Influenced by the global uptake of digital transformations, governments in developing countries are making considerable investments in digital transformation initiatives; however, these often result in very high failure rates. The overall purpose of this study is to identify why digital transformations in the public sector of developing country contexts fail. This paper reports on a rich revelatory case study of a Sri Lankan government agency that experienced digital transformation failure. Data was collected primarily via semi-structured interviews and augmented with document analysis that enabled us to derive deep insights into why digital transformations fail. We identified 23 failure factors which were grouped into 5 meta-themes, namely, Organisational, Implementing Agency, Cultural, Leadership and Macro-Level Factors, forming a failure factor model. The analysis also unveiled complex interrelationships between these themes/factors, which formed the basis for 6 evidence-supported propositions detailed in the paper. The findings will benefit public sector organizations in developing countries and their implementation partners to effectively plan their digital transformation strategies.
Al-RuitheM.BenkhelifaE., & HameedK. (2018). Key issues for embracing the cloud computing to adopt a digital transformation: A study of saudi public sector. Procedia Computer Science, 130, 1037-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.145.
2.
AlGhaziA.LiM.CuiT.FossoS., & ShenJ. (2018). Exploration of the Misalignment Between Business and IT Strategic Objectives in Public-Sector Organisations: An Empirical Study in Saudi Arabia. In W. Cho, M. Fan, M.J. Shaw, B. Yoo, & H. Zhang, Digital Transformation: Challenges and Opportunities Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.
3.
AlvesC.ValençaG., & SantanaA. (2014). Understanding the Factors That Influence the Adoption of BPM in Two Brazilian Public Organizations. In I. Bider, K. Gaaloul, J. Krogstie, S. Nurcan, H. Proper, R. Schmidt, & P. Soffer (Eds.), Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, Springer, Vol. 175, pp. 272-286. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-43745-2_19.
4.
BandaraW.GableG.G.TateM., & RosemannM. (2021). A validated business process modelling success factors model. Business Process Management Journal, 27(5), 1522-1544. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2019-0241.
5.
BazeleyP. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. SAGE.
6.
BerghausS., & BackA. (2016). Stages in Digital Business Transformation: Results of an Empirical Maturity Study. Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS).
7.
Beynon-daviesP. (1995). Information systems ‘failure’: The case of the London Ambulance Service’s Computer Aided Despatch project. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(3), 171-184. doi: 10.1057/ejis.1995.20.
8.
BhatnagarS. (2004). Building blocks of e-government: lessons from developing countries. World Bank. Retrieved Oct, 2021 from http://www1.worldbank.org/prem/PREMNotes/premnote91.pdf.
9.
BourdeauA. (2010, Mar 2010). Failure factors: The magazine for canadian entrepreneurs. Profit, 29(1), 24.
10.
ChenY.ChenH.HuangW., & ChingR.K. (2006). E-government strategies in developed and developing countries: An implementation framework and case study. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(1), 23.
11.
DawesS.S.CresswellA.M., & PardoT.A. (2009). From “Need to Know” to “Need to Share”: Tangled Problems, Information Boundaries, and the Building of Public Sector Knowledge Networks. 69(3), 392-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01987_2.x.
12.
DeCuir-GunbyJ.T.MarshallP.L., & McCullochA.W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136-155. doi: 10.1177/1525822X10388468.
13.
DobbinsJ.H., & DonnellyR.G. (1998). Summary research report on critical success factors in federal government program management (Acquisition Review Quarterly, Issue. D. S. M. College.
14.
DobrolyubovaE.KlochkovaE., & AlexandrovO. (2019). Digitalization and Effective Government: What Is the Cause and What Is the Effect? In D.A. Alexandrov, A.V. Boukhanovsky, A.V. Chugunov, Y. Kabanov, O. Koltsova, & I. Musabirov, Digital Transformation and Global Society Cham.
15.
DwivediY.K.WeerakkodyV., & JanssenM. (2011). Moving towards maturity: Challenges to successful e-government implementation and diffusion [Review]. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 42(4), 11-22. doi: 10.1145/2096140.2096142.
