
≥3 h, n (%)	12 (12.9)	2 (2.2)
<3 h, n (%)	58 (62.4)	56 (62.2)
None, n (%)	23 (24.7)	32 (35.6)

Data are presented as medians, interquartile ranges or number of patients (%). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and χ² test were used. ADAS-cog, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale; APOE, apolipoprotein E; CDR-SOB, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes; CMB, cerebral microbleed; DBDS, Dementia Behavior Disturbance Scale; EPVS, enlarged periventricular space; FAB, Frontal Assessment Battery; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; IADL, instrumental activities of daily living; LTCI, Long-Term Care Insurance; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MNA-SF, Mini-Nutritional Assessment-Short Form; MoCA-J, Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Japanese version; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RCPM, Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices; SLI, silent lacunar infarct; VSRAD, voxel-based specific regional analysis system for Alzheimer’s disease; WMH, white matter hyperintensity.

Table 2

Comparisons of periodontal information between participants with and those without all-cause dementia

	Dementia (+)	Dementia (–)	p
	(n = 93)	(n = 90)
Oral function
Periodical visit to the dentist, n (%)	63 (67.7)	76 (84.4)	0.010
Periodontal disease*			0.001
None, n (%)	5 (5.4)	2 (2.2)
Mild, n (%)	26 (28.0)	39 (43.3)
Moderate, n (%)	20 (21.5)	28 (31.1)
Severe, n (%)	42 (45.2)	21 (3.3)
Number of remaining teeth, n	21, 7–26	23, 18–26	0.036
Attachment loss, mm^†	2.4, 2.2–2.9	2.2, 2.0–2.6	0.002
Probing depth, mm^†	3.0, 2.6–3.6	2.8, 2.5–3.4	0.088
Tooth brushing
Times/day	2, 1–2	2, 2–3	<0.0001
≥3 times/day, n (%)	7 (7.5)	27 (30.0)	<0.0001
min/day	3, 1–5	5, 3–10	<0.0001
≥10 min/day, n (%)	3 (3.4)	26 (29.2)	<0.0001
Use of toothpaste, n (%)	61 (80.3)	76 (91.6)	0.064
Any use of denture, n (%)^‡	50 (53.8)	45 (50.0)	0.658
Tongue brushing, n (%)	19 (22.6)	35 (39.3)	0.022

Data are presented as medians, interquartile ranges or number of patients (%). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and χ² test were used. ^*Periodontal disease was defined according to the classification proposed by the workgroup from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in partnership with the American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP criteria). ^†Fifteen participants had no data for attachment level and probing depth because they had no teeth as a result of severe periodontal disease. ^‡Any use of removable partial denture or dental implant.

No PeD and mild PeD versus moderate and severe PeD

Compared with participants with no PeD and mild PeD, participants with moderate and severe PeD were more likely to have impaired cognitive function, apathy (median vitality index; 9 versus 10, p = 0.037), and had higher scores on the ankle-brachial index (median value; 1.13 versus 1.10, p = 0.003). However, there were no significant differences between these two groups in age, sex, and risk factors (Table 3, Supplementary Table 6). Furthermore, participants with moderate and severe PeD were less likely than those with no PeD and mild PeD to make periodical visits to the dentist (moderate and severe PeD versus no PeD and mild PeD; 69.4% versus 86.1%, p = 0.013), had a lower number of remaining teeth (median; 21 versus 24, p = 0.009), and had less frequent teeth-brushing habits (Table 3, Supplementary Table 7). Participants with moderate and severe PeD were more likely to live alone, to rarely engage in physical exercise, and to receive LTCI, and more frequently took daytime naps, although these differences were not significant.

