Cortical complexity plays a central role in the diagnosis and prognosis of age-related diseases. However, little is known about the regional cortical complexity in the context of brain atrophy.
Objective:
We aimed to systematically examine the age-related changes of the cortical complexity of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and its subregions.
Methods:
Two hundred and fourteen cognitively normal adults drawn from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) were divided into four age groups: young, middle-aged, young-old, and old-old. Based on structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) scans, the multiscale measures of cortical complexity included cortical thickness (mm), surface area (mm2), grey matter volume (mm3), density, gyrification index (GI), and fractal dimension (FD).
Results:
Advancing age was associated with reduced grey matter volume, pial surface area, density, and FD of left DLPFC, but correlated with increased cortical thickness and GI. Volumetric measures, cerebrospinal fluid volume in particular, showed better performance to discriminate young-old adults from old-old adults, while FD was more sensitive than the volumetric measures to discriminate young adults and middle-aged adults.
Conclusion:
This is the first demonstration that chronological age has a pronounced and differential effect on the cortical complexity of left DLPFC. Our findings suggest that surface-based measures of cortical region, thickness, and gyrification in particular, could be considered as valuable imaging markers for the studies of aging brain and neurodegenerative diseases.
MadanCR, KensingerEA (2016) Cortical complexity as a measure of age-related brain atrophy. Neuroimage134, 617–629.
2.
SalatDH, KayeJA, JanowskyJS (1999) Prefrontal gray and white matter volumes in healthy aging and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol56, 338–344.
3.
ThompsonPM, HayashiKM, De ZubicarayG, JankeAL, RoseSE, SempleJ, TogaAW (2003) Dynamics of gray matter loss in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci23, 994–1005.
4.
KaoYH, ChouMC, ChenCH, YangYH (2019) White matter changes in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and associated factors. J Clin Med8, 167.
5.
DicksteinDL, KabasoD, RocherAB, LuebkeJI, WearneSL, HofPR (2007) Changes in the structural complexity of the aged brain. Aging Cell6, 275–284.
6.
Ruiz de MirasJ, CostumeroV, BellochV, EscuderoJ, ÁvilaC, SepulcreJ (2017) Complexity analysis of cortical surface detects changes in future Alzheimer’s disease converters. Hum Brain Mapp38, 5905–5918.
7.
FilmerHL, EhrhardtSE, ShawTB, MattingleyJB, DuxPE (2019) The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation to prefrontal areas is related to underlying cortical morphology. Neuroimage196, 41–48.
8.
PallantiS, Di RolloA, AntoniniS, CauliG, HollanderE, QuercioliL (2012) Low-frequency rTMS over right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the treatment of resistant depression: cognitive improvement is independent from clinical response, resting motor threshold is related to clinical response. Neuropsychobiology65, 227–235.
9.
JorgeRE, MoserDJ, AcionL, RobinsonRG (2008) Treatment of vascular depression using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Arch Gen Psychiatry65, 268–276.
10.
ChervyakovAV, ChernyavskyAY, SinitsynDO, PiradovMA (2015) Possible mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci9, 303.
11.
BashirS, PerezJM, HorvathJC, Pena-GomezC, VernetM, CapiaA, Pascual-LeoneA (2014) Differential effects of motor cortical excitability and plasticity in young and old individuals: a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study. Front Aging Neurosci6, 111.
12.
MyliusV, AyachSS, AhdabR, FarhatWH, ZouariHG, BelkeM, SchmidtS (2013) Definition of DLPFC and M1 according to anatomical landmarks for navigated brain stimulation: inter-rater reliability, accuracy, and influence of gender and age. Neuroimage78, 224–232.
13.
LuH (2017) Towards a more targeted rTMS treatment for late-life depression: age-specific morphometric variance of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Stimul10, 365.
14.
LevyR, Goldman-RakicPS (2000) Segregation of working memory functions within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Exp Brain Res133, 23–32.
15.
AizensteinHJ, ButtersMA, WuM, MazurkewiczLM, StengerVA, GianarosPJ, CarterCS (2009) Altered functioning of the executive control circuit in late-life depression: episodic and persistent phenomena. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry17, 30–42.
16.
MarcusDS, WangTH, ParkerJ, CsernanskyJG, MorrisJC, BucknerRL (2007) Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): cross-sectional MRI data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults. J Cogn Neurosci19, 1498–1507.
17.
ShattuckDW, LeahyRM (2002) BrainSuite: an automated cortical surface identification tool. Med Image Anal6, 129–142.
18.
PantazisD, JoshiA, JiangJ, ShattuckDW, BernsteinLE, DamasioH, LeahyRM (2010) Comparison of landmark-based and automatic methods for cortical surface registration. Neuroimage49, 2479–2493.
19.
ApostolovaLG, ThompsonPM, RogersSA, DinovID, ZoumalanC, SteinerCA, CummingsJL (2010) Surface feature-guided mapping of cerebral metabolic changes in cognitively normal and mildly impaired elderly. Mol Imaging Biol12, 218–224.
LuH, MaSL, ChanSSM, LamLCW (2016) The effects of apolipoprotein ɛ 4 on aging brain in cognitively normal Chinese elderly: a surface-based morphometry study. Int Psychogeriatr28, 1503–1511.
22.
ShattuckDW, MirzaM, AdisetiyoV, HojatkashaniC, SalamonG, NarrKL, TogaAW (2008) Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. Neuroimage39, 1064–1080.
23.
GoodCD, ScahillRI, FoxNC, AshburnerJ, FristonKJ, ChanD, FrackowiakRS (2002) Automatic differentiation of anatomical patterns in the human brain: validation with studies of degenerative dementias. Neuroimage17, 29–46.
