Detecting the beginning of cognitive decay is crucial to guarantee good management and the possible prevention of dementia progression. The present study arises from observations collected during an educational event to promote mental and physical health in which incidental neuropsychological data gathered on 290 citizens showed the importance of routine neuropsychological examination in detecting early signs of cognitive decay, since many individuals were unaware of the decrease in their cognitive efficiency. Accordingly, the availability of a screening tool that is computerized, portable, self-administrable, and sensitive to the main neurocognitive changes testifying the progression towards pathological aging is critical.
Objective:
To this aim, we developed a computerized battery for the early, preclinical Diagnosis of Neurocognitive disease (DiaNe), that can be self-administered and performed autonomously by using a tablet.
Methods:
DiaNe includes tests expected to evaluate the main cognitive domains involved in neurodegenerative diseases (memory, attention, executive functions) with a detailed assessment of visuospatial memory in particular.
Results:
DiaNe is not just the translation of standard tests into telematics, rather it is a new tool that provides both accuracy and response time measurements, aimed to screen cognitive profile and monitor it over time, being able to detect changes in still normal performances that may be suggestive of an ongoing onset of neurocognitive disorders.
Conclusion:
Here we present an investigation of DiaNe concurrent validity showing that its results are comparable to those obtained by existing paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests, and propose that DiaNe could be a useful, quick, and economical instrument for the monitoring of cognitive aging.
PattersonC (2018) World Alzheimer Report 2018. Alzheimer’s Disease International, London.
2.
WimoA, JönssonL, BondJ, PrinceM, WinbladB (2013) The worldwide economic impact of dementia 2010. Alzheimers Dement9, 1–11.e3.
3.
DraperB, CationsM, WhiteF, TrollorJ, LoyC, BrodatyH, SachdevP, GonskiP, DemirkolA, CummingRG, WithallA (2016) Time to diagnosis in young-onset dementia and its determinants: The INSPIRED study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry31, 1217–1224.
4.
Van VlietD, De VugtME, BakkerC, PijnenburgYAL, Vernooij-DassenMJFJ, KoopmansRTCM, VerheyFRJ (2013) Time to diagnosis in young-onset dementia as compared with late-onset dementia. Psychol Med43, 423–432.
5.
PetersenRC, CaraccioloB, BrayneC, GauthierS, JelicV, FratiglioniL (2014) Mild cognitive impairment: A concept in evolution. J Intern Med275, 214–228.
6.
JessenF, AmariglioRE, Van BoxtelM, BretelerM, CeccaldiM, ChételatG, DuboisB, DufouilC, EllisKA, Van Der FlierWM, GlodzikL, Van HartenAC, De LeonMJ, McHughP, MielkeMM, MolinuevoJL, MosconiL, OsorioRS, PerrotinA, PetersenRC, RabinLA, RamiL, ReisbergB, RentzDM, SachdevPS, De La SayetteV, SaykinAJ, ScheltensP, ShulmanMB, SlavinMJ, SperlingRA, StewartR, UspenskayaO, VellasB, VisserPJ, WagnerM (2014) A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement10, 844–852.
7.
AmievaH, Le GoffM, MilletX, OrgogozoJM, PérèsK, Barberger-GateauP, Jacqmin-GaddaH, DartiguesJF (2008) Prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: Successive emergence of the clinical symptoms. Ann Neurol64, 492–498.
BellevilleS, FouquetC, HudonC, ZomahounHTV, CroteauJ (2017) Neuropsychological measures that predict progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s type dementia in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rev27, 328–353.
11.
BessiV, MazzeoS, PadiglioniS, PicciniC, NacmiasB, SorbiS, BraccoL (2018) From subjective cognitive decline to Alzheimer’s disease: The predictive role of neuropsychological assessment, personality traits, and cognitive reserve. A 7-year follow-up study. J Alzheimers Dis63, 1523–1535.
12.
IachiniT, IavaroneA, SeneseV, RuotoloF, RuggieroG (2012) Visuospatial memory in healthy elderly, AD and MCI: A review. Curr Aging Sci2, 43–59.
13.
BocciaM, SilveriMC, SabatiniU, GuarigliaC, NemmiF (2016) Neural underpinnings of the decline of topographical memory in mild cognitive impairment. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen31, 618–630.
14.
WenigerG, RuhlederM, LangeC, WolfS, IrleE (2011) Egocentric and allocentric memory as assessed by virtual reality in individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia49, 518–527.
HampsteadBM, TowlerS, StringerAY, SathianK (2018) Continuous measurement of object location memory is sensitive to effects of age and mild cognitive impairment and related to medial temporal lobe volume. Alzheimers Dement (Amst)10, 76–85.
17.