Table 3

Comparisons of background information of participants with periodontal disease (PeD; moderate and severe versus none and mild)

PeD	Moderate and severe	None and mild	p
	(n = 111)	(n = 72)
Demographics
Age, y	79, 75–83	78, 74–82	0.575
Sex, female, n (%)	51 (46.0)	40 (55.6)	0.228
Risk factors
Smoking habit, n (%)	46 (41.4)	22 (30.6)	0.160
Alcohol consumption, n (%)	24 (21.6)	17 (23.6)	0.856
Lifestyle
Living alone, n (%)	13 (12.2)	4 (6.1)	0.293
Physical exercise habit	60 (56.6)	47 (72.3)	0.051
Recipient of LTCI service	41 (36.9)	17 (23.6)	0.074
Daytime nap			0.112
≥3 h, n (%)	11 (9.9)	3 (4.2)
<3 h, n (%)	72 (64.9)	42 (58.3)
None, n (%)	28 (25.2)	27 (37.5)
Cognitive function
MMSE	23, 19–27	25, 21–29	0.045
MoCA-J	17, 13–22	19, 15–24	0.020
CDR-SOB	2.5, 1–4.5	2, 0.5–3.5	0.111
ADAS-cog	15, 7.3–21.3	10.8, 5.9–15.5	0.004
RCPM	25, 18.3–29.8	28, 24–31	0.009
FAB	10, 7–12	10.5, 9–14	0.026
Brain MRI findings
EPVS n (%)	69 (62.2)	57 (79.2)	0.022
Oral function
Periodical visit to the dentist, n (%)	77 (69.4)	62 (86.1)	0.013
Number of remaining teeth, n	21, 10–26	24, 16.3–27	0.009
Attachment loss, mm^†	3.3, 2.7–4.0	2.6, 2.3–3	<0.0001
Probing depth, mm^†	2.7, 2.3–3.1	2.1, 1.9–2.2	<0.0001
Tooth brushing
Frequency per day	2, 1–2	2, 2–2	0.030
Minutes per day	3, 2–6	5, 2–7.8	0.051

Data are presented as medians, interquartile ranges, or number of patients (%). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and χ² test were used. ADAS-cog, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale; CDR-SOB, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes; EPVS, enlarged periventricular space; FAB, Frontal Assessment Battery; LTCI, Long-Term Care Insurance; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MoCA-J, Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Japanese version; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RCPM, Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices.

Cognitive function and PeD

Cognitive function impairment, as indicated by MMSE, MoCA-J, ADAS-cog, FAB, and RCPM scores, was significantly associated with increasing severity of PeD (Fig. 2). The significant cutoff values of these neuropsychological tests for the presence of moderate and severe PeD detection were as follows: MMSE: 24, MoCA-J: 18, ADAS-cog: 16, FAB: 14, RCPM: 23, respectively (Table 4, Supplementary Figure 1). The AUC of the MMSE was the lowest among the neuropsychological tests. Two MoCA-J items (impaired visuospatial function and attention) and three ADAS-cog items (impaired word recall task, following commands task, and word recognition task), which were extracted on the basis of significant results in the univariate logistic regression analyses, showed the highest OR (OR 1.21; by two MoCA-J items) and the highest AUC (AUC 0.653; by three ADAS-cog items) among the neuropsychological function tests (Supplementary Figure 2, Supplementary Table 8).

Fig. 2

Associations between cognitive function tests and the degree of periodontal disease divided by three groups. The results of cognitive function tests indicated by MMSE (a), CDR-SOB (b), MoCA-J (c), ADAS-cog (d), FAB (e), and RCPM (f) are plotted relative to the degree of periodontal disease stratified into three groups based on the following classifications: none or mild, moderate, and severe periodontal disease. Degree of cognitive impairment increase with increasing degrees of periodontal disease (Kruskal–Wallis test). ADAS-cog, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale; CDR-SOB, Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes; FAB, Frontal Assessment Battery; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MoCA-J, Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Japanese version; RCPM, Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices.

