Many governments now seek ways to generate ideas for public policies through online platforms. Although this concept is promising, further knowledge is needed to understand the factors associated with generating ideas within online communities in a public policy consultation setting. Building on existing theories and empirical findings, we empirically test how online interaction through commenting activities in the Open Government Dialogue might influence the likelihood of proposing accepted ideas. By crawling the interaction and contribution data from the online policy forum, our findings show that proposing accepted ideas is positively correlated with boundary-spanning activities and the receipt of feedback. In particular, for repeat contributors, the likelihood of proposing accepted ideas for government consultation is positively related to prior success but negatively related to the number of ideas posted. These findings provide implications for using commenting functions to facilitate usable and feasible ideas in the online public policy consultation setting.
ZhangJPuron-CidGGil-GarciaJR. Creating public value through open government: perspectives, experiences and applications. Inform Polity. 2015; 20(2-3): 97-101. doi: 10.3233/IP-150364.
3.
ClarkBYBrudneyJLJangS-G. Coproduction of Government Services and the New Information Technology: Investigating the Distributional Biases. Public Administration Review. 2013; 73(5): 687-701.
4.
EbdonCFranklinAL. Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review. 2006; 66(3): 437-447. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00600.x.
5.
FarinaCREpsteinDHeidtJNewhartMJ. Designing an Online Civic Engagement Platform: Balancing “More” vs. “Better” Participation in Complex Public Policymaking. International Journal of E-Politics. 2014; 16.
6.
LiuHK. Crowdsourcing Government: Lessons from Multiple Disciplines. Public Adm Rev. 2017; 77(5): 656-667.
7.
AhnMJBretschneiderS. Politics of E-government: E-government and the political control of bureaucracy. Public Adm Rev. 2011; 71(3): 414-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02225.x.
8.
MillardJ. Government 1.5-is the bottle half full or half empty. Eur J ePract. 2010; 9(1): 35-50.
9.
JohnstonE. Governance infrastructures in 2020. Public Adm Rev. 2010; 70: s122-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02254.x.
10.
EpsteinDLeshedG. The Magic Sauce: Practices of Facilitation in Online Policy Deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation. 2016; 12(1).
11.
NamT. Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Gov Inf Q. 2012; 29(1): 12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005.
12.
ObstfeldD. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Adm Sci Q. 2005; 50(1): 100-30. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100.
13.
EavesD. After the collapse: open government and the future of civil service. In: LathropDRumaL, eds. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media; 2010. p. 139-50.
14.
BayusBL. Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: an analysis of the Dell ideastorm community. Manag Sci. 2013; 59(1): 226-44. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1599.
15.
SteilsNHanineS. Creative contests: knowledge generation and underlying learning dynamics for idea generation. J Mark Manage. 2016; 32(17-18): 1647-69. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2016.1251956.
16.
ParycekPSachsM. Open Government – information flow in Web 2.0. European Journal of ePractice. 2010; 9(1): 57-68.
17.
ChristensenHS. Political activities on the internet: slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday. 2011; 16(2). doi: 10.5210/fm.v16i2.3336.
18.
KeenA. The cult of the amateur: how blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the rest of today’s user-generated media are destroying our economy, our culture, and our values. Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publishing/Broadway Business; 2008.
19.
LipowiczA. [Internet] GSA Wiki Sets Bad Example. Federal Computer Week [updated 2011; Cited 2012 May 10]. Available from: http://fcw.com/articles/2011/10/05/gsa-wiki-spam.aspx.
20.
LampeCZubePLeeJParkCHJohnstonE. Crowdsourcing civility: A natural experiment examining the effects of distributed moderation in online forums. Government Information Quarterly. 2014; 31(2), 317-326. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.005.
21.
National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). [Internet] Summary Analysis of the Open Government Brainstorm [updated 2009; Cited 2013 Apr 12]. Available from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/files/documents/ostp/opengov_inbox/NAPA_analysis.pdf.
22.
BinghamLB. Next generation of administrative law: building the legal infrastructure for collaborative governance. Wis L Rev. 2010; 10(2): 297-356.
23.
The White House. [Internet] Transparency and Open Government [updated 2009; Cited 2013 Apr 12]. Available from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Transparency_and_Open_Government.
24.
Open Government Dialogue. [Internet] Open Government Dialogue 2009 [updated 2016; cited 2013 Apr 12]. Available from: http://opengov.ideascale.com/.
25.
HoweJ. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine. 2006; 14: 1-4.
26.
SullivanE. A group effort: more companies are turning to the wisdom of the crowd to find ways to innovate. Mark News (February). 2010; 28: 22-8.
27.
NamT. Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Govt Inform Q. 2012; 29(1): 12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005.
28.
LiuHK. Exploring online engagement in public policy consultation: the crowd or the few? Aust J Public Admin. 2016. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12209.
29.
PrpićJTaeihaghAMeltonJ. The fundamentals of policy crowdsourcing. Policy Internet. 2015; 7(3): 340-61. doi: 10.1002/poi3.102.
ClausenTH. The role of institutional arbitrage in the search for product innovation: firm level evidence from Norway. Ind Mark Manage. 2014; 43(3): 392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.007.
32.