BocciaM, Di VitaA, DianaS, MargiottaR, ImbrianoL, RendaceL, CampanelliA, D’AntonioF, TrebbastoniA, De LenaC, PiccardiL, GuarigliaC (2019) Is losing one’s way a sign of cognitive decay? Topographical memory deficit as an early marker of pathological aging. J Alzheimers Dis68, 679–693.
18.
SapkotaRP, Van Der LindeI, LamichhaneN, UpadhyayaT, PardhanS (2017) Patients with mild cognitive impairment show lower visual short-term memory performance in feature binding tasks. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra7, 74–86.
19.
Vann JonesSA, O’BrienJT (2014) The prevalence and incidence of dementia with Lewy bodies: A systematic review of population and clinical studies. Psychol Med44, 673–683.
KempJ, PhilippiN, PhillippsC, DemuynckC, AlbasserT, Martin-HunyadiC, Schmidt-MutterC, CretinB, BlancF (2017) Cognitive profile in prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies. Alzheimers Res Ther9, 19.
23.
WalkerZ, PossinKL, BoeveBF, AarslandD (2015) Lewy body dementias. Lancet386, 1683–1697.
24.
ZygourisS, TsolakiM (2015) Computerized cognitive testing for older adults: A review. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen30, 13–28.
25.
Trustram EveC, De JagerCA (2014) Piloting and validation of a novel self-administered online cognitive screening tool in normal older persons: The Cognitive Function Test. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry29, 198–206.
26.
KahanaM, LoftusG (1999) Response time versus accuracy in human memory. In The Nature of Cognition, Sternberg RJ, ed. MIT Press, pp. 323–384.
27.
RandolphC, TierneyMC, MohrE, ChaseTN (1998) The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): Preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol20, 310–319.
28.
PontieriM, PioliR, PadovaniA, TunesiS, de GirolamoG (2007) RBANS Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (Italian version), Firenze.
29.
CrookT, BartusRT, FerrisSH, WhitehouseP, CohenGD, GershonS (1986) Age-associated memory impairment: Proposed diagnostic criteria and measures of clinical change—report of a National Institute of Mental Health Work Group. Dev Neuropsychol2, 261–276.
30.
BrazzelliM, CapitaniE, Della SalaS, SpinnlerH, ZuffiM (1994) A neuropsychological instrument adding to the description of patients with suspected cortical dementia: The Milan overall dementia assessment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry57, 1510–1517.
31.
SnitzBE, MorrowLA, RodriguezEG, HuberKA, SaxtonJA (2008) Subjective memory complaints and concurrent memory performance in older patients of primary care providers. J Int Neuropsychol Soc14, 1004–1013.
32.
MagniE, BinettiG, BianchettiA, RozziniR, TrabucchiM (1996) Mini-mental state examination: A normative study in Italian elderly population. Eur J Neurol3, 198–202.
33.
VandierendonckA (2017) A comparison of methods to combine speed and accuracy measures of performance: A rejoinder on the binning procedure. Behav Res Methods49, 653–673.
34.
WolbersT, WienerJM (2014) Challenges for identifying the neural mechanisms that support spatial navigation: The impact of spatial scale. Front Hum Neurosci8, 571.
35.
CohenJ (2013) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Academic Press.
36.
DongY, ThompsonCL, Huey Joanne TanS, Ben Swie LimL, PangW, Li-Hsian ChenC (2013) Test-retest reliability, convergent validity and practice effects of the RBANS in a memory clinic setting: A pilot study. Open J Med Psychol02, 11–16.
37.
GoetteW (2020) Reconsidering the RBANS factor structure: A systematic literature review and meta-analytic factor analysis. Neuropsychol Rev30, 425–442.
SalthouseT (2012) Consequences of age-related cognitive declines. Annu Rev Psychol63, 201–226.
40.
PliatsikasC, VeríssimoJ, BabcockL, PullmanMY, GleiDA, WeinsteinM, GoldmanN, UllmanMT (2019) Workingmemory in older adults declines with age, but is modulated by sex and education. Q J Exp Psychol72, 1308–1327.
41.
MiyakeA, FriedmanNP, EmersonMJ, WitzkiAH, HowerterA, WagerTD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol41, 49–100.
42.
PrenskyM (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. In On the Horizon, MCB University Press, pp. 1–6.
43.
NoriR, PalmieroM, GiusbertiF, GambettiE, PiccardiL (2020) Web searching and navigation: Age, intelligence, and familiarity. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol71, 902–915.
44.
SanchizM, ChevalierA, AmadieuF (2017) How do older and young adults start searching for information? Impact of age, domain knowledge and problem complexity on the different steps of information searching. Comput Human Behav72, 67–78.