Table 4

The cutoff values of neurological tests for the presence of mild or severe periodontal disease detection

	OR	Cutoff	Specificity	Sensitivity	AUC
Neuropsychological tests
MMSE	1.07	24	0.57	0.58	0.588
MoCA-J	1.06	18	0.58	0.63	0.606
ADAS-cog	1.06	16	0.77	0.48	0.633
RCPM	1.07	23	0.79	0.46	0.619
FAB	1.14	14	0.90	0.74	0.601
Extracted items ^†
Two MoCA-J items	1.21	6	0.65	0.55	0.619
(Visuospatial function and attention)
Three ADAS-cog items	1.12	8	0.64	0.63	0.653
(Word recall task, following commands task, and word recognition task)

^*Odds ratio indicates cognitive function impairment per one point of increase or decrease in performance on each neuropsychological test. ^†Two MoCA-J items and three ADAS-cog items were extracted according to the assessment of the individual items of MoCA-J and ADAS-cog showing the presence of moderate or severe periodontal disease, as shown in Table S3. ADAS-cog, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale; AUC, Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; FAB, Frontal Assessment Battery; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MoCA-J, Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Japanese version; OR, odds ratio; RCPM, Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices.

Multivariable analyses

Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed significant associations between moderate and severe PeD, and the results of neuropsychological tests (MMSE, MoCA-J, ADAS-cog, RCPM, and FAB) (Supplementary Table 9). In addition, two MoCA-J items (lower than the cutoff score for the detection of moderate or severe PeD) were associated with twice the risk of the presence of moderate or severe PeD (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.04–4.29, p = 0.037) compared with the MMSE (by 1 point decrease; OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00–1.13, p = 0.051). Likewise, three ADAS-cog items were associated with approximately three times the risk (OR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.41–5.32, p = 0.003), as calculated in the stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses after adjusting for other confounding covariables (Table 5, Supplementary Table 10).

Table 5

Multivariable logistic regression analyses for the presence of moderate or severe periodontal disease

	OR	95% CI	p
MMSE
MMSE, per 1 point decrease	1.06	1.00–1.13	0.051
Smoking habit	2.79	1.33–5.85	0.005
EPVS	0.36	0.18–0.75	0.005
Years of education	0.86	0.75–0.98	0.025
Two MoCA items < 6^*
Two MoCA items <6	2.11	1.04–4.29	0.037
Smoking habit	2.24	1.04–4.82	0.035
Years of education	0.85	0.74–0.99	0.031
EPVS	0.32	0.14–0.69	0.003
Three ADAS-cog items ≥ 8 ^†
Three ADAS-cog items ≥8	2.80	1.41–5.32	0.003
Smoking habit	2.44	1.12–5.32	0.021
Years of education	0.86	0.74–1.00	0.045
EPVS	0.42	0.19–0.90	0.023

The dependent variable was the presence of moderate or severe periodontal disease. Model: backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, a history of stroke, chronic kidney disease, smoking, alcohol consumption, and apolipoprotein E ɛ4), years of education, components of cerebral small vessel disease (silent lacunar infarcts, white matter hyperintensity, cerebral microbleeds, and enlarged perivascular spaces), and VSRAD score. ADAS-cog, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale; CI, confidence interval; EPVS, enlarged perivascular spaces; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MoCA-J, Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Japanese version; OR, odds ratio.

DISCUSSION

The main finding of the present study was that performance on a range of neuropsychological tests (MMSE, MoCA-J, ADAS-cog, FAB, and RCPM) was independently associated with the presence of moderate or severe PeD. Among the tests, the MMSE had the lowest AUC. Additionally, impaired visuospatial function and attention extracted from the MoCA-J were associated with twice the risk of the presence of moderate or severe PeD compared with the MMSE after adjustment of covariables. Likewise, impaired word recall and recognition, and following commands task performance extracted from ADAS-cog, were associated with approximately three times the risk of PeD. These findings may indicate close relationships between cognitive impairment and the presence of PeD.

Few previous studies have conducted comprehensive testing with a range of scales, such as assessment of ADL, various neuropsychological tests, brain MRI, and oral function testing. In addition, none of the previous reports comprehensively assessed the importance of accurately measuring cognitive impairment when considering its relationship with PeD. Previous studies reported an association between dementia and PeD using various neuropsychological tests, such as MMSE, CDR, and ADAS-cog [17–19 , 47]. Importantly, the present results revealed the novel finding that two MoCA-J items and three ADAS-cog items were superior for detecting the presence of moderate or severe PeD compared with the MMSE. The MMSE is widely used as a standard cognitive screening test. A previous study reported that 14 of 22 clinical studies of PeD used the MMSE alone [9]. Our findings identified specific neuropsychological items that were closely associated with PeD. Furthermore, these items can be assessed easily on a daily basis without measuring MMSE.