16.
EdenR., & Burton-JonesA. (2018). The dynamics of organizational culture: The case of culture work in a digital hospital. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) 2018.
17.
EdenR.Burton-JonesA.CaseyV., & DraheimM. (2019). Digital transformation requires workforce transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(1), 1-17. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol18/iss1/4.
18.
EdenR., & SederaD. (2014). The largest admitted IT project failure in the Southern Hemisphere: a teaching case. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information Systems.
19.
EdmondsonA.C. (2011). Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48-55.
20.
EisenhardtK.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. doi: 10.2307/258557.
21.
EkaP.J., & AbidinM.Z. (2011). Opening the Black Box of Leadership in the Successful Development of Local E-Government Initiative in a Developing Country. International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation (IJANTTI), 3(3), 1-20. doi: 10.4018/jantti.2011070101.
22.
FakhouryR. (2018). Digital government isn’t working in the developing world. Here’s why. https://theconversation.com/digital-government-isnt-working-in-the-developing-world-heres-why-94737.
23.
FilatovaO.GolubevV., & StetskoE. (2018). Digital Transformation in the Eurasian Economic Union: Prospects and Challenges. In D.A. Alexandrov, A.V. Boukhanovsky, A.V. Chugunov, Y. Kabanov, & O. Koltsova, Digital Transformation and Global Society Cham.
24.
FinneyS., & CorbettM. (2007). ERP implementation: A compilation and analysis of critical success factors. Business Process Management Journal, 13(3), 329-347. doi: 10.1108/14637150710752272.
25.
FortuneJ., & WhiteD. (2006). Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.07.004.
26.
Gil-GarciaJ.R.GulerA.PardoT.A., & BurkeG.B. (2019). Characterizing the importance of clarity of roles and responsibilities in government inter-organizational collaboration and information sharing initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101393. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.101393.
27.
GioiaD.A.CorleyK.G., & HamiltonA.L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the gioia methodology. 16(1), 15-31. doi: 10.1177/1094428112452151.
28.
GlaserB. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications, CA, USA.
29.
GlaserB., & StraussA. (2017). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=GTMrDwAAQBAJ.
30.
GlassR.L. (2013). The queensland health payroll debacle. Information Systems Management, 30(1), 89-90. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2013.739899.
31.
GraingerN.McKayJ., & MarshallP. (2009, 2–4 December). Learning from a strategic failure. 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Melbourne.
32.
HeeksR. (2003). Most eGovernment-for-development projects fail: how can risks be reduced? iGovernment-Information Systems, Technology and Government.
33.
IANS. (2018). Sri Lanka plans to introduce E-motoring for vehicle registration. Business Recorder. https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/sri-lanka-plans-to-introduce-e-motoring-for-vehicle-registration-118041001037_1.html.
34.
IraniZ.KamalM.AngelopoulosS.KitsiosF., & PapadopoulosT. (2010). New service development in e-government: Identifying critical success factors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(1), 95-118. doi: 10.1108/17506161011028821.
35.
KassahunA.E., & MollaA. (2011). BPR Complementary Competence For Developing Economy Public Sector: A Construct And Measurement Instrument. PACIS.
36.
KlaraB.L., & CormacM. (2020). Failure as a catalyst for learning: Towards deliberate reflection in academic development work. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2020.1717783.
37.
KutznerK.SchoormannT., & KnackstedtR. (2018, 23–28 June). Digital transformation in information systems research: a taxonomy-based approach to structure the field. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2018), Portsmouth, UK.
38.
LaursenM., & SvejvigP. (2016). Taking stock of project value creation: A structured literature review with future directions for research and practice. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 736-747.
39.
LeeA.S. (1989). A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly, 33-50.
40.
LukS.C.Y. (2009). The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong. Government Information Quarterly, 26(4), 594-604.
41.
MandaM.I. (2021). Power, politics, and the institutionalisation of information systems for promoting digital transformation in the public sector: A case of the South African’s government digital transformation journey. Information Polity, Preprint, 1-18. doi: 10.3233/IP-200233.
