Ship design complexity,sources,drivers,and factors: A literature review

Abstract

Handling complexity in conceptual ship design processes requires a thorough understanding of complexity aspects in general. More than 100 scientific papers on the subject published since 1962 are, therefore, reviewed and discussed in this paper. The paper expands the understanding of complexity theory by reviewing the literature in the engineering domain. Different definitions of complexity, characteristics of complex systems, aspects of complexity in design, complexity sources, and its drivers are explored and discussed in detail. Furthermore, the findings are arranged into relevant complexity factors in ship design. Related complexity factors in ship design, are also discussed by use of examples from everyday ship design practices. This study is a theoretical elaboration to shed light on the current practice and future research direction in handling complexity in conceptual ship design processes to improve competitiveness.

Keywords

Ship design complexity complexity handling decision making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Oxford Dictionary, Oxford University Press, 2016.

Aboutaleb and

Monsuez, Handling complexity of a model in system design: Framework, formalism and metrics, Procedia Manuf. 3(Ahfe) (2015), 1981–1988. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.244.

Alabdulkareem,

Alfaris,

Sakhrani,

Alsaati and

De Weck, Framework (MHIF) for modeling complex engineering systems, in: Complex Syst. Des. Manag., 2013, pp. 301–313.

Andrews, Integrated approach to ship synthesis, Naval Architect. (1986), 73–102.

Andrews, A comprehensive methodology for the design of ships (and other complex systems), Proceedings: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 454(1968) (1997), 187–211.

Andrews, Simulation and the design building block approach in the design of ships and other complex systems, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 462(2075) (2006), 3407–3433.

Andrews, Concept studies for a joint support ship, in: International Conference Warship, Vol. 44, no. 2, 2007, pp. 241–268.

Arnold, Handling complexity in decision making concering preventive health actions: Grasping health knowledge, in: ESERA 2017 Conference Dublin, 2017, pp. 2–4.

R.D.

Arnold and

J.P.

Wade, A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach, Procedia – Procedia Comput. Sci. 44 (2015), 669–678. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050.

10.

Asan and

Albrecht, Handling complexity in system of systems projects-lessens learned from MBSE efforts in boarder security projects, in: Complex Syst. Des. Manag., 2013.

11.

S.W.

Azim, Understanding and managing project complexity, 2010.

12.

Backlund, The concept of complexity in organisations and information systems, Kybernetes 31 (2002).

13.

Bar-Anan,

T.D.

Wilson and

D.T.

Gilbert, The feeling of uncertainty intensifies affective reactions, Emotion 9(1) (2009), 123–127. doi:10.1037/a0014607.

14.

S.D.

Bekiros, Fuzzy adaptive decision-making for boundedly rational traders in speculative stock markets, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202(1) (2010), 285–293. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.04.015.

15.

Benedettini and

Neely, Factors influencing service complexity: The perspective of servitized manufacturers factors influencing service complexity, 2012.

16.

Betzabe and

Vega, Structural complexity of manufacturing systems layout, 2012.

17.

Bode and

S.M.

Wagner, Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions, J. Oper. Manag. 36 (2015), 215–228. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.12.004.

18.

Boschetti, A graphical representation of uncertainty in complex decision making, Emerg. Complex. Organ. 13 (2011), 146–166.

19.

Braha and

Bar-Yam, The statistical mechanics of complex product development: Empirical and analytical results, Manage. Sci. 53(7) (2007), 1127–1145. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0617.

20.

Brinzer and

Banerjee, Measuring the human aspect: The key for managing the complexity in production, in: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2017, pp. 14–24.

21.

Broekel, Measuring technological complexity – current approaches and a new measure of structural complexity, Math. Phys. arXiv Appl., 2017.

22.

J.D.

Caprace and

Rigo, A real-time assessment of the ship design complexity, CAD Comput. Aided Des. 44(3) (2012), 203–208. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2010.12.005.

23.

Chan, Complex adaptive systems, in: Research Seminar in Engineering Systems, 2001, pp. 1–9.

