REMEDES for Alzheimer-R4Alz Battery: Design and Development of a New Tool of Cognitive Control Assessment for the Diagnosis of Minor and Major Neurocognitive Disorders
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November 26, 2019
REMEDES for Alzheimer-R4Alz Battery: Design and Development of a New Tool of Cognitive Control Assessment for the Diagnosis of Minor and Major Neurocognitive Disorders
Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are acknowledged stages of the clinical spectrum of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and cognitive control seems to be among the first neuropsychological predictors of cognitive decline. Existing tests are usually affected by educational level, linguistic abilities, cultural differences, and social status, constituting them error-prone when differentiating between the aforementioned stages. Creating robust neuropsychological tests is therefore prominent.
Objective:
The design of a novel psychometric battery for the cognitive control and attention assessment, free of demographic effects, capable to discriminate cognitively healthy aging, SCD, MCI, and mild Dementia (mD).
Methods:
The battery initial hypothesis was tuned using iterations of administration on random sampling healthy older adults and people with SCD, MCI, and mD, from the area of Thessaloniki, Greece. This resulted in the first release of the REflexes MEasurement DEviceS for Alzheimer battery (REMEDES for Alzheimer-R4Alz).
Results:
The first release lasts for almost an hour. The battery was design to assess working memory (WM) including WM storage, processing, and updating, enriched by episodic buffer recruitment. It was also designed to assess attention control abilities comprising selective, sustained, and divided attention subtasks. Finally, it comprises an inhibitory control, a task/rule switching or set-shifting, and a cognitive flexibility subtask as a combination of inhibition and task/rule switching abilities.
Conclusion:
The R4Alz battery is an easy to use psychometric battery with increasing difficulty levels and assumingly ecological validity, being entertaining for older adults, potentially free of demographic effects, and promising as a more accurate and early diagnosis tool of neurodegeneration.
YagiT, ItoD, SugiyamaD, IwasawaS, TabuchiH, KonishiM, ArakiM, SaitohN, NiheiY, MimuraM, SuzukiN (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of neuropsychological tests for classification of dementia. Neurol Asia21, 47–54.
2.
LemosR, SimoesMR, SantiagoB, SantanaI (2015) The free and cued selective reminding test: Validation for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuropsychol9, 242–257.
3.
NasreddineZS, PhillipsNA, BedirianV, CharbonneauS, WhiteheadV, CollinI, CummingsJL, ChertkowH (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc53, 695–699.
4.
TombaughTN (2004) Trail Making Test A and B: Normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol19, 203–214.
5.
ZygourisS, GiakoumisD, VotisK, DoumpoulakisS, NtovasK, SegkouliS, KaragiannidisC, TzovarasD, TsolakiM (2015) Can a virtual reality cognitive training application fulfill a dual role? Using the virtual supermarket cognitive training application as a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis44, 1333–1347.
6.
PoptsiE, MoraitouD, EleftheriouM, Kounti-ZafeiropoulouF, PapasozomenouC, AgogiatouC, BakoglidouE, BatsilaG, LiapiD, MarkouN, NikolaidouE, OuzouniF, SoumpourouA, VasiloglouM, TsolakiM (2019) Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Greek older adults with subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol32, 265–274.
7.
OumellalA, FarisMEA, BenabdeljlilM (2018) The Trail Making Test in Morocco: Normative data stratified by age and level of education. Open J Med Psychol7, 1–12.
8.
BooneK, VictorT, WenJ, RazaniJ, PontonM (2007) The association between neuropsychological scores and ethnicity, language, and acculturation variables in a large patient population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol22, 355–365.
9.
IversonGL, BrooksBL, AshtonVL, JohnsonLG, GualtieriCT (2009) Does familiarity with computers affect computerized neuropsychological test performance?J Clin Exp Neuropsychol31, 594–604.
ChaytorN, Schmitter-EdgecombeM (2003) The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol Rev13, 181–197.
12.
CocchiL, ZaleskyA, FornitoA, MattingleyJB (2013) Dynamic cooperation and competition between brain systems during cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci17, 493–501.
13.
MillerEK, WallisJD (2009) Executive function and higher-order cognition: Definition and neural substrates. Encyclopedia Neurosci4, 99–104.
14.
LenartowiczA, KalarDJ, CongdonE, PoldrackRA (2010) Towards an ontology of cognitive control. Top Cogn Sci2, 678–692.
15.
ChecaP, Rodríguez-BailónR, RuedaMR (2008) Neurocognitive and temperamental systems of self-regulation and early adolescents’ social and academic outcomes. Mind Brain Educ2, 177–187.
16.
MiyakeA, FriedmanNP, EmersonMJ, WitzkiAH, HowerterA, WagerTD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol41, 49–100.
17.
