Temporal synchronization-based functional connectivity (FC) has long been used by the neuroscience community. However, topographical FC information may provide additional information to characterize the advanced relationship between two brain regions. Accordingly, we proposed a novel method, namely high-order functional connectivity (HOFC), to capture this second-level relationship using inter-regional resemblance of the FC topographical profiles. Specifically, HOFC first calculates an FC profile for each brain region, notably between the given brain region and other brain regions. Based on these FC profiles, a second layer of correlations is computed between all pairs of brain regions (i.e., correlation’s correlation). On this basis, we generated an HOFC network, where “high-order” network properties were computed. We found that HOFC was discordant with the traditional FC in several links, indicating additional information being revealed by the new metrics. We applied HOFC to identify biomarkers for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease by comparing 77 mild cognitive impairment patients with 89 healthy individuals (control group). Sensitivity in detection of group difference was consistently improved by ∼25% using HOFC compared to using FC. An HOFC network analysis also provided complementary information to an FC network analysis. For example, HOFC between olfactory and orbitofrontal cortices was found significantly reduced in patients, besides extensive alterations in HOFC network properties. In conclusion, our results showed promise in using HOFC to comprehensively map the human brain connectome.
BullmoreE, SpornsO (2009) Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci10, 186–198.
2.
ModhaDS, SinghR (2010) Network architecture of the long-distance pathways in the macaque brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A107, 13485–13490.
3.
van den HeuvelMP, Hulshoff PolHE (2010) Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol20, 519–534.
4.
BullmoreE, SpornsO (2012) The economy of brain network organization. Nat Rev Neurosci13, 336–349.
5.
PessoaL (2014) Understanding brain networks and brain organization. Phys Life Rev11, 400–435.
6.
SmithSM (2012) The future of FMRI connectivity. Neuroimage62, 1257–1266.
7.
HutchisonRM, WomelsdorfT, AllenEA, BandettiniPA, CalhounVD, CorbettaM, Della PennaS, DuynJH, GloverGH, Gonzalez-CastilloJ, HandwerkerDA, KeilholzS, KiviniemiV, LeopoldDA, de PasqualeF, SpornsO, WalterM, ChangC (2013) Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage80, 360–378.
8.
FristonKJ (2011) Functional and effective connectivity: A review. Brain Connect1, 13–36.
WeeCY, YangS, YapPT, ShenD (2016) Sparse temporally dynamic resting-state functional connectivity networks for early MCI identification. Brain Imaging Behav10, 342–356.
24.
LeonardiN, RichiardiJ, GschwindM, SimioniS, AnnoniJM, SchluepM, VuilleumierP, Van De VilleD (2013) Principal components of functional connectivity: A new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest. Neuroimage83, 937–950.
25.
MadhyasthaTM, GrabowskiTJ (2014) Age-related differences in the dynamic architecture of intrinsic networks. Brain Connect4, 231–241.
XuZ, SunJ (2010) Image inpainting by patch propagation using patch sparsity. IEEE Trans Image Process19, 1153–1165.
28.
CohenAL, FairDA, DosenbachNU, MiezinFM, DierkerD, Van EssenDC, SchlaggarBL, PetersenSE (2008) Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage41, 45–57.
29.
GordonEM, LaumannTO, AdeyemoB, HuckinsJF, KelleyWM, PetersenSE (2016) Generation and evaluation of a cortical area parcellation from resting-state correlations. Cereb Cortex26, 288–303.
30.
WigGS, LaumannTO, PetersenSE (2014) An approach for parcellating human cortical areas using resting-state correlations. Neuroimage93 Pt 2, 276–291.
31.
ShehzadZ, KellyC, ReissPT, Cameron CraddockR, EmersonJW, McMahonK, CoplandDA, CastellanosFX, MilhamMP (2014) A multivariate distance-based analytic framework for connectome-wide association studies. Neuroimage93 Pt 1, 74–94.
32.
van den HeuvelMP, SpornsO (2011) Rich-club organization of the human connectome. J Neurosci31, 15775–15786.
33.
JonesDT, KnopmanDS, GunterJL, Graff-RadfordJ, VemuriP, BoeveBF, PetersenRC, WeinerMW, JackCRJr (2016) Cascading network failure across the Alzheimer’s disease. Brain139(Pt 2), 547–562spectrum.
