In his paper, a bi-objective balancing model for U-shaped mixed-model assembly lines to minimize total costs as well as the workload of stations, considering zoning constraints and task duplications is presented. In order the uncertain nature of the input data (i.e. monetary and time data), an interactive fuzzy possibilistic programming approach has been applied, and the bi-objective nature of the presented model is treated via an efficient multi-criteria decision analysis-DEA based approach. Finally, applicability of the presented model and its effectiveness is tested on a real industrial case study.
BettsJ. and MahmoudK., A method for assembly line balancing, Engineering Costs and Production Economics18 (1989), 55–64.
2.
ToksariM.D., İşleyenS.K.,
GünerE. and
BaykoçÖ.F., Assembly line balancing problem with deterioration tasks and learning effect, Expert Systems with Applications37 (2010), 1223–1228.
3.
ChicaM., CordónO., DamasS. and BautistaJ., Including different kinds of preferences in a multi-objective ant algorithm for time and space assembly line balancing on different Nissan scenarios, Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 709–720.
4.
TopalogluS., SalumL. and SupcillerA.A., Rule-based modeling and constraint programming based solution of the assembly line balancing problem, Expert Systems with Applications39 (2012), 3484–3493.
5.
RabbaniM., KazemiS.M. and ManavizadehN., Mixed model U-line balancing type-1 problem: A new approach, Journal of Manufacturing Systems31 (2012), 131–138.
6.
WangH., CheZ. and ChiangC.-J., A hybrid genetic algorithm for multi-objective product plan selection problem with ASP and ALB, Expert Systems with Applications39 (2012), 5440–5450.
7.
BattiniD., FaccioM., PersonaA. and SgarbossaF., Balancing–sequencing procedure for a mixed model assembly system in case of finite buffer capacity, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology44 (2009), 345–359.
8.
KaraY., OzcanU. and PekerA., An approach for balancing and sequencing mixed-model JIT U-lines, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology32 (2007), 1218–1231.
9.
KleinR. and SchollA., Maximizing the production rate in simple assembly line balancing— a branch and bound procedure, European Journal of Operational Research91 (1996), 367–385.
10.
LapierreS.D., RuizA. and SorianoP., Balancing assembly lines with tabu search, European Journal of Operational Research168 (2006), 826–837.
11.
NicosiaG., PacciarelliD. and PacificiA., Optimally balancing assembly lines with different workstations, Discrete Applied Mathematics118 (2002), 99–113.
12.
SchollA., BoysenN. and FliednerM., The sequence-dependent assembly line balancing problem, OR Spectrum30 (2008), 579–609.
13.
RekiekB., DolguiA., DelchambreA. and BratcuA., State of art of optimization methods for assembly line design, Annual Reviews in Control26 (2002), 163–174.
14.
YagmahanB., Mixed-model assembly line balancing using a multi-objective ant colony optimization approach, Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 12453–12461.
15.
SimariaA.S. and VilarinhoP.M., A genetic algorithm based approach to the mixed-model assembly line balancing problem of type II, Computers & Industrial Engineering47 (2004), 391–407.
16.
Coves MorenoA.M. and
NiuH., The Japan (Toyota) industrial organization pattern in mixed-model-assembly-line, 2011.
17.
HaqA.N., RengarajanK. and JayaprakashJ., A hybrid genetic algorithm approach to mixed-model assembly line balancing, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology28 (2006), 337–341.
18.
AkpinarS. and MiracG., Bayhan, A hybrid genetic algorithm for mixed model assembly line balancing problem with parallel workstations and zoning constraints, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence24 (2011), 449–457.
19.
BukchinY. and RabinowitchI., A branch-and-bound based solution approach for the mixed-model assembly line-balancing problem for minimizing stations and task duplication costs, European Journal of Operational Research174 (2006), 492–508.
20.
KazemiS.M., GhodsiR., RabbaniM. and Tavakkoli-MoghaddamR., A novel two-stage genetic algorithm for a mixed-model U-line balancing problem with duplicated tasks, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology55 (2011), 1111–1122.
21.
KucukkocI. and ZhangD.Z., Mathematical model and agent based solution approach for the simultaneous balancing and sequencing of mixed-model parallel two-sided assembly lines, International Journal of Production Economics158 (2014), 314–333.
22.
AkpinarŞ.
and BaykasoğluA., Modeling and solving mixed-model assembly line balancing problem with setups. Part I: A mixed integer linear programming model, Journal of Manufacturing Systems33 (2014), 177–187.
23.
AkpinarŞ.
and
BaykasoğluA., Modeling and solving mixed-model assembly line balancing problem with setups. Part II: A multiple colony hybrid bees algorithm, Journal of Manufacturing Systems33(1) (2014), 177–187.
24.
SparlingD. and MiltenburgJ., The mixed-model U-line balancing problem, International Journal of Production Research36 (1998), 485–501.
25.
KaraY., OzcanU. and PekerA., Balancing and sequencing mixed-model just-in-time U-lines with multiple objectives, Applied Mathematics and Computation184 (2007), 566–588.
26.
HwangR. and KatayamaH., A multi-decision genetic approach for workload balancing of mixed-modelU-shaped assembly line systems, International Journal of Production Research47 (2009), 3797–3822.
27.
ÖzcanU., KellegözT. and TokluB., A genetic algorithm for the stochastic mixed-model U-line balancing and sequencing problem, International Journal of Production Research49 (2011), 1605–1626.
28.
KaraY. and TekinM., A mixed integer linear programming formulation for optimal balancing of mixed-model U-lines, International Journal of Production Research47 (2009), 4201–4233.
29.
KaraY., PaksoyT. and ChangC.-T., Binary fuzzy goal programming approach to single model straight and U-shaped assembly line balancing, European Journal of Operational Research195 (2009), 335–347.
30.
ChangC.-T., Binary fuzzy goal programming, European Journal of Operational Research180 (2007), 29–37.
31.
MahdaviI., JavadiB., SahebjamniaN. and Mahdavi-AmiriN., A two-phase linear programming methodology for fuzzy multi-objective mixed-model assembly line problem, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology44 (2009), 1010–1023.
32.
HopN.V., A heuristic solution for fuzzy mixed-model line balancing problem, European Journal of Operational Research168 (2006), 798–810.
33.
JiménezM., ArenasM., BilbaoA. and RodríguezM.V., Linear programming with fuzzy parameters: An interactive method resolution, European Journal of Operational Research177 (2007), 1599–1609.
34.
BukchinJ., A comparative study of performance measures for throughput of a mixed model assembly line in a JIT environment, International Journal of Production Research36 (1998), 2669–2685.
35.
SofianopoulouS., Manufacturing cells efficiency evaluation using data envelopment analysis, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management17 (2006), 224–238.
36.
AzadehA., Rezaei-MalekM., EvazabadianF. and SheikhalishahiM., Improved design of CMS by considering operators decision-making styles, International Journal of Production Research53(11) (2014), 3276–3287.
37.
CharnesA., CooperW.W. and RhodesE., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research2 (1978), 429–444.
38.
ZhouP., AngB. and PohK., A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators, Ecological Economics62 (2007), 291–297.
39.
NardoM., SaisanaM., SaltelliA., TarantolaS., HoffmanA. and GiovanniniE., Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, OECD publishing, 2005.
40.
HatefiS. and TorabiS., A common weight MCDA–DEA approach to construct composite indicators, Ecological Economics70 (2010), 114–120.
