The Cytome Assay as a Tool to Investigate the Possible Association Between Exposure to Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Fields and an Increased Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February 2, 2016
The Cytome Assay as a Tool to Investigate the Possible Association Between Exposure to Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Fields and an Increased Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease
Exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) has been identified as one of the potential environmental risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, this is far from being established. So far there is no experimental evidence supporting this alleged association. We have performed an in vitro cytogenetic laboratory investigation to explore the plausibility of such association. Our investigation was based on possible similarities found in cells from AD patients and in cells exposed to ELF-MF. We especially found that 50 Hz ELF-MF increase the frequency of cells with (large) micronuclei and nuclear buds indicating that fields above 50 μT may induce chromosome instabilities as those found in AD patients. It should be stressed yet that results from the few published experimental studies on ELF-MF and AD are rather reassuring. Thus, our findings certainly do not prove anything. They only suggest that further investigations might be necessary.
WertheimerN, LeeperE (1979) Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol109, 273–284.
2.
IARC (2002) Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: Static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 80, Lyon, France.
SluskyDA, DoesM, MetayerC, MezeiG, SelvinS, BufflerPA (2014) Potential role of selection bias in the association between childhood leukemia and residential magnetic fields exposure: A population-based assessment. Cancer Epidemiol38, 307–313.
5.
PedersenC, Raaschou-NielsenO, RodNH, FreiP, PoulsenAH, JohansenC, SchüzJ (2014) Distance from residence to power line and risk of childhood leukemia: A population-based case-control study in Denmark. Cancer Causes Control25, 171–177.
6.
LeitgebN (2014) Childhood leukemia not linked with ELF magnetic fields. J Electromagn Anal Appl6, 174–183.
7.
SobelE, DavanipourZ, SulkavaR, ErkinjunttiT, WikstromJ, HendersonVW, BuckwalterG, BowmanJD, LeePJ (1995) Occupations with exposure to electromagnetic fields: A possible risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Epidemiol142, 515–524.
8.
SobelE, DunnM, DavanipourZ, QianZ, ChuiHC (1996) Elevated risk of Alzheimer’s disease among workers with likely electromagnetic field exposure. Neurology47, 1477–1481.
9.
SobelE, DavanipourZ (1996) Electromagnetic field expo-sure may cause increased production of amyloid beta and eventually lead to Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology47, 1594–1600.
10.
GravesAB, RosnerD, EcheverriaD, YostM, LarsonEB (1999) Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord13, 165–170.
11.
QiuC, FratiglioniL, KarpA, WinbladB, BellanderT (2004) Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Epidemiology15, 687–694.
12.
DavanipourZ, TsengCC, LeePJ, SobelE (2007) A case-control study of occupational magnetic field exposure and Alzheimer’s disease: Results from the California Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Centers. BMC Neuro7, 13.
13.
SorahanT, KheifetsL (2007) Mortality from Alzheimer’s, motor neuron and Parkinson’s disease in relation to magnetic field exposure: Findings from the study of UK electricity generation and transmission workers, 1973-2004. Occup Environ Med64, 820–826.
14.
GarcíaAM, SisternasA, HoyosSP (2008) Occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields and Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol37, 329–340.
15.
HussA, SpoerriA, EggerM, RöösliM (2009) Swiss National Cohort Study. Residence near power lines and mortality from neurodegenerative diseases: Longitudinal study of the Swiss population. Am J Epidemiol169, 167–175.
16.
MaesA, AnthonissenR, VerschaeveL (2012) Testing chemicals with the cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Folia Biol58, 215–220.
17.
MaesA, CollierM, VandoninckS, VerschaeveL (2000) Cytogenetic effects of 50 Hz magnetic fields of different magnetic flux densities. Bioelectromagnetics21, 589–596.
18.
VerheyenG, PauwelsG, VerschaeveL, SchoetersG (2003) The effect of co-exposure of 50 Hz magnetic fields and an aneugen on human lymphocytes, determined by the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Bioelectromagnetics24, 160–164.
19.
MineurP (2009) Study of the biological effects of environmental physical agents. PhD thesis, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium [In French].
20.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to timevarying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys74, 494–522.
21.
FenechM, CrottJW (2002) Micronuclei, nucleoplasmic bridges and nuclear buds induced in folic acid deficient human lymphocytes – evidence for breakage-fusion-bridge cycles in the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Mutat Res504, 131–136.
22.
FenechM (2006) Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay evolves into a “cytome” assay of chromosomal instability, mitotic dysfunction and cell death. Mutat Res600, 58–66.
KastenbaumMA, BowmanKO (1970) Tables for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies. Mutat Res9, 527–549.
25.
NelderJA, WedderburnRWM (1972) Generalized linear models. J Royal Stat Soc Series A135, 370–384.
26.
VerschaeveL (2012) Evaluations of international expert group reports on the biological effects of radiofrequency fields. In Wireless CommunicationsAliE, ed. INTECH Publ., Rijeka, pp. 523–546.
27.
Vijayalaxmi, ScarfiMR (2014) International and national expert group evaluations: Biological/health effects of radiofrequency fields. Int J Environ Res Public Health11, 9376–9408.
28.
ArendashGW, MoriT, DorseyM, GonzalezR, TajiriN, BorlonganC (2012) Electromagnetic treatment to old Alzheimer’s mice reverses β-amyloid deposition, modifies cerebral blood flow, and provides selected cognitive benefit. PLoS One7, e35751.
29.
MortazaviS, Shojaei-FardM, HaghaniM, ShokrpourN, MortazaviS (2013) Exposure to mobile phone radiation opens new horizons in Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Biomed Phys Eng3, 109–112.