34.
SupekarK, MenonV, RubinD, MusenM, GreiciusMD (2008) Network analysis of intrinsic functional brain connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS Comput Biol4, e1000100.
35.
JackCRJr>, KnopmanDS, JagustWJ, PetersenRC, WeinerMW, AisenPS, ShawLM, VemuriP, WisteHJ, WeigandSD, LesnickTG, PankratzVS, DonohueMC, TrojanowskiJQ (2013) Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer’s disease: An updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Lancet Neurol12, 207–216.
36.
DamoiseauxJS, PraterKE, MillerBL, GreiciusMD (2012) Functional connectivity tracks clinical deterioration in Alzheimer’s disease.828 e. Neurobiol Aging33, 819–830.
37.
ChongMS, SahadevanS (2005) Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: Diagnosis and prediction of progression. Lancet Neurol4, 576–579.
38.
WeeCY, YapPT, ZhangD, DennyK, BrowndykeJN, PotterGG, Welsh-BohmerKA, WangL, ShenD (2012) Identification of MCI individuals using structural and functional connectivity networks. Neuroimage59, 2045–2056.
39.
DaiZ, YanC, WangZ, WangJ, XiaM, LiK, HeY (2012) Discriminative analysis of early Alzheimer’s disease using multi-modal imaging and multi-level characterization with multi-classifier (M3). Neuroimage59, 2187–2195.
40.
ZhangZ, LiuY, JiangT, ZhouB, AnN, DaiH, WangP, NiuY, WangL, ZhangX (2012) Altered spontaneous activity in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment revealed by Regional Homogeneity. Neuroimage59, 1429–1440.
41.
ShelineYI, RaichleME (2013) Resting state functional connectivity in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Psychiatry74, 340–347.
42.
PievaniM, de HaanW, WuT, SeeleyWW, FrisoniGB (2011) Functional network disruption in the degenerative dementias. Lancet Neurol10, 829–843.
43.
AlbertMS, DeKoskyST, DicksonD, DuboisB, FeldmanHH, FoxNC, GamstA, HoltzmanDM, JagustWJ, PetersenRC, SnyderPJ, CarrilloMC, ThiesB, PhelpsCH (2011) The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement7, 270–279.
44.
SperlingRA, AisenPS, BeckettLA, BennettDA, CraftS, FaganAM, IwatsuboT, JackCRJr, KayeJ, MontineTJ, ParkDC, ReimanEM, RoweCC, SiemersE, SternY, YaffeK, CarrilloMC, ThiesB, Morrison-BogoradM, WagsterMV, PhelpsCH (2011) Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement7, 280–292.
45.
SperlingRA, DickersonBC, PihlajamakiM, VanniniP, LaViolettePS, VitoloOV, HeddenT, BeckerJA, RentzDM, SelkoeDJ, JohnsonKA (2010) Functional alterations in memory networks in early Alzheimer’s disease. Neuromolecular Med12, 27–43.
46.
QiZ, WuX, WangZ, ZhangN, DongH, YaoL, LiK (2010) Impairment and compensation coexist in amnestic MCI default mode network. Neuroimage50, 48–55.
BinnewijzendMA, SchoonheimMM, Sanz-ArigitaE, WinkAM, van der FlierWM, TolboomN, AdriaanseSM, DamoiseauxJS, ScheltensP, van BerckelBN, BarkhofF (2012) Resting-state fMRI changes in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging33, 2018–2028.
49.
PetersenRC, DoodyR, KurzA, MohsRC, MorrisJC, RabinsPV, RitchieK, RossorM, ThalL, WinbladB (2001) Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol58, 1985–1992.
50.
RichiardiJ, MonschAU, HaasT, BarkhofF, Van de VilleD, RaduEW, KressigRW, HallerS (2015) Altered cerebrovascular reactivity velocity in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging36, 33–41.
51.
CantinS, VillienM, MoreaudO, TropresI, KeignartS, ChiponE, Le BasJF, WarnkingJ, KrainikA (2011) Impaired cerebral vasoreactivity to CO2 in Alzheimer’s disease using BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage58, 579–587.
52.
FairDA, SchlaggarBL, CohenAL, MiezinFM, DosenbachNU, WengerKK, FoxMD, SnyderAZ, RaichleME, PetersenSE (2007) A method for using blocked and event-related fMRI data to study resting state functional connectivity. Neuroimage35, 396–405.