42.
McAdamR., & DonaghyJ. (1999). Business process re-engineering in the public sector. Business Process Management Journal, 5(1), 33-52. doi: 10.1108/14637159910249135.
43.
NapitupuluD., & SensuseD.I. (2014). The critical success factors study for e-Government implementation. International Journal of Computer Applications, 89(16), 23-32.
44.
NoyC. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327-344.
45.
OmarA.WeerakkodyV., & SivarajahU. (2017). Digitally enabled service transformation in UK public sector: A case analysis of universal credit [Article]. International Journal of Information Management, 37(4), 350-356. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.04.001.
46.
PadalkarM., & GopinathS. (2016). Six decades of project management research: Thematic trends and future opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1305-1321.
47.
PawsonR., & TilleyN. (1997). An Introduction to Scientific Realist Evaluation. In E. Chelimsky & W. R. Shadish (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook (pp. 405-418). SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781483348896.
48.
PeffersK.GenglerC.E., & TuunanenT. (2003). Extending critical success factors methodology to facilitate broadly participative information systems planning. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 51-85. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045757.
49.
RajapakseJ. (2013). e-government adoptions in developing countries: A sri lankan case study. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 9(4), 38.
50.
RockartJ.F. (1979). Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 81-93.
51.
SagarikD.ChansukreeP.ChoW., & BermanE. (2018). E-government 4.0 in Thailand: The role of central agencies. Information Polity, 23, 343-353. doi: 10.3233/IP-180006.
52.
SaldanñaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
53.
SharmaR.SharmaA., & PandeyU. (2011). E-Governance: A Successful Implementation of Government Policies using Cloud Computing. IJCA Proceedings on International Conference on Web Services Computing.
54.
SiggelkowN. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20-24.
55.
SyedR.BandaraW., & FrenchE. (2018a). Effective Leadership in BPM Implementations-eDAS MoFA: A Case Study of BPM in a Developing Country, Public Sector Context 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), San Francisco.
56.
SyedR.BandaraW., & FrenchE. (2018b). Effective leadership in BPM implementations-eDompe Hospital: A Case Study of BPM in a developing country, public sector context International Conference on Business Process Management, Sydney.
57.
SyedR.BandaraW.FrenchE., & StewartG. (2017). What does leadership entail in public sector BPM initiatives of developing nations: Insights from an interpretative case study from Sri Lanka International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS),
58.
SyedR.BandaraW.FrenchE., & StewartG. (2018). Getting it right! Critical Success Factors of BPM in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22.
59.
TregearR., & JenkinsT. (2007). Government Process Management: A review of key differences between the public and private sectors and their influence on the achievement of public sector process management. BPTrends.
60.
UrquhartC., & FernándezW. (2013). Using grounded theory method in information systems: The researcher as blank slate and other myths. Journal of Information Technology, 28(3), 224-236. doi: 10.1057/jit.2012.34.
61.
Van den BerghJ.IşikÖ.ViaeneS., & HelsenE. (2016). Re-Positioning Business Process Management: Exploring Key Capabilities For Successful Business Transformation. BPTrends. http://www.bptrends.com/repositioning-business-processmanagement.
62.
WallerP., & WeerakkodyV. (2016). Digital Government: Overcoming the Systemic Failure of Transformation. Digital Transformation Through Policy Design with ICT-Enhanced Instruments [Working Paper]. Brunel University. https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12732.
63.
WeerakkodyV.El-HaddadehR., & Al-ShafiS. (2011). Exploring the complexities of e-government implementation and diffusion in a developing country. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 24(2), 172-196. doi: 10.1108/17410391111106293.
64.
WestermanG.BonnetD., & McAfeeA. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.
65.
WilliamsJ.J., & RamaprasadA. (1996). A taxonomy of critical success factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 5(4), 250-260. doi: 10.1057/ejis.1996.30.
66.
YinR.K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). Guilford publications.
67.
ZietsmaC., & LawrenceT.B.J.A.s.q. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. 55(2), 189-221.