24.

H.V.

Deo and

N.P.

Suh, Axiomatic design of automobile suspension and steering systems: Proposal for a novel six-bar suspension, SAE Tech. Pap. Ser., vol. 1, 2004.

25.

H.W.

Dettmer, Systems thinking and the Cynefin framework a strategic approach to managing complex systems, in: Goal Systems International, 2011.

26.

Dooley, Organizational complexity, in: International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, no. April, 2002.

27.

Earl,

Eckert and

Clarkson, Design change and complexity, in: 2nd Workshop on Complexity in Design and Engineering Mar 2005, University of Glasgow, UK, 2005.

28.

Ebrahimi,

P.O.

Brett and

J.J.

Garcia, Managing complexity in concept design development of cruise-exploration ships, in: International Marine Design Conference (IMDC), 2018, pp. 569–577.

29.

Ebrahimi,

P.O.

Brett,

J.J.

Garcia,

H.M.

Gaspar and

Ø.

Kamsvåg, Better decision making to improve robustness of OCV designs, in: International Maritime Design Confrence IMDC 2015, 2015.

30.

H.A.

ElMaraghy,

Kuzgunkaya and

R.J.

Urbanic, Manufacturing systems configuration complexity, CIRP Ann. – Manuf. Technol. 54(1) (2005), 445–450. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60141-3.

31.

ElMaraghy,

Tomiyama and

Monostori, Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing, CIRP Ann. – Manuf. Technol. 61(2) (2012), 793–814. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.001.

32.

Eoyang and

Berkas , Evaluating performance in a CAS, Hum. Syst. Dyn. Inst., pp. 1–21, 1999.

33.

S.O.

Erikstad, Merging physics, big data analytics and simulation for the next-generation digital twins, Hiper (September) (2017), 139–149.

34.

S.O.

Erikstad, Design for modularity, in: A Holistic Approach to Ship Design, Optimisation of Ship Design and Operation for Life Cycle, Vol. 1, no. April, 2019, Chapter 10.

35.

J.H.

Evans, Basic design concepts, A.S.N.E. J. (November) (1959), 671–678.

36.

Fabac, Complexity in organizations and environment – adaptive changes and adaptive decision-making, Interdiscip. Descr. Complex Syst. 8(1) (2010), 34–48.

37.

H.M.

Gaspar,

D.H.

Rhodes,

A.M.

Ross and

S.O.

Erikstad, Addressing complexity aspects in conceptual ship design: A systems engineering approach, J. Sh. Prod. Des. 28 (2012), 145–159. doi:10.5957/jspd.2012.28.4.145.

38.

H.M.

Gaspar,

A.M.

Ross,

D.H.

Rhodes and

S.O.

Erikstad, Handling complexity aspects in conceptual ship design conceptual ship design; systems engineering; handling complexity information growth in ship design, in: International Marine Design Conference (IMDC), no. June, 2012.

39.

J.K.

Gershenson,

G.J.

Prasad and

Zhang, Product modularity: Measures and design methods, J. Eng. Des. 15(1) (2004), 33–51. doi:10.1080/0954482032000101731.

40.

T.G.

Gill, Task complexity and design science, Informing Sci. (2006).

41.

Gorze, Improving decision making in complexity environment, in: 21st International Economic Conference 2014, Vol. 16, no. May, 2014, pp. 402–409.

42.

S.T.

Hannah,

P.A.

Balthazard,

D.A.

Waldman,

P.L.

Jennings and

R.W.

Thatcher, The psychological and neurological bases of leader self-complexity and effects on adaptive decision-making, J. Appl. Psychol. 98(3) (2013), 393–411. doi:10.1037/a0032257.

43.

Hannapel,

Vlahopoulos and

Singer, Including principles of set-based design in multidisciplinary design optimization, Aiaa September(2012–5444) (2012), 1–13.

44.

Haumann and

Butzer, SPS12 – managing complexity – a methodology, exemplified by the industrial sector of remanufacturing, in: International Swedish Production Symposium SPS 12, 2016.

