Information access and open communication – through in person and mediated information and communication technology – are critical to an informed citizenry in democratic societies. The 2011 Arab Spring uprising that originated in Tunisia and resulted in the overthrow of long-time Tunisian authoritarian president Ben Ali, established a new transitional government with more democratic institutions and more open press and political expression. In this paper, we explore changes over time (2011–2019) in the use by young, educated Tunisians of different political information sources, the perceived reliability of these sources, their information sharing behavior, and sense of being politically well-informed (i.e., political information efficacy). We report here results from the third of three surveys we administered of an online questionnaire to three different but comparable opportunity samples of young, educated Tunisians. The first two surveys conducted in 2012 and 2015 have been previously reported. We compare results from the most recent survey regarding 2019 elections with findings from the two prior surveys. Our findings confirm increasing perceived reliability of government information sources during the 2014 and 2019 elections, and decreasing reliability of social media. Results also confirm that higher perceptions of information reliability along with information sharing, lead to greater political information efficacy which is an important predictor of further democratic political participation.
Al-AniB.MarkG.ChungJ., & JonesJ. (2012). The Egyptian Blogosphere: A counter-narrative of the revolution. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’12), 17-26. ACM Digital Library. doi: 10.1145/2145204.2145213.
2.
AlmondG.A., & VerbaS. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press.
3.
ArieffA. (2020). Tunisia: In Brief. Congressional Research Service. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20200316_RS21666_5a6e0d290f8920461bf85c50138f53d81c407327.pdf.
4.
Associated Press. (2014, October 30). Tunisia Election Results: Nida Tunis wins most seats sidelining Islamists. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/30/tunisia-election-results-nida-tunis-wins-most-seats-sidelining-islamists.
5.
BellinE. (2012). Reconsidering the Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Lessons from the Arab Spring, Comparative Politics, 44(2), 127-49.
6.
BennettL. (1998). The Media and Democratic Development: The social basis of political communication. In O’NeilP.H. (Ed.), Communicating Democracy: The Media and Political Transitions. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
7.
BoydD.GolderS., & LotanG. (2010). Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-43). IEEE Computer Society.
8.
BreuerA., & GroshekJ. (2014). Online Media and Offline Empowerment in Post-Rebellion Tunisia: An Analysis of Internet Use During Democratic Transition. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(1), 25-44.
9.
British Broadcasting Corporation. (2014, December 22). Tunisian Election: Essebsi wins presidential run-off. Retrieved March 8, 2015 from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-30579662.
10.
British Broadcasting Corporation. (2019, October 14). Tunisia election: Kais Saied to become president. Retrieved January 11, 2021 from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-50032460.
11.
BrowneD. (1999). International Broadcasting in Arabic: Tunisia. Iowa State University Press, 261-278.
12.
ChadwickA. (2006). Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies. Oxford University Press.
13.
ChunS.A., & NoveckB.S. (2020). Editorial: Digital Democracy: 25 Years Look Back, Look Ahead. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 1(1) Article 1: 1-3. doi: 10.1145/3374904.
14.
DahdalS. (2012). Social Media and the Arab Spring: The historical context and the role of Aljazeera satellite station. Donau-Universitat Krems, Vienna.
15.
DahlR.A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. Yale University Press.
16.
Datareportal (2019). Digital 2019: Tunisia. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-tunisia.
17.
DennisE.E.MartinJ.D., & HassanF. (2019). Media use in the Middle East, 2019: A seven-nation survey. Northwestern University in Qatar. https://ww.mideastmedia.org/survey/2019.
18.
DhillonN., & YoussefT. (2009). Generation in Waiting: The unfulfilled promise of young people in the Middle East. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
19.
EgelD., & GarboujM. (2013). Socioeconomic drivers of the spread of the Tunisian revolution. RAND Corporation and the Graduate Institute.
20.
ElswahM., & HowardP.N. (2020). Challenges of Monitoring Social Media in the Arab World: The case of the 2019 Tunisian elections. COMPROP Data Memo 2020.1/23 March, 2020. https://demtech.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2020/03/Tunisia-memo-English.pdf.
21.
GabsiZ. (2019), Tunisia’s youth: Awakened identity and challenges post-Arab Spring. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 46(1), 68-87.
22.
GaronL. (2003). Dangerous Alliances: Civil society, the media and democratic transition in North Africa. Zed Books.
23.
GhannamJ. (2012). Digital media in the Arab world one year after the revolutions. Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA), National Endowment for Democracy, Washington, DC.
24.
GhareebE. (2000). New Media and the Information Revolution in the Arab World. The Middle East Journal, 54(3), 395-418.
25.