Teeth-brushing is an important factor for preventing PeD [8]. In older adults with dementia, maintaining oral healthcare is difficult because of decreased ADL ability. Specifically, impaired visuospatial function and attention can lead to an inability to brush teeth. Preparing a toothbrush and toothpaste, and correctly performing teeth-brushing requires visuospatial function and attention, which correspond to two MoCA-J items. Furthermore, impaired word recall and recognition, and impaired performance in the following commands task may interfere with tooth brushing and the inability to implement teeth-brushing recommendations from family members or caregivers. In contrast, the ratio of the orientation area to the whole area is high in the MMSE compared with that of MoCA-J (score of orientation per total score; MMSE: 10/30, MoCA-J: 6/30). This high ratio in the MMSE may have led to the lowest AUC for detecting the presence of PeD.

Social factors may be also associated with PeD [8, 19]. Older adults with dementia were less likely to visit dentists, had less frequent teeth-brushing habits, and more frequently took daytime naps in the present study. Daytime napping increases the risk of PeD because salivation decreases during sleep [8]. Additionally, salivation decreases in older adults with dementia [8]. Thus, these factors increase the risk of PeD. Furthermore, older adults with moderate or severe PeD were more likely to live alone, to rarely engage in physical exercise, to receive LTCI, and to more frequently take daytime naps in the present study. These factors are suggestive of impaired ADL and social frailty. Living alone with cognitive decline leads to a greater need for daily living support to continue living in the community and passive attitudes about their dental care [48] may be associated with difficulty visiting dentists. Dental visits are important because they can prevent oral and physical frailty [49], in addition to preventing PeD. Poor oral health status has negative biological, behavioral, and social impacts on daily activities and quality of life among older adults [50]. Furthermore, oral health interventions by oral healthcare coaches may be effective for improving oral health in care-dependent older adults [51]. Therefore, social healthcare support for oral function may contribute to the prevention of worsening PeD in older adults with dementia.

The present study yielded several important findings. First, there were significant differences between women and men regarding habits of smoking, alcohol consumption, and brushing teeth. Additionally, the extent of PeD was less severe in women compared with men. However, women with PeD had an increased risk of cognitive decline compared with men [52]. These findings suggest gender differences in the risk of PeD [47]. Second, in the current study, probing depth was not significantly different between the dementia and non-dementia groups. This finding is in accord with a previous study [7].

The present study had several strengths. First, the results revealed novel relationships between neuropsychological test performance and PeD. To reduce the burden of PeD and prevent PeD in older adults, detection of potential risk and the development of countermeasures for PeD may contribute to healthcare in older adults with dementia. Second, we identified neuropsychological assessment items for detecting moderate or severe PeD that were more sensitive compared with the MMSE. In daily life and clinical settings, assessing these items will be helpful for screening PeD in older adults by checking teeth-brushing ability. Finally, whereas most previous studies of PeD used the MMSE alone [9], we conducted a detailed assessment of ADL, brain MRI, and lifestyle in addition to neuropsychological tests. Concomitant assessment of these factors and cognitive function may shed light on the association between PeD and dementia.

The present study involved several limitations. We were unable to clarify the causal relationship between PeD and cognitive function because of the study’s cross-sectional design. Additionally, selection bias may have affected the results because our sample was a single hospital-based cohort and sample size was not calculated. Because of the small number of participants, we handled individuals with moderate PeD, severe PeD, and edentulism as an aggravation group, because edentulism status is known to be associated with a high risk of mortality, as well as moderate or severe PeD [53]. Additionally, we did not assess the details of each dementia subtype. We plan to examine this issue further in future research. We did not assess oral microbiota such as Porphyromonas gingivalis in the present study, which are recent clinical problems regarding Alzheimer’s disease [55]. Concomitant assessment of oral and fecal microbiota [56] was not performed in the present study. However, because we stored the oral samples from the Pearl study, we plan to address this issue in the near future.