45.

J.H.

Holland, Studying complex adaptive systems, J. Syst. Sci. Complex. (November) (2006), 1–8. doi:10.1007/s11424-006-0001-z.

46.

Holt, Using the Cynefin framework to make sense of it all, 2011.

47.

S.S.

Horn and

Pachur, The development of adaptive decision making: Recognition-based inference in children and adolescents, 52(9) (2016), 1470–1485.

48.

Hsiao and

G.P.

Richardson, In search of theories of dynamic decision making, in: 17th Int. Conf. Syst. Dyn. Soc., 1999, pp. 1–33.

49.

L.J.G.

Huijgens, Quantification of manufacturing complexity in shipbuilding projects, 2016.

50.

M.C.

Jackson, SYSTEMS THINKING: Creative Holism for Managers, University of Hull, UK: Wiley, John & Sons Ltd, 2006.

51.

M.A.

Jacobs, Complexity: Toward an empirical measure, Technovation 33(4–5) (2013), 111–118. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.01.001.

52.

Jäger,

Kluth,

Schatz and

Bauernhansl, Complexity patterns in the advanced complexity management of value networks, Procedia CIRP 17 (2014), 645–650. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.070.

53.

Jakob, Product complexity: A definition and impacts on operations, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/232845066.pdf.

54.

C.W.

Johnson, What are emergent properties and how do they affect the engineering of complex systems?, in: Complexity in Engineering Design, 2006, pp. 8–19.

55.

D.D.P.

Johnson and

J.H.

Fowler, Complexity and simplicity in the evolution of decision-making biases, Trends Ecol. Evol. 28(8) (2013), 446–447. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.06.003.

56.

Kasser and

Y.Y.

Zhao, Simplifying solving complex problems, in: SoSE 2016, 2016, pp. 1–6.

57.

Kohr,

Budde and

Friedli, Identifying complexity drivers in discrete manufacturing and process industry, Procedia CIRP 63 (2017), 52–57. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.290.

58.

A.N.

Kolmogorov, On tables of random numbers, Theor. Comput. Sci. 207(2) (1998), 387–395. doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(98)00075-9.

59.

Komoto and

Tomiyama, Multi-disciplinary system decomposition of complex mechatronics systems, CIRP Ann. – Manuf. Technol. 60(1) (2011), 191–194. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.102.

60.

Kumar, A complexity index for the design process, in: ICED, 2001.

61.

Levander, Systems based ship design, NTNU, 2007.

62.

I.P.

Levin,

J.A.

Weller,

A.A.

Pederson and

L.A.

Harshman, Age-related differences in adaptive decision making: Sensitivity to expected value in risky choice, Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2(4) (2007), 225–233.

63.

Liew and

Sundaram, Complex decision making processes: Their modelling and support, in: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2005, pp. 1–10. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2005.158.

64.

Lindemann and

Maurer , Facing multi-domain complexity in product development, 2007.

65.

Lindemann,

Maurer and

Braun, Structural Complexity Management: An Approach for the Field of Product Design, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009.

66.

Luzeaux, SoS and large-scale complex systems architecting adapting to a changing environment a particular field: Defense, in: Complex Syst. Des. Manag., 2013, pp. 39–49.

67.

MacCormack,

Baldwin and

Rusnak, The architecture of complex systems: Do core-periphery structures dominate?, 2010.

68.

M.W.

Maier, Architecting principles for systems-of-systems, Syst. Eng. 1(4) (1998), 267–284. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1998)1:4<267::AID-SYS3>3.0.CO;2-D.

69.

Maptisa, Designing diagnostics in complexity: Measuring technical and contextual aspects in monitoring and evaluation systems, African Eval. J. (2017), 1–5.

70.

Marti, Complexity Management: Optimizing Product Architecture of Industrial Products, 2007.

71.

Maurer, Complexity Management in Engineering Design – a Primer, 2017.

72.

D.S.

Mileti,

D.F.

Gillespie and

J.E.