MostofskySH, SimmondsDJ (2008) Response inhibition and response selection: Two sides of the same coin. J Cogn Neurosci20, 751–761.
18.
MonsellS (1996) Control of mental processes. In Unsolved mysteries of the mind: Tutorial essays in cognition, Vicki Bruce, Psychology Press, pp. 93–148.
19.
DiamondA (2006) The early development of executive functions. In Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change, Bialystok, Ellen, Fergus IM Craik, and Senior Scientist Fergus IM Craik, eds. Oxford University Press, USA, 210, pp. 70–95.
20.
EslingerPJ, GrattanLM (1993) Frontal lobe and frontal-striatal substrates for different forms of human cognitive flexibility. Neuropsychologia31, 17–28.
21.
MillerGA, GalanterE, PribramKH (1960) Plans and the structure of behavior. Henry Holt and Co., New York, NY.
22.
BaddeleyAD, HitchG (1974) Working memory. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation,
BowerGA, ed. Academic Press, pp. 47–89.
23.
UnsworthN, EngleRW (2008) Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: An individual differences investigation of focus switching. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn34, 616–630.
24.
UnsworthN, RedickTS, HeitzRP, BroadwayJM, EngleRW (2009) Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory17, 635–654.
25.
TowseJN, HitchGJ, HuttonU (1998) A reevaluation of working memory capacity in children. J Mem Lang39, 195–217.
26.
MorrisN, JonesDM (1990) Memory updating in working memory: The role of the central executive. Br J Clin Psychol81, 111–121.
27.
BaddeleyA (2000) The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends Cogn Sci4, 417–423.
28.
SalthouseTA (1985) Speed of behavior and its implications for cognition. In The handbooks of aging. Handbook of the psychology of aging,
BirrenJESchaieKWeds. Van Reinhold Nostrand Co, New York, NY, pp. 400–426.
29.
SalthouseTA (1996) The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev103, 403–428.
30.
JamesW (1890) The perception of reality. In Principles of Psychology,
JamesW ed., Henry Holt and Company, 2, pp. 283–324.
31.
BroadbentDE (1958) Perception and communication,
Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY.
DeutschJA, DeutschD, LindsayPH, TreismanAM (1967) Comments and reply on “Selective attention: Perception or response?Q J Exp Psychol19, 362–367.
34.
ShiffrinRM, SchneiderW (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol Rev84, 127.
35.
BaddeleyAD (1986) Working memory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36.
NormanDA, ShalliceT (1986) Attention to action. In Consciousness and self-regulation,
DavidsonRJ,
SchwartzGE,
ShapiroD, eds. Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 1–18.
37.
PerryRJ, HodgesJR (1999) Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. A critical review. Brain122(Pt 3), 383–404.
FanJ (2014) An information theory account of cognitive control. Front Hum Neurosci8, 680.
40.
MillerEK, CohenJD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci24, 167–202.
41.
SabiaS, Singh-ManouxA, Hagger-JohnsonG, CamboisE, BrunnerEJ, KivimakiM (2012) Influence of individual and combined healthy behaviours on successful aging. CMAJ184, 1985–1992.
42.
SunQ, TownsendMK, OkerekeOI, FrancoOH, HuFB, GrodsteinF (2010) Physical activity at midlife in relation to successful survival in women at age 70 years or older. Arch Intern Med170, 194–201.
43.
GunstadJ, PaulRH, BrickmanAM, CohenRA, ArnsM, RoeD, LawrenceJJ, GordonE (2006) Patterns of cognitive performance in middle-aged and older adults: A cluster analytic examination. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol19, 59–64.
44.
RushBK, BarchDM, BraverTS (2006) Accounting for cognitive aging: Context processing, inhibition or processing speed?Aging Neuropsychol Cogn13, 588–610.
45.
ChristensenH, MackinnonA, JormAF, HendersonAS, AlE (1994) Age differences and interindividual variation in cognition in community-dwelling elderly. Psychol Aging9, 381–390.
46.
SchnitzspahnKM, StahlC, ZeintlM, KallerCP, KliegelM (2013) The role of shifting, updating, and inhibition in prospective memory performance in young and older adults. Dev Psychol49, 1544–1553.
47.
BrockmoleJR, LogieRH (2013) Age-related change in visual working memory: A study of 55,753 participants aged 8-75. Front Psychol4, 12.
48.
ParkDC, LautenschlagerG, HeddenT, DavidsonNS, SmithAD, SmithPK (2002) Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging17, 299–320.
49.
GiovagnoliAR, Del PesceM, MascheroniS, SimoncelliM, LaiaconaM, CapitaniE (1996) Trail making test: Normative values from 287 normal adult controls. Ital J Neurol Sci17, 305–309.
50.
ChenT, LiD (2007) The roles of working memory updating and processing speed in mediating age-related differences in fluid intelligence. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn14, 631–646.