JiangJ, ZhuW, ShiF, ZhangY, LinL, JiangT (2008) A robust and accurate algorithm for estimating the complexity of the cortical surface. J Neurosci Methods172, 122–130.
26.
KingRD, BrownB, HwangM, JeonT, GeorgeAT, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (2010) Fractal dimension analysis of the cortical ribbon in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage53, 471–479.
27.
FoxMD, LiuH, Pascual-LeoneA (2013) Identification of reproducible individualized targets for treatment of depression with TMS based on intrinsic connectivity. Neuroimage66, 151–160.
28.
CendesF, AndermannF, GloorP, EvansA, Jones-GotmanM, WatsonC, LerouxG (1993) MRI volumetric measurement of amygdala and hippocampus in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology43, 719–719.
29.
ReiterK, AlpertKI, CobiaDJ, KwasnyMJ, MorrisJC, CsernanskyJC, WangL (2012) Cognitively normal individuals with AD parents may be at risk for developing aging-related cortical thinning patterns characteristic of AD. Neuroimage61, 525–532.
30.
JiangT, HeY, ZangY, WengX (2004) Modulation of functional connectivity during the resting state and the motor task. Hum Brain Mapp22, 63–71.
31.
WatanabeT, HiroseS, WadaH, ImaiY, MachidaT, ShirouzuI, MasudaN (2013) A pairwise maximum entropy model accurately describes resting-state human brain networks. Nat Commun4, 1370.
32.
ZillesK, ArmstrongE, SchleicherA, KretschmannHJ (1998) The human pattern of gyrification in the cerebral cortex. Anat Embryol179, 173–179.
33.
KochunovP, RogersW, ManginJF, LancasterJ (2012) A library of cortical morphology analysis tools to study development, aging and genetics of cerebral cortex. Neuroinformatics10, 81–96.
34.
CaoB, MwangiB, PassosIC, WuMJ, KeserZ, Zunta-SoaresGB, SoaresJC (2017) Lifespan gyrification trajectories of human brain in healthy individuals and patients with major psychiatric disorders. Sci Rep7, 511.
35.
LemaitreH, GoldmanAL, SambataroF, VerchinskiBA, Meyer-LindenbergA, WeinbergerDR, MattayVS (2012) Normal age-related brain morphometric changes: nonuniformity across cortical thickness, surface area and gray matter volume?Neurobiol Aging33, 617e1.
36.
WorkerA, BlainC, JaroszJ, ChaudhuriKR, BarkerGJ, WilliamsSC, SimmonsA (2014) Cortical thickness, surface area and volume measures in Parkinson’s disease, multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. PLoS One9, e114167.
37.
Van EssenDC (1997) A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature385, 313.
38.
WinklerAM, KochunovP, BlangeroJ, AlmasyL, ZillesK, FoxPT, GlahnDC (2010) Cortical thickness or grey matter volume? The importance of selecting the phenotype for imaging genetics studies. Neuroimage53, 1135–1146.
39.
SowellER, PetersonBS, ThompsonPM, WelcomeSE, HenkeniusAL, TogaAW (2003) Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat Neurosci6, 309–315.
40.
ImK, LeeJM, LytteltonO, KimSH, EvansAC, KimSI (2008) Brain size and cortical structure in the adult human brain. Cereb Cortex18, 2181–2191.
41.
HogstromLJ, WestlyeLT, WalhovdKB, FjellAM (2012) The structure of the cerebral cortex across adult life: age-related patterns of surface area, thickness, and gyrification. Cereb Cortex23, 2521–2530.
42.
DengX, ZhouM, TangC, ZhangJ, ZhuL, XieZ, XuR (2016) The alterations of cortical volume, thickness, surface, and density in the intermediate sporadic Parkinson’s disease from the Han population of mainland China. Front Aging Neurosci8, 185.
43.
WangY, NecusJ, KaiserM, MotaB (2016) Universality in human cortical folding in health and disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A113, 12820–12825.
44.
WangY, NecusJ, RodriguezLP, TaylorPN, MotaB (2019) Human cortical folding across regions within individual brains follows universal scaling law. Commun Biol2, 1–8.
45.
LeeJM, YoonU, KimJJ, KimIY, LeeDS, KwonJS, KimSI (2004) Analysis of the hemispheric asymmetry using fractal dimension of a skeletonized cerebral surface. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng51, 1494–1498.
46.
MotaB, Herculano-HouzelS (2015) Cortical folding scales universally with surface area and thickness, not number of neurons. Science349, 74–77.
47.
MacDonaldAW, CohenJD, StengerVA, CarterCS (2000) Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science288, 1835–1838.
48.
TekinS, CummingsJL (2002) Frontal–subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: an update. J Psychosom Res53, 647–654.
49.
LuH, ChanSS, LamLC (2019) Localized Analysis of Normalized Distance from Scalp to Cortex and Personalized Evaluation (LANDSCAPE): focusing on age-and dementia-specific changes. J Alzheimers Dis67, 1331–1341.
50.
LuH, LamLC, NingY (2019) Scalp-to-cortex distance of left primary motor cortex and its computational head model: Implications for personalized neuromodulation. CNS Neurosci Ther25, 1270–1276.
51.
RahmanA, ReatoD, ArlottiM, GascaF, DattaA, ParraLC, BiksonM (2013) Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects. J Physiol591, 2563–2578.
52.
LuH (2020) Developing and aging: A tale of two stages. CNS Neurosci Ther26, 281–282.