53.
SongXW, DongZY, LongXY, LiSF, ZuoXN, ZhuCZ, HeY, YanCG, ZangYF (2011) REST: A toolkit for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data processing. PLoS One6, e25031.
54.
YanC, ZangY (2010) DPARSF: A MATLAB Toolbox for Pipeline Data Analysis of Resting-State fMRI. Front Syst Neurosci4, 13.
55.
AshburnerJ (2007) A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage38, 95–113.
56.
FengG, ChenHC, ZhuZ, HeY, WangS (2015) Dynamic brain architectures in local brain activity and functional network efficiency associate with efficient reading in bilinguals. Neuroimage119, 103–118.
57.
Tzourio-MazoyerN, LandeauB, PapathanassiouD, CrivelloF, EtardO, DelcroixN, MazoyerB, JoliotM (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage15, 273–289.
58.
LynallME, BassettDS, KerwinR, McKennaPJ, KitzbichlerM, MullerU, BullmoreE (2010) Functional connectivity and brain networks in schizophrenia. J Neurosci30, 9477–9487.
59.
LiaoW, JiGJ, XuQ, WeiW, WangJ, WangZ, YangF, SunK, JiaoQ, RichardsonMP, ZangYF, ZhangZ, LuG (2016) Functional connectome before and following temporal lobectomy in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Sci Rep6, 23153.
60.
ChenZJ, HeY, Rosa-NetoP, GermannJ, EvansAC (2008) Revealing modular architecture of human brain structural networks by using cortical thickness from MRI. Cereb Cortex18, 2374–2381.
61.
NewmanME (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A103, 8577–8582.
62.
WangL, YuC, ChenH, QinW, HeY, FanF, ZhangY, WangM, LiK, ZangY, WoodwardTS, ZhuC (2010) Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. Brain133, 1224–1238.
63.
WangL, ZhuC, HeY, ZangY, CaoQ, ZhangH, ZhongQ, WangY (2009) Altered small-world brain functional networks in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Hum Brain Mapp30, 638–649.
64.
SpornsO, BetzelRF (2016) Modular brain networks. Annu Rev Psychol67, 613–640.
65.
KringelbachML (2005) The human orbitofrontal cortex: Linking reward to hedonic experience. Nat Rev Neurosci6, 691–702.
66.
VolzKG, RubsamenR, von CramonDY (2008) Cortical regions activated by the subjective sense of perceptual coherence of environmental sounds: A proposal for a neuroscience of intuition. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci8, 318–328.
67.
SchoenbaumG, TakahashiY, LiuTL, McDannaldMA (2011) Does the orbitofrontal cortex signal value?Ann N Y Acad Sci1239, 87–99.
68.
ZhangD, RaichleME (2010) Disease and the brain’s dark energy. Nat Rev Neurol6, 15–28.
69.
GottfriedJA, ZaldDH (2005) On the scent of human olfactory orbitofrontal cortex: Meta-analysis and comparison to non-human primates. Brain Res Brain Res Rev50, 287–304
.
70.
TekinS, CummingsJL (2002) Frontal-subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: An update. J Psychosom Res53, 647–654.
ThirionB, PedregosaF, EickenbergM, VaroquauxG (2015) Correlations of correlations are not reliable statistics: Implications for multivariate pattern analysis. ICML Workshop on Statistics, Machine Learning and Neuroscience (Stamlins 2015), Lille, Francehttps://hal.inria.fr/hal-01187297.
73.
VaroquauxG, CraddockRC (2013) Learning and comparing functional connectomes across subjects. Neuroimage80, 405–415.
74.
VaroquauxG, GramfortA, PedregosaF, MichelV, ThirionB (2011) Multi-subject dictionary learning to segment an atlas of brain spontaneous activity. Inf Process Med Imaging22, 562–573.
75.
VaroquauxG, BaronnetF, KleinschmidtA, FillardP, ThirionB (2010) Detection of brain functional-connectivity difference in post-stroke patients using group-level covariance modeling. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv13(Pt 1), 200–208.
76.
ChengH, WuH, FanY (2014) Optimizing affinity measures for parcellating brain structures based on resting state fMRI data: A validation on medial superior frontal cortex. J Neurosci Methods237, 90–102.