Overall, although this was a cross-sectional study, the results provided evidence for the existence of relationships between PeD and cognitive function, and identified some neuropsychological items that were strongly associated with the presence of PeD. Specifically, visuospatial function, attention, word recall and recognition, and performance in the following commands task were associated with teeth-brushing and the presence of PeD. Social factors may also be associated with more severe PeD. Assessment of the relationships between PeD and dementia focusing on PeD bacillus should be conducted in future studies to determine the underlying mechanisms.

Conclusions

Cognitive decline such as visuospatial function, attention, word recall and recognition, and following commands task performance were strongly associated with the presence of PeD. These items can be assessed easily on a daily basis without measuring MMSE. Social factors may also be important to prevent worsening PeD.

Footnotes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Yukie Ohsaki, Hana Saito, Mieko Suzuki (NCGG) and Shiho Yunoue, Misaki Mugiyama, Kazumi Hosokubo, Minami Ido, Kaori Nohara, and Momo Shinmei at the Lion Foundation for Dental Health for their technical and secretarial assistance. We also thank the BioBank and NCGG for quality control of the clinical samples and data. Finally, we thank Benjamin Knight, MSc., from Edanz () for editing a draft of this manuscript.

FUNDING

This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Numbers: JP20K07861, JP20H03904, JP22K10011, JP23H03122), grants from the Research Funding of Longevity Sciences from the NCGG (19-24, 21-6, 22-23), the Lion Foundation for Dental Health, the Danone Institute of Japan Foundation, and the Honjo International Scholarship Foundation.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Dr. Saji received JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20K07861, the Danone Institute of Japan Foundation, and the Honjo International Scholarship Foundation. Dr. Ishihara received JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP22K10011. Dr. Matsushita received JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP20H03904 and JP23H03122, and research grants from the Lion Foundation for Dental Health. Drs. Saji, Takeda, Sakurai, and Matsushita received research grants from the Research Funding of Longevity Sciences from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (19-24, 21-6, 22-23). Drs. Murotani and Uchiyama report no conflicts of interest related to this study. Dr. Saji is an Editorial Board Member of this journal but was not involved in the peer-review process nor had access to any information regarding its peer-review.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

The supplementary material is available in the electronic version of this article: .

References

Livingston

, Sommerlad

, Orgeta

, Costafreda

, Huntley

, Ames

, Ballard

, Banerjee

, Burns

, Cohen-Mansfield

, Cooper

, Fox

, Gitlin

, Howard

, Kales

, Larson

, Ritchie

, Rockwood

, Sampson

, Samus

, Schneider

, Selbaek

, Teri

, Mukadam

(2017) Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet 390, 2673–2734.

Prince

, Wu

, Guo

, Gutierrez Robledo

, O’Donnell

, Sullivan

, Yusuf

(2015) The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet 385, 549–562.

Cabinet Office Japan. Annual Report on the Ageing Society: 2021 (Summary). Available at: https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/english/annualreport/2021/pdf/2021.

Saji

, Sakurai

, Suzuki

, Mizusawa

, Toba

; ORANGE investigators (2016) ORANGE’s challenge: Developing wide-ranging dementia research in Japan. Lancet Neurol 15, 661–662.

Malone

, Jung

, Tran

, Zhao

(2022) Periodontal disease and risk of dementia in medicare patients with hepatitis C virus. J Alzheimers Dis 85, 1301–1308.

Panzarella

, Mauceri

, Baschi

, Maniscalco

, Campisi

, Monastero

(2022) Oral health status in subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: Data from the Zabut Aging Project. J Alzheimers Dis 87, 173–183.

Holmer

, Eriksdotter

, Habel

, Hed Myrberg

, Jonsson

, Pussinen

, Garcia-Ptacek

, Jansson

, Sandborgh-Englund

, Buhlin

(2022) Periodontal conditions and incident dementia: A nationwide Swedish cohort study. J Periodontol 93, 1378–1386.

