Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The current public dialogue regarding the possible risks of repetitive head trauma playing football is not unlike the sport itself, with intense exchanges of opposing perspectives [1]. The genesis of this recent debate was the discovery of neuropsychiatric symptoms linked to a distinct neuropathological entity in former National Football League (NFL) players, chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) [2, 3]. Noticeably lacking in this dialogue are assertions weighted in data from living professional football players. Several small studies have described structural and functional brain abnormalities in this group. One study of 28 former NFL players found lower hippocampal volumes in those with a history of concussion leading to loss of consciousness compared to 27 controls [4]. This same cohort was found to have white matter tract abnormalities on diffusion tensor imaging correlating to increased symptoms of depression [5]. A separate functional MRI study of 54 retired NFL players compared to 53 controls found hypoconnectivity and hyperactivation in the frontal lobes suggestive of executive dysfunction [6].
Other studies have shown increased structural abnormalities [7] and neuropsychiatric deficits in NFL players. A study of 30 retired players found a lifetime history of concussions correlated to increased depressive symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory II test [8]. In a larger group of 1,044 former players surveyed, the increased risk of depression persists at least up to 9 years after retirement [9] and this association was independent of declining physical health. Currently, there is a relative lack of data on i) What regions are neurophysiologically impaired in living NFL players compared to healthy controls; ii) How well these brain abnormalities distinguish possible repetitive concussive and subconcussive pathology in NFL players from healthy individuals; and iii) What specific brain areas are most predictive of such a classification. The purpose of this work is to address these questions in a large NFL cohort with functional imaging data and predictive data analytics. We specifically hypothesize that areas of abnormally low cerebral perfusion on single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging in NFL players compared to controls will reliably separate these groups with high accuracy.
METHODS
Study participants
Starting in 2009, we recruited a cohort of retired and current NFL players (
Functional perfusion neuroimaging
All subjects (
Predictive data analytics
All statistical analyses were performed in Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, version 23, IBM, Armonk, NY) and were controlled for both age and gender. To identify specific brain regions we hypothesize are predictive in distinguishing NFL players from controls, a one-way ANOVA was conducted to identify regions of low perfusion in NFL players compared to controls. In all, 36 regions out of the 128 tested met our cutoff level for statistical significance (
RESULTS
All NFL players were male, while 56% of the control group were women. The control group was 56% Caucasian, while the NFL group was 53%. In the NFL group, baseline neuropsychological assessments showed 92% of players had decreased general cognitive proficiency, 86% had decreased information processing speed, 83% had memory loss, 83% had attentional deficits, and 85% had executive function impairment. The most common psychiatric co-morbidities in the NFL players were depression (29%), anxiety (22%), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (13%). In the NFL cohort, 3% had a history of substance abuse. In total, 36 brain regions were found to have abnormally low blood flow on functional perfusion neuroimaging on ANOVA (
Predictive modeling
The discriminant analysis yielded a correct classification rate of 87% with the leave-one-out cross validation at 82%. The corresponding accuracy of the linear discriminant probabilities in identifying NFL players from controls was 94.4% based upon AUC analysis with 90% sensitivity and 86% specificity. The automatic linear modeling analysis produced essentially identical results with 95% accuracy (95% CI: 92.6-97.6), 90% sensitivity and 87% specificity. The diagnostic metrics of these two models do not change when adding demographic co-variates such as age, gender, and race or co-morbidities such as depression or ADHD. Based upon the automated linear modeling, the most important regions in predicting NFL players from controls were the i) anterior superior temporal lobes, ii) rolandic operculum, iii) insula, iv) superior temporal poles, v) precuneus, and vi) cerebellar vermis. The accuracy estimates from these models did not change when accounting for age, gender, or co-morbidities such as anxiety, depression, or ADHD by including them as co-variates in both discriminant and automatic linear regression models. Additionally, the results of these predictive models were not significantly different when female subjects were entirely excluded from the analysis. For example, in the discriminant analysis, the accuracy was 92%, sensitivity was 86%, and specificity was 81%. The correct classification was 86% and 80% with a leave-one-out validation with females completely excluded from the analysis.
DISCUSSION
Former and current NFL players have lower cerebral perfusion and impaired neuropsychological function compared to healthy controls. The regional perfusion abnormalities alone reliably separate these individuals from controls with high accuracy in two separate predictive analytic models. The result of our study advances the literature in living NFL players by characterizing regional abnormalities and their ability to distinguish players from controls in the largest known imaging study of this population. The main caveats to our data are its retrospective design and lack of NFL players with no traumatic brain injury (TBI) to serve as an NFL control group thus necessitating our use of a non-NFL control group.
Playing professional football has been correlated with alterations on structural and molecular neuroimaging [20] and our study adds several key insights. First results of low perfusion in the frontal and temporal lobes match what is known from a prior systematic review of the literature identifying the most common abnormalities on SPECT in mild TBI [21]. Second, involvement of the hippocampus and precuneus suggest neural correlates for poor memory function in our NFL subjects and increased risk for dementia [22]. Abnormally low flow in the insula is consistent with literature correlating perfusion decreases in this structure with depression, a common co-morbidity in our study [23]. Low flow in the cerebellar vermis is relevant as mild TBI involving this structure in diffusion tensor imaging is related to anxiety, also a common co-morbidity in our population [24]. From a network perspective, the abnormal brain regions in this study are most commonly found in the default mode network and frontal-parietal network, both of which are implicated in Alzheimer’s disease and psychiatric disorders [25]. We had previously used default mode network regions to separate veterans with histories of TBI from healthy controls with 94% accuracy [15]. Also of note is the correlation between the functional abnormalities seen in our cohort and the
There are several implications of our study to consider. In this and other studies, it is becoming increasingly suggestive that playing football at the professional level is associated with brain abnormalities in players. Longitudinal studies are required at the pre-teen, high school, and college level to better characterize the time course of such alternations.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Authors’ disclosures available online (http://j-alz.com/manuscript-disclosures/16-0207r1).