Haas, Size and structure in complex, Soc. Forces 56(1) (1977), 208–217. doi:10.2307/2577422.

73.

Mistree,

W.F.

Smith,

B.A.

Bras,

J.K.

Allen and

Muster, Decision-based design: A contemporary paradigm for ship design, Trans. – Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng. 98 (1990), 565–597.

74.

Mistree,

W.F.

Smith and

Member, Decision-based design: A contemporary paradigm for ship design, SNAME Trans. 98 (1990), 565–597.

75.

G.M.

Mocko and

Porter, Engineering design complexity: An investigation of methods and measures, Res. Eng. Des. (2008), 161–179. doi:10.1007/s00163-008-0053-2.

76.

A.T.

Nguyen,

L.D.

Nguyen,

Le-Hoai and

C.N.

Dang, Quantifying the complexity of transportation projects using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, JPMA 33(6) (2015), 1364–1376, ScienceDirect.

77.

Oliva,

M.L.

Mack,

Shrestha and

Peeper, Identifying the perceptual dimensions of visual complexity of scenes, in: Proc. Twenty-Sixth Annu. Conf. Cogn. Sci. Soc., Vol. 26, 2004, pp. 1–6.

78.

S.S.

Pettersen

et al., Ill-structured commercial ship design problems: The responsive system comparison method on an offshore vessel case, J. Sh. Prod. Des. 34(1) (2018), 72–83. doi:10.5957/JSPD.170012.

79.

Pigagaite and

Hussein, Sources of complexities in new product and process development projects, in: The Third International Workshop of Advanced Manufacturing and Automation, no. November, 2013.

80.

Pina, Complexity, simplicity, simplexity, Eur. Manag. J. 28 (2010), 85–94. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2009.04.006.

81.

Project Guts, What is a complex adaptive system?, 2006.

82.

R.V.

Ramasesh and

T.R.

Browning, A conceptual framework for tackling knowable unknown unknowns in project management, J. Oper. Manag. 32(4) (2014), 190–204. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.003.

83.

Rebentisch

et al., Measurement of organizational complexity in product development projects, in: 2016 Proceedings of PICMET’16: Technology Management for Social Innovation, 2016, pp. 2445–2459.

84.

C.F.

Rehn

et al., Quantification of changeability level for engineering systems, Trondheim, Norway, 2018.

85.

Remington and

Pollack, Tools for Complex Projects, 2008.

86.

D.H.

Rhodes and

A.M.

Ross, Five aspects of engineering complex systems emerging constructs and methods, in: Annual IEEE Systems Conference, 2010.

87.

Rodriguez-t,

S.J.

Tate and

Gared , Complexity metrics for design (simplicity + simplicity = complexity), J. Eng. Manuf. 2017(November) (2003), 721–725. doi:10.1243/095440503322011461.

88.

Rzevski, Managing complexity: Theory and practice, in: SoSE, 2016, pp. 1–6.

89.

Rzevski,

Knezevic,

Skobelev,

Borgest and

Lakhin, Managing aircraft lifecycle complexity, 11(2) (2016), 77–87.

90.

Sadat,

Salajegheh,

Gaspar and

Olaf, Improving early OSV design robustness by applying ‘Multivariate Big Data Analytics’ on a ship’s life cycle, J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 10(November) (2018), 29–38.

91.

S.M.

Salaken,

Khosravi,

Nguyen and

Nahavandi, Output uncertainty score for decision making processes using interval type-2 fuzzy systems, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 65 (2017), 159–167. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2017.07.019.

92.

N.A.

Salingaros, Complexity in architecture and design, Oz Journal 36(May) (2014), 18–25.

93.

Saranga,

George,

Beine and

Arnold, Resource configurations, product development capability, and competitive advantage: An empirical analysis of their evolution, J. Bus. Res. 85(November) (2018), 32–50. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.045.

94.

Schleich,

Schaffer,

L.F.

Scavarda and

De Janeiro, Managing complexity in automotive production, 2003.

95.