Werber

, Bata

, Vaszine

, Berente

, Kamondi

, Horvath

(2021) The association of periodontitis and Alzheimer’s disease: How to hit two birds with one stone. J Alzheimers Dis 84, 1–21.

Asher

, Stephen

, Mantyla

, Suominen

, Solomon

(2022) Periodontal health, cognitive decline, and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Am Geriatr Soc 70, 2695–2709.

10.

Schmidt

, Jentsch

, Stingu

, Sack

(2014) General immune status and oral microbiology in patients with different forms of periodontitis and healthy control subjects. PLoS One 9, e109187.

11.

Kim

, Son

, Nam

(2023) Association between depressive mood and chronic periodontitis among senior residents using the National Health Insurance Service-Senior Cohort Database. J Periodontol 94, 742–750.

12.

Lee

, Tsai

, Yen

, Huang

, Chao

, Hu

, Shen

, Lee

(2022) Periodontitis is a potential risk factor for transient ischemic attack and minor ischemic stroke in young adults: A nationwide population-based cohort study. J Periodontol 93, 1848–1856.

13.

, Luo

, Yin

, Roosaar

, Axell

, Zhao

, Ye

(2023) Poor oral health as a risk factor for dementia in a Swedish population: A cohort study with 40 years of follow-up. J Alzheimers Dis 92, 171–181.

14.

Loughman

, Adler

, Macpherson

(2023) Unlocking modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease: Does the oral microbiome hold some of the keys? J Alzheimers Dis 92, 1111–1129.

15.

Kamer

, Pirraglia

, Tsui

, Rusinek

, Vallabhajosula

, Mosconi

, Yi

, McHugh

, Craig

, Svetcov

, Linker

, Shi

, Glodzik

, Williams

, Corby

, Saxena

, de Leon

(2015) Periodontal disease associates with higher brain amyloid load in normal elderly. Neurobiol Aging 36, 627–633.

16.

Srisilapanan

, Jai-Ua

(2013) Oral health status of dementia patients in Chiang Mai Neurological Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 96, 351–357.

17.

Ide

, Harris

, Stevens

, Sussams

, Hopkins

, Culliford

, Fuller

, Ibbett

, Raybould

, Thomas

, Puenter

, Teeling

, Perry

, Holmes

(2016) Periodontitis and cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 11, e0151081.

18.

Gil-Montoya

, Sanchez-Lara

, Carnero-Pardo

, Fornieles

, Montes

, Vilchez

, Burgos

, Gonzalez-Moles

, Barrios

, Bravo

(2015) Is periodontitis a risk factor for cognitive impairment and dementia? A case-control study. J Periodontol 86, 244–253.

19.

Holmer

, Eriksdotter

, Schultzberg

, Pussinen

, Buhlin

(2018) Association between periodontitis and risk of Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive decline: A case-control study. J Clin Periodontol 45, 1287–1298.

20.

Saji

, Murotani

, Hisada

, Kunihiro

, Tsuduki

, Sugimoto

, Kimura

, Niida

, Toba

, Sakurai

(2020) Relationship between dementia and gut microbiome-associated metabolites: A cross-sectional study in Japan. Sci Rep 10, 8088.

21.

Saji

, Niida

, Murotani

, Hisada

, Tsuduki

, Sugimoto

, Kimura

, Toba

, Sakurai

(2019) Analysis of the relationship between the gut microbiome and dementia: A cross-sectional study conducted in Japan. Sci Rep 9, 1008.

22.

Saji

, Murotani

, Hisada

, Tsuduki

, Sugimoto

, Kimura

, Niida

, Toba

, Sakurai

(2019) The relationship between the gut microbiome and mild cognitive impairment in patients without dementia: A cross-sectional study conducted in Japan. Sci Rep 9, 19227.

23.

Saji

, Hisada

, Tsuduki

, Niida

, Toba

, Sakurai

(2019) Proportional changes in the gut microbiome: A risk factor for cardiovascular disease and dementia? Hypertens Res 42, 1090–1091.

24.