51.
HartmanM, BoltonE, FehnelSE (2001) Accounting for age differences on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Decreased working memory, not inflexibility. Psychol Aging16, 385–399.
52.
SweeneyJA, RosanoC, BermanRA, LunaB (2001) Inhibitory control of attention declines more than working memory during normal aging. Neurobiol Aging22, 39–47.
53.
SalthouseTA (1994) The aging of working memory. Neuropsychology8, 535.
54.
JessenF, AmariglioRE, van BoxtelM, BretelerM, CeccaldiM, ChetelatG, DuboisB, DufouilC, EllisKA, van der FlierWM, GlodzikL, van HartenAC, de LeonMJ, McHughP, MielkeMM, MolinuevoJL, MosconiL, OsorioRS, PerrotinA, PetersenRC, RabinLA, RamiL, ReisbergB, RentzDM, SachdevPS, de la SayetteV, SaykinAJ, ScheltensP, ShulmanMB, SlavinMJ, SperlingRA, StewartR, UspenskayaO, VellasB, VisserPJ, WagnerM, Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative Working Group (2014) A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement10, 844–852.
55.
MolM, CarpayM, RamakersI, RozendaalN, VerheyF, JollesJ (2007) The effect of perceived forgetfulness on quality of life in older adults; a qualitative review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry22, 393–400.
56.
ItoK, InagakiH, SugiyamaM, OkamuraT, ShimokadoK, AwataS (2013) Association between subjective memory complaints and mental health well-being in urban community-dwelling elderly in Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int13, 234–235.
57.
KochanNA, BunceD, PontS, CrawfordJD, BrodatyH, SachdevPS (2016) Reaction time measures predict incident dementia in community-living older adults: The Sydney Memory and Ageing Study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry24, 221–231.
58.
MirandaB, MadureiraS, VerdelhoA, FerroJ, PantoniL, SalvadoriE, ChabriatH, ErkinjunttiT, FazekasF, HennericiM, O’BrienJ, ScheltensP, VisserMC, WahlundLO, WaldemarG, WallinA, InzitarionD, LADISStudy (2008) Self-perceived memory impairment and cognitive performance in an elderly independent population with age-related white matter changes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry79, 869–873.
MitchellAJ, BeaumontH, FergusonD, YadegarfarM, StubbsB (2014) Risk of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in older people with subjective memory complaints: Meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand130, 439–451.
61.
PetersenRC, CaraccioloB, BrayneC, GauthierS, JelicV, FratiglioniL (2014) Mild cognitive impairment: A concept in evolution. J Intern Med275, 214–228.
62.
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®), American Psychiatric Publishing.
63.
JohnsEK, PhillipsNA, BellevilleS, GoupilD, BabinsL, KelnerN, SkaB, GilbertB, MassoudF, de BoyssonC, DuncanHD, ChertkowH (2012) The profile of executive functioning in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Disproportionate deficits in inhibitory control. J Int Neuropsychol Soc18, 541–555.
SachdevP, KalariaR, O’BrienJ, SkoogI, AlladiS, BlackSE, BlackerD, BlazerDG, ChenC, ChuiH, GanguliM, JellingerK, JesteDV, PasquierF, PaulsenJ, PrinsN, RockwoodK, RomanG, ScheltensP, Internationlal Society for Vascular Behavioral and Cognitive Disorders (2014) Diagnostic criteria for vascular cognitive disorders: A VASCOG statement. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord28, 206–218.
66.
Alzheimer’s Association (2014) 2014 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement10, e47–92.
67.
BellevilleS, ChertkowH, GauthierS (2007) Working memory and control of attention in persons with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology21, 458–469.
68.
CrawfordTJ, HighamS (2016) Distinguishing between impairments of working memory and inhibitory control in cases of early dementia. Neuropsychologia81, 61–67.
69.
HutchisonKA, BalotaDA, DuchekJM (2010) The utility of Stroop task switching as a marker for early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. Psychol Aging25, 545–559.
70.
DodsonCS, SpaniolM, O’ConnorMK, DeasonRG, AllyBA, BudsonAE (2011) Alzheimer’s disease and memory-monitoring impairment: Alzheimer’s patients show a monitoring deficit that is greater than their accuracy deficit. Neuropsychologia49, 2609–2618.
71.
DesmondDW (2004) The neuropsychology of vascular cognitive impairment: Is there a specific cognitive deficit?J Neurol Sci226, 3–7.
72.
DoxopoulosP, PanayiotouKL, TsardouliasEG, SymeonidisAL (2018) Creating an extrovert robotic assistant via IoT networking devices. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.04361, https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.04361, Posted 12 April 2018, Accessed 11 June 2019.
73.