JangSChungJ. How do interaction activities among customers and between customers and firms influence market performance and continuous product innovation? An empirical investigation of the mobile application market. J Prod Innov Manage. 2015; 32(2): 183-91. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12170.
33.
BanduraA. The evolution of social cognitive theory. In: SmithKGHittMA, eds. Great Minds in Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
34.
JayantiRKSinghJ. Pragmatic learning theory: an inquiry-action framework for distributed consumer learning in online communities. J of Consumer Research. 2010; 36(6): 1058-1081.
35.
FreyKLüthjeCHaagS. Whom should firms attract to open innovation platforms? The role of knowledge diversity and motivation. Long Range Plann. 2011; 44(5-6): 397-420. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2011.09.006.
36.
KohnNWSmithSM. Collaborative fixation: effects of others’ ideas on brainstorming. Appl Cognit Psychol. 2011; 25(3): 359-71. doi: 10.1002/acp.1699.
37.
KohnNWPaulusPBChoiY. Building on the ideas of others: an examination of the idea combination process. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2011; 47(3): 554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.004.
38.
OsbornAF. Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York: Scribner; 1963.
39.
BarcelliniFDétienneFBurkhardtJ-M. Participation in online interaction spaces: design-use mediation in an open source software community. Int J Ind Ergon. 2009; 39(3): 533-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.013.
40.
PreeceJNonneckeBAndrewsD. The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Comput Hum Behav. 2004; 20(2): 201-23. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.015.
41.
JohnsonSLSafadiHFarajS. The emergence of online community leadership. Inform Syst Res. 2015; 26(1): 165-87. doi: 10.1287/isre.2014.0562.
42.
FarinaCRMillerPNewhartMJCardieC. Rulemaking in 140 characters or less: social networking and public participation in rulemaking. Pace L Rev. 2011; 31: 382.
43.
BrzozowskiMSandholmTHoggT. Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, FL, May 10-13, 2009). New York: NY: ACM; 2009. p. 61-70.
44.
CrandallDCosleyDHuttenlocherDKleinbergJSuriS. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Las Vegas, NV, August 24-27, 2008). New York, NY: ACM; 2008. p. 160-8.
45.
LampeCJohnstonE. Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work 2005 (Nov 6 2005). New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2005. p. 11-20.
46.
BrewerMB. The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1991; 17(5): 475-82. doi: 10.1177/0146167291175001.
47.
SherifMHovlandCI. Social judgment: assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1961.
48.
BaumeisterRFLearyMR. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995; 117(3): 497-529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
49.
HongS. Who benefits from Twitter? Social media and political competition in the U.S. House of Representatives. Gov Inf Q. 2013; 30(4): 464-72. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.009.
50.
LeaMSpearsR. Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. J Organ Comput. 1992; 2(3-4): 321-41.
51.
WaltherJBJangJ-W. Communication processes in participatory websites. J Comput-Mediat Comm. 2012; 18(1): 2-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01592.x.
52.
TokarchukOCuelRZamarianM. Analyzing crowd labor and designing incentives for humans in the loop. IEEE Internet Comput. 2012; 16(5): 45-51. doi: 10.1109/MIC.2012.66.x.
53.
AndersonAHuttenlocherDKleinbergJLeskovecJ. Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: a case study of stack overflow. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2012. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2012. p. 850-8.
54.
FlederDHosanagarK. Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: the impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Manag Sci. 2009; 55(5): 697-712.
55.
GinsbergWR. [Internet] Obama Administation’s Open Government Initiative: Issues for Congress. Wahsington DC: Congressional Research Service [updated 2011; Cited 2016 Sept 28]. Available from: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R41361.pdf.
56.
KonieczkaSP. Practicing a participatory presidency? An analysis of the Obama administration’s open government dialogue. International Journal Public Participation. 2010; 4(1): 43-66.
KussO. How to use SAS for logistic regression with correlated data. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. Vol. 261, 2002.
59.
AllisonPD. Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2005.
60.
AmabileTM. Brilliant but cruel: perceptions of negative evaluators. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1983; 19(2): 146-56. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90034-3.
61.
ChengJDanescu-Niculescu-MizilCLeskovecJ. [Internet]. Antisocial Behavior in Online Discussion Communities. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence [updated 2015]. Available from: www.aaai.org.
62.
GirotraKTerwieschCUlrichKT. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Manag Sci. 2010; 56(4): 591-605. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1144.
63.
LiuXWangGAJohriAZhouMFanW. Harnessing global expertise: a comparative study of expertise profiling methods for online communities. Inform Syst Front. 2014; 16(4): 715-27. doi: 10.1007/s10796-012-9385-6.
64.
NiemannMM. [Internet] The Duality of Expertise: Identifying Expertise Claims and Community Options within Online Forum Dialogue. Monash University Faculty of Information Caulfield School of Information Technology [udpated 2015; Cited 2016 Sept 28]. Available from: http://arrow.monash.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/monash:162366.
65.
BryerTA. Public participation in regulatory decision-making. Public Perform Manage Rev. 2013; 37(2): 263-79. doi: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576370204.
66.
SchuurmanDBaccarneBDe MarezL. Smart ideas for smart cities: investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res. 2012; 7(3): 49-62. doi: 10.4067/S0718-18762012000300006.