Saji

, Tsuduki

, Murotani

, Hisada

, Sugimoto

, Kimura

, Niida

, Toba

, Sakurai

(2022) Relationship between the Japanese-style diet, gut microbiota, and dementia: A cross-sectional study. Nutrition 94, 111524.

25.

Saji

, Murotani

, Hisada

, Tsuduki

, Sugimoto

, Kimura

, Niida

, Toba

, Sakurai

(2021) The association between cerebral small vessel disease and the gut microbiome: A cross-sectional analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 30, 105568.

26.

Tabei

, Saji

, Ogama

, Abe

, Omura

, Sakurai

, Tomimoto

(2022) Quantitative analysis of white matter hyperintensity: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging image analysis software. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 31, 106555.

27.

Saji

, Murotani

, Sato

, Tsuduki

, Hisada

, Shinohara

, Sugimoto

, Niida

, Toba

, Sakurai

(2022) Relationship between plasma neurofilament light chain, gut microbiota, and dementia: A cross-sectional study. J Alzheimers Dis 86, 1323–1335.

28.

Saji

, Saito

, Yamashita

, Murotani

, Tsuduki

, Hisada

, Sugimoto

, Niida

, Toba

, Sakurai

(2022) Relationship between plasma lipopolysaccharides, gut microbiota, and dementia: A cross-sectional study. J Alzheimers Dis 86, 1947–1957.

29.

Toba

(2005) The guideline for comprehensive geriatric assessment. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi 42, 177–180.

30.

Saji

, Kimura

, Yagita

, Kawarai

, Shimizu

, Kita

(2015) Comparison of arteriosclerotic indicators in patients with ischemic stroke: Ankle-brachial index, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and cardio-ankle vascular index. Hypertens Res 38, 323–328.

31.

Saji

, Toba

, Sakurai

(2016) Cerebral small vessel disease and arterial stiffness: Tsunami effect in the brain? Pulse (Basel) 3, 182–189.

32.

Saji

, Kimura

, Ohsaka

, Higashi

, Teramoto

, Usui

, Kita

(2015) Functional independence measure scores predict level of long-term care required by patients after stroke: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. Disabil Rehabil 37, 331–337.

33.

Folstein

, Folstein

, McHugh

(1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12, 189–198.

34.

Morris

(1993) The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43, 2412–2414.

35.

Tsoi

, Chan

, Hirai

, Wong

, Kwok

(2015) Cognitive tests to detect dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 175, 1450–1458.

36.

Perneczky

, Wagenpfeil

, Komossa

, Grimmer

, Diehl

, Kurz

(2006) Mapping scores onto stages: Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 14, 139–144.

37.

McKhann

, Knopman

, Chertkow

, Hyman

, Jack

Jr , Kawas

, Klunk

, Koroshetz

, Manly

, Mayeux

, Mohs

, Morris

, Rossor

, Scheltens

, Carrillo

, Thies

, Weintraub

, Phelps

(2011) The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 3, 263–269.

38.

Albert

, DeKosky

, Dickson

, Dubois

, Feldman

, Fox

, Gamst

, Holtzman

, Jagust

, Petersen

, Snyder

, Carrillo

, Thies

, Phelps

(2011) The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 3, 270–279.

39.

Rosen

, Mohs

, Davis

(1984) A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 141, 1356–1364.

40.

Dubois

, Slachevsky

, Litvan

, Pillon

(2000) The FAB: A Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology 55, 1621–1626.

41.

Raven

(1965) Guide to using the coloured progressive matrices. H.K. Lewis, London.

42.

Preshaw

, Alba

, Herrera

, Jepsen

, Konstantinidis

, Makrilakis

, Taylor

(2012) Periodontitis and diabetes: A two-way relationship. Diabetologia 55, 21–31.

43.

Eke

, Page

, Wei

, Thornton-Evans

, Genco

(2012) Update of the case definitions for population-based surveillance of periodontitis. J Periodontol 83, 1449–1454.

44.