GibsonJ.L. (2001). Social Networks, Civil Society, and the Prospects for Consolidating Russia’s Democratic Transition. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 51-68.
26.
GranovetterM. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, (78)6, 1360-1380.
27.
GrewalS. (2019). Tunisian democracy at a crossroads. Policy Brief. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
28.
HaugbølleR. & CavatortaF. (2012). Vive la grande famille des médias Tunisiens: Media reform, authoritarian resilience and societal responses in Tunisia. Journal of North African Studies, 17(1), 97-112.
29.
HonwanaA. (2013). Youth and Revolution in Tunisia. Zed Books.
30.
HowardP. (2011). The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam. Oxford University Press.
31.
HowardP.N. & HussainM.M. (2013). Democracy’s Fourth Wave? Digital media and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press.
32.
International Foundation for Electoral Systems. Election Guide: Democracy assistance and election news: Country Profile Tunisia. https://www.electionguide.org/countries/id/217.
33.
JebrilN.StetkaV., & LovelessM. (2013). Media and Democratisation: What is known about the role of mass media in transitions to democracy? University of Oxford. https://www.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/media-and-democratisation-what-is-known-about-the-role-of-mass-media-in-transitions-to-democracy.html.
34.
KaidL.L.McKinneyM.S., & TedescoJ. C. (2007). Political information efficacy theory and younger voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1093-1111.
35.
KarolakM. (2017). The Use of Social Media from the Revolution to Democratic Consolidation: The Arab Spring and the case of Tunisia. Journal of Arab & Muslim Research, 10(2), 199-216.
36.
KavanaughA. (1998). The Social Control of Technology in North Africa: Information in the global economy. Praeger/Greenwood Press.
37.
KavanaughA.SheetzS.Sandoval-AlmazanR.TedescoJ., & FoxE. (2016). Media Use during Conflicts: Information seeking and political efficacy during the 2012 Mexican elections. Special Issue on Smart Government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3): 595-60.
38.
KavanaughA.SheetzS.HassanR.YangS.ElmonguiH.FoxE.MagdyM., & ShoemakerD. (2013). Between a Rock and a Cell Phone: Communication and Information Technology Use during the 2011 Uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 5(1), 1-21.
39.
KavanaughA.SheetzS.SkandraniH.TedescoJ.SunY., & FoxE.A. (2016). The use and impact of social media during the 2011 Tunisian Revolution. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 20–30. ACM Digital Library. doi: 10.1145/2912160.2912175.
40.
KavanaughA.SheetzS.SkandraniH., & FoxE. A. (2017). Media use by young Tunisians during the 2011 revolution and 2014 elections. Information Polity, 22(2-3), 137-158.
41.
KéfiR. (2015). Tunisia: Civil society, the driving force behind the democratic transition, IEMed (Ed.), Mediterranean Yearbook 2015, IEMed, Barcelona, 237-40. http://www.iemed.org/observatori/arees-danalisi/arxius-adjunts/anuari/med. 2015/IEMed%20Yearbook%202015_Panorama_TunisiaDemocraticalTransition_RidhaKefi.pdf.
42.
KimJ.WyattR. & KatzE. (1999). News, Talk, Opinion, Participation: The part played by conversation in political participation. Political Communication, 16, 361-385.
43.
KlaasB. & DirsusM. (2018). Non-Governmental Organizations, International Organizations, and Civil Society in Tunisia. NATO OPEN Publications, 2(1), 1-20. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/b3eb9d_3bbd6c2ab6564a3e980b221f565f5175.pdf.
44.
LotanG.GraeffE.AnannyM.GaffneyD.PearceI. & BoydD. (2011). The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1375-1405.
45.
LutherK.KavanaughA.Thebault-SpiekerJ., & AntinJ. (2020). Guest Editorial for Special Issue on Negotiating Truth and Trust in Socio-technical Systems, in Transactions on Social Computing, 3(1). ACM Press.
46.
MalhotraN.K.BirksD.F., & WillsP. (2012). Marketing Research – An Applied Approach, fourth edition. Pearson Education Limited.
47.
MartinJ.D.MartinsR.J., & NaqviS. (2018). Media use predictors of online political efficacy among Internet users in five Arab countries. Information, Communication & Society, 21(1), 129-146.
48.
MarzoukiY.Skandrani-MarzoukiI.BejaouiM.HammoudiH., & BellajT. (2012). The contribution of Facebook to the 2011 Tunisian revolution: A cyber-psychological insight. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(5), 237-244.
49.
McCarthyR. (2019). The politics of consensus: al-Nahda and the stability of the Tunisian transition. Middle Eastern Studies, 55(2), 261-275.
50.