RöösliM (2008) Commentary: Epidemiological research on extremely low frequency magnetic fields and Alzheimer’s disease–biased or informative. Int J Epidemiol37, 341–343.
32.
RealeM, KamalMA, PatrunoA, CostantiniE, D’AngeloC, PesceM, GreigNH (2014) Neuronal cellular responses to extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure: Implications regarding oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. PLoS One9, e104973.
33.
ZhangY, LiuX, ZhangJ, LiN (2015) Short-term effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields exposure on Alzheimer’s disease in rats. Int J Radiat Biol91, 28–34.
34.
MaesA, VerschaeveL (2012) Can cytogenetics explain the possible association between exposure to extreme low frequency magnetic fields and Alzheimer’s disease. J Appl Toxicol32, 81–87.
35.
MaesA, AnthonissenR, VerschaeveL (2015) On the alleged association between extremely low frequency magnetic field exposures and an increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease. In Proc 3rd International Conference on Radiation and Applications in Various Fields of Research, RisticG, ed. Budva, Montenegro, 8-13 June 2015, RAD Association, Niš, Serbia, pp. 451–454.
36.
JiangDP, LiJ, ZhangJ, XuSL, KuangF, LangHY, WangYF, AnGZ, LiJH, GuoGZ (2013) Electromagnetic pulse exposure induces overexpression of beta amyloid protein in rats. Arch Med Res44, 178–184.
37.
Del GiudiceE, FacchinettiF, NofrateV, BoccaccioP, MinelliT, DamM, LeonA, MoschiniG (2007) Fifty Hertz electromagnetic field exposure stimulates secretion of beta-amyloid peptide in cultured human neuroglioma. Neurosci Lett418, 9–12.
38.
VerschaeveL, AnthonissenR, GrudniewskaM, WudarskiJ, GevaertL, MaesA (2011) Genotoxicity investigation of ELF-magnetic fields in Salmonella typhimurium with the sensitive SOS-based VITOTOX test. Bioelectromagnetics32, 580–584.
39.
VerschaeveL, WambacqS, AnthonissenR, MaesA (2016) Co-exposure of ELF-magnetic fields and chemical mutagens: An investigation of genotoxicity with the SOS-based VITOTOX test in Salmonella typhimurium. Mutat Res795, 31–35.
40.
VerschaeveL (2013) High-throughput bacterial mutagenicity testing: Vitotox™ assay. In High Throughput Screening Methods in Toxicity Testing, SteinbergP, ed. Wiley, Hoboken, pp. 213–232.
ScarfiMR, PriscoF, LioiMB, ZeniO, Della NoceM, Di PietroR, FranceschiC, IafuscoD, MottaM, BersaniF (1997) Cytogenetic effects induced by extremely low frequency pulsed magnetic fields in lymphocytes from Turner’s syndrome subjects. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg4, 221–226.
43.
ThomasP, FenechM (2007) A review of genome mutation and Alzheimer’s disease. Mutagenesis22, 15–33.
44.
UdroiuI, CristaldiM, IeradiLA, BediniA, GiulianiL, TanzarellaC (2006) Clastogenicity and aneuploidy in newborn and adult mice exposed to 50 Hz magnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol82, 561–567.
45.
WuRY, ChiangH, HuGL, ZengQL, BaoJL (2000) The effect of 50 Hz magnetic field on GCSmRNA expression in lymphoma B cell by mRNA differential display. J Cell Biochem79, 460–470.
46.
LeeHC, HongMN, JungSH, KimBC, SuhYJ, KoYG, LeeYS, LeeBY, ChoYG, MyungSH, LeeJS (2015) Effect of extremely low frequency magnetic fields on cell proliferation and gene expression. Bioelectromagnetics36, 506–516.
47.
CollardJF, HinsenkampM (2015) Cellular processes involved in human epidermal cells exposed to extremely low frequency electric fields. Cell Signal27, 889–898.
48.
PhillipsJL (1993) Effects of electromagnetic field exposure on gene transcription. J Cell Biochem51, 381–386.
49.
CuppenJJM, WiegertjesGF, LobeeHWJ, SavelkoulHFJ, ElmusharafMA, BeynenAC, GrootenHNA, SminkW (2007) Immune stimulation in fish and chicken through weak low frequency electromagnetic fields. Environmentalist27, 577–583.
50.
ChowK, TungWL (2000) Magnetic field exposure enhances DNA repair through the induction of DnaK/J synthesis. FEBS Lett478, 133–136.
51.
PhilipsJL, IvaschukO, Ishida-JonesT, JonesRA, Campbell-BeachlerM, HaggrenW (1998) DNA damage in Molt-4 T lymphoblastoid cells exposed to cellular telephone radiofrequency fields in vitro. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg45, 103–110.
52.
MaesA, Van GorpU, VerschaeveL (2006) Cytogenetic investigation of subjects professionally exposed to radiofrequency radiation. Mutagenesis21, 139–142.
53.
MortazaviSM, MotamedifarM, NamdariG, TaheriM, MortazaviAR, ShokrpourN (2013) Non-linear adaptive phenomena which decrease the risk of infection after pre-exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Dose Response12, 233–245.
54.
Cao VijayalaxmiY, ScarfiMR (2014) Adaptive response in mammalian cells exposed to non-ionizing radiofrequency fields: A review and gaps in knowledge. Mutat Res760, 36–45.
55.
LieblMP, WindschmittJ, BesemerAS, SchaferAK, ReberH, BehlC, ClementAM (2015) Low frequency magnetic fields do not aggravate disease in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Sci Rep5, 8585.
ChoYH, JeonHK, ChungHW (2007) Effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on delayed chromosomal instability induced by bleomycin in normal human fibroblast cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A70, 1252–1258.