Kataoka

, Kimura

, Yamaguchi

, Egashira

, Yamamoto

, Koike

, Ogawa

, Fujiharu

, Namai

, Taguchi

, Takahashi

, Kameda

, Kasen

, Hano

, Kubota

, Sato

, Yamaga

, Nohara

, Shirasawa

, Sekine

, Fukuda

, Aoki

, Takeuchi

, Mugiyama

, Mori

, Sawada

, Kashiwagi

, Kitamura

, Hayashi

, Nakagawa

, Murakami

(2021) A cross-sectional study of relationships between periodontal disease and general health: The Hitachi Oral Healthcare Survey. BMC Oral Health 21, 644.

45.

Murakami

, Kimura

, Yasumoto

, Miki

, Yamamoto

, Ito

, Momma

, Owan

, Yano

, Ono

(2018) Usefulness differs between the visual assessment and specific binding ratio of (123)I-ioflupane SPECT in assessing clinical symptoms of drug-naive Parkinson’s disease patients. Front Aging Neurosci 10, 412.

46.

Demmer

, Norby

, Lakshminarayan

, Walker

, Pankow

, Folsom

, Mosley

, Beck

, Lutsey

(2020) Periodontal disease and incident dementia: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC). Neurology 95, e1660–e1671.

47.

Nilsson

, Berglund

, Renvert

(2018) Periodontitis, tooth loss and cognitive functions among older adults. Clin Oral Investig 22, 2103–2109.

48.

Geddis-Regan

, Wassall

, Abley

, Exley

(2023) Exploring dental treatment decision-making experiences of people living with dementia and family carers. Gerodontology, doi: 10.1111/ger.12687.

49.

Tanaka

, Takahashi

, Hirano

, Kikutani

, Watanabe

, Ohara

, Furuya

, Tetsuo

, Akishita

, Iijima

(2018) Oral frailty as a risk factor for physical frailty and mortality in community-dwelling elderly. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 73, 1661–1667.

50.

Malekpour

, Devine

, Dare

, Costello

(2023) Investigating the perspectives of older adults in residential aged care on oral health-related quality of life. Gerodontology 40, 220–230.

51.

Palmers

, De Almeida Mello

, Janssens

, De Visschere

, Declerck

, Duyck

(2023) Implementing an oral health policy in long-term care facilities for older adults in Flanders, Belgium: The Oral Health Care Track. Gerodontology, doi: 10.1111/ger.12693.

52.

Larvin

, Gao

, Kang

, Aggarwal

, Pavitt

, Wu

(2023) The impact of study factors in the association of periodontal disease and cognitive disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 52, afad015.

53.

, Chen

, Visser

, Marks

LAM

, Tjakkes

(2022) Combined association of cognitive impairment and poor oral health on mortality risk in older adults: Results from the NHANES with 15 years of follow-up. J Periodontol 93, 888–900.

54.

Pritchard

, Fabian

, Lawrence

, Morton

, Crean

, Alder

(2022) An investigation into the effects of outer membrane vesicles and lipopolysaccharide of Porphyromonas gingivalis on blood-brain barrier integrity, permeability, and disruption of scaffolding proteins in a human in vitro model. J Alzheimers Dis 86, 343–364.

55.

Liu

, Dashper

, Zhao

(2023) Association between oral bacteria and Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis 91, 129–150.

56.

Cirstea

, Kliger

, MacLellan

, Yu

, Langlois

, Fan

, Boroomand

, Kharazyan

, Hsiung

RGY

, MacVicar

, Chertkow

, Whitehead

, Brett Finlay

, Appel-Cresswell

(2022) The oral and fecal microbiota in a Canadian cohort of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 87, 247–258.

Cross-Sectional Analysis of Periodontal Disease and Cognitive Impairment Conducted in a Memory Clinic: The Pearl Study

Abstract

Background:

Objective:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

Participants

Assessments

Classification of cognitive function

Brain imaging

Dental examination

Statistical analysis

RESULTS

Participant characteristics

Dementia versus non-dementia

No PeD and mild PeD versus moderate and severe PeD

Cognitive function and PeD

Multivariable analyses

DISCUSSION

Conclusions

Footnotes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

FUNDING

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

DATA AVAILABILITY

References