MeikeljohnA. (1948). Free Speech and its Relation to Self-Government. Harper & Brothers.
51.
MichaelsonM. (2000). Political efficacy and electoral participation of Chicago Latinos. Social Science Quarterly, 81(1), 136-150.
52.
MiladiN. (2021). Tunisia: The Transformative Media Landscape after the Revolution. In RichterC. and KozmanC. (Eds.) Arab Media Systems, Open Book Publishers, 267-284. doi: 10.11647/OBP.0238.16.
53.
MoyP., & GastilJ. (2006). Predicting deliberative conversation: The impact of discussion networks, media use and political cognitions. Political Communication, 23, 443-460.
54.
National Institute of Statistics. Tunisia. Institut National des Statistiques (National Institute of Statistics). http://www.ins.tn/en/themes/population.
55.
Pew Research Center. (2019). Mobile Connectivity in Emerging Economies. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/03/07/mobile-connectivity-in-emerging-economies/.
56.
PingreeR. (2007). How messages affect their senders: A more general model of message effects and implications for deliberation. Communication Theory, 17(4), 439-461.
57.
RadcliffeD., & AbuhmaidH. (2020). Social Media in the Middle East: 2019 in Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3517916.
58.
RichterC. (2017). Media policy in times of transition. Publizistik, 62, 325-337. doi: 10.1007/s11616-0170340-x.
59.
RojasH., & Puig-i-AbrilE. (2009). Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in the digital age. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 902-927.
60.
RothenbuhlerE. (1991). The process of community involvement, Communication Monographs, 58(1), 63-78.
61.
SalemF., & MourtadaR. (2014). Citizen engagement and public services in the Arab world: The potential of social media. Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government, Dubai, UAE.
62.
SchollH.J. (2020). Digital Government: Looking Back and Ahead on a Fascinating Domain of Research and Practice. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 1(1) Article 7: 1-12. doi: 10.1145/3352682.
63.
SchulerD. (2020). Can the Internet Support Democracy? Digital Government: Research and Practice, 1(1), Article 3: 1-14. doi: 10.1145/3352462.
64.
SghaierM.SkandraniH., & RobsonJ. (2021). Repairing Political Trust in Tunisia. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, in press.
65.
ShaneP. M. (2004). Democracy Online: The prospects for political renewal through the Internet, Routledge, New York, NY.
66.
SiebertF. S.PetersonT. & SchrammW. (1963). Four Theories of the Press, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
67.
SkandraniH.KooliK., & DoudechH.N. (2020). Inhibitors of Non-for Profit Organisations’ activities and survival in a crisis context, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, forthcoming.
68.
StarbirdK. & PalenL. (2012). (How) will the revolution be retweeted? Information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’12) (Seattle, WA, February 11-13). ACM, New York, NY, 7-16.
69.
The World Bank. World Development Indicators (various years 2010–2019). International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), Washington, DC.
70.
ThomasK. (2018). Civic Engagement in the Middle East and North Africa, Arab Barometer. Retrieved January 17, 2020, from https://www.arabbarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/PublicOpinion_CivicEngagement_MiddleEast_NorthAfrica_2018.pdf.
71.
Tunis Afrique Presse. (2019, May 15). Unemployment rate down 0.1% to 15.3% in Q1 2019 (INS).” https://www.tap.info.tn/en/Portal-Society/11451211-unemployment-rate.
72.
VerbaS., & NieN.H. (1972). Participation in America: political democracy and social equality. Harper & Row, New York, NY.
73.
WangY., & MarkG. (2013). Trust in online news: comparing social media and official media use by Chinese citizens. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’13). ACM Press, 599-610.
74.
WulfV.MitaseK.AtamM.RandallD., & RohdeM. (2013). ‘On the Ground’ in Sidi Bouzid: Investigating social media use during the Tunisian revolution. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’13). ACM Press, 1409-1418.
75.
YerkesS. (2019). Tunisia’s Elections, Explained: The world’s youngest democracy votes. Carnegie International Endowment for Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/publications/interactive/tunisian-elections-2019.
76.
ZayaniM. (2015). Network Publics and Digital Contention: The Politics of Everyday Life in Tunisia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
77.
ZúñigaH.G.D.JungN., & ValenzuelaS. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 17 (2012), 319-336.
78.
ZúñigaH.G.D.TrevorD., & Ardévol-AbreuA. (2017). Internal, External, and Government Political Efficacy: Effects on News Use, Discussion, and Political Participation, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 61(3), 574-596.
79.
ZúñigaH.G.D.LiuJ.H.BarnidgeM.HuberB. (2018). Social Media as a Sphere for “Risky” Political Expression: A twenty-country multilevel comparative analysis. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(2), 161-182.
