This paper analyses citizen motives for not using electronic government services. Using qualitative interviews among users of Citizens’ Service Centers in Latvia, this paper analyses the motives of citizens who do not use electronic government services but rely on non-electronic equivalents or on in-person assistance. It expands the literature on e-commerce and e-government through an explicit focus on non-adoption rather than adoption. Findings show a higher than expected importance of hardware and internet availability, as well as the importance of convenience factors for non-adoption. Furthermore, the research reveals that the well-intentioned supply of non-electronic alternatives may hamper the take-up of e-government. Several recommendations for the further development of electronic government services follow.
Ajzen,I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
Ajzen,I., & Fishbein,M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
3.
Alzahrani,L.Al-Karaghouli,W., & Weerakkody,V. (2017). Analyzing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 26(1), 164-175.
4.
Bertot,J.C.Jaeger,P.T.Gorham,U.Taylor,N.G., & Lincoln,R. (2013). Delivering e-government services and transforming communities through innovative partnerships: Public libraries, government agencies, and community organizations. Information Polity, 18(2), 127-138.
5.
Carter,L. (2008). E-government diffusion: a comparison of adoption constructs. Transforming Governments: People, Processes and Policy, 2(3), 147-161.
6.
Carter,L., & Bélanger,F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25.
7.
Carter,L., & Weerakkody,V. (2008). E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 473-482.
8.
Carter,L.Weerakkody,V.l.Phillips,B., & Dwivedi,Y.K. (2016). Citizen Adoption of E-Government Services: Exploring Citizen Perceptions of Online Services in the United States and United Kingdom. Information System Management, 33(2), 124-140.
9.
Compeau,D.R., & Higgins,C.A. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 189-211.
10.
CSB. (2017). DSG12. Darba ṇēmēju skaita sadalījums pēc bruto darba ienākumiem un dzimuma. Retrieved October 5, 2017, from http://data.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/Sociala/Sociala__ikgad__dsamaksa/DS0120_euro.px/table/tableViewLayout2/?rxid=cdcb978c-22b0-416a-aacc-aa650d3e2ce0.
11.
Da Silva,L.A.Magnus,S.Silveira,M.S., & Maciel,C. (2013). Designing help system for e-GOV websites: A Brazilian case study. Information Polity, 18(3), 261-274.
12.
Davis,F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
13.
Ebbers,W.E.Jansen,M.G., & van Deursen,A.J. (2016). Impact of the digital divide on e-government: Expanding from channel choice to channel usage. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 685-692.
14.
Eurostat. (n.d.). Households with broadband access. Retrieved October 5, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tin00073&plugin=1.
15.
Geffen,D.Karahanna,E., & Straub,D.W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
16.
Hung,S.Y.Chang,C.M., & Yu,T.J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment systems. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 97-122.
17.
Jeyaraj,A.Rottman,J.W., & Lacity,M.C. (2006). A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research.
18.
Kunstelj,M.Jukić,T., & Vintar,M. (2009). How to fully exploit the results of e-government user surveys: the case of Slovenia. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 117-149.
19.
Lægran,A.S. (2002). The petrol station and the Internet café: Rural technospaces for youth. Journal of Rural Studies, 18(2), 157-168.
20.
Lean,O.Choudhury,V., & Kacmar,C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, 334-359.
21.
Lean,O.K.Zailani,S.Ramayah,T., & Fernando,Y. (2009). Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia. International Journal of Information Management, 29(6), 458-475.
22.
McKnight,H.Choudhury,V., & Kacmar,C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, 334-359.
23.
Meier,R.Ben,E.R., & Schuppan,T. (2013). ICT-enabled public sector organisational transformation: Factors constituting restistance to change. Information Polity, 18(4), 315-329.
24.
Mensah,I.K., & Mi,J. (2017). Electronic Government Services Adoption: The Moderating Impact of Perceived Service Quality. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 13(3), 38-54.
25.
Rana,N., & Dwivedi,Y.K. (2015). Citizen Adoption of an e-government system: Validating extended social cognitive theory (SCT). Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 172-181.
26.
Sung,W. (2016). A study of the digital devide in the current phase of the information age: The moderating effect of smartphonces. Information Polity, 21(3), 291-306.
27.
Taipale,S. (2013). The use of e-government services and the Internet: The role of socio-demographic, economic and geographical predictors. Telecommunications Policy, 37(4-5), 413-422.
28.
Teo,T.S.Srivastava,S.C., & Jiang,L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99-132.
29.
Van Deursen,A.Van Dijk,J., & Ebbers,W. (2006, September). Why e-government usage lags behind: explaining the gap between potential and actual usage of electronic public services in the netherlands. In International Conference on Electronic Government (pp. 269-280). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
30.
VARAM. (2017). Valsts un pašvaldības vienotais klientu apkalpošanas centru tīkls. Retrieved October 5, 2017, from http://www.varam.gov.lv/lat/fondi/ESper07_13/15120/KAC_pilotprojekts/?doc=17634.
31.
Venkatesh,V. (1999). Creation of Factorable User Perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239-260.
32.
Venkatesh,V., & Davis,F.D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