PoptsiE, LazarouI, MarkouN, VassiloglouM, NikolaidouE, DiamantidouA, SiatraV, KarathanassiE, KarakostasA, ZafeiropoulouFK, TsiatsosT, TsolakiM (2019) A comparative single-blind randomized controlled trial with language training in people with mild cognitive impairment. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen34, 176–187.
74.
BrandtJ, AretouliE, NeijstromE, SamekJ, ManningK, AlbertMS, Bandeen-RocheK (2009) Selectivity of executive function deficits in mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology23, 607–618.
75.
MostiCB, RogLA, FinkJW (2019) Differentiating mild cognitive impairment and cognitive changes of normal aging. Handbook on the Neuropsychology of Aging and Dementia,
RavdinLD,
KatzenHL, eds. Springer, pp. 445–463.
76.
NarazakiK, NofujiY, HondaT, MatsuoE, YonemotoK, KumagaiS (2013) Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in a Japanese community-dwelling older population. Neuroepidemiology40, 23–29.
77.
LuJ, LiD, LiF, ZhouA, WangF, ZuoX, JiaXF, SongH, JiaJ (2011) Montreal Cognitive Assessment in detecting cognitive impairment in Chinese elderly individuals: A population-based study. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol24, 184–190.
78.
ArdilaA, BertolucciPH, BragaLW, Castro-CaldasA, JuddT, KosmidisMH, MatuteE, NitriniR, Ostrosky-SolisF, RosselliM (2010) Illiteracy: The neuropsychology of cognition without reading. Arch Clin Neuropsychol25, 689–712.
79.
PawlowskiJ, RemorE, ParenteMADMP, de SallesJF, FonsecaRP, BandeiraDR (2012) The influence of reading and writing habits associated with education on the neuropsychological performance of Brazilian adults. Read Writ25, 2275–2289.
80.
WechslerD (1997) Wechsler Memory Scale–Third Edition (WMS–III). The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
81.
MyersonJ, EmeryL, WhiteDA, HaleS (2003) Effects of age, domain, and processing demands on memory span: Evidence for differential decline. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn10, 20–27.
82.
MillerGA (1956) The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev63, 81–97.
83.
MillerAL, GrossMP, UnsworthN (2019) Individual differences in working memory capacity and long-term memory: The influence of intensity of attention to items at encoding as measured by pupil dilation. J Mem Lang104, 25–42.
84.
OwenAM, McMillanKM, LairdAR, BullmoreE (2005) N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp25, 46–59.
85.
JaeggiSM, BuschkuehlM, PerrigWJ, MeierB (2010) The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure. Memory18, 394–412.
86.
BorkowskaA, DrozdzW, JurkowskiP, RybakowskiJK (2009) The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the N-back test in mild cognitive impairment and elderly depression. World J Biol Psychiatry10, 870–876.
87.
MissonnierP, GoldG, Fazio-CostaL, MichelJP, MulliganR, MichonA, IbanezV, GiannakopoulosP (2005) Early event-related potential changes during working memory activation predict rapid decline in mild cognitive impairment. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci60, 660–666.
88.
RobertsonIH, WardT, RidgewayV, Nimmo-SmithI (1994) The test of everyday attention (TEA). Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds, UK, pp. 197–221.
89.
RobertsonIH, WardT, RidgewayV, Nimmo-SmithI (1996) The structure of normal human attention: The Test of Everyday Attention. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2, 525–534.
90.
van der LeeuwG, LeveilleSG, JonesRN, HausdorffJM, McLeanR, KielyDK, GagnonM, MilbergWP (2017) Measuring attention in very old adults using the Test of Everyday Attention. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn24, 543–554.
91.
DelisDC, KaplanE, KramerJH (2001) Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System®(D-KEFS®): Examiner’s Manual: Flexibility of Thinking, Concept Formation, Problem Solving, Planning, Creativity, Impulse Control, Inhibition, Pearson.
92.
LezakMD, HowiesonDB, LoringDW, FischerJS (2004) Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 429–498.
93.
MitrushinaM, BooneKB, RazaniJ, D’EliaLF (2005) Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment,
MitrushinaMaura ed. Oxford University Press.
94.
SpreenO, StraussE (1998) A compendium of neurological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 712–736.
95.
StroopJR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol18, 643.
96.
DemakisGJ (2004) Frontal lobe damage and tests of executive processing: A meta-analysis of the category test, Stroop test, and trail-making test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol26, 441–450.
97.
HameleersPA, Van BoxtelMP, HogervorstE, RiedelWJ, HouxPJ, BuntinxF, JollesJ (2000) Habitual caffeine consumption and its relation to memory, attention, planning capacity and psychomotor performance across multiple age groups. Hum Psychopharmacol15, 573–581.
98.
MoeringRG, SchinkaJA, MortimerJA, GravesAB (2004) Normative data for elderly African Americans for the Stroop Color and Word Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol19, 61–71.