Schuh, Approach to evaluate complexity in new product development projects, Int. J. Des. Nat. Ecodynamics 11(4) (2016), 573–583. doi:10.2495/DNE-V11-N4-573-583.

96.

Schuh and

Monostori, CIRP annals – manufacturing technology complexity-based modeling of reconfigurable collaborations in production industry, Manuf. Technol. 57 (2008), 445–450.

97.

Schuh,

Potente,

R.M.

Varandani and

Schmitz, Methodology for the assessment of structural complexity in global production networks, Procedia CIRP 7 (2013), 67–72. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.012.

98.

Seifert,

Butzer,

Westermann and

Steinhilper, Managing complexity in remanufacturing, in: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering WCE 2013, Vol. I, 2013, pp. 3–8.

99.

P.M.

Senge, The Fifth Discipline, the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, 2004.

100.

Serdarasan, Computers & industrial engineering a review of supply chain complexity drivers, Comput. Ind. Eng. 66(3) (2013), 533–540. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2012.12.008.

101.

Sheard,

Konrad and

Weinstock, Definition and measurement of complexity in the context of safety assurance, Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City, 2017.

102.

Sheel, Supply chain complexity drivers and its management, IOSR J. Bus. Manag. 18(1) (2016), 39–43.

103.

H.A.

Simon, The architecture of complexity, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106(6) (1962).

104.

D.J.

Singer,

Doerry and

M.E.

Buckley, What is set-based design?, Nav. Eng. J. 121(4) (2009), 31–43. doi:10.1111/j.1559-3584.2009.00226.x.

105.

D.J.

Snowden, The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world, IBM IBM Syst. J. 42(3) (2003).

106.

Snyder, Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines, J. Bus. Res. 104(August) (2019), 333–339. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

107.

Sofo and

Colapinto, Adaptive Decision Making and Intellectual Styles, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6708-3.

108.

Sovani, Addressing engineering challenges of increasingly complex automobiles.

109.

Suh, The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, 1990.

110.

N.P.

Suh, Complexity in engineering, CIRP Ann. 54(2) (2005), 46–63. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60019-5.

111.

J.M.

Sussman, Ideas on complexity in systems – twenty views.

112.

Tani and

Cimatti, Technological complexity: A support to management decisions for product engineering and manufacturing, in: 2008 IEEE Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag. IEEM 2008, 2008, pp. 6–11. doi:10.1109/IEEM.2008.4737822.

113.

J.R.

Turner and

R.A.

Cochrane, Goals-and-methods matrix: Coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them, Int. J. Proj. Manag. 11(2) (1993), 93–102. doi:10.1016/0263-7863(93)90017-H.

114.

Turyakira,

Venter and

Smith, The impact of corporate social responsibility factors on the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises, South African J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 17(2) (2014), 157–172. doi:10.4102/sajems.v17i2.443.

115.

Ulstein and

P.O.

Brett, Critical systems thinking in ship design approaches, in: International Marine Design Conference (IMDC), 2012.

116.

van Bruinessen, Towards controlled innovation of complex objects – a sociotechnical approach to describing ship design, Delft University of Technology, 2016.

117.

Vogel, Complexity drivers in manufacturing companies: A literature review, Logist. Res. 9(1) (2016), 1–66. doi:10.1007/s12159-016-0152-9.

118.

Vogel and

Lasch, Approach for complexity management in variant rich product development, no. August, 2015.

119.

von Bertalanffy, General System Theory, 1968.

120.

W.E.

Walker,

Haasnoot and

J.H.

Kwakkel, Adapt or perish: A review of planning approaches for adaptation under deep uncertainty, Sustainability 5(3) (2013), 955–979. doi:10.3390/su5030955.

121.

B.T.

Walsh,

Kaye and

Geliebter, How does the brain implement adaptive decision making to eat?, J. Neurosci. 35(41) (2015), 13868–13878. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2602-15.2015.

122.

Wu,

Vassileva,

Zhao,

Noorian and

Waldner, Complexity or simplicity? Designing product pictures for advertising in online marketplaces, J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 28 (2016), 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.08.009